Protecting the 9/11 Patsies

Protecting the 9-11 Patsies: Order W199I-WF-213589

The following is a collection of links related to W199I; a presidential directive forcing the FBI to "back off" the
bin Laden family in pre-911 terrorism investigations.

US agents told to "back off" Bin Ladens (ANANOVA)

Bush Thwarted FBI probe against Bin Ladens (AFP)

FBI told to "back off" investigating Bin Laden family before the attacks on Sept. 11th: BBC Newsnight Video

Has someone been sitting on the FBI? BBC Newsnight transcript

Bush took FBI Agents off bin Laden family trail (TIMES OF INDIA)

FBI claims Bin Laden inquiry was frustrated (LONDON GUARDIAN)

FBI 'was told to back off bin Laden family' (SYDNEY MORNING HERALD)

Another FBI Agent Blows the Whistle on 9-11

FBI agent: I was stymied in terror probe

Whistleblower Complains of FBI Obstruction

Judicial Watch press conference featuring special FBI agent Robert Wright - impeded from terrorist investigations

Scandal Inside the FBI: Did G-Men Miss the Boat on 9-11?



FBI Lawyer Tells of Terror 'Roadblock'

Minneapolis agent says FBI headquarters rewrote requests for search warrants for Moussaoui

Agent Claims FBI Supervisor Thwarted Probe

Agent blasts FBI over 11 September 'cover-up'

Angry FBI agents joked about al Qaeda mole at HQ

Another FBI Agent Blows the Whistle - New evidence that the Bureau quashed another terror probe before 9/11

FBI Agent: Bureau Prevented Terror Probe

The ignored warning: FBI officer prevented from prosecuting future 9/11 hijacker

Another FBI Agent Blows the Whistle


Click below for Full Text! deletes deletes comment posts that deal with 911 being an inside job...everyone who visits that site should address this with a barrage of truth.

I just checked my comment on the anthrax blog yesterday

it was still there.

agreed. i have a long

agreed. i have a long standing battle with C&L. im currently banned. they are SHAMELESS.

Youtube vid about bush-saudi ties...

I haven't seen this nutil now, but I'm sure it's been around for a long time...

Really shows a lot about the bin laden / bush relationship.

very good.

The Fake bin Laden Video Tape

From: Nashid Abdul-Khaaliq
To: aplacefortruth
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:33 PM
Subject: [APFT] The Fake bin Laden Video Tape

The Fake bin Laden Video Tape

A videotape purportedly showing Osama bin Laden confessing to the 9/11 attacks was made public on December 13, 2001:

The tape bore a label indicating it was made on November 9. Administration officials wouldn't reveal exactly how or when they got it, except to say it was found in a house in Jalalabad after anti-Taliban forces moved in. [Online NewsHour]

The videotape was supposedly physically located.

The size of a standard VHS videotape is 7.5 inches wide by 4.2 inches deep by 1 inch high - if you look in a video cabinet you'll see they're not very big. The satellite photograph on the right shows Jalalabad - it is very big and it contains a lot of buildings (not all single storey).

Don't you find it somewhat fortuitous that a very small video tape of Osama confessing to the 9/11 attacks was found in this very big city? Were squads of video watchers sent in to view every tape found just in case one showed Osama confessing?
Here's what was said of the "lucky find": Satellite photo of Jalalabad.
Population ~150,000

Click for full sized image

"For those who see this tape, they'll realise that not only is he guilty of incredible murder, he has no conscience and no soul, that he represents the worst of civilisation, " said President George W Bush.
US Senator Ron Wyden, who has also seen the tape, says he hopes it will remove suspicions in countries such as Pakistan that the 11 September attacks were an Israeli plot aimed at drawing the US into a war with Islamic countries. [BBC News]

The video was very effective in diverting media attention away from the deportation of five Israelis who danced as the twin towers burned - "Osama" certainly picks his moments to appear.

Details of the videotape - includes full video and transcript.

A German TV show found that the White House's translation of the video was inaccurate and "manipulative" . Bin Laden even praised two live 'hijackers' - Wail M. Alshehri and Salem Alhazmi. Why didn't he know the names of hijackers he personally chose?

The quality of the video was very poor and the authenticity of the tape was questioned. This annoyed President Bush:

"It is preposterous for anybody to think that this tape is doctored," he said during a brief photo opportunity with the prime minister of Thailand. "That's just a feeble excuse to provide weak support for an incredibly evil man." [CNN]

To be perfectly honest it is preposterous to suggest this videotape could be authentic, but lets have a look at it anyway. Here's 5 Osamas - which is the odd one out?

Even Mr Magoo would have to say that Osama 'E' stands out like a sore thumb, and this is the man confessing on the "lucky find" tape. Between the nose and the cheeks it is clear that this man is NOT Osama.

In the video Osama 'E' appears to write notes with his right hand, yet the FBI's description of Osama indicates he is left-handed. Osama 'E' wears a ring on his right hand which does not appear on other confirmed photos of Osama (e.g. Osama 'B').
Another man is seen wearing a large gold ring in the video. Since the wearing of gold rings is forbidden by Islam it shows neither he nor Osama 'E' has any devotion to this faith.

