Donna Marsh O'Conner Issues An Open Letter to Bill Clinton

We received the following letter this evening from Donna Marsh O’Connor, mother of Vanessa Lang Langer who died in WTC Tower II, 93rd floor on 9/11. Please be sure to click 'read more' for the entire letter. Comments to this thread are allowed, but anything which I deem at all inappropriate will be removed.

An Open Letter to Bill Clinton from a 9/11 Mother

Dear President Clinton,

This is a letter explaining to you in, I hope, explicitly simple detail why I feared your eventual speaking out almost as much as I feared one more minute of the reign of Dick Cheney and George W. Bush. But first I have to say, with absolute clarity, from the bottom of my soul, heart, in fact the very soles of my feet, thank you for finally, finally, five years too late to be sure, but finally, telling the truth about 9/11/2001.

The Bush administration had ample warning to make sure that following the Presidential Daily Briefing of August 6, 2001, that my daughter, Vanessa Lang Langer, and the thousands who died both along with her that day and in the days following survived to breathe again on this planet. They failed to save her. They used her death to perpetrate crimes every day, every minute since.

Please see it from my point of view. You along with all American citizens who have remained silent too long, please hear what I am saying:

My kid died. My kid who was raised, like you, for some time by a single parent. But unlike you, she was a female. And I worried for her on a daily basis about the ways in which a female child, particularly a female child of a young, single, divorced parent would be treated by society. She was born along with the towers in 1971 and like the towers she was gloriously beautiful. She was fierce and proud and more than a handful. Instead of nurturing her desires, I tried to rein them in for fear of what they would bring for her. That’s what a mom does, no? Instead of making her my friend, I was her mom. And on August 6th, 2001 when George W. Bush dismissed the PDB and went about with his little life on his big boy ranch, he sealed her fate. And on that day, too, I sealed my own. Vanessa was four months pregnant with her first child. She and I had the final of our many tiffs. I wanted her to finally treat me like a person, not a mom. She wanted me to let her rant. Nobody’s business, really. Just another one of our battles that was to end two weeks after 9/11/2001 when she and I were to go away, just the two of us. The two of us plus one. To talk it out. To make peace. Peace? The hideous irony of what that means now. My kid, my daughter, my baby girl with her flamboyant beauty had a fight with her husband on 9/10/2001. Hormones? She had the first fight of her life with her best friend on earth, her brother James who was fourteen at the time. In short, Vanessa believed time was wide in front of her. She was marking her space as a family member. She, as did I, thought we had all the time in the world to kiss deeply and make up, to fight for our family space and move on.

George W. Bush knew better.

(more after the break..)

On that horrid morning, my fourteen year-old son lost his best friend and the ability to say, or let her say, I’m sorry. Her husband lost both his ability to make up and, ultimately, his life. He, too, died—of a broken heart. (Ask Hillary. She, with the powers of her office, tried to save him.) Vanessa died that morning running for her life. She was one of only about 283 whole and intact bodies removed from the pile. Five minutes after the first plane hit Tower I, Vanessa was so sure she was safe, she was reporting by phone to the uptown office of the company she worked for that she was safe. Five minutes, at least, she sat at her desk. There were eighteen minutes between plane hits of the towers. Not very long for most American citizens as we ran in circles like scared animals, but a lifetime in air traffic control. And about five hundred lives in Tower II alone.

Here, I am sure you can guess, is what I am left with that you cannot fix:

A hole in my life so deep it makes the hole left at Ground Zero look like a pot hole,

A country so divided that even I (a person who taught writing and rhetoric for the better part of twenty years) cannot begin to fathom a language that would bridge our gap,

The death of my first born child the justification for war beyond limits and death beyond comprehension.

The refusal of all Democratic candidates to speak in a voice loud enough for the American people to hear and therefore allowing the Bush Cheney administration to use Vanessa’s death to overtake our electoral process. In short, no one until you dared to defend yourself, spoke truth regarding that day. In fact, no candidate even invoked that day. My daughter was buried whole and intact—literally and rhetorically.

