Galloway, Fisk, Hersh: Azzam’s Favorite Infidels

Kurt Nimmo | September 5 2006

It should come as no surprise Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American,” an obvious intelligence plant, would mention Seymour Hersh, George Galloway, and Robert Fisk, even though they are infidels, the same way the dead Osama mentioned William Blum on a previous occasion.

It makes perfect sense because all three are particularly effective in documenting the machinations of the neocons and thus need to be linked to “al-Qaeda,” especially Galloway who is especially vociferous and has effectively resisted all efforts to slander him, including successfully suing the Daily Telegraph for defamatory remarks (the Daily Telegraph attempted, rather feebly, to link Galloway to Iraqi intelligence and Saddam Hussein, a dismal effort that cost the newspaper, formerly owned by the neocon Conrad Black, £150,000 in damages plus costs estimated to total £1.2 million).

Azzam’s CIA scriptwriters wrote the following:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/September2006/050906Infidels.htm

Kurt Nimmo is the man.

Well, I just got done taking a look at the "explosions" in wtc7 over at lc.com. To me it really didn't look like explosion flashes. To me, it looks like the window in which the flashes occure is broken, and the flash only occures on the side of the broken piece. So, to me, it looks like it could be the reflection of the sun or something.

MikeJr

Did you listen to the video ? The analyst on the second part of the video is just saying that independant don't win, and is just joking about independant. What a dork who is just saying that you can't change anything to politic, so stick this up your ass!!!

Dylan:

I'm hoping that in the wealth of footage you've amassed of WTC 7 in the last months, you might have some footage which helps to put to rest questions about the supposed massive structural damage to the south side of WTC7. Damage for which, as of yet, we have not seen any meaningful photographic of videographic documentation. (Instead, Popular Mechanics claims to have seen NIST photos that for some reason can't be released to the public...)

Popular Mechanics quotes NIST's Sunder saying:" "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom--approximately 10 stories--about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out."

Well, this kind of claim is one that should be easy to prove or disprove- though of course it raises questions, too. Is there footage you've seen showing this absolutely massive amount of structural damage to the south side of the building? I can't see through all the smoke in this latest clip whether there is such a hole- or whether the whole thing is, er, a smokescreen, so to speak.