Rock Frontman Invites Viewing Millions To See Alex Jones Movie
Muse singer scrawls name of Terror Storm on t-shirt, performs headlining show at Reading Festival

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | August 27 2006

Critically acclaimed rockers Muse cited Alex Jones' new film as one of their influences as frontman Matt Bellamy scrawled "Terror Storm" on the back of his shirt for the band's Saturday night headline gig at the Reading Festival in the UK.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/270806rockfrontman.htm

http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_27267989.shtml

"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi

How can we plan our future when we get the past so wrong?

News Tribune Online 08/28/06

The World Trade Center towers fell because of controlled demolition explosions from inside the buildings. The Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile, not an airplane. United Flight 93 landed in Cleveland where passengers disembarked before it took off again, only to be shot down by U.S. fighter jets.

Ridiculous. Not even worth discussing or dignifying with a response.

Except. Except according to a recent Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll, more than one-third of Americans believe federal government officials may have assisted in the 9/11 attack or intentionally failed to prevent them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East.

In other words, more than one-third of this country is completely, hopelessly, O.J.-jury nuts.

You need merely type "9/11 conspiracy" into an Internet search engine to become swept into this seductive web of nonsense. The creators of films like "Loose Change" (perfectly titled because it doesn't add up to much) and Web sites like www.911Truth.org pick through the details of one of this nation's darkest days with the paranoid verve of mad patriots, convinced they are uncovering the truth behind their worst fears.

But all they uncover is the truth about how easy it is to abandon logic in the pursuit of preordained conclusions. It would all be quite fascinating if it didn't also make me ill.

Nearing the five-year anniversary of Sept. 11, it sickens me that anyone would invoke the memory of the victims when spinning the attack as some government scheme to wage unimpeded war or achieve some Bond-villain global dominance.

Distrust of the government post-Watergate has become a national obsession. I realize not much has happened in the past five years to provide grounds for any great faith in our leaders. I don't exactly trust President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secratary Donald Rumsfeld. But verifiable facts are precisely what are needed before accusing a large group of people with mass murder and treason.

I'm not about to get into a shouting match with 9/11 conspiracy theorists on the supposed merits of their arguments. Based on how they respond to criticism and reason, talking sense to people like these serves as much purpose as licking a bald man's head to solve algebraic equations.

But allow me to summarize: 9/11 really was a conspiracy. One undertaken by 19 fanatic al-Qaida henchmen supported by a network of terrorists led (at least then) by Osama bin Laden. Every scrap in the heaps of evidence collected before and since Sept. 11 point in this direction.

Oh, the conspiracists ask, why can't you see a plane clearly on the video of American Airlines Flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon? Why were there only two fighter jets protecting the entire Eastern Seaboard? How can jet fuel fires melt steel? How can cell phones operate at 30,000 feet? What about this photograph smudge or this strange piece of equipment or this out-of-place piece of dust?

Nobody ever said you should not ask questions. But just because you can find unanswered questions, apparent inconsistencies or coincidences in one version of events does not mean you have constructed a theory of your own. And when someone actually does postulate a theory involving government agents faking the cell phone calls from doomed airline passengers, we haven't so much slipped through the looking glass as crushed it to bits and eaten the shards.

It's one thing to investigate how something so horrible might have happened and what we could have done to prevent it so we don't have to relive such horror. But it seems as though the people advocating these theories aren't interested in anything so useful. They ignore all facts that explain away their suspicions, asking irrelevant and absurd questions that only muddle the whole thing and make us all dumber. In the end, they hijack this disaster for their own dubious agenda, just as they accuse Bush of doing.

Shouldn't all these conspiracy geniuses (a frightening number of them with advanced degrees or positions at respected universities) stop to think that there really wasn't any kind of blueprint for what might happen when fully fueled jet liners ram at top speeds into skyscrapers and fortified pentagonal buildings?

Or wonder how thousands of people across almost every government agency have managed to execute such a perfect plan in perfect secrecy, with nobody speaking a word of it even five years later?

Or — the real kicker — is it wise to credit the administration of George W. Bush with such a crack operation when they can't seem to do much else? Only on "24" is the president both incompetent and a criminal mastermind.

Many if not most people in the Middle East believe that Jews working in downtown Manhattan were warned by Israel not to go to work on Sept. 11. Many poor New Orleans residents believe the government blew up the levees to divert Katrina's waters away from richer neighborhoods. These theories are based on sociology and emotion, not logic.

Unless our homegrown conspiracy buffs want to join the ranks of the willfully ignorant, maybe they can offer one tiny piece of positive proof to support their outlandish claims. Or better yet, just continue to play with themselves instead of blindly picking away at our tenuous national sanity.

Rick Harrison also knows for certain O.J. Simpson was guilty, the Earth revolves around the sun and he can be reached at rharrison@thnt.com

http://www.thnt.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060828/COLUMNISTS/60828...

UNH prof provokes 9/11 firestorm

Scores of UnionLeader.com readers have commented by e-mail on yesterday's article on a University of New Hampshire professor's views about a 9/11 conspiracy.

I am going to debate a peculiar pro official story from a anonymous:

(Note that Penn & Teller represent comedic magicians who know how to deceive an audience for entertainment and they know how to spot con-artists who dishonestly deceive the public.)

