The Dollar$ & $en$e Of 911

The Dollar$ & $en$e Of 911

By Douglas Herman

"Behind every great fortune there is a great crime."

Who benefitted most by the New York Massacre? Millions were invested before the attack. Hundreds of millions were made the same day. Neither crime received much attention by the US government. Perhaps because friends of the US government stood to gain billions of dollars, in the following years. Trillions eventually will change hands, simply because a great crime was never properly investigated.

Behind every great crime lies a great fortune.

Remember those Put Options? "The identity of this person who had foreknowledge of the attack is known and this person's identity is being protected by our government and this is a fact! Period, end of story," reported Jesse Richard, editor of A few years ago, TNL carried the definitive argument against the official version of 9-11: All The Proof You Need--Two Moves to Checkmate.

"Try to purchase some stock, or some futures, a mutual fund or some put options, without providing your identity. Go ahead and try it! See if you get anywhere. Find out what happens when you tell the investment firm that you want to make a huge investment anonymously. It can't be done.

"Then ask yourself this question: How could someone have placed anonymous put options on American Airlines and United Airlines just prior to the attacks of 9/11? Then ask yourself why no one has investigated this suspicious deal. Ask yourself why there has been no attempt by the US government to identify the person who anticipated huge profits from a disaster that was yet to occur. Is it because the trail possibly leads to the CIA?

Millions of dollars in such options were placed. If the perpetrators had been Islamic terrorists or fellow plotters, wouldn't Americans have heard by now? Logically then, the co-conspirators were high officials in banking, finance or tied to the US government.

How embarassing for the US government and the mainstream media if those who sought to profit from the massacre of nearly 3,000 people were Americans? Curiously, neither the US government nor the media chooses to investigate, thus implicating them both in the plot.

Not surprisingly, the CIA occupied offices in the WTC-7, which mysteriously fell down. Wrote Richard: "Larry Silverstein invested $386 million in WTC 7. On 9/11, by his own admission, Larry Silverstein ordered the demolition of his building (for all intents and purposes a highly secure,US government building). In February of 2002, his company won a settlement of $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers."

In any great crime---except this one---the Justice Department and the local police officials would work tirelessly to find and punish the mass murderers. Instead they have relied on circumstantial evidence (fuzzy videotapes of OBL, Korans, charred passport) that would be laughed out of any honest court in the land. If one could be found.

Behind every great crime are great criminals who planned it well.

Remarkable, Brilliant, Cunning. Diabolical. Those words best describe the masterminds and the crime. Except for a few flaws--like those Put Options--probably placed by a greedy co-conspirator, 9-11 was the Perfect Crime. Because it masqueraded as an act of terrorism, few questioned the billions, dare I say trillions, in profits that continue to accumulate today.

Like the hundreds of millions of dollars in gold and silver that reportedly disappeared from beneath the imploded WTC-7. Here stood a stout steet US government building, recently purchased, that inexplicably fell down from a few fires. Remarkable. Down below, far below street level, a vault containing hundreds of millions in gold was pillaged in the seven hours between the first strike and the collapse of WTC-7.

Was the cunning, insider, masterplan to hijack the gold while Islamic terrorists carried out their suicide plot? Sounds believable, doesn't it? Only one problem. For the hijackers to escape and cover their tracks, they would need to blow the building. Which fell seven hours after the Twin Towers. As mentioned, the building housed the secret spy organization, the CIA, most adept at diabolical deeds and monitoring Al Qaeda.

Continued... - Thanks, Carol.

Reasons for 10 Bush admin. to change a lightbulb...

How many members of the Bush administration does it take to change a light bulb?

1. One to deny that a light bulb needs to be changed;

2. One to attack the patriotism of anyone who says the light bulb needs to be changed;

3. One to blame Clinton for burning out the light bulb;

4. One to arrange the invasion of a country rumored to have a secret stockpile of light bulbs;

5. One to give a billion dollar no-bid contract to Halliburton for the new light bulb;

6. One to arrange a photograph of Bush, dressed as a janitor, standing on a step ladder under the banner: Light Bulb Change Accomplished;

7. One administration insider to resign and write a book documenting in detail how Bush was literally in the dark;

8. One to viciously smear #7;

9. One surrogate to campaign on TV and at rallies on how George Bush has had a strong light-bulb-changing policy all along;

10. And finally one to confuse Americans about the difference between screwing a light bulb and screwing the country.



F*in hilarious Ronnied, made my day!