On December 27, 2001, a second video containing the pale skinned and very real Osama 'C' was broadcast on al Jazeera.

The "Gaunt Tape," so named because bin Laden is haggard and doesn't move his left arm, is believed to have been recorded around Nov. 19, 2001. In the tape, bin Laden refers to the U.S. bombing of a mosque in Khost "several days" earlier. The U.S. bombed a mosque in Khost on Nov. 16. Bin Laden does not move his left arm and his appearance is both gaunt and pale. [MSNBC]

So, this tape was made around ten days after the "lucky find" tape was reportedly made. Are we to believe that Osama's skin, hair and beard changed color in ten days?
The broadcast of the tape caught the US government completely off-guard:

The recording was dismissed by the Bush administration ... as sick propaganda possibly designed to mask the fact the al-Qa'eda leader was already dead. "He could have made the video and then ordered that it be released in the event of his death," said one White House aide. [Telegraph]

This was a very telling response.

Also, his comments caused quite a stir because because they contradicted the "confession" video:

American officials argued that bin Laden's frequent references to US support for Israel were a bogus justification for his terrorism because in the "dinner party" tape of a private conversation there was no mention of the Middle East. [Telegraph]

This is very odd indeed because in bin Laden's September 28, 2001 denial of involvement in the 9/11 attacks he had plenty to say about the US and Israel:

This system is totally in control of the American-Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is clear that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the U.S. is not uttering a single word. [Public Action]
And his views were the same in 1998:
"We say to the Americans as people and to American mothers, if they cherish their lives and if they cherish their sons, they must elect an American patriotic government that caters to their interests, not the interests of the Jews." [American Free Press]

Not only do the real Osama and the "lucky find" Osama look totally different, they also write with different hands and have different faiths and priorities.

It does not get any more obvious than this.

There is clearly good reason to doubt the November 9 tape. There is excessive noise on the audio track, making it impossible to really hear what is being said. Given that the tape was recorded in an area supposedly devoid of audio urban signature, there should have been little ambient noise, yet the speech is masked with a great deal of noise.

But there are very good reasons to suspect that the tape is not what the US Government claims it to be. In the tape, Osama supposedly states that he knew of the attack on the WTC 5 days in advance, yet we know from the preparations inside the United States that the plan had been in existence for much longer than that. The records of those flight schools where the hijackers supposedly trained have been confiscated under the watchful eye of Jeb Bush, Governor of Florida and brother to the President. Will the Bush administration now claim that the hijackers learned to fly a passenger jet in just 5 days?

Likewise, The translation of the Osama tape has him stating that the hijackers did not know they were about to die, yet letters the FBI claim to have found written by the hijackers indicate the exact opposite.

Finally, this was not the first video tape claiming to show Osama confessing, and claims made in the earlier "confession" tape, including a claim that Osama had nukes, were created by the translator, not actually stated by Osama.

This never-to-be- seen video also appeared right on cue:

Emergency powers to imprison suspected international terrorists indefinitely using special closed courts will be announced this week. The measure, which will require exemption from human rights legislation, will be used to round up about 20 suspects hiding in Britain beyond the reach of existing laws. [Telegraph 11/11/2001]

Even hard line secular Pakistanis were unconvinced by the released bin Laden video tape. Iqbal Haider, a former senator from the party of ousted prime minister Benazir Bhutto, said he found it hard to believe that bin Laden would allow himself to be filmed confessing to the crime. "It is hard to believe that a man who masterminds the September attacks with such secrecy and finesse could be that stupid and imprudent," he said. "I hate Osama and the Taliban because they inflicted incalculable damage on Muslims ... but it is hard to digest that he can be such a fool."

When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden's Most Wanted web page, [Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI] said, "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11." ... The Muckraker Report attempted to secure a reference to the U.S. government authenticating the Bin Laden "confession video", to no avail. However, it is conclusive that the Bush Administration and U.S. Congress, along with the dead stream media, played the video as if it was authentic. So why doesn't the FBI view the "confession video" as hard evidence? [Muckraker Report]

You are being lied to by the US Government. They are using deception to trick you into surrendering your freedoms, money, and the lives of your children for a phony "War On Terror".

"Strive as in a race to achieve the
goal of excellence in all that you do."

We must be the change we wish to see in the world. M Gandhi


Any chance of getting this on the main page?

New doc re London Bombings:

Outstanding Documentary

Looks like the Brits are in the same position we are in. Having lived in London for a few years, I'd be surprised if they have many cops who are aware of the government's complicity. Still if this doco is indicative of the quality of the work of the truth movement I think they'll win.

It's obvious, the Cockburns are in it too.

The question; did the G-men miss the boat?
Answer; No..they weren't allowed to board it
Question; Why were the Bin Ladens given such protections?
Answer; Osama's a bad boy and makes a perfect patsy
Question; what safe haven is there for whistleblowers?
Answer ; We the people keeping the pressure on, full force
Question; What is the most promising avenue of approach to get that independant investigation going?
Answer; Possibly Hugo Chavez. No matter what a person thinks of this guy, He hates Bush, and believes 9/11 was an inside job AND would get major media coverage(I realize the MSM would paint him as crazy).
Question; Was 9/11 an inside job?
Answer; At the minimum it was a collaboration, the intense resistance met at all points looking for the truth, shows it is a major coverup.
Solution; Expose the media

OT....Michael Zebhur and Webster Tarpley...

