Popular Mechanics invited to the National 9/11 Debate

Popular Mechanics invited to the National 9/11 Debate - teamliberty.net

This letter / invitation was “hard copy” mailed to Popular Mechanics Editor-In-Chief James B. Meigs, and editors of the Popular Mechanics book, Debunking 9/11 Myths, Brad Reagan and David Dunbar. Meigs was recently on Fox News, O’Reilly Factor touting the Popular Mechanics book as the final answer on 9/11. Let’s see if they really stand behind their work! Call them, write them, e-mail them, and let them know its time to debate because their book is debatable!
Dear James Meigs, David Dunbar, and Brad Reagan,

The National 9/11 Debate will be held on March 10, 2007 in Charleston, SC at the Charleston Convention Center / Embassy Suites. There will be two, seven-member debate teams. You are probably familiar with a few of the names on the debate team that rejects the government’s official version of 9/11.
have noted that Popular Mechanics is now touting itself as the final answer that debunks 9/11 Myths. The question now is will the people behind and responsible for the book titled Debunking 9/11 Myths, people such as yourself, stand firmly behind your work and participate in the National 9/11 Debate?

Please note, debate team members’ plane fares and hotel costs will be paid for by the National 9/11 Debate.

I look forward to your response to this invitation as soon as possible.

Yours in Liberty,

Ed Haas

Thanks Mike for the heads up!

Should be interesting!

I figure the ST911 crew will spend more time at each other.

If only they would spend time to thoroughly debate the issues rather than quickly just run to Jones/Fetzer/Griffin for the decree... then we could move forward.

So, I think this debate will be like watching sparks fly!

Real Constructive

Real constructive there, qwerty.

What is your take on "the issues"?


Will this debate just deal with the "government version" or will all the evidence be allowed? What are the ground rules?

We'll be living in 1985 by

We'll be living in 1985 by then.

1985? is that the sequel to

1985? is that the sequel to 1984?

whats wrong with the site?

whats wrong with the site?

there shouldnt be anything

there shouldnt be anything wrong with it.. except for people still trying to hit it at 911blogger.com/v2 instead of 911blogger.com.. or for people whose browsers are still loading cached stuff..

are you seeing some issues?

not anymore, except that the

not anymore, except that the recent blogs and recent comments boxes are gone.

ya.. disabled them

ya.. disabled them temporarily because of the CPU quota errors.. ill post about it here in a bit.

ok, cool. in the meantime,

ok, cool. in the meantime, check out these videos of obviously(in my opinion)remote controlled 757's flying extremely close to the ground. great find Coffeelover!



Not remote controlled..

I saw Hani Hanjour waving out the pilot's window :-)

"A patriot must be ready to defend his country against his government" - Edward Abbey

Chris, thanks a lot for

Chris, thanks a lot for those videos.

Those are hardcore.

dont thank me, thank

dont thank me, thank Coffeelover from a few threads below. (he said hes in the military by the way,and to notice how this test was likely done in another country.)

I won't hold my breath

Mr Haas put this challenge to them before,and they declined.
He also invited NIST,and the 9/11 commission.You guessed it.They declined as well.
Think about it.The media is'nt promoting this so theirs no repercussions.They know they can't debate us or the lie will crumble.
Still it gives us a warm fuzzy feeling knowning this.

New Popular Mehanics podcast on 911

If you care to hear their propaganda, this site has a link to a 37MB (over 1 hour long) podcast on debunking "911 conspiracy theories."