N.H. Union Leader continues Woodward coverage

(Gov.) Lynch calls teacher's theories crazy as UNH stands behind 9/11 prof

Union Leader Staff
Tuesday, Aug. 29, 2006

University of New Hampshire administrators are standing behind a tenured professor who has publicly theorized that the U.S. government orchestrated the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, even as Gov. John Lynch condemned his remarks.

Calling psychology professor William Woodward's theory "completely crazy and offensive," the governor said in a statement yesterday that he plans to address his concerns with the University System of New Hampshire Board of Trustees...

For Governor Lynchs website, click here.

For his official contact email, click here.

Tom Burnett Foundation

A who is search of the Tom Burnett Foundation reports
the address to be 152 Hickory Creek Circle, Little
Rock, AR which is the same address for Dr. William T.
Burgess. Anesthesiologists would come in handy if you
had a plane load of people to dispose of.




William T. Burgess, M.D.
152 Hickory Creek Circle, Little Rock, AR 72212.




I don't know if you've got a super solid one there, but I do think this lie machine will eat itself up that way. That strong probability increases with ever passing day.

As the remaining defenders and sycophants of The Big Lie are reduced, the stench from its source becomes easier and easier to find.

Also read the Union Leader editorial

Also read the editorial posted on Aug 29th from the very conservative paper in NH, the Union Leader

If you have time, please respond to their statement:

"Woodward's beliefs call into question his rational abilities, to say the least. It is one thing to question the official version of 9/11 events. It is another to take that skepticism and leap to the conclusion that the only possible explanation for anomalies in the official version of events is that the Bush administration brought the towers down. One would expect a professor to use better logic than that.
But the group to which Woodward belongs, Scholars for 9/11 Truth, is that sloppy in its thinking."


In how many cases does the

In how many cases does the official version "leap to a conclusion"?

Bull's Eye!

If leaping to a conclusion is a suspicious act.... There is no collection of acts more suspicious than those of this U.S. Government.

Please e-mail the clown

I am so disgusted with these politicians who back the official story I could screem. I just e-mailed this clown and urge all to do the same. Here is a copy.

"Professor William Woodward is correct in his assumption that the government was complicit in the 9/11/2001 attacks. The so-called "Official Story" is a sick joke. I consider it comic book stuff. You prove to me that some caveman in Afghanistan and his group of super-terrorists caused all the damage wrought that awful day. The burden of proof is on you and your so-called government, not on me or Professor Woodward. Also please explain to me who put the explosives in WTC 7. Did Osama do that too? You politicians make me sick. In all my 64 years I have never seen anything like these last five years. I am no longer proud to be an American, I am ashamed and disgusted."

No longer proud to be an American.

But I will use what she gave me, pounding to the death those who've made shit of her old name by burning the constitution "to save it".


"it reflects a reckless disregard for the true facts"


"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi

Misquot represented responsably false truths:

"True false facts are not proof of facts true false, proving that true be false, as false makes true false facts to highlight the truth of your falseness as completely crazy and offensive."

I think he's absolutely wrong, and I'm disappointed that he would have those positions, But he's an individual, and he has a right to have positions, as you and I have a right to have positions presenting controversial material so long as he does it responsibly.

Did I get that right? Hope I haven't misquotrepresentedresponsablyfalsetruths. I hope.

[dz: had to break up the title, was causing issues with the side panel]
[em: got it]

Cat-a-pults.... mreaaarrrrrr.

What's the smell, Bones?
Troll shit, Jim. From the drying banks of Denial.

Here's what I just wrote

Here's what I just wrote to Governor Lynch...

"Mr. Lynch, please wake up. The official story regarding the events of 9/11 is full of holes. Any honest critique of the 9/11 Commission Report reveals numerous errors, ommissions, and distortions. The facts are simply not on your side, and the official conspiracy theory is the most unbelievable one of them all. It is intellectualy dishonnest of you to discredit the work of Professor Woodward and all the other experts who have conducted solid research on the events of 9/11, especially when you are profoundly ignorant of what they have discovered. Please stop pandering to the masses with hollow emotional appeal and start doing some critical thinking. You should be just as critical of the 9/11 Commission Report as you are of Prof W."

That a cross may crush me if I refuse to believe in it.

Look! Do you see your dial in the rockingglass? Look well! Bend down a stigmy till I! It's secret! Iggri, I say, the booseleers! I had it from Lamppost Shawe. And he had it from the Mullah. And Mull took it from a Bluecoat schooler. And Gay Socks jot it from Potapheu's wife. And Rantipoll tipped the wink from old Mrs. Tinbullet. And as for she was confussed by pro-Brother Thacolicus. And the good brother feels he would need to deficate you. And the Flimsy Follettes are up up in arms. That a cross may crush me if I refuse to believe in it. That I may rock anchor through the ages if I hope it's not true. That the host may choke me if I beneighbour you without my charity! Sh! Shem, you are. Sh! You are mad!

(When else will life demand, quoting Finnegans Wake? I love you Zsuzsanna.)

Trolls are out today. 

Trolls are out today.  Catapult your propaganda else where please.

i sent them this

9/11: Press for Truth - Build the Buzz...

Help this film help us all.

The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie (completely discredits & dismantles OUR Govt 9-11 story...pw)
by Dr. David Ray Griffin
Sunday, May 22, 2005

They Found a Patsy

Man arrested in Death of Giuliani aide

Associated Press
Man arrested in Death of Giuliani aide
By TOM HAYS , 08.30.2006, 01:35 PM

A homeless drug addict wanted in the killing of a former aide to Rudolph Giuliani was arrested after a chance encounter with detectives investigating the case, police said Wednesday.

The detectives were searching for records at an employment agency that had hired the suspect, Edwin Ramos, 26, when Ramos walked in seeking back-pay, police said.

Police would not say how they identified him as a suspect in the strangulation of Martin Barreto, 49, a one-time deputy press secretary at City Hall. But they alleged he made statements implicating himself in the killing and the theft of the victim's laptop computer, cell phone and keys.

Barreto's body was discovered on Aug. 21 on a bed at his home in Manhattan's Greenwich Village after a friend reported he wasn't responding to phone calls or knocks on his door. The medical examiner ruled his death a homicide, saying an autopsy found he died from "asphyxia due to compression of the neck."


Homeless drug addict.

Underreported bad consequence of homelessness and drug use: susceptibility to being patsy-ized. Patsified?

querey into what barreta might have known

Do we know how much he knew about 9/11?

or mabey just giuliani?

obviously he knew the wrong thing

20 security cameras not working in !

A NY Daily News article stated that all 20 cameras in Barreto's door-manned, luxury apartment building were not working that day! Gee, what bad luck, I'm sure.