-Yeah and Penn & Teller really made a point by speaking profanities throughout the whole 911 segment, giving no arguments against theories other than emotional comments, charged by the word Fuck.
(Not only did these emails agree with the conspiracy theories but some of them felt angered by my refusal to see their side (I did see their side, I just didn't agree with it). This amazed me because I have yet to see a single 9/11 conspiracy theory that makes any sense (what have I missed?) Moreover, most of the inventors of these theories do not even agree with each other (always a red flag) and most of their claims do not even meet the requirement of common sense. How in the world could anyone not see the holes in their argument, I thought.)

-So we should just feel nothing after our government let 9-11 happen, and we have people trying to defend the official story with explanations that dont make sense at all. What really makes no sense is the official story. That suggest that 3 buildings fell because of fire and structural damage, 2 of them being 110 stories hight, falling at a speed of 10 floors per second in about 10 seconds, close to free fall speed of 8.2 making it only 1-2 second resistance that all 110 floors gave away, making it almost freefall speed, making it appear as if steel had no strength at all, and to top it all off the top of one building broke to the side, reducing downward presure, yet the building fell evenly to its footprints, defying all logic.

(On second thought, I knew that beliefs can have such an overpowering affect on an individual that it can conceal important things like evidence, facts, and even reality. But these emails came from my people. Not necessarily nonbelievers, mind you, but liberals, freethinkers, and skeptics. Even the best of them can fall prey for scams, cons, illusions, frauds, and swindles.)

-This comment totally applies to the original story, where they conceal important evidence, like gettin rid of all the steel of the twin towers, and the government doing nothing to preserve the evidence, why they never reveal the inside trading in the stock market the days before 9-11, why the hid the tapes of the cameras sorrounding the pentagon, why they confiscated the firemen tapes, why they only show 5 frames from the pentagon explosion, when the cameras are at least 30 frames per second, and they are able to capture at least 10 frames from a object traveling at least 550 miles per hour, enought to capture a boing on video. Talk about the original story not making any sense. Look at the big picture and not throught tunnel vision please. I bought a 20 dollar webcam that takes video at 30fps, and your going to tell me that the most secured building in the USA had video cameras than could only capture 5 frames, at 1 frame per second as Popular Mechanics states it.

(Of course we should allow anyone to ask any questions and speculate but these conspiracy theorists do not do this honestly. They leave out evidence that contradicts their theories, present out-of-context eyewitness reports, twist their words, and many times make things up. This makes them scam-artists and not worthy of respect. They use inductive reasoning (you cannot prove anything by inductive reasoning alone) and unsubstantiated deductive premises to explain them. Like all con-artists, they throw in their theories amongst actual facts to make them look as if they agree with the facts (they don't).)

-Of course we are asking question to the nonsense of the official explanations. Talk about leaving out evidence from the official explanations and the commission report. Talk about how the bush administration twist words by publicly saying: "We had no idea they could used hijack planes to attack us", when they where running simulations the same day about the same thing that happened on 9-11, not counting that inteligence had been telling the bush administration for months before that terrorist would used hijack planes to attack us, and to come in TV and claim they did not had any idea that would happen, is trying to hard to steer guilt away from them. How would you bush supporters responds to this discrepancies and lies known to be public. Talk about twisting facts, by invading iraq by making it seem there where ties of iraq to 9-11, when bush came on TV saying iraq had nothing to do with 9-11, when his letter to congress which you can find at whitehouse.gov justifying permission to go into iraq says that iraq was connected to the axis of evil that made 9-11 happen. Isn't that a boldface lie to us. That makes the official theory a conspiracy and far outlandish explanation to what happened on 9-11.

(For example, how could one not question the demolition theory of the WTC buildings? Think of all the people that would have to install explosives in every story of the buildings, lay miles of electrical detonation wires. It usually takes months for professional detonation crews to set up a large building for destruction and they also spend lots of time weakening structural columns with saws and torches.)

For example they where doing many 12 hour shift on secret, the where taking dog sneefing dogs for weeks before 9-11, plus bush brother was chief of security on those buildings. There is something call wireless technology nowadays people. and also you can easily deceive people by telling them building improvements being done, without telling them what materials they are using, or you could tell them its at complete rewire of certain systems in the building, that is without counting that most people that worked there died there. exept for some people that managed to survived but their stories have never been taken into account by the goverment and the media.

We have another anonymous trying to ridicule the obvious lie that is the official story, when in a recent interview with PM magazine representative, said that the 9 arabs alive is a fake story, and said that they had collected DNA from the twin towers that confirm the identitiy of the hijackers and when asked about where they get the DNA to match it, they did not had a response, because there is no DNA to match it. How come they want to come and boldly lie in audio about something that is not truth cause if they had the DNA the comission report would not have omitted, but now they are desperate to cover the truth by hiring profesionals to pretend the 911 official story is correct.

They also say that they have a photo showing the hole in building 7 that made it collapse, and confirm they had seen it, but the PM book dont show such a photo, and they stated that they dont show it cause it's part of a larger criminal investigation, but give me a break, its been 5 years and they dont want to officialy show such a photo, cause i've seen that photo in sites claiming to debunk 911 myths, but we all know those photos are photoshoped, so they don't officially show it cause it can be quickly dissmissed as faked and such can't prove the hole in building 7.

See those protecting the official story and the Bush administration, twist and bend more information. Such statements do not apply to us who are using the Scientific approach to investigate and analyze what happened on 911.

I will update this post as needed.

I could keep on debunking this argument but i think its enought to prove my point, if more debunking is needed i would be more than happy to go argument by argument with those protecting the official story.