Hit Piece on Tarpley and Malloy

(This hit piece is self-explanatory; from a mock media watchdog site called, (the irony!), "Accuracy in Media". To read this article properly, please tilt your head to the right. To retort: Phone: (202) 364-4401 Fax: (202) 364-4098 E-mail: info@aim.org - Posting here for your awareness and for archiving purposes, NOT AS AN ENDORSEMENT.)

Here is Tarpley on Malloy in case you missed it;

White Rose Society archive download:
Thursday, August 3rd, 2006 - 19.3 MB

Local Mirror download

------------------------------------------

Air America Network in Turmoil

By Cliff Kincaid | August 31, 2006

Liberal Air America radio host Mike Malloy had his show abruptly "terminated" on Wednesday, allegedly for financial reasons. The network is failing but there could be another factor behind the Malloy debacle. There is still fallout from Malloy's recent decision to turn over two-and-a-half hours of his three hour show to a former associate of ex-con Lyndon LaRouche, a perennial candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination who campaigns against what he views as British and Zionist control of the U.S. political system. The LaRouche organization is frequently labeled as a cult.

The former high-level LaRouche associate, Webster Griffin Tarpley, was on the Malloy show to promote his view that unnamed U.S. officials carried out the attacks on 9/11 and blamed Muslims for the terrorist acts. But Tarpley went beyond this to suggest that leftist Noam Chomsky, a supporter of the Hezbollah terrorist group that attacked Israel, is a rich puppet of the U.S. military industrial complex and a tool of the Zionists. The hapless Malloy seemed to gobble it all up.

It appears that, in this case, the looney left became too looney, even for Air America's backers. And those backers, according to a July 17 article in the Washington Post, were going to include the so-called Democracy Alliance, a group of rich liberals led by convicted inside-trader and billionaire George Soros. It turns out that Tarpley, who wrote the book, 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, thinks Soros has been one of those behind-the-scenes money manipulators telling Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve what to do. You can read all about it on page 116 of the Tarpley book. It probably didn't look good for Air America to be featuring someone who has been critical of the network's hoped-for financial savior.

Indeed, the controversial Malloy interview with Tarpley may have jeopardized the Air America financial rescue plan.

"Web" as Malloy called him, declared his belief that an "invisible government" was behind 9/11 and the hijackers were "patsies." He declared, "You're dealing first of all with a military coup by an invisible government or rogue network faction inside the U.S. command structure. It is a U.S. operation from beginning to end with some help perhaps from the British." Malloy, who described himself as a friend of the recently defeated and erratic Rep. Cynthia McKinney, did not disagree.

Tarpley also told Malloy, without any rebuttal, that former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani was a "destroyer of the crime scene" at ground zero and a "functionary of the invisible government."

All of this might be tossed aside as the rhetoric of a political extremist were it not for the fact that Tarpley, described by Malloy as "probably the premier spokesman" for the "9/11 Truth Movement," is not the only former LaRouche associate who has achieved a place of prominence on the political left. Robert Dreyfuss, another former LaRouche collaborator, is a contributor to TomPaine.com, The Nation, Mother Jones, and Rolling Stone. Dreyfuss recently spoke at the New America Foundation on the topic of the "phony clash of civilizations" between Islam and the West. When he worked for LaRouche, Dreyfuss exposed various "Zionist" plots.

That Air America would air an interview with Tarpley at a time when it is angling for major cash from Soros was strange indeed. One has to conclude that it was a factor in Malloy's ouster. Ironically, his show with Tarpley aired one day after the Soros-funded Media Matters website ran an article calling LaRouche a "political extremist" who had influenced the book The Shadow Party by conservatives David Horowitz and Richard Poe. The book, based on independent investigative reporting, is strongly critical of Soros' financial takeover, through contributions, grants and subsidies, of much of the political left and even the Democratic Party. Accuracy in Media published a major article showing how the billionaire, convicted of inside trading in France, has been funding not only the political left but various "media reform" and journalism organizations.

While LaRouche (and many others) have been critical of Soros in the past, conservatives had come to their own conclusions about Soros―and LaRouche―years ago. During the 1980s, as I noted in a Human Events article, "Who and What is Lyndon LaRouche?," members of the group showed up at airports and other events promoting nuclear power and attacking Ralph Nader, hoping to make inroads into the conservative movement. This was during a time when LaRouche was pursuing a pro-Soviet line on foreign policy issues. I warned conservatives to stay away from him and his movement. Lately, however, various Soros-funded pro-drug legalization groups have been showing up as sponsors of the Conservative Political Action Conference.

While most conservatives have come to the realization that LaRouche and his associates are political opportunists and extremists, the ouster of Malloy from Air America does not suggest that the left as a whole has come to that awareness. Malloy said that Tarpley, whose previous association with LaRouche was never mentioned on the air, was appearing in response to listener demands. Indeed, no callers expressed any disagreement with anything Tarpley said.

The Tarpley book is worth examining, if only to understood his peculiar brand of "investigative reporting." On the one hand, on page 157, he noted that the Arab satellite channel Al-Jazeera had "the best reporting from inside Afghanistan," but later dismissed Al-Jazeera reporter Yosri Fouda's book, Masterminds of Terror, which documents the al-Qaeda role in 9/11. It turns out, of course, that Al-Jazeera had "the best reporting from inside Afghanistan" because its Kabul, Afghanistan, bureau chief, Tyseer Alouni, was an al-Qaeda agent. He is now serving seven years in prison in Spain for carrying money for al-Qaeda, and he was linked to the 9/11 plot.

LaRouche and his associates, who openly supported Saddam Hussein before the first Gulf War, were interviewed on Al-Jazeera in 2002 and compared the Israelis to the Nazis.

More recently, Al-Jazeera has been promoting Tarpley's "9/11 Truth Movement," knowing it deflects attention away from the real perpetrators of these terrorist acts and inspires even more hatred of America. Even our own C-SPAN public affairs channel recently devoted precious air-time to Tarpley and his collaborators.

The damage that is done is reflected in the enthusiastic reaction to Tarpley on Air America. Near the end of the interview, Malloy read an email from a listener who wanted to know why "left gatekeepers" like Amy Goodman of the "Democracy Now" program did not want his "truth" about 9/11 to be more widely disseminated. Tarpley essentially dismissed Goodman as an agent of the Ford Foundation, which he implied was doing the work of the U.S. intelligence community. Malloy did not dispute any of this.

Tarpley also brought up Noam Chomsky, saying he will not expose the truth about 9/11 because he is affiliated with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and it "receives massive contracts from the federal government." Some of that money, Tarpley said, may go to Chomsky, who has become "a wealthy man" and "I believe some people in his family have also become wealthy." There was no mention of the fact that LaRouche had served time in prison on financial fraud charges. Tarpley also alleged that Chomsky had too casually dismissed the significance of a recent academic paper "on the power of the Zionist lobby." There was no dissent from Malloy on that one.

"I don't think I've ever had one person on for two and one-half hours," Malloy said as he thanked Tarpley and urged him to "watch your back," as if his life was in danger for spouting this nonsense. Apparently aware that some of the charges that were made on his show were too impossible to believe, Malloy told his audience, "Just make your own decision." It looks like the rich liberals running Air America have made theirs.

What do you make of this?

What do you make of this? Hadn't seen this before. Explosion at Ground Zero.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I

yeah, i saw it for the first

yeah, i saw it for the first time today as well. some people around here have been saying they think its fake, that the sound was added in after the fact. i dont know about that, but it is kind of wierd how this seemed to have turned up out of nowhere.

I saw it years ago on German

I saw it years ago on German national TV.
I don't think its fake.
Probably just censored in the US...

Malloy is streaming on the Air America site now

Not sure if the show was terminated yet. I'm listening to an archived Malloy now.

Does anyone have the scoop

Does anyone have the scoop on Tarpley's relationship to LaRouche?

LaDouche

As if you have to be a disciple of Lyndon LaRouche to know that the U.S. govt is under the influence of globalists.

Gasp!

The upcoming psy-op against the 9/11 movement will be associating it with blatant anti-Semitism. So don't forget to hide your Hufschmid books.

Some of my best truther friends are...

Jewish, and can smell a rat as well as anyone else. This idea that Jews are somehow unable to separate bigotry from criticism of grossly politically Jewish people (read Zionists) is an example of the soft bigotry of low expectations. I'm not going to pretend that Jews are somehow unable to handle the truth--I've known too many righteous Jews to think so poorly of them. Zionists on the other hand don't think Jews are capable of being accepted by other people, so they say anyway, in order to scare Jews into their cold embrace. Brrrrr.... Zionists.... check out www.alllies.org for some truly righteous Israeli anarchists. who are the real dividers? the ones who do everything possible to convince Jews that everyone hates them, so that everyone else will think Jews hate THEM, which will make them act in ways that confirm Jews' Zionist inspired fear that everyone hates them, which will etc..... I'm sick of this shit and I'm not the only one. I hope someday you'll join us in opposing ALL manner of racism, then maybe we'll all live, work, love, play, eat, drink, dance, and sing as one. Until then, f*** poeple who manipulate racial prejudice for their sick ends._

