9/11 Bloglines (08/27)

9/11 Bloglines (08/27)
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001

Professor William Woodward's 9/11 theories outrage NH leaders (NH Union Leader)
Powerhouse Collection of 9-11 Controlled Demolition Quotes
OwntheNWO at 911blogger rants at '911hoax' posting: TV networks aired fake video of animated, CGI planes
At 911blogger: Suspicions about Prof. Jones grow...
TerrorStorm Texas Premiere a Huge Success!
Updates on LC broadcasts on Dutch TV
Delver's blog claims: "9/11 Eyewitness" is disinfo
FMNN: Moseley retracts...
Junk scientist Mark Bilk rants back again...
LC possibly premieres on History Channel Australia
Wood/Zebuhr: Strange Coincidence

[dz: updated to remove mischaracterization of OwntheNWO's statements as was changed in the original source for this post]

again, you are incredibly

again, you are incredibly deceptive in your postings.. its one thing to make a simple mistake, but it appears you are intentionally deceptive and misinforming.. how do you expect to have any credibility when you post things that are 100% wrong?

i am specifically referring to this:
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=625

You quote a user of this site as though he is in support of 'TVFakery', when he specifically says the exact opposite:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/2302

quotes:

  • "god whoever this is over at the history channel forum is killing us with garbage like this"
  • "I want to slap this F*cking idiot"

This is by no means the first time i have seen what appears to be intentionally incorrect misinformation, but seeing as how easily it is to check out the source with the link given, it seems there is no other purpose but to try to antagonize or frustrate others.

so why dont you update your post and say that the user you quoted (who was quoting someone else) in no way supports the theory, but instead specifically states that he completely disagrees? why the need to intentionally misdirect?

dz, somehow it wasn't really

dz,
somehow it wasn't really clear who's quoting who.

"... * "god whoever this is over at the history channel forum is killing us with garbage like this"
* "I want to slap this F*cking idiot"

Originally the post was from "911Hoax" at the History Channel Forum. Now that you're pointing this out, it makes sense.
I changed the header now to
"OwntheNWO at 911blogger picks up '911hoax' posting: TV networks aired fake video of animated, CGI planes"

In this case dz is

In this case dz is correct.
The blogger at 911blogger *complained about a post of
"911Hoax" aka Scott Loughrey at HistoryChannel Forum.

New title:
OwntheNWO at 911blogger rants at '911hoax' posting: TV networks aired fake video of animated, CGI planes
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=625

FYI, i just updated your

FYI, i just updated your post on this site.. you didnt remove the comment you made regarding OwntheNWO's statements, so I just updated it to match what you had changed it to on your own site.

what the fuck is this?

"OwntheNWO at 911blogger: TV networks aired fake video of animated, CGI planes"

I didn't say that!

In my blog I was griping about you or some idiot who follows you posting this tripe at the history channel forum

TIME TO VOTE TO BAN THIS NONSENSE

no wonder your so confused about my post being for or against the NPT, thats how you have a fervent belief in it in the first place, and as I stated in below thread even if it is true there's no point in discussing it but amongst ourselves because it's not going to help sway public opinion

and this thread right here, with a blatant misrepresenation of my opinion, only reaffirms others desire to vote to ban you.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/2309

Calm down OwntheNWO. I

Calm down OwntheNWO.
I changed the title already.

Scott Loughrey aka 911hoax.com is a good friend of mine,
also an excellent veteran 9/11 researcher and former member of "9/11 Science and Justice Alliance".
I was somehow confused if he really re-posted here or not, while quoting *your outrage.

I don't like these kind of confusions by myself,
therefore i am glad that dz corrected that mistake.

If you think that "banning" is the appropriate response on something you don't understand or accept, then you have more in common with this Government or the so called "NWO" you allegedly want to oppose or "own".

backtracking liar. you knew

backtracking liar. you knew damn well what you were doing, just like when i caught you last month doing the same thing with someone else. you try so hard to spin peoples comments to fit your no-plane agenda you could care less if you misrepresent or not. go ahead and cry "ORWELLIAN CENSORSHIP, BUTTERHEAD, BLAH BLAH BLAH", like i know you will. its not censorship if your told time after time to stop and you dont.

Nico regularly misrepresents

Nico regularly misrepresents what people on this site, and other sites say to fit his no plane agenda. this is becoming more blatant. i called him on it last week and he gave some bullshit excuse about how he misread or something. now he does it again with OwntheNWO. what is it gonna take for this bastard to be banned? does he have to misqoute a few more people from this site?

I definetely did not

Chris,
I definetely did not misquote you as one of the current Top 15 'rabid planehuggers' of this movement :)

The others are:

Prof. "Los Alamos" Jones
Jim "HavetoaskJones" Fetzer
WING TV
Dem Bruce Styles/911blogger (together with Chris/911blogger
even louder than Jones and Fetzer together)
Mark Bilk (only occasionally loud)
Eric Hufschmid (too busy with ranting more against 'Crypto-Jews' instead against no-planes)
Kyle Hence (rants when he wakes up every 4 weeks)
Victoria Ashley (louder than Jim Hoffman, but only when i rarely post at 9/11Truth Alliance)
Bill Douglas (usually chickens out after 2, 3 replies)
Ken Jenkins ("jenk science" only on demand)
Loose Change (too busy conspiring with the Naudet Brothers or endless RE-Re-Recuts :)
Ralph Omholt (too busy with being silent at "hard evidence list)
Russell Pickering (trolls only back for Bilk if he's busy), Mark Rabinowitz (? where is he)
- the last 4 are not even loud enough anymore.

...Ah yes, The Salter Brothers retired from planehugging already in late 2005. The only real smart guys of this Top 10

wow. you motherfucking

wow. you motherfucking moron. i never said you misqouted ME, i said you misqouted someone earlier this month. you know what, you really are quite slow, i feel kind of bad beating you down now. carry on with you cartoon delusions you dumb son of a bitch.

Nico, I must respond...Nico, you said:

Nico, you said: "If you think that "banning" is the appropriate response on something you don't understand or accept, then you have more in common with this Government or the so called "NWO" you allegedly want to oppose or "own".

I must respond by countering thusly: If you think banning thoroughly unconvincing, distracting and ultimately distructive claims is wrong, then I'd have to wonder if you are disinfo.

Duck Checklist

Walks like a duck? CHECK!
Looks like a duck? CHECK!
Sounds like a duck? CHECK!
Acts like a duck? CHECK!

AFLAK

first impressions are the most important EWing, you didn't do yoruself any plus points.