9/11 Bloglines (09/08)
9/11 Bloglines (09/08)
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001
ScrewLoose Editorial in the Seattle PI
Screw Loose Change in France!
Spooked: Mainstream Media Can't Get Enough of the 9/11 Conpspiracy Theories Now
Nimmo: Gatekeeper Alex Cockburn Attacks 9/11 “Conspiracy Nuts”
911fraud blogspot: Bin Laden Working for CIA Proxy...
Huffington Post: Let's Scrap the 9/11 Commission Report and Start Again
Daily Telegraph UK: The CIA couldn't have organised this...
Was 9/11 an inside job? - Mail + Guardian Online
"Anonymous" attacks Les Jamieson
Lisa Guliani vs. Popular Mechanics
Jimmy Walter: Paul Watson + Kyle Hence is Disinfo
FalseFlagNews on RBN
Alternet: 9/11 Conspiracy Fantasies
09/08: Peter Dale Scott followed by Kevin Ryan on Alex Jones
New Roundup 9/11 Anniversary Weekend
Randi Rhodes Interviews Paul Thompson 9/7/2006
FMN News: Strike for 9/11 Truth on Monday?
BrianV/ No-Planes: 9/11: The Twin Towers
"No-Planer" tag summary at 911blogger.com
Pentagonhit Blogspot: Modelling the SecCam
TheNation: 9/11 in a Movie-Made World
Holmgren: Redefining "truth": Double-think inside the movement
BYU Professor on Paid Leave for 9-11 Theory
Update: Italian 9/11 Truth Conference
Anderson Cooper trained with CIA
Senators Threaten to Revoke Disney's TV License Over "9/11 Lies"
Discuss at MSNBC: 9/11 Conspiracy
MSNBC Poll: do you believe any "9/11 Conspiracy Theories"?
MSMBC/WP- Nico Haupt: "you'll realize there were no planes "
NewStatesman: "Meet the No-planers"
Belgium police hold 17 in Military Insider 'plot'
Book says CIA tried to provoke Saddam to war
New poll says most Canadians blame U.S. for 9/11 attacks
Dutch 9/11 Truth Site: If only the moon could talk...
ABC's 9/11 Docudrama: When Do the Facts Matter? - Newsweek
Spiked Online UK about Killtown
TheNation: The 9/11 Conspiracy Nuts
ADL: Five Years Later, Anti-Semitic 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Live On
Update: DC 9/11 Truth Anniversary Events
"New" Video Purports to Show Bin Laden Planning 9/11
NY Review of Books: "why would anyone use real planes?"
09/07: TotalRadio with special edition about Reynolds/Wood at NPR
Abby Singer At Ground Zero: "9/11 Conspiracy Wars"
09/08: Dylan Avery apparently on DemocracyNow!
- ewing2001's blog
- Login to post comments
"9/11 truth" and "no planes"
"9/11 truth" and "no planes" are contradictory. Please leave this site Nico, no one wants any of you "no planers" here except yourselves, a sub total of about 5 suspect individuals. Please go away!
It's actually just you,
It's actually just you, Chris and Andy White, who are harrassing me all the time on this forum.
Everyone else turned into a civilized debater on this topic and even WP didn't care much.
And here is their conclusion:
"...Some days the 9/11 truth movement resembles an Italian coalition government -- dissolution is a certainty..."
The diversion was started by Jones and Fetzer who called our findings "junk science". Why don't you ask them to finally present their pseudo evidence on "remote controlled pod-planes", an absurdity which was now also picked up at TELEMUNDO 2 days ago?
The real wackos are at the top of st911.
That's why our paper will be released ASAP over there to clean up the mess.
http://www.911tvfakery.net
Maybe one day you'll
Maybe one day you'll actually realise just how much damage you're doing to the effort that's actually concerned with winning. That's unless you aren’t actually just a genuinely foolish person, and are in fact paid to spread absurdity in an attempt to deliberately smear 911 truth. Again in the politest possible terms I'm asking you to hit the road Nico, and don't you come back no more lol!
A Civilized Debate?
When someone shows you an article from Counterpunch that proclaims the NTSB did study the black boxes from the WTC, which would indicate planes were there, you ignore it, and state that Nicholas DeMasi is under investigation for fraud. Lie.
When someone asks you about all of the people who say they saw the plane, you think they are part of an actor's guild.
When someone asks you about all of the people who heard the planes, you have no explanation.
When every article that has you mentioned in it considers you to be crazy, or on hashish, you disregard it for whatever reason.
When someone shows you a picture of a piece of the planes, you say it's planted evidence, or a fake picture.
There is no such thing as a civilized debate with you Nico. There never has been, and there never will be.
You're just taking up space on 911Blogger.com, and are part of the fringe element of the movement.
___________________________________
"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi
Jon, you are still playing
Jon,
you are still playing the "safe side" with your hangout drivel, don't you?
"...When someone shows you an article from Counterpunch that proclaims the NTSB did study the black boxes from the WTC.."
then Gold doesn't give us any visual evidence on these Boxes
"...When someone asks you about all of the people who say they saw the plane, you think they are part of an actor's guild.."
