Patriots Question 9/11

A great new website has just been launched called "Patriots Question 9/11", at

Subtitled "Senior Military, Intelligence, and Government Critics of 9/11 Commission Report", the website layout is appealing for traditional American sensibilities.

It also contains links to hard-to-find source materials, such as former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland's statements that "It is a national scandal" and "If this decision stands [to limit access to White House documents], I, as a member of the commission, cannot look any American in the eye, especially family members of victims, and say the commission had full access. This investigation is now compromised."

Send your more traditional friends, family members, and colleagues to this new site

Thanks to Fred Burks for the heads up.

Can anyone add to patriotsquestion911 people?

I already wrote to Alan Miller with suggestions of people to add...


Wikipedia listing

David Schippers
Cynthia McKinney
Daniel Ellsburg
John Buchanan
John Newman
Peter Dale Scott (former diplomat)
Ron Paul ?

Capt. May

Alfons and the crew at Veterans for 911 truth

Anyone have anymore to add?

Just off the top of my head.

Weldon and Christianson are already there

Big D, check out the site.
They are already there....

Howard Dean?

He's made some comments that "Bush Knew"

"There's a shadow on the faces of the men who send the guns to the wars that are fought in places where their business interest runs."

He Has? Can you

provide a link?

Anyone Seen This Yet?

"Nonlethal weapons such as high-power microwave devices should be used on American citizens in crowd-control situations before being used on the battlefield, the Air Force secretary said Tuesday.

The object is basically public relations. Domestic use would make it easier to avoid questions from others about possible safety considerations, said Secretary Michael Wynne.

"If we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation," said Wynne. "(Because) if I hit somebody with a nonlethal weapon and they claim that it injured them in a way that was not intended, I think that I would be vilified in the world press.""

Definitely going in my M.O. Archive for any Sheep that doubt or Military would do such things.

"Non lethal weapons..."

I know! Serious crowd control, anyone? At least they're non-lethal (or they're meant to to be, anyway.)
Still, I've never heard of military planning quite like that. "You know, we really should use these new weapons on our own civilian population first, just to make it fair..."

Bush just said...

That it is not unpatriotic to question him.

"There's a shadow on the faces of the men who send the guns to the wars that are fought in places where their business interest runs."

Morgan Reynolds

I'm a little uneased about Morgan Reynolds (no-plane theory, ridiculous attack on Steven E. Jones with Judy Wood) being a member of this group! Any comments?

Thomas (DK)

People have complained

People have complained lately about Phil Berg too

"There's a shadow on the faces of the men who send the guns to the wars that are fought in places where their business interest runs."

Legal Subterfuge - Phil

Legal Subterfuge - Phil Berg's Lawsuit On Behalf Of Ellen Mariani

One of the many reasons why I don't trust Jim Fetzer is because shortly after Fetzer burst onto the 9/11 scene, he was with Phil Berg at some Capitol or Judicial building. I think it was during the Moussaui trial. They held a press conference outside about why 9/11 was an inside job. I had read about Phil Berg's fraudulent lawsuits approximately a year prior to that 2006 press conference that had Fetzer and Berg together with a few other "truthers".

Go to the above link and read it. I would post the pic of Fetzer and Berg if I knew what to search under online. But I don't recall the exact date or place that they were together. Anyone else who's been paying attention will remember what I'm talking about.

Phil Berg = Fraud. Soon after Jim Fetzer burst onto the 9/11 scene, he was with Phil Berg in a very public press thing, all buddy buddy together standing side by side like two scam artists. Coincidence? I doubt it.



I have to agree, but...

I have to agree, but for the patriotsquestion911 intended audience, I think he should be there....

People new to the movement can form their own opinions about him...


All aspects of the truth are consistent

This is exciting

This is the most exciting compiling of names and bios and quotes i've seen. Kinda makes it hard to ignore.

i love that site. it could

i love that site. it could use some more names, but regardless, what a great idea. Bushs speech was revolting. i sometimes forget how disrespectful and condescending he is.

seen this site

seen this site yet?:

Please don't forget to digg this story

Sometimes, I have the feeling that only a few of us are having a digg account, but it is extremely important to promote stories regarding the 9/11 truth movement.

Please make sure to create an account and digg 9/11 truth stories. Digg is highly influential!

Some other stories to digg:

Not that active anymore :-( :

I can't believe that most of the stories only get 20-30 diggs.

Great site!

Great site! I will start using it as my primary link to push on forums and blogs. Seeing former defence ministers, military officers and other high-level officials agree with you really takes away their "crazy" argument.

even though he's an NPT also... david shayler?

just a thought.

It's not clear to me exactly

It's not clear to me exactly what the criteria are for inclusion on the list but the 162 names here seem like good candidates. Some are already included. Some that are not that I think should be are Daniel Ellsberg and Howard Zinn.

Great stuff.

Great stuff.

I see christison and Kwiatkowski, I've read their excellent articles for years at counterpunch.

Recently, we had a hit piece from Cockburn calling 911 truthers nuts.

So, the prominent members on this site are nuts? Permit me to laugh.

The leftgatekeepers have showed their true colors. I recently read a hit piece by Raimondo, who I used to admire.

Chomsky, Cockburn, Raimondo etc are exposed...

PS: Amy Goodman deserve some kudos.

i agree, Goodman gets raked

i agree, Goodman gets raked pretty bad around here, and she does deserve credit for hosting a debate in which she let the Loose Change guys speak pretty openly. wish it would have been longer though.

Goodman not there yet

Amy Goodman has got a LONG WAY to go before she regains any credibility in my eyes. I have too many friends who scoff at 911 Truth because they believe in the left gatekeepers.

One thing Barry Zwicker said this week in DC - Many of the left gatekeepers support the Oswald killed Kennedy bullshit, and they don't question the MLK or the Bobby Kennedy murders either. This could be their achilles heel.

i said shes deserves credit

i said shes deserves credit for hosting the debate and not interjecting. i totally agree with your point that she basically doesnt have credibility(though she is right on many issues). left gatekeepers have the same fear as the right and the MSM when it comes to fear of being branded a "conspiracy theorist", no matter how credible the evidence for inside involvement is.