Does anyone know what relationship Michael Zebhur had to Webster Tarpley and his book 9/11 SYNTHETIC TERROR?

Michael Zebhur

I have heard Tarpley say that he thinks Michael was murdered because of his work on 911. He was working with Prof. Judy Wood, who is often seen in the company of Morgan Reynolds. Her willingness to continue to make public presentations about the destruction of the World Trade Center, despite the murder of her assistant ought to be sufficient to get those people in the movement who call her a disinfo agent to shut the hell up.

Lucky Larry

This new site is a little different.I wanted to send this in as a main article.It was sent to me from a friend in Canada...............

911 warnings put out by U.S. gov in first place?

Why did the U.S. Government ignore the warnings of a terrorist attack in the United States before 9/11/2001?

Maybe because the warnings came from them in the first place.

Consider the possibility that evidence compiled by investigative journalists is true, and that factions within the U.S. government committed the crimes of 9/11/01. They were out to conquer oil-rich Arab lands, and they needed an acceptable excuse to launch an attack. They had their Mohammed Atta patsies lined up --- and they protected them from investigation --- as world-wide surveillance picked up evidence that Al Qaeda was planning an attack.

Phony radio transmissions have been used to frame targeted countries before, for example in 1986 before the U.S. bombed Libya. The following excerpt of a magazine article tells the story.

Washington Report on Middle East Affairs,
OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 1999, pages 22-23,
The Israeli Deception That Led to the Bombing of Pan American Flight 103 Over Lockerbie, Scotland
by Richard H. Curtiss

. . . The manner in which Israel's Mossad tricked the U.S. into attacking Libya was described in detail by former Mossad case worker Victor Ostrovsky in The Other Side of Deception, the second of two revealing books he wrote after he left Israel's foreign intelligence service. The story began in February 1986, when Israel sent a team of navy commandos in miniature submarines into Tripoli to land and install a "Trojan," a six-foot-long communications device, in the top floor of a five-story apartment building. The device, only seven inches in diameter, was capable of receiving messages broadcast by Mossad's LAP (LohAma Psicologit-psychological warfare or disinformation section) on one frequency and automatically relaying the broadcasts on a different frequency used by the Libyan government.

The commandos activated the Trojan and left it in the care of a lone Mossad agent in Tripoli who had leased the apartment and who had met them at the beach in a rented van."By the end of March, the Americans were already intercepting messages broadcast by the Trojan," Ostrovsky writes.

"Using the Trojan, the Mossad tried to make it appear that a long series of terrorist orders were being transmitted to various Libyan embassies around the world," Ostrovsky continues. As the Mossad had hoped, the transmissions were deciphered by the Americans and construed as ample proof that the Libyans were active sponsors of terrorism. What's more, the Americans pointed out, Mossad reports confirmed it.

"The French and the Spanish, though, were not buying into the new stream of information. To them it seemed suspicious that suddenly, out of the blue, the Libyans, who had been extremely careful in the past, would start advertising their future actions…The French and the Spanish were right. The information was bogus."

Ostrovsky, who is careful in what he writes, does not blame Mossad for the bombing, only a couple of weeks after the Trojan was installed, of La Belle Discothèque in West Berlin, which cost the lives of two American soldiers and a Turkish woman. But he convincingly documents the elaborate Mossad operation built around the Trojan, which led the U.S. to blame Libya for the bombing of the Berlin nightclub frequented by U.S. soldiers. The plot was given added credibility since it took place at a time when Qaddafi had "closed" the airspace over the Gulf of Sidra to U.S. aircraft, and then suffered the loss of two Libyan aircraft trying to enforce the ban, which were shot down by carrier-based U.S. planes.

A Prompt Reaction

The U.S. reacted promptly to the attack on the Berlin nightclub. On April 16, 1986 it sent U.S. aircraft from a base in England and from two U.S. carriers in the Mediterranean to drop more than 60 tons of bombs on Qaddafi's office and residence in the Bab al Azizia barracks, less than three blocks from the apartment containing the Trojan transmitter, and on military targets in and around the two Libyan cities. Some of the U.S. missiles and bombs went astray, inflicting damage on residential buildings, including the French Embassy in Tripoli. The planes flying from England were forced to skirt both French and Spanish airspace, and one of them, a U.S. F-111, was shot down over Tripoli, killing the two American crew members.

"Operation Trojan was one of the Mossad's greatest successes," Ostrovsky writes. "It brought about the air strike on Libya that President Reagan had promised--- a strike that had three important consequences. First, it derailed a deal for the release of the American hostages in Lebanon, thus preserving the Hezbollah as the number one enemy in the eyes of the West. Second, it sent a message to the entire Arab world, telling them exactly where the United States stood regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict. Third, it boosted the Mossad's image of itself, since it was they who, by ingenious sleight of hand, had prodded the United States to do what was right. . .