That last one is the mainstream media, yes?

"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

The Mother Of All Lies

Check this one out truth seekers. Barbara Olson's "Phone Call" From Flight 77

Pentagon report to refute pre-9/11 intel claim (Able Danger)

via AP
Updated: 34 minutes ago

A new Pentagon report knocks down the idea that a secret military unit had garnered intelligence a year before the Sept. 11 attacks that might have stopped the hijackers, a senior defense official said Thursday.

Lawmakers were supposed to be briefed Thursday on the Defense Department inspector general’s report, and officials hoped to post a redacted version of the report on the Pentagon’s Web site as early as Thursday afternoon, two officials said. The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the report had not yet been released, declined to provide further details about the study’s conclusions.

The report was ordered following the assertion that four of the 19 hijackers were identified in 2000 by a classified military intelligence unit known as “Able Danger.”

The claim was made by a former intelligence officer who worked on Able Danger, Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, and by Rep. Curt Weldon, a Pennsylvania Republican and vice chairman of the House Armed Services and Homeland Security committees.

Weldon said the unit used data mining to link ringleader Mohammed Atta and three other hijackers to al-Qaida more than a year before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Weldon said the intelligence unit wanted the information given to the FBI, but that Pentagon lawyers rejected the recommendation.

The Pentagon has previously acknowledged that some employees recall seeing an intelligence chart identifying Atta as a terrorist before the attacks.

John Tomaszewski, Weldon’s press secretary, said they have been told the report’s release was imminent.

Lets see if they can refute

Lets see if they can refute cheney's claim that NSA spying prior to 9/11 could have averted the attacks if they were allowed to do so

Tuesday, December 20, 2005
Nationwide spying could have averted 9/11: Cheney

WASHINGTON: US Vice President Richard Cheney suggested Sunday that the September 11 attacks could have been averted, if the government could have order surveillance of phone calls and emails without warrants.

In his first comment on a new rights controversy that has hit the US administration, Cheney said: "It's the kind of capability if we'd had before 9/11 might have led us to be able to prevent 9/11."

Cheney said

If someone had put a bullet in Cheney's head prior to 9/11 the attacks might have been averted.


HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA, goddamn thats cold. you may be right though, they got their man on the inside and it was no doubt Cheney.

NSA spying, Able Danger,

NSA spying, Able Danger, same thing

Off the topic

NEW YORK (Reuters) - President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan said that after the September 11 attacks the United States threatened to bomb his country if it did not cooperate with America's war campaign against the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Speaking of financing 9/11.

Very interesting. Musharraf is now acting like the U.S. played hardball right after the attacks.
U.S. threatened to bomb Pakistan after 9/11: Musharraf

Don't forgot the ISI and

Don't forgot the ISI and court decision to release bomb plot suspects due to lack of evidence

Feeling the pressure yet?

7/7 documentary. Looking for it's name.

What was the name of the documentary that was recently released on

Not mind the gap, it's newer..

Ludicrous Diversion - 7/7 London Bombings Documentary

Ludicrous Diversion - 7/7 London Bombings Documentary


Hope this helps...



Follow the Money!

A cardinal rule of any criminal investigation is "follow the money." The same goes here, and as this piece illustrates, there is plenty to be followed. In fact, this is one of our best lines of attack, and is not emphasized nearly enough in debate with the debunkers.


Insult to injury. Man what a mess we're in.

Following the REST of the money!

Aside from the insurance, the probable gold heist, etc. there would be the issue of the evidence of wall street crimes totalling hundreds of billions in theft including the Enron hijacking of the California energy market, the IPO scams involving, well, every investment bank pretty much, and Lord knows how many other crimes we'll now never know about. But of course, we need to give the structural engineers time to really get to the bottom of how building 7 collapsed, if not from intentional explosive demolition. After all, we are a country of laws--er I mean endless fruitless pseudo investigations I mean. Remember that guy that torched his house, murdering his wife and collecting the insurance for both because no one could prove that his wife hadn't spontaneously combusted? Me neither, but it's bound to start happening more often in our new land of opportunity (and means and motive!)

How many times do we have to sing the song before God actually BLESSES America? I'm getting a little hoarse...


"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers