Jim Hoffman shreds NIST's latest release
NIST's World Trade Center FAQ
A Reply to the National Institute for Standards and Technology's
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
by Jim Hoffman
Introduction
On August 30, 2006, the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) posted on their website a list of fourteen frequently asked questions (FAQ) and answers to them. NIST should be commended for at least addressing a number of the serious questions that have been raised with regard to its investigation. However, NIST's new FAQ avoids answering the central charges of its most visible critique, Building a Better Mirage.
* That NIST fails to support it's key assertion that "collapse initiation" automatically leads to "global collapse".
* That NIST uses the diversionary tactic of describing some events -- such as the airliner crashes -- in great detail, while almost completely avoiding the core question of what brought the Towers down.
* That NIST's report is internally inconsistent, supposing that steel columns were heated to temperatures hundreds of degrees in excess of the maximum temperatures indicated by its steel samples.
* That NIST fails to substantiate it's implied claim that its computer models predicted "collapse initiation".
* That NIST fails to even address most of the features of the Towers' destruction that are apparently unique to controlled demolitions.
[SNIP]
Continued at link.
- stallion4's blog
- Login to post comments
This should be on the front
This should be on the front page.
Hoffman doesn't get enough attention. His work is rock-solid troll-scaring science and logic.
agreed, and this story is
agreed, and this story is headlining over at RawStory right now, with a healthy set of comments ensuing:
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Federal_agency_releases_911_conspiracy...
agreed
Thank God for the Jim Hoffmans of the world who take the time to counter the BS being spewed by the MSM shills and government stooges.
stallion4, It is hard to
stallion4,
It is hard to believe you are the same poster that came down on me for contesting some NPTers.
Please elaborate. But if
Please elaborate. But if you do, use a screen name other than "Anonymous" when posting on this blog. I don't care what name you use. Just make one up and stick with it. Thanks.
S4
"You don't need a weather man to know which way the wind blows" -Dylan
dude this totally needs to be front page
some one email the night watchmen.
i guess thru all the
i guess thru all the b.s.---the cream really does rise to the top