Israel's "Clean Break" + PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses" = 9/11?
I'm sure most here are familiar with PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses (RAD)" paper, which states "...the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor." However, we never hear much about an Israeli policy paper that preceded PNAC's RAD plan by four years entitled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm".
The excerpt from the article below explains how Israel's "Clean Break" policy paper and PNAC's "RAD" plan are intimately related:
The $64,000.00 question of “Who done it?“ is found in the brainchild of Richard Perle and Benjamin Netanyahu…”A Clean Break”, the founding document of PNAC.
A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm
Commonly referred to as the "Clean Break" report, was prepared in 1996 by a study group led by Richard Perle. The other participants were James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr, Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, Jonathan Torop, David Wurmser and Meyrav Wurmser
The report was prepared as a proposed new policy for the government of Israel, and presented to then Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in July of 1996.
The principle recommendations were:
* A repudiation of the concept of "Land for Peace," which was the basis for the Oslo Accords.
* Armed incursions into Palestinian areas under the rubric of the "right of hot pursuit".
* Armed incursions into Lebanon, and possible strikes against Syria and Iran.
* The removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq.
* A repudiation of the tenets of Labor Zionism and a change to Economic liberalism.
The authors of the report are all prominent Neoconservatives that have strong ties to the Likkud party of Israel. They are also rabidly Zionist with dual citizenship to Israel as part of the Jewish Diaspora. It would not be considered hyperbole to say that Perle and Co., are agents for Israel, working on it’s behalf here and abroad.
Perle, Feith, and David Wurmser assumed important positions in the administration of President George W. Bush. The similarities between the proposed actions in the Clean Break document, and the subsequent 2003 invasion of Iraq and 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict are evident...
..."Clean Break" is a paper written by Benjamin Netanyahu with Richard Perle and a few other Likkud Jews from the U.S.. In light of the events today, the invasion of Lebanon by Israel and threats of sanctions against Iran and Syria by the U.S., doesn’t this at least put Israel in the category of “Persons Of Interest” with re to any 911 investigation?
When PNAC was founded, a group of neo-cons wrote a spin-off paper elaborating on “Clean Break”. It was entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” or RAD. The title implies that agents of Israel, (Perle and co.) got together and wrote a policy paper that was concerned only with America’s future security and establishment as the preeminent world power. A PAX Americana if you will. They even got Dick Cheney to participate to give it a more “American” look and less of an “Israeli” front group image.
The paper “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” is the only paper that is discussed in great detail by 911 researchers...
...Perle’s PNAC authored a Project Paper entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses", which laid out an extensive plan for US global domination, beginning with invading and occupying the Middle East.
PNAC has been pushing for regime change in Iraq since 1997, and their members include Jeb Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, John Bolton, Richard Perle and many others close to the Bush administration. With the start of the Bush presidency, many PNAC members were installed in various positions in Bush's cabinet, and the push for war began -- a push for war based on false evidence at best and fabricated lies at worst.
RAD is a paper that is a spin-off of the original, or founding document for PNAC, “Clean Break”. “A Clean Break” implicates Israel, RAD implicates Cheney and the American neo-cons. This is the preferred "conspiracy theory", as it is Politically Correct.
It doesn’t implicate Israel and therefore is not “anti-Semitic”.
[Webster Tarpley, summarized his own views on the events of 9/11. He emphasized that “neocon fascist madmen” had perpetrated the 9/11 “myth.” He went on to say, “The most important thing is that the 9/11 myth is the premise and the root of the Afghanistan War and the Iraq War and the coming attack on Iran. ... We must ... deprive [the myth’s perpetrators] of the ability to stampede and manipulate hundreds of millions of people [with their] ... cynically planned terrorist events.” ]
“Neocon fascist madmen”? Perle, Wolfowitz, Wurmser, Feith, and Netanyahu?…He could have just said Jews, or Israelis, but that would be too obvious (anti-Semitic). We wouldn’t want to devise a Conspiracy Theory that people could understand without much effort. We have to get the people to buy the books and videos and keep up with the soap opera known as the “911 Truth Movement”. This is what is commonly known as putting the “Con” in Conspiracy.
The evidence implicating Israel is abundant. We have the plan (Clean Break) for the Middle East war, written in advance, calling for American military to implement Israeli domination of the Middle East.
We have the spin off document (RAD) calling for a “new Pearl Harbor” to get Americans behind an invasion of the Middle East that would make Israel the preeminant power in that region with the help of the American military. Americans, believing the government's spin would seek to avenge the deaths of 911, by supporting military action in the Middle East to fight the "War On Terror".
I think we can all agree that 911 was our “new Pearl Harbor” and many of the goals found in "Clean Break" and "RAD" have been accomplished as the authors intended.
We have Benjamin Netanyahu’s prints all over the “Clean Break” document as the original sponsor. This clearly implicates Israel, as the prime mover behind the invasion of Iraq by the U.S., with the most to gain from this military operation. Thus, Israel had a vested interest in the success of the Twin Tower attacks, as this would be the catalyst for American involvement in the Israeli plan for Middle East domination or "Securing The Realm".
Likkud Jews created PNAC and were placed in Bush’ cabinet to write foreign policy. Agents of Israel in the Bush cabinet wrote in "Clean Break":
["…removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq" was an "important Israeli strategic objective in its own right as a means of foiling Syria's regional ambitions…
The Israeli designs would only be feasible if the United States provided the muscle and the resources.”]
The entire article can be read here
Excerpt from transcript:
(Discussing Israel/Lebanon conflict)
JAMES BAMFORD: "...They‘ve had this goal for years, for a decade, at least. In 1996, they came up with the clean-break plan, which was an outline for how Israel would basically get rid of Iraq and Saddam Hussein and move into Syria, Lebanon, and on to Iran.
I think they‘re trying to carry out this plan. It was written by the person who‘s now the Middle East adviser to Dick Cheney, and the person who was in charge of the war in Iraq, largely, Doug Feith at the Pentagon, in addition to the person who is head of the Defense Policy Board, Richard Perle.
So this has been a plan that‘s been in the works for a long time. And I think now it‘s their chance to see a possibility for this to come to fruition."
Entire transcript located here.