Ryanair to allow mobile calls at 30,000ft
An article in the "Travel News and Comment" section of the Times of London yesterday (30-August 2006, but reported on Yahoo news today), by Mark Ferry has the headline:
Ryanair to allow mobile calls at 30,000ft
I will not post the entire article here, please click the headline which is a
link to the article.
An important quote from Ryanair spokesman is "Ryanair will soon enable
passengers to use their mobile phones and electronic communications devices in
the air, just as they do on the ground. That means they will be able to pass on
the good news to workmates, friends and family that they are travelling on
another on-time flight with Europe's most punctual airline."
The importance of this article to the 9/11 truth movement is obvious.
The simple question is why all the fanfare about this new technology, when calls
from airplanes were obviously not a problem on September 11th 2001?? Who
can ever forget "Hi mom this is Mark Bingham"??
I've tried to post comments raising this question on the Times website to
this article but they have been censored.
I urge 9/11 truth'ers to read the article and ask the question to the Times of London: "Why all the fanfare about this new technology, when cell phones worked fine at 30,000 ft on 9/11??"
- Sherlock Holmes's blog
- Login to post comments
Not Censored
The Times does not censor. I have asked the question, and they have printed it. Go take yourself a look!
"The Times doesn't not censor" please check your information...
I'm very pleased that the Times has printed your question.
Please don't make patronising, condescending and sweeping statements such as 'The Times does not censor'.
They simply printed your statements/question, but they rejected and ignored mine. I'm just glad I brought the issue to the attention of people on this website.
Further if I may point out, if the illustrious Times of London didn't censor then the truth about 9/11, 7/7 and government sponsored "Synthetic Terror" in general, the truth would be mainstream and we wouldn't be staring into the abyss of WWIII.
Thank you.
"From a drop of water, a logician could infer the possibility of an Atlantic or a Niagra without having seen or heard of one or the other. So it is that my name is Sherlock Holmes, it is my business to know what other people don't know"
Yeah right the times doesn't censor...
Yeah right, this is the same Times owned by that Australian... Murdoch right??
Wait a minute this is the same Murdoch that owns Sky News, Fox TV, ....
Oh right "The Times doesn't censor".. give me a break.. 'TROLL ALERT'.
The Times DOES censor!
I couldn't have put it better my self.
"From a drop of water, a logician could infer the possibility of an Atlantic or a Niagra without having seen or heard of one or the other. So it is that my name is Sherlock Holmes, it is my business to know what other people don't know"
great find
but you should have written a more detailed response on the times comment section.
Should
I disagree. Brevity is sometimes best - the question says everything.