Support 911Blogger


Grab Bag of News Submissions

Got flooded with news submissions today. I would encourage everyone to make use of the blogs section to post and discuss news as we can't give each of these submissions the attention they deserve at the rate they are coming in.


(image courtesy of louder than words)

Loose Change Creators post Photos and Commentary from 5th Anniversary


Massive Protests at Ground Zero with Alex Jones on a bullhorn:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5318381050582557158
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2058900307247947089
9/11 Mysteries available on google video:
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-7143212690219513043
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-999558027849894376
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=1162851149755261569
9/11:Press for Truth on google video:
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-1016720641536424083
New first hand footage from 9/11 in NYC: September 11, 2001: What We Saw
Revver.com .MOV
Google video
Dutch program Zembla investigates 9/11 theories - streaming video

One of the more interesting moments in this documentary (about 46:25 minutes into it) is when they ask demolition expert Danny Jowenko (who has his own demolition firm and reportedly has been active in this business for 27 years) to comment on videos of the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. His response to the WTC 7 video:
"This is controlled demolition"
.


Dutch 'Metro' paper publishes 2 pages on 9/11 skepticism (translation)
NYC 5th Anniversary Photos from Augmentor
9/11: Press for Truth Premeir in Decatur, GA - bravenewtheaters.com
Enough of the 9/11 Conspiracies, Already - progressive.org
Brad Blog editor reviews 9/11:Press for Truth
Oliver Stone hints at darker 9/11 film in future
Five years later, 9/11 doubters linger - Aspen Daily News
VIDEO: The Debate: Loose Change Vs. Popular Mechanics
Rush Limbaugh fields Caller who says 9/11 an inside job
9/11 Truth Movement Needs Legal Action Group

thanks to kim, stuart, barry, JT, Kev, Sam L, johan, road66, david, Michael, Paul, and others for the submissions!!

Thanks to everyone who sent this stuff to DZ

I just put a blog together for myspace.

http://www.911blogger.com/nod

http://www.911blogger.com/node/2793
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001
September 13, 2006

