Can Anything Be Done?

Many readers have praised me for my courage in broaching taboo subjects and stating obvious truths. Others denounce me for “being unpatriotic and distrusting our government.” One reader, Susan Hartman, wrote to me that I was obviously in the pay of Islamic Jihadists and that she had reported me to the FBI.

Despite the lack of evidence to support their belief, a number of readers remain confident that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and that America narrowly missed being annihilated. These readers know for a fact that Hussein had WMD, because “the President would know, and he wouldn’t lie.”
For reporting a scientific finding, I was called a “conspiracy theorist.” Only in America is scientific analysis seen as conspiracy theory and government lies as truth.

Applications of the laws of physics and scientific calculations can be reviewed and checked by other scientists. Scientists, like the rest of us, can make mistakes. However, questions raised about the collapse of the WTC buildings are not engaged but ignored.

The 9/11 scholars findings seem to be in sync with public opinion. Polls show that more than one-third and as much as one-half of the American public does not believe the government’s 9/11 story.
My point is a simple one. Attentive people, even if they are not scientifically literate, can sense when there are too many oddities for an explanation to be believable.

If deception is sensed, there is a receptive audience when experts or film makers speak. Denouncing inconvenient facts as “conspiracy theories” is a way of suppressing debate and investigation.


sup‧press  /səˈprɛs/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[suh-pres] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–verb (used with object)

1. to put an end to the activities of (a person, body of persons, etc.): to suppress the Communist party.

2. to do away with by or as by authority; abolish; stop (a practice, custom, etc.).

3. to keep in or repress (a feeling, smile, groan, etc.).

4. to withhold from disclosure or publication (truth, evidence, a book, names, etc.).

5. to stop or arrest (a flow, hemorrhage, cough, etc.).

6. to vanquish or subdue (a revolt, rebellion, etc.); quell; crush.

7. Electricity. to reduce or eliminate (an irregular or undesired oscillation or frequency) in a circuit.

Does That Sound...

Like an America friendly word?

Ask a native American;)

Ask a native American;)

No Argument

Here... we screwed over those poor people.


We're not SUPPOSED to stand for that kind of thing...

national anthem

Especially recommended: Whitney Houston, favourite singer of OBL (according to recent MSM b.s.)

" of the free...home of the brave..."

Roberts Article

When I read stuff like this it makes me realize how dumb the average person is. " Despite the lack of evidence to support their belief, a number of readers remain confident that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and that America narrowly missed being annihilated. These readers know for a fact that Hussein had WMD, because “the President would know, and he wouldn’t lie." This is scary stuff truth seekers. It's scary because quite a few people think this way. They are called sheeple and they are being led to slaughter.

I think 3000+ already got

I think 3000+ already got slaughtered on 911! :(


Stand for SOMETHING...or you'll fall for ANYTHING!!

HAHAHA, what is that shit?

HAHAHA, what is that shit? you know Bin LAden is dead for sure when the MSM is putting out "cute" stories about his crush on Whitney Houston. what a friggin crock. i wonder what the main purpose of an article like that is.

Fantastic article, except...

...the last line:
"We can do very little as we have lost control over our government."

I found that statement to be extremely defeatist and counter-productive.

I'm glad the Founding Fathers didn't have that viewpoint.


Alex, I think there is a cover up. Yet at the end of the day, despite noting Susan's comment that yours "is the only nation that can't see this for what it is", I am pessimistic.

Which one nation, can you tell me, has denounced what it views as lies and the murder of cirka 3000 people? Which of our so-called civilised nations, not counting those "nasty ones" that might have WMD, have expressed their discust, or raised this issue at the United Nations?

If Susan meant awareness among the public, well yes, I dare say that this is growing. I myself have accepted that the official version of 911 just will not hold water. I believe that charges were placed in the towers from the evidence that the truth movement has made available - by whom, like one of the scientists I believe put it, "I don't want to go there", because I just don't know.

Yet awareness is not enough, and frankly I am a pessimist. Does it change anything that "everybody knows"? Perhaps that is part of the perpertrators' perverse plan: after a while everybody knows what really happened, but nobody will ever be brought to account because ordinary mortals like you and me can believe what we will, we do not count.

I was once young, and alas you become more cynical as you grow older. I used to believe a lot of things that I now know are untrue. When I was growing up in Britain, I used to think that the USA was the beacon of light to the world (I won't write what I think now)! More to the point I used to think that if you got enough signatures in a petition, you might change things. If everyone in the USA and the world "knew", it ain't going to change a thing.

Has President Kennedy's assasin, and the back men behind that, ever really been brought to justice? I mean "everybody" knows that the person who was convicted never did it, and we all "know" that most likely that too was an "insider job". Strangely enough, that event, though it be so long ago, may be a key injustice that needs solving before 911 can be solved. I suggest that the two are connected, not by the same people of course, but by the same structures of power.

The young person in me would like to think that people are going to be so outraged at the plight of the child who has lost his father, mother, and those who have lost loved ones in the slaughter of 911 - would risk all and DO something. But I am sorry, the truth is, that you will find that most people will leave that to someone else... which means it is never going to happen.

Yes, therefore, this makes me guilty myself, but if *you* are honest so are you. If the truth be told, we probably don't believe a lot of things the power elites are telling us, it is just an accepted if unsaid thing that "politics is a DIRTY game". That is what my late father used to tell me.

And believe me, attrocities like 911 are nothing new. Remember that those who write history write it to suit them. The only victory ordinary mortals like you and me can hope for is that one day, the history books will record "who done it" on 911. Yet by then, you can be sure that we - and everybody else involved - will be six feet under.

Question: Why is it that

Question: Why is it that every nation apart from the US can see the obvious truth about 911,controlled demolitions, illegal wars, the lack of WMD. Why is it so difficult for us to accept the truth.

Answer: Cos for years we have been brainwashed by MSM, spoon fed with hate for everything non American by the likes of Fox News etc. Cos admitting that we kiiled 3000 of our own would bring shame and humiliation up ourselves.

Once we overcome and realise that we have to admit the truth to ourselves will we ever be free again and reclaim America from the terrorists that control it now.

Its time to rise and make a change!


Stand for SOMETHING...or you'll fall for ANYTHING!!

Awareness in China

A friend of mine has been in China the last two years - I spoke to him recently and the topic got round to 9/11 and I thought he'd call me a loony conspiracy theorist for saying that it was an inside job - but he said 'of course it was, everyone knows that' and said that out there it was common knowledge - as were the homeland detention centers etc - so I told him that noone in the UK media talks about it and it gets dismissed as conspiracy nonsense and he was shocked.

Maybe we should be contacting the international media to get them to cover the cover-up?

Remind this Media what they risk more than eyes and ears.

Doesn't strike me as a bad idea....

This U.S. Media may only respond at this point to shameful embarrassment.

OR, the disturbing likelihood that their coveted measurer of success and influence, The Dollar, will only de-base harder and faster the longer they avoid facing facts.

Simple matter of dollars and 'sense'.


"The truth shall make you free." Why not make the truth free? We live on a priceless blue pearl, awash in a universe of fire and ice. Cut the crap.