Wayne Madsen Report

A couple of articles you may have missed, lots more available at the following site:


Sept. 13, 2006 -- The "Left Gatekeepers" came in for stringent criticism at the 911 Truth conference in New York on Sept. 10. The so-called liberal "progressive" movement is rife with those who proclaim their opposition to the Iraq War while debunking its root cause -- the highly compartmentalized covert operation that led to the 911 attacks in order to bring about the Project for the New American Century "New Pearl Harbor" agenda of a global American empire and a fascist regime here at home. Speaker after speaker commented on these "left gatekeepers" and their magazines, web sites, and radio networks disguised as "progressive" and "liberal." WMR has identified many of these gatekeepers in the past. Craig Hill, the Green candidate for the U.S. Senate from Vermont is challenging one "left gatekeeper," Independent "Socialist" Bernie Saunders who is running for the Senate with the intention of caucusing with the Democrats in the absence of an official Democratic candidate. Hill contends that Saunders is a left gatekeeper who will not investigate 911 further and endorsed a future U.S. military attack on Iran. For that reason, WMR heartily endorses Craig Hill for the U.S. Senate from Vermont. The "left gatekeepers" must be thrown out of Congress along with the neo-cons.

Sept. 12, 2006 -- According to sources who worked with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) at Ground Zero on and after 911, residents of southern Manhattan and rescue and clean-up workers involved in the recovery operations at the site of the former World Trade Center are experiencing an unusually high rate of non-Hodgkin lymphoma -- a cancer that is common among individuals who have been exposed to extremely high levels of ionizing radiation, such as that from nuclear blasts and major nuclear reactor leaks. In addition to the respiratory problems among rescue workers at Ground Zero who breathed toxic "pulverized" concrete and other debris into their lungs, the radiation cancer is of extreme interest to researchers who suspect that the World Trade Center towers and Building 7 were brought down with the help of high energy releases. WMR spoke to a number of individuals who were at Ground Zero on 911 who are now experiencing symptoms resulting from severe damage to their immune systems -- a condition that is common among those exposed to high levels of radiation.

Sources close to FEMA in New York confirmed to WMR that the lymphoma cases are believed to be the result of a release of extremely high levels of radiation from a series of nuclear events on the morning of 911. They believe that explains the reason for the "pulverization" of concrete, molten metals, pyroclastic surges and fallout, and other anomalies resulting from the catastrophe. It was also pointed out that some vehicles parked on the west side of the World Trade Center were "fused" on the sides facing the towers -- the doors being melted into the body frames. Other cars parked nearby were not similarly affected. There is also evidence of explosions and fires on top of the Woolworth Building, three blocks away from the World Trade Center, during the attack on the towers.

FEMA officials from Washington, DC were quick to ban any unofficial photography in southern Manhattan in the weeks following 911. Any photographers who had not received prior permission from FEMA to be in southern Manhattan found their photographic and filming equipment confiscated by the government.


If there had been explosions

If there had been explosions and fires on top of the Woolworth Building, wouldn't the damage have been obvious on 9/12, 9/13, etc. when the WTC smoke cleared?

I recall hearing nothing from anyone who looked up and noted the explosion and fire damage.


Ive been told in no uncertian terms that Wayne Madsen is "BUUULLLLSHIT". So I've been hesitant to site any of his stuff. I take it that has not been your experience Jon?

I meant SBG not Jon.

I meant SBG not Jon.

Bernie Sanders

I gotta say that I am shocked to hear the claim that Bernie Sanders would advocate invading Iran. This just does not sound like the Bernie Sanders I am familiar with at all.

i agree, i would have to see

i agree, i would have to see some proof of that claim to believe it myself.