More World Press picking up Chavez 9/11 Inside Job Remark
More reports from NY 9/11 Truth Protest
AA critics ABC 9/11 series (Atta/Portland connection!)
National Review/Oprah: Female AA gate agent who checked in Mohamed Atta committed suicide?
Association Of Professors Defending BYU's Jones
Discovery: Supercomputer models World Trade Center impact
10/7: First Big Japanese 9/11 Truth Conference
NY 9/11 Protest Huge 327mb video
WacoTrib: "Ah, those conspiracy theories"
Les Jamieson on Geraldo (FOX) on "9/11 Conspiracy Theory"
"The Revver Tape": Brandnew Amateur Tape: NO plane in it
Kevin Barrett: Letter from Ground Zero
9/11 Truth Movement covered in Scientific Investigation (Delft TU) on Dutch TV
911EyeWitness News: "Dylan Avery is a NPT"
Paula Zahn (CNN) on 9/11 Conspiracies
Village Voice covers 9/11 Truth Protest
"Cockpit View 'Flight 11' into North Tower"
Green Party calls for new 9/11 Investigation
WINGTV: Ground Zero Reports
Jack Blood Coverage of ny911 protests
9/11TVF: Photo/Video Comparison shows discrepancy of Aircraft Altitude
Arbeiterfotografie on German 9/11 Doku
"Investigate 9/11" with Bush (and more Photo Stories)
Voice of America (VIDEO has lot of ny911truth protest): "They came to protest.."
CD experts supports view on WTC 7
INN World Report: James Fetzer
CNN Interviews Mike J. Wilson to Discuss Pentagon Conspiracy Theories
Totalradio: Reynolds & Wood on NPR
George Noory - C2C - 911 Fifth Anniversary Show, David Hawkins, AJ, WingTV
Petition to support Prof. Jones
KXMB: 9/11 Conspiracy Buffs vs. PopMech (Video of Amy Goodman)
Mickey Mouse- Co-Conspirator of 9/11 (Satire Video)
PrisonPlanet: 9/11 Truth Movement Needs Legal Action Group and Distance from 9/11 TV Fakery
AP/Newsweek: Theory that U.S. orchestrated Sept. 11 attacks 'not absurd': Venezuela
NY 9/11 Anniversary Event (own report)
Why Professor Jones was put on "Paid Leave"
NY Daily News:
NY POST Meigs Editorial: Conspiracy Cranks
AB: "we know that everything has been a lie. so why not the planes?"
Nafeez Ahmed is bashing “no planes” theory
Travelgolf: Crazy crackpot 9-11 conspiracy theories even invade golf
Daily Texan: 9/11 films stir controversy
Yelling "9/11 was an Inside Job" at Gainesville Anniversary Event
Pensacolanews: 9/11 conspiracy theories are way too far-fetched
Counterpunch: How the 9/11 Truth Movement Helps Bush & Cheney
"Appropriate 9/11 Tribute" from Bush
CTV Canada: Shooting down best 9/11 conspiracy theories
Columbus Dispatch about ny911 protest
WP about Pentz/Marrs/Hence at Kean/Hamilton...
BBC covers 9/11 truth protest at Ground Zero
2 sec AP clip of Alex Jones with 2 protestors
CBC Sunday covered 9/11 alternative theories.
Accuracy in Media on Bowman/NPC and ny911 event: Impeaching Bush Over 9/11
LA Times about NY Washington Square Protest (09/10)
MSNBC: The 9/11 conspiracy: Rubbish or reality?
Miami Herald: 9/11 paranoia breeds nutball conspiracy tales
OfficialWire: Editorial/Op-Ed: 9/11 An Inside Job?
Alex Jones reports from Ground Zero
London 9/11 Truth Protests
Rush Limbaugh: Conspiracy Kook: 9/11 Was Inside Job,
More 9/11 Conspiracy MSM reports
9/11 Anniversary Events (Updates)
Robert Bowman to Appear at LC2E Screening for Democrats
Report: German 9/11 Summit "Success"
Report on Protests from NYC
Mainstream Norwegian TV Covers 9/11 Press for Truth
UPI: Magnified by the web, 9/11 conspiracy theories abound
Australian MP attacks Channel Ten over v.Kleist's "In Plain Sight"

Gratuitous Myspace Plug

http://myspace.com/911blogger

I'm the Rodney Dangerfield of 911blogger.com

9/11 Mysteries in WMV available at
http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm

A big "Oh Crackle" to the D.A. passing to The Berminator upon shouts of Zionism.

Da Jews Ya?

Like Jon Gold? ;-)

Nice video so far pal.

"There's a shadow on the faces of the men who send the guns to the wars that are fought in places where their business interest runs."

Very pretty girl!! We need more of them!

:-)

haha, for real, who is that

haha, for real, who is that chick?

I hate Adam Sessler

She reminds me of someone named MMMMorrrgan. ;p

im sorry, thats over my

im sorry, thats over my head, haha.

We're 23 of course we drink... -Loose Change

I was disgruntled by people who stopped walking to the next location to buy smokes at the local shop.

I saw Alex Jones blowing fags a few times. No homo of course. The Britons get it.

"There's a shadow on the faces of the men who send the guns to the wars that are fought in places where their business interest runs."

how about yanks savvy on british lingo

:-D

wow, super-Christian Alex

wow, super-Christian Alex Jones smokes ciggarettes? haha, just kidding, i like Alex Jones but he always tries to sound so moralistic its kind of surprising hes a smoker.

he's admitted he has the occasional cig on air

besides he's never touted himself as pious.

9/11 Mysteries

I just watched the approx. 90 minutes of 9/11 Mysteries -- it's in 3 parts, about 30 min. each -- and all three together constitute PART 1 which is focusing on controlled demolition at the WTC.