Just some of them. That was Morgan's opinion, not mine.
The rest was cherry picked. Other witnesses saw the opposite:
Nothing. That is also still ignored by Gold.http://911closeup.com/nico/witness_contradictions.html
"...When someone asks you about all of the people who heard the planes, you have no explanation.."
Not true, see above.
"...When every article that has you mentioned in it considers you to be crazy, or on hashish, you disregard it for whatever reason.."
I did not. Everyone in this movement is described as a looney, anti-semite or treasenous, even as a terrorist.
Compared with them, the descriptions about me appear harmless.
"...When someone shows you a picture of a piece of the planes, you say it's planted evidence, or a fake picture..."
As it was also planted at the Pentagon or at Shanksville.
See also http://www.911foreknowledge.com
"...There is no such thing as a civilized debate with you Nico. There never has been, and there never will be..."
The debate is about the topic, not me.
And it turned into a very civilized debate, just check the latest blogs at 911blogger.
Um Nico...
"then Gold doesn't give us any visual evidence on these Boxes"
If the 9/11 Commission says they don't exist, then what makes you think I would be able to obtain a picture of them?
In regards to witnesses Nico, there were 1000's who saw the second plane. A few online contradictions do not negate those 1000's.
"As it was also planted at the Pentagon or at Shanksville."
Exactly. Thanks for making my point.
___________________________________
"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi
"...there were 1000's who
"...there were 1000's who saw the second plane..."
There is currenty a blog, where you couldn't even bring more than 3 URLs on alleged witnesses vs. my 16 own no-plane witnesses
there were 1000's who saw the second plane
If there are no pictures or protocols of any WTC BlackBoxes, then they don't exist. The 9/11 Panel has nothing to do with this...
It's called...
Common sense. After the first plane struck, EVERYBODY in New York City who could get a view of the towers, got a view of the towers. There were 1000's of people on the street, staring up at the burning tower. It's odds Nico. If 1000's of people were viewing the burning tower, chances are, a GREAT many of them heard and saw the second plane hit. I have seen SEVERAL instances of people stating that they heard and saw the planes. I posted one for you the other day that was in a movie that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. I have no reason to think they're lying. I have no reason to think that they're delusional.
___________________________________
"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi
"...If 1000's of people were
"...If 1000's of people were viewing the burning tower, chances are, a GREAT many of them heard and saw the second plane hit...."
Chances are great that you also could provide some links to back it up.
But you can't :)
How many links...
Are enough Nico? How many eyewitness accounts would it take for you to never talk about no planes hitting the WTC again?
___________________________________
"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi
Listen John,
Listen John,
eye-witness accounts are not helpful for either your or my case.
They didn't help at the Pentagon, they didn't help at Shanksville.
You didn't read my link about eye-witnes accounts at all.
THE WITNESSES CONTRADICT EACH OTHER!
http://911closeup.com/nico/witness_contradictions.html
Does that get in your brain??
Even if you get more than my 16 no-plane witnesses there is *still a contradiction and it's useless in front of court.
But if you're so desperate, get 17 pro-plane witnesses for the 2nd hit.
Have fun :)
Here's what I want you to do...
Get a camcorder, and get 100 eyewitness accounts on the street from random people in New York City.
Go do some real research for a change.
___________________________________
"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi
You're a real truthling. You
You're a real truthling.
You can't read and you're desperate.
Here is it again:
THE WITNESS ACCOUNTS CONTRADICT EACH OTHER!
Got it now, butterhead??
You're right Nico...
I'm desperate to make you stop posting about how no planes struck the towers because, as I showed you in the other thread, you are making fools of us with your ridiculous nonsense.
That's what it is you know. Ridiculous nonsense.
I bet you're delusional enough to think that the media attention you've gotten lately has to do with your amazing research. Am I right?
The reason the media mentions you is because they are still covering up 9/11 Truth, and mentioning how some of us think that no planes struck the towers on 9/11, makes the movement's message lose credibility.
My friends at work showed me that today by laughing at me, and by including me in your ridiculous nonsense.
An anonymous man showed me that when I was handing out leaflets at the premier of World Trade Center.
So please Nico, and the rest of you "no-planers"... stop promoting this ridiculous nonsense.
___________________________________
"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi
Yea he is playing safe Nico,
Yea he is playing safe Nico, but so are you. What about "NUT", you know the "No Universe Theory"? Saying "No Planes" is one thing, saying "No Towers" is another. But unless you’re saying "No Universe" everything else is a "limited hangout".
If there would be no
If there would be no universe, we wouldn't be here and 9/11 never happened.
See how he takes it
See how he takes it seriously, god damn I feel sorry for you Nico. But that still doesn’t excuse the damage you've caused, please leave this site! This is the wrong place for "no planes".
Nico, be honest about exactly what shayler said yesterday
Shayler: "...TV Fakery...i think they're right about it,
but it's a waste of time..."