Jack Blood interviews JohnDoeX


Jack Blood interviewed John Doe X today;

Interview starts at 45:00

13.5 MB MP3

Local Mirror:

Jack Blood home page

I knew it! the airliner was

I knew it! the airliner was a flyover! That's why so many people saw a large plane. Shortly after that they must have hit it with a missile or small drone/missile.

It was always an absurd

It was always an absurd theory that the perps would trust hani to hit the right spot. LIHOP is for suckers.

I think it's a disinfo campaign

Faked photos, fake flight data, video from surveillance camera with frames cut out...
We are thrown with so many data and they count on that we get lost.

Maybe Boeing hit Pentagon, maybe not - what's important is that goverment
is MESSING UP with the evidence! And focus on that when talking with

I am also wondering whether

I am also wondering whether this is phony data from the NTSB. I have absolutely no idea. But it could be. And that would help continue to feed the "no 757 hit the Pentagon" trap.

Overwhelming evidence indicates that no 757 hit Pentagon!

Come on. Neither AA77 nor any other B-757 struck the Pentagon. Everything points to a drone or missile.

dont put your faith in

dont put your faith in people who havent gotten anywhere with there jfk evidence in 40 years

Never say die

I am not about to “put my faith” in anyone but myself. Having said that, the Oswald didit story is widely discredited, the JFK assassination is still a live story forty-three years after the event, and who is to say that a breakthrough in that assassination will not occur alongside the exposure of the 911 false flag operation. It is all part of the same thing, and many of those who wake up to 911 truth will also reconsider the slaughter in Dallas.

i agree

great post shrapnel

9/11 is the biggest

9/11 is the biggest falseflag terror attack in history. If 9/11 falls, the rest will follow. Whatever the government has to hide, nobody will trust them anymore after 9/11 is exposed.

JFK = 9/11

JFK and 9/11 are two chapters in the same book...the care and feeding of the Military-Industrial Complex.

The parallels are striking.

When will the American public wake up to what an expensive, destructive parasite the M-I C is, and has been since WW II?

Eisenhower's farewell address should be on a monument in D.C.


Flights 77 and 11 Did Not Exist

CIA used 'micro nuclear' bomb in Bali: Bashir

WOW this guy is outright

WOW this guy is outright saying it was false flag by the CIA. We need more of this...

How would Bashir know?

Bashir reeks of "asset" to me.

Never forget

In the choice between changing ones mind
and proving there's no need to do so,
most people get busy on the proof.
John Kenneth Galbraith


(this is my first comment as a verified and registered user of 911blogger.com, yey!)

Everyone NEEDS to see this.


There is going around poeple that claim to be part of the truth movement, and distracting by making us distrust Jones and the site 911truth.org and Alex Jone for example.

Look this is all that join claims of the fall of the twin towers:
I've seen many David Ray grifin documentaries
Judge griffin for yourself in that video, ive seen wild claims that grifin, Steven jones is misleading the truth movement, when they have focused on the points that have been ommited on the official truth, they have been wild claims that those authors have spoken things that are out of norm.
Please do not waste your time in the disinfo that is being thrown out at this moment.
I say that we really dont know how the towers came down. We know for sure that they didn't come down because of the planes(wheter it was hit or not hit by any planes) why waste our time argueing about no planes.
We are wasting to much time about Profesor Jones and Grifin, when they all have lay out what has been omitted by the commision report. Jones suggest that thermite might have been used, but not by itself as other types of explosives might have been used along with what profesor Jones suggest.
Lets focus on the facts that according to the structural design of the towers and the steel graded to resist fires of 2000F for 6 hours, therefore making it a silly idea that 50 minutes to 1 hour of jet fuel fire, which by the way burned in the fireballs of the impacts that couldn't have weaken the steel. We dont really know what kind of method of wiring(wired or wireless), or what kind of explosive was used, But we certainly know that fire and the planes crashing couldn't have made the towers collapse in around 10 seconds.
The tapes that never where realase around the pentagon. We only got 5 frames of video at 1 frame per second. Give me a break a 20 dollar webcam that I bought films video at 30 FPS, i dont believe that the most protected building in the world had cheaper camaras than that.
Lets focus in the removal of evidence and the complete denial of the attacks, which shows clear negligence by the bush administration, like when they come in public and state that they had no idea they would use hijack planes to attack us, when there is clear proof they had knownledge that those kinds of attack might happen.
Lets focus on how they rushed to claim to know the identities of the hijackers, when they dont even have the DNA from where to match it. Lets focus on the lie from where they assured us that Bin Laden was the mastermind of 911 when not even the CIA.gov website charge him with the 911 crime. When they never has given us proof that al qaeda
was behind the attacks, all those boldface lies, that launch us into 2 wars, the deaths of thousands of soldiers and civilians in Iraq and afganistan, all because of faulty inteligence, but rather more like deliverate actions of letting a terrorist attack happen or even worst making it happen, would launch the country in total confusion, so they could launch they agenda that included the Patriot Act, the Department of Homeland Security and the invasion of Afganistan, Iraq and probably Iran.
All those facts of negligence are just enough to Impeach and Jailed them for treason and negligency by acting withouth concrete proof. Such grave errors are not to be allowed by the United States and so we should protect our constitution and get competent leaders in our government by removing the failure of Administration we have now.
There is no proof that Bin Laden did it, but they claim with certainty that he did, they claim al qaeda did it, the cannot prove it, they cannot find traces of any terrorist cells that could have sponsor the would be hijackers, other than thier claims that have so far been lies or so they blame on faulty inteligence.
If there was no proof that Afganistan and Iraq did it therefore the Bush Administration entered us into 2 illigal wars
I agree that Afganistan and Iraq had terrorist that hated us and our freedoms, and sooner or later we had to take them out like we already did but with solid proof and not paranoid beliefs like the Bush administration, but what angers me are the lies that made us enter those wars. What I despise about all this is the sacrifice of more than 3000 thousand people that the bush administration used to enter a war for Oil and not for freedoms.

The flyover and

The flyover and drone/missile follow-up theory makes perfect sense. Explains eyewitness acounts and damage patterns. I highly doubt the perps would allow an actuall Boeing 757 to hit the Pentagon. Too much danger. Too many variables. Not enough precision. At the very least, I think we call all agree that WHATEVER hit the Pentagon was not piloted by a Muslim extremist. Rumsfeld would have to be out of his mind to permit such a contigency.

Thos tapes will not be released. If they are, we'll have a REAl example of CGI fakery for disinfo types like Nico to sink their teeth into.

I like that Troll's first

I like that Troll's first line in his spiel, despite the fact that he is nothing but a government clown:

"The mistaken belief that a handful of unexplained anomalies can undermine a well-established theory :

At least he admits the official story is a theory with unexplained anomalies, and the only reason it is well established  is because of the MSM and disinfo nutjobs like him out promoting the official story.

9/11 has generated the mother of all conspiracy theories

May 23, 2005

Fahrenheit 2777

9/11 has generated the mother of all conspiracy theories

By Michael Shermer

Noted French left-wing activist Thierry Meyssan\'s 9/11 conspiracy book, L\'Effroyable Imposture, became a best-seller in 2002. But I never imagined such an \"appalling deception\" would ever find a voice in America. At a recent public lecture I was buttonholed by a Michael Moore–wannabe filmmaker who breathlessly explained that 9/11 was orchestrated by Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the Central Intelligence Agency as part of their plan for global domination and a New World Order. That goal was to be financed by G.O.D. (Gold, Oil, Drugs) and launched by a Pearl Harbor–like attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, thereby providing the justification for war. The evidence was there in the details, he explained, handing me a faux dollar bill (with \"9-11\" replacing the \"1,\" a picture of Bush supplanting that of Washington) chockablock with Web sites.

In fact, if you type \"World Trade Center\" and \"conspiracy\" into Google, you\'ll get more than 250,000 hits. From these sites, you will discover that some people think the Pentagon was hit by a missile; that U.S. Air Force jets were ordered to \"stand down\" and not intercept Flights 11 and 175, the ones that struck the twin towers; that the towers themselves were razed by demolition explosives timed to go off soon after the impact of the planes; that a mysterious white jet shot down Flight 93 over Pennsylvania; and that New York Jews were ordered to stay home that day (Zionists and other pro-Israeli factions, of course, were involved). Books also abound, including Inside Job, by Jim Marrs; The New Pearl Harbor, by David Ray Griffin; and 9/11: The Great Illusion, by George Humphrey. The single best debunking of this conspiratorial codswallop is in the March issue of Popular Mechanics, which provides an exhaustive point-by-point analysis of the most prevalent claims.

The mistaken belief that a handful of unexplained anomalies can undermine a well-established theory lies at the heart of all conspiratorial thinking (as well as creationism, Holocaust denial and the various crank theories of physics). All the \"evidence\" for a 9/11 conspiracy falls under the rubric of this fallacy. Such notions are easily refuted by noting that scientific theories are not built on single facts alone but on a convergence of evidence assembled from multiple lines of inquiry.

No melted steel, no collapsed towers.

For example, according to www.911research.wtc7.net, steel melts at a temperature of 2,777 degrees Fahrenheit, but jet fuel burns at only 1,517 degrees F. No melted steel, no collapsed towers. \"The planes did not bring those towers down; bombs did,\" says www.abovetopsecret.com. Wrong. In an article in the Journal of the Minerals, Metals, and Materials Society and in subsequent interviews, Thomas Eagar, an engineering professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, explains why: steel loses 50 percent of its strength at 1,200 degrees F; 90,000 liters of jet fuel ignited other combustible materials such as rugs, curtains, furniture and paper, which continued burning after the jet fuel was exhausted, raising temperatures above 1,400 degrees F and spreading the inferno throughout each building. Temperature differentials of hundreds of degrees across single steel horizontal trusses caused them to sag--straining and then breaking the angle clips that held the beams to the vertical columns. Once one truss failed, others followed. When one floor collapsed onto the next floor below, that floor subsequently gave way, creating a pancaking effect that triggered each 500,000-ton structure to crumble. Conspiricists argue that the buildings should have fallen over on their sides, but with 95 percent of each building consisting of air, they could only have collapsed straight down.

All the 9/11 conspiracy claims are this easily refuted. On the Pentagon \"missile strike,\" for example, I queried the would-be filmmaker about what happened to Flight 77, which disappeared at the same time. \"The plane was destroyed, and the passengers were murdered by Bush operatives,\" he solemnly revealed. \"Do you mean to tell me that not one of the thousands of conspirators needed to pull all this off,\" I retorted, \"is a whistle-blower who would go on TV or write a tell-all book?\" My rejoinder was met with the same grim response I get from UFOlogists when I ask them for concrete evidence: Men in Black silence witnesses, and dead men tell no tales.

The Truth about 9/11