I'll have to say this is probably the best film I've seen that brings together an incredible range of witnesses, experts, footage -- and quite a few important parts of the puzzle, including the condition of the WTC and why it was needing repair estimated at $1 BILLION and nobody was prepared to fix it. The filmmaker debunked the whole idea of Silverstein's comment to "pull it" which some have suggested meant to PULL THE FIREMEN out of the building. According to the film, there WERE NO FIREMEN in building 7 because they were all ordered to leave late in the morning, many hours before the building came down. So there goes that argument out the window -- fortunately!

Lots more in the film -- really well done. I believe the filmmakers are planning on 2 more films -- PART 2 and 3. More info at http://www.911weknow.com/

I'm not feeling that "9/11

I'm not feeling that "9/11 Mysteries", seems a bit wack to me. I’ve just started watching it so I could be wrong, but I don't like the way they’re presenting it so far, it's not serious enough for me, almost disrespectful. It's reminding me of 911eyewtiness in the tone of it, and to call it "Mysteries" is to associate 911 scepticism with alien abduction etc, so I'll have to see how it goes I might be wrong. But so far my personal opinion is a thumbs down. "Press for Truth" is much more compassionate, which is what documentaries covering 9/11 should all attempt to achieve, at least in sentiment if nothing else. And this doesn’t seem to get that, seems out of touch. And really the impression so far is that this is just an almost kooky "Conspiracy Video", not cool.

Well. i have watched the

Well. i have watched the whole of 911 Mysteries, and i thought it was GREAT.......just shows you how everything is in the eye of the beholder.

Very, very good film deserving pride of place on a 9/11 video collection imo.

Yea after watching the whole

Yea after watching the whole thing my initial impressions were wrong, it's not that bad. I still don't like the intro though lol.

The Progressive hit piece

That article in The Progressive by Matthew Rothschild is beyond ridiculous. I stopped reading after several paragraphs since he's so beyond reason.

And, you gotta love the irony of this quote he chose from Carl Sagan:

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”
—Carl Sagan

AS IF the government has produced extraordinary evidence for ITS extraordinarily absurd claims about Osama and the cavemen? Gimme a fucking break. These journalist-denialists need to GO DOWN IN SHAME.

Now you have video proof that they are cavemen!

You think anybody wants a roundhouse kick to the face while I'm wearing these bad boys?

Forgettaboutit.

"There's a shadow on the faces of the men who send the guns to the wars that are fought in places where their business interest runs."

dude, it was written by a rothschild

what did you expect?

Why many people will be swayed by the Progressive hit piece

This debunking article too addresses only the physical evidence, which is our weak spot.

Note carefully that in attacking David Ray Griffin, he mentions only what Griffin said about the physical evidence (which Griffin should have stayed away from, but that's another story). He does not address Griffin's logical deconstructions of the timeline and the 9/11 report.

The article also stays totally away from the war games, the connections with drugs and oil, and other powerful circumstantial evidence described by Ruppert.

I have said again and again that because Bush destroyed the physical evidence, that is our weak spot. Yet the 9/11 truth movement allows itself to be baited with articles like this. The way to deal with these debunkers is to sidestep this trap and confront them with what we already know. Ask them to provide a timeline that works (Bush hasn't been able to do it even after five years). Ask them to demonstrate that the multiple, simultaneous war games did not incapacitate air defenses. The debunkers ignore questions like these because they know that this is our strong area. It's just that we are not exploiting it. We are hitting the opposition with weak little jabs when we could be throwing a powerful left hook and closing in for the KO.

Instead what is happening is many people will read hit pieces like this and conclude that the 9/11 truth movement is a bunch of squirrels.

In conclusion: Let's stop allowing debunkers to exploit our weakness, and instead start hitting them in their weak spot.

There is some strong physical evidence

...
have a look at 911Mysteries, 2nd part 6m6s

There is clearly seen a series of explosions going from left to right of the building.

In a veeery ordered manner - could it be possible in a random, progressive collapse? - no way, not to such extent

And the most compelling evidence should be the fact that given this, molten metal, explosions heard
there still was no investigation of possible controlled demoliton.

The truth is here.

Use ALL the evidence

Motives and means PLUS physical evidence. It's a slam dunk! Also, put them on the defensive. Have them prove the "Official Story". Fat chance. The official story is a joke.

Establishment Lefties

are at the bottom of the outhouse hole as far as I'm concerned. I respect freepers far more than I respect these jellyfish. They will enjoy all the benefits of the hard work real patriots did over the last few years without lifting a finger. The patriots on the right who railed against the open borders have splintered the GOP enough to make them beatable in November that combined with the true antiwar crowd may give the house to the undeserving demohacks.

you respect freepers, who

you respect freepers, who not only support the lies of 9/11 but do NOTHING to protest the illegal war, illegal spying,torture, the pissing on the constitution by this administration etc. more than you repsect those that protest all of that except 9/11. yeah, thats not too irrational. so you would rather the republicans hold onto absolute power than the undeserving democrats? i understand your anger towards the democratic party and the leftwing media that ignores 9/11, but the right is much worse(plus the right OWNS the MSM) and to say you respect them more is ridiculous. the patriots on the right are virtually nonexistent. oh, they protested illegal immigrants? wow, what a noble cause. where were they when the president was taking a shit on the Constitution? who voted against the Patriot Act again? how many Dems and how many republicans? want me to spell it out for you? fuck both political parties, but seriously FUCK the republican party.

Okay, Everyone. I need some confirmation here.

I submitted the link for the new Sept. 11 WTC collapse footage that was released by the Drudge Report.

http://www.revver.com/view.php?id=59686

Do what I did, download the entire clip so that you have it locally, you'll need to go frame by frame and you don't want to depend on your browser. Blow it up as large as you can, I have a projector so mine's huge.

I mentioned that there are strange, small, white flashes visible during the second collapse. They aren't visible in the uncollapsed sections of the building (as it's falling), but actually in the part being "blown up". In other words look into the pyroclastic looking cloud part for the flashes. I'm not a professional, but they look almost exactly like the flashes happening here -
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8378726085939575248&q=controlled...

On the quicktime counter, look very carefully at counter time 19:47. Center left, upper portion of picture. Go frame by frame slow motion. There are many more of these flashes, but this small sequence seems like it's going horizontally on one floor. Guys and gals, this looks like something you might want to check out. Remember, enlarge the vid as much as possible.

To me, it appears as though they might have blown out the top of the building to make a giant cloud with which to cover up the charges going off underneath. What appears to be obscured by the pyroclastic cloud is actually still standing, for a brief moment. It seems to be this area that shows the flashes.

I'm very much a skeptic, but this is really got me worked up.

Please download and review!

cutter flashes

Yes, I was similarly "worked up" when I first took a hard look at this:
http://www.911Eyewitness.com/truth/downloads/spirefinish.wmv

The multiple flashes are even more visible in Siegel's clip.

Scottish engineer Gordon Ross explains their use here:
http://gordonssite.tripod.com/id2.html

Yes, you're right.

The clip you posted shows them even more clearly. Perhaps someone with some expertise could try to compile a defined timing sequence, so that we can prove that there was a concrete order to the flashes.

I'm guessing that the counter-arguments will be that it's electrical lines ripping out, or that it's shiny bits of metal suddenly reflecting the sunlight. BS, but I wouldn't put it past them.

I am really beginning to think that they blew off the tops to create a spectacular cover for the rest of the demolition charges. Only a few angles seemed to capture any of these flashes, and it seems like they're obscured even further if you were looking up from ground level, as most cameras were that day. Any more input on this (just please, no CGI people please).

stuartprovine

If you read Gordon's analysis you will see that he still needs help with screen captures of the core flashes for "phase 4".

