Translation of "Largest Newspaper in Switzerland asks if Bush was behind 9-11"


Now also Swiss say:
“The more we research, the more doubt we”
15.09.2006 | 12:03: 15

ZURICH - 2973 humans died with the notices of 9/11. “Bin Laden” and “aluminium Kaida”, the Bush clan cried. The world believed him. In the meantime even scientists doubt the Bush version. Also Swiss university University of Albert A. Stahel (63) and Daniele Ganser (34) place now hot questions.

“Something is correct not”, says strategy expert Stahel in the “world week” and refers to the “incomplete” official 9/11-Report of the US Government of 2004.

In relation to VIEW the university professor confirms the criticism:

Osama Ben Laden cannot be “the large godfather” behind the notices. It did not have enough means of communication.

Stahel doubts that a passenger airline cracked in the Pentagon: “For flight beginners it is actually impossible to meet the building so exactly.”

Seven hours after the twin Towers beside it the World trade center 7 collapsed. The official version: It burned for a long time. Stahel: “Nothing at all is clear.”

Still as Stahel historian Daniele Ganser, its colleague at the University of Zurich continues to go. Also it calls the official US version “a conspiracy theory”: “There are 3 theories, which we should treat equally”:

# “Surprise theory” Bin Laden and Al Kaida implemented the notices.

# “Let it intentionally happen” parts of the US Government knew the aluminum dock since plans. They did not react, in order to legitimize a series from wars to.

# “Lead it intentionally out” the notices by the Pentagon and/or secret services were implemented. The being shop videos are falsified. 3000 humans were sacrificed for strategic interests.

Ganser: “The more we research, the we doubt more of Bush version.” For it it is conceivable that the Bush government was responsible. “Bush lied already so much! And already 1962 gave it in the Pentagon a plan to sacrifice innocent US citizens for own interests.” As far as Ganser Stahel does not go: “I place only questions.”

Translation Corrections

Problem no. I help your appreciate.