"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

that seems like a really

that seems like a really good attitude

with every birth there is birthpain---and i think alot of the troubles in the world are gonna end when there is open discussion of the talmud,bible,and koran

they all need to acknowledge that mankind has evolved passed murdering for god

since we can now split the atom

to each their own

metaphysics is good for some people, but when osshales use it for their destructive ends that's where we all have to draw the line and call foul, time out, whatever it takes. no matter your view on metaphysics you should respect physics as randkiller points out. humanity has progressed scientifically but not ethically or morally. whether our species survives depends on whether or not we have it in us to stop the insanity that benefits no one. it's like collectively humans have a deathwish. we can see that clearly enough, but lots of people can't and blame others, be they Muslims, Christians, Jews, atheists, hippies, republicans--anyone but "their own". What ever happened to self-examination? Humility? Respect? I don't think religion has failed people, I think people have failed religion. I could be wrong about that I know. But if I was, about that or anything else I would suck it up and move on, not start a war. Anyway I do think we're in Gandhi's "fighting" stage. Anyone know how long it lasted relative to the other stages in his case? Normally I would say things happen quicker now with all our teckomonology. In any case, I have about ten times more hope right now than I did exactly one year ago...
_

"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

this is what i wrote on the

this is what i wrote on the air america/mike malloy blog comment:
"its all about Soros
Read this article by Cliff Kincaid:

http://www.aim.org/aim_column_print/4831_0_3_0/

"Liberal Air America radio host Mike Malloy had his show abruptly "terminated" on Wednesday, allegedly for financial reasons. The network is failing but there could be another factor behind the Malloy debacle. There is still fallout from Malloy's recent decision to turn over two-and-a-half hours of his three hour show to a former associate of ex-con Lyndon LaRouche, a perennial candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination who campaigns against what he views as British and Zionist control of the U.S. political system. The LaRouche organization is frequently labeled as a cult.

The former high-level LaRouche associate, Webster Griffin Tarpley, was on the Malloy show to promote his view that unnamed U.S. officials carried out the attacks on 9/11 and blamed Muslims for the terrorist acts. But Tarpley went beyond this to suggest that leftist Noam Chomsky, a supporter of the Hezbollah terrorist group that attacked Israel, is a rich puppet of the U.S. military industrial complex and a tool of the Zionists. The hapless Malloy seemed to gobble it all up.

It appears that, in this case, the looney left became too looney, even for Air America's backers. And those backers, according to a July 17 article in the Washington Post, were going to include the so-called Democracy Alliance, a group of rich liberals led by convicted inside-trader and billionaire George Soros. It turns out that Tarpley, who wrote the book, 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, thinks Soros has been one of those behind-the-scenes money manipulators telling Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve what to do. You can read all about it on page 116 of the Tarpley book. It probably didn't look good for Air America to be featuring someone who has been critical of the network's hoped-for financial savior. "

@@@@
Then this one about Soros:

http://www.aim.org/special_report/2089_0_8_0_C/

Here's an online pdf of Webster Tarpley's book. read it, and decide for yourself whether he is "Anti-Semitic" or "Looney": http://www.uads.org/u/looyah/Tarpley-911synthetic_terror_made_in_USA.pdf

And if you don't think there's "left gatekeeping" going on please check out Barrie Zwicker's new book "Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-up of 9/11" http://www.newsociety.com/bookid/3932

I recently interviewed Mr. Zwicker on my radio show, http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/aluhlooyah_zwicker_081606.mp3 and, now that you have all that free time not listening to AAR, you can check out my archives at your leisure: http://feeds.feedburner.com/aluhlooyah

This is the Mike Malloy show where he interviews Tarpley: http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/webster_tarpley_interview_-_aug_3__20...

TNX, excellent interview

TNX, excellent interview with Barry Zwicker.

Makes me think of Gandhi

First they ignore you,
then they laugh at you,
then they fight you,
then you win!

In Mike Malloy's case, it's clearly the fighting stage. Also with all those university professors under attack. I wonder if "then you win" will occur within my lifetime.

I thought this was rather

I thought this was rather good......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WohURF13efU

rather good?

quite good....

Love that last line, "F*ck'm".

We Win...

Step back and watch the 9/11 truth wave from "outside of it"

You patriots are so engulfed in your work, sometimes its hard for you to see the change taking place.

In only a matter of months, 60-80 million Americans "doubt" the official story. This sucker is unstoppable! Just like the tsunami, it travels "under the surface" until it reaches the shoreline... BAMM!! The 9/11 truth explosion is right off shore my friends

Schopenhauer/Gandhi...

Both knew, "The (Stage 3) fight" is the beginning, of the end, for those who try to control.

I visit this site almost everyday to literally watch a revolution take place... You all inspire me :)

Scott Ledger

Your words, Mr Ledger...

...inspire more.

Thanks for the positive feed-back loop.....
We're going to snap each and every transistor and amplifier circuit in this PA of lies.

THAT bad day for Media, will be a great day for humanity.

Your right Scott.

Your right Scott.
I have seen a dramatic change from two years ago when I found out that 9/11 was government sponsored. The movement had grown exponentially and is now literally exploding. I figure within a year it will be all over but the shouting. Then there still will be much work to do. Like changing the whole damn financial system so that this will never happen again. I will leave that up to the smart guys. I am just a 9/11 grunt trying to help as best I can.

The Neo-Cons are scared of the 9/11 Truth Movement

Towards the end of this article the author writes, "The damage that is done is reflected in the enthusiastic reaction to Tarpley on Air America."

That to me is a good example of how scared the neo-faschists are of the 9/11 Truth Movement. They'll even admit it!!

IGNORE THE PRESSURE TO SELF

IGNORE THE PRESSURE TO SELF CENSOR ABOUT THE OBVIOUS ZIONIST ROLE IN THE 9/11 ATTACKS

I was banned from the Air America forums for linking to hardcore information on who was really behind 9/11. The excuse........"anti-semitic"........"hate speech" etc. etc. etc.

The hit piece by agent Kincaid was a clumsy and transparent attempt to discourage the bankrupt left gatekeepers who may be contemplating the repentance of their sins by embracing the 9/11 truth movement. Malloy was definately made an example of. These left gatekeepers know their cover has been blown and their credibility has almost run out, so they might be contemplating hopping on the semi-9/11 truth bandwagon as the government controlled 9/11 truth movement is "mainstreamed". Tarpley has done exemplary work in taking us beyond the thick web of 9/11 truth disinfo spun by washed up spooks like Mike Ruppert. The constant attempt to characterize effective 9/11 truth researchers as anti-semitic is THE BIG CLUE, that a network of these self proclaimed semites were indeed involved in the 9/11 attacks. May this desperate attempt to quell and derail the 9/11 truth movement backfire on the coalition of Israeli and American murderers who attacked us and tried to make it look like Arabs did it. The main thing this 9/11 truth movement needs to do now is to start circulating the names of these criminals far and wide. Rest assured that any 9/11 researcher who isnt Naming Names by now is bullshitting you. DEMAND THE NAMES and settle for nothing less. A good place to start after you have finished reading Tarpleys book, is with the work of journalist Christopher Bollyn americanfreepress.net and independant researcher Nico Haupt team8plus.org.

Don't worry about Tarpley

Reality Cheque

The Truth Movement has picked up steam, no doubt. But nothing is 'unstoppable' when you own, lock stock and barrel, the message delivery system, the media.

And you don't have to outright deny the truth, because that can draw too much attention. You simply have to manage it's perception amongst the masses.

But how will the criminals

But how will the criminals escape when mainstream America find out the media had manipulated the 9/11 south tower videos in addition to the fact that the towers collapsed in a "questionable" way? 911tvfakery.blogspot.com shows us precisely how to put the final nail in the coffin.

How will the criminals be able to scapegoat the Arabs then? What will they do when the American people find out how they tried to fool us with faked videos?

How

Submitted by Inphoman (not verified) on Fri, 09/01/2006 - 6:45pm.
But how will the criminals escape when mainstream America find out the media had manipulated the 9/11 south tower videos in addition to the fact that the towers collapsed in a "questionable" way?
...............................
Not to sound like a wise guy, but... exactly how are they going to find that out if they aren't told, or if it's never seriously presented in a way Joe 6-Pack can get it? (Note: Charlie Sheen didn't sell it, in case no one noticed that.)

Don't misunderestimate the power of a totally controlled media. It's not just that the media is "a little corrupted." It's purchased. Outside of the interent, they get exactly what they want.

Right now you're seeing a lot of material that is politically critical of Bush. If you think that's an indication that 9/11 revelations are right around the corner, then you're been successfully scammed. No one in this scenario is as stupid as they are portraying themselves, not even Dubya. A lot of time and effort goes into these people appearing to be journalists. It's all phoney - they're closer to being carneys than reporters.