Can you help?

His email is on the essay.

Is there any way to

Is there any way to authenticate that clip?

That is STUNNING.

Zembla Film destroys most MIHOP theories

Zembla film must have Loose Change, Scholars for 911 Truth and MIHOP believers just cringing at how easily it destroyed notions like "no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon" and the "Twin Towers" where brought down by controlled demolitions. The only things left where LIHOP theories and a controlled demolition of WTC7. The controlled demolition of WTC7 didn't cause mass murder, WTC7 was damaged anyway and it's demolition would cover up the LIHOP.

This must be a kick to the nuts for MIHOP belivers. I know it is for me.

and no link to this film just bloviating

not to mention an unverified account. Keep up the bad work you aren't hurting anyone but yourself.

It's at the top of the thread knuckle head.

Dutch program Zembla investigates 9/11 theories - streaming video

I posted that yesterday

I posted that yesterday already.
Mark's analysis is correct.

I watched the complete documentary.
It appears they're on our side, but it's a clear hit piece at the end with Students pointing out, that they feel deceived by "Loose Change".

This Zembla doku is also much more professional and self-confident than what PopMech + NIST together ever did.

I think, that the Delft/Zembla co-production works also into my prediction from some weeks ago, that the 9/11 media perps will "move" the investigation on 'controlled demolition' more and more to Europe (Delft, Edinburgh, etc...) to dry out the movement here and manipulate them more with domestic politics for the forthcoming election (Bowman etc..) or "more movies" (AJones) to win time for the globalist fascist planning of WW4/5.

http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=1036
incl. video link
http://cgi.omroep.nl/cgi-bin/streams?/tv/vara/zembla/bb.20060911.asf

On the bigger picture it was therefore no surprise to me, that MSM almost completely blackouted the protests in NYC. (With the old gatekeeper trick to have BBC break it first while only a few U.S. MSM showed some pieces of the protest., but merged it with anti-war drivel)

That was just done to reinforce the hunger in this movement and continue to "delay the truth".

The script is clear. They will rebuilt now their strategy on "how" to present this movement in the future:

As 'conspiracists' aka terrorists.
And that's how flagwavers like Meads (PopMech) and leftgatekeepers like Ferguson (Village Voice) have in common:

Their deceptive writing style will let people think, that a 'war' against those 'conspiracists' makes sense.

That's also why they play the Chavez card in MSM, who is already linked to BRICS incl. India, Russia and pending partner Iran, the very same front who are preparing WW4-5 for next year with the help of Goldman Sachs and Shanghai Cooperation Organisation.

http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?2617.60
Wargame + Terror Drill Watch 2006 (Pt.2)T

SCO anti-terror drill to take place in Russia
http://www.rbcnews.com/free/20060606153406.shtml

RBC, 06.06.2006, Moscow 15:34:06.A joint anti-terrorism exercise of Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) member states will be held in Russia in 2007, SCO Secretary-General Zhang Deguang told a video press conference today. The SCO is resolute in the matter of fighting terrorism, and does not only fight terrorism in words, but also in deed, he noted. Zhang Deguang stressed that the drill was not of a military nature, and was not directed against any country. He believes that if the SCO held no such exercises, it would turn from an effective organization into a "membership club". The time and place for the exercise are currently being decided, he added.
The SCO is formed of China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Mongolia, Pakistan, India and Iran are the organization's observer states..."

Also planned for 2007:
Cooperative Corp Thunder 07 (Sequel of July 06) which brings together 11 air force units from around the world, including the Untied States, Canada, Japan, Germany, Slovak Republic and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)...

absurd. these socalled

absurd.
these socalled "experts" are so stupid they belive one of the best buildings ever crumbled to dust by an airliner. ofcourse, the stupid arcitects didnt think of that happening to a 110story building...
also the demolition dude is ridiculous. he calims the "fire" meltet everything. is he an expert on metal chemistry also?
this smells!
none of the witnesses of bombs are mentioned.

LIHOP came and went while you were shilling for EMDI

Evil Muslims Did It

Of course they let it happen--they weren't about to deny Silverstein his multi billion dollar payout. Larry "boom boom" Silverstein PULLED IT off alright! With a little help from his friends in the neocon Pentagon fo shizzle.

Oh my oh my, who will tell the children?? Oh yeah... WE will. Have another kick in the nuts on me Mark!

Have fun in the salt mines!

RT
_

"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

You are right. Zembla is

You are right. Zembla is promoting some kind of weak LIHOP scenario and the dutch boards are being flooded with shills promoting this...to me it seems like a coordinated effort to steer the opinion to support this weak (unholdable) LIHOP stuff.

LIHOP = Last Ineffective Hope Of Perps

When I was trying to get my local "leftist" shills to push for 9/11 Truth, they dealt with me by having a group discussion where one defended the official story and another pretended to think that MAYBE they let it happen. Can't provide too many details but these are hard core professional shills, and that was their strategy about a year ago. Now that the shit is hitting the fan, seems every shill is getting the order to push LIHOP as a way to divide us. I don't know if they grossly miscalculated the appeal of LIHOP or if they just realize it's their last card to play in their "let's blame this on Muslims" grand strategy. Either way they will fail because LIHOP makes no sense whatsoever and besides, everyone who started with LIHOP ended up as a MIHOP. So really they are just buying time, whether or not that's how they see it. Problem for LIHOPPERS is that building 7, the Pentagon, and the controlled demolition of the towers are the clearest problems with the official story and LIHOP cannot account for any of them. But it's nice to see that they're this desperate. We have them on the run and they know it. This is the time to step up our visibility and voices for full-on MIHOP--the people are waking up, they're asking questions, they're coming up to me and saying "you know, I think you may be right..." The shills who come up to me are visibly agitated and upset. America loves a good scandal and this one is SO RIPE it's on the verge of exploding in orgasmic waves of truth and transformation. This is the time for all truthers to take it to the next level, to assume the leadership roles we have earned, to show the perpetrators--those who have repeatedly beaten and raped our beloved country--what real justice looks like.
_

"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

well put, LIHOP is indeed

well put, LIHOP is indeed the last refuge of the guilty. LIHOP will not get at those that pull the strings, only those that get their strings pulled(Rummy,Bush,Cheney,Myers etc.)

The Puppet Masters

You got that right Chris. The "Puppet Masters" want Bushco to take the fall and they will be left un-touched. Tarpley has stated this many times and I agree. MIHOP is the only thing. LIHOP is a waste of time.................................."Every Dog Has His Day"............................Our day is at hand!

haha

what are u calling facts here? 3 knuckleheads claiming they measured the energy req. to take down the building with NO info whatsoever? and a landing wheel and a rotor at pentagon? lol
the pieces could have been planted. animated. and for all we know it could have been a small plane. NOT 757.
this demolition expert clearly has no understanding of how well made these structures are. jetfuel meltet all 47 halv a meter thick coloums? HAHA!

Some statistics

Some interesting web stats around this sept. 11:

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=911blogger.com
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=911truth.org

Try other truth sites too, many of them show a huge spike in activity.

well, yeah, the server crashed yesterday

in case you didn't try and visit in the evening.

Demo Expert

I started a blog for the Danny Jowenko story here:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/2807

"I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." -Thomas Jefferson

Sad, but had they taken a

Sad, but had they taken a U.S. controlled demolition expert, he would have parroted that WTC7 fell from fire, because Bush says so.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/controlled_demolition_expert_and...

The smart thing about the

The smart thing about the Danny Jowenko story is that they didn't tell him in advance the story about WTC 7. I did the same thing in an interview with Dr. Heinemeyer (civil engineering) from the Technical University in Aachen, Germany and his first reaction was the same too, that it must have been a controlled demolition.

That's how the cover-up

That's how the cover-up works (or worked): something happens and then telling people what to think, over and over again. Now the P.M. book tries to do it about WTC7 and the other things we used to thing freely about.

WOW that was POWERFUL!!!!!

He said it clear as day "yes that is controlled demolition!"

WOW..just wow :0)

I just believe he doesnt understand how they can blow the towers from the impact zones...and neither do i. But we all know the impossibilities of floors pancaking near free-fall speed + molten metal + pulverization of concrete + steel members partially disentgrated....

I thought Rick Sigel was crazy about his mini nuke but..now im starting to think again...how could they have a plane impact without charges going off early due to the fire????

good question: how to demolish the WTC?

I'd be very interested in a study of how the WTC would have been demolished with a controlled demolition, if it had been done 'naturally', and without the asbestos making it problematic. - Would it have looked like what we saw? or would it have been demolished from ground up, not top down?

well

since this attack is fake, it demolition of wtc couldnt be from the bottom up. ofcourse it had to fall from where the aircarft hit. thats why it topples over. and ofcourse its possible!

this dutch demo guy clearly has no idea how to do that, so he comes with the same lame jetfuel explanation...
the funniest thing about the whole documentary is the 2 jerks with a laptop saying a 757 hit pentagon according to 3 pictures ho-ho.

I'm not feeling that "9/11

That protest footage from ground zero with Alex Jones is POW-ER-FUL, so inspiring!!!!!

Bottom to top riskier?

Wouldn't it be actually riskier to demolish very tall buildings from the bottom up?

If something went wrong, they could easily topple. On the other hand, when demolishing them from top to bottom, something going wrong where the explosions are taking place would only result in (parts of) the top sections toppling, while the larger intact structure below would remain standing.

Perhaps WTC 7 was so much shorter than the Twin Towers that it lent itself easier to the traditional approach.

Just enlightened guesses...

This is a quick demonstration

of just how easy it is to expose apologists like Rothschild, from a longer ironic "appreciation" I emailed to The Progressive:

“The building was designed for a fire duration of no more than about three hours,” says Corley. “Eight hours was way more than what that building was designed for.” (Corley, by the way, also headed up the investigation of the Murrah Building’s collapse in Oklahoma City.)
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/ok_city1.wmv

Where DID those local reporters get their wild, wacky info?

Dr. Steven Jones Petition

I'm promoting a petition to BYU in support of Dr. Jones. Please sign it and spread it. Thanks!
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/525834923
Also, feel free to contact me about how to spread this very widely. Thanks!
harmonicrat@yahoo.com
The Harmonicratic political party is in favor of harmony amoung all the people of the earth and between humanity and the environment. This begins with the Truth of 9/11.

LIHOP?!?! NOT WITH WTC7

my thing about the zembla film is that admitting that WTC7 was a controlled demo, extinguishes all LIHOP. cause they MADE wtc7 HAPPEN

Hook Me Up...

With this very lovely woman.
___________________________________

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

And know...

Ms. Lovely Woman that I have nothing but respect for your efforts on the anniversary. ;)
___________________________________

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

i'll second that. 9/11 truth

i'll second that. 9/11 truth savvy and dark hair, just my type, haha.

Wouldn't you rather like Ann

Wouldn't you rather like Ann Coulter? Neocon's special offering.

HAHA, i dont think so, she

HAHA, i dont think so, she most certaintly isnt my type.

Thanks for the links

Thanks for all the links. Not to much I didn't already know but there is still a lot of people to convince.

HERE'S AN IDEA

To all the non believers,skeptics,and the like.
Let's end this BS. Tell our goverment to release ALL videos,photos,tapes,and eyewitness accounts.
Also tell your so called experts to debate ours on national tv.
Let the chips fall.