Here is what you can fix:

The absolute and utter loss of any powerful voice of reason and truth in this country.

The loss of confrontation of the media conglomerates that enable the crimes of the Bush administration to go unchecked, though their abuses of power and their total lack of human compassion display rampant through all media venues.

My desperate feeling of isolation as I lobby persons in power to stop the crime that began before September 11th, 2001 (probably before the end of your presidency as the Republican machine kept you deliberately distracted) and that continues today—the biggest cover-up in global history on my sweet baby’s bones.

The utter despicable neglect that on that morning she had no protection from our air defense systems. This is the United States of America. Not one fighter jet. Not one branch of our nation’s services or protective forces raised one finger to save my baby girl. And no decent politician had the courage to call the Bush administration to answer for her death.

How do I raise my remaining American sons? What do I tell them to trust? God help me, I believe my own government killed my daughter.

And that is why I feared your speaking out. I feared you would not come out swinging. You would acquiesce as did all of the Democrats and many of the decent Republicans, you would name, in the fight for Democratic control of our minor branches of government, the problems, but fail to put 9/11 and Vanessa’s death in the very hands in which that crime belongs—Richard Cheney and George W. Bush. I feared you would let them scare you with their claims that you (who had nothing to gain from 9/11) were as culpable as they (the complete and total beneficiaries of all that came from that horrible day). Halliburton, Iraq, Iran, Exxon Mobil, executive power, world power—that is only a part of what they had to gain. And you know it.

It is way beyond time to tell the truth. The darkest truth imaginable to me, a person who loves this country so damn much that I cry when I hear God Bless America, is what I know in my bones to be true.

For God’s sake, Mr. President, hold them accountable. Continue to tell the truth. Because God has already blessed us. And we’re letting them take it away.

Your rage gives me hope. If you back down now and let them call your words a tantrum, we will all lose again and again.

And they will win.


Donna Marsh O’Connor
Mother of Vanessa Lang Langer, WTC Tower II, 93rd floor

I love this lady. She's got

I love this lady. She's got great focus. These are the people that truthers have to embrace to get the ball rolling.

While I respect this woman

While I respect this woman for her loss and feel for her, I would hardly consider ANY clinton statement the truth; why was this posted here? I assumed this site was over the left right bs. =(

Amen to that - Clinton

Amen to that - Clinton probably laughed and spilt some barbecue sauce on his tie over that one.

Clinton is as pro-terror and

Clinton is as pro-terror and pro official story of 9/11 as Bush

Via: VideoSift

CIA torture renditions began

I feel sorry for this poor

I feel sorry for this poor woman, who apparently believes in the whole democrat/republican WWF hoax. Two property parties with one name, so it goes. Hell, Barbara Bush calls Bubba 'son". That should tell you something. O'Connor is very brave, however, in stating outright that she fears her own government killed her loved one. The evidence is indeed ovewhelming that her suspicions are correct.

Bill Clinton spoke of "forewarnings" etc. to rescue his own reputation. He couldn't care less about average Americans and their suffering and is no doubt fully aware that 911 was an inside job.

Once again, George W. Bush's mother calls Bill Clinton "son". Bubba is pals with both her and Poppy Bush, the latter a major suspect in the 911 attacks. Poppy's had his hooves in every major black op for the last quarter century.

Pro Terror

They are all pro-terror. Clinton, Bush? What's the difference. Poor Donna, she still don't get it. My heart goes out to her. I love her passion but it will get her no place until she sees the big picture. Everyone in office knows 9/11 was a self-inflicted wound. If an average guy like me can see it so clearly why can't other? How can the denial go so deep? My God, her daughter is dead and these monsters are responsible. Why can't she see it? Why can't Cindy Sheehan see it? If it were my daughter or sons it would be open season for all politicians. My God forgive me but I just hate these people. Murderers all!......................maddog................

Ignoring 911

I suspect those that continue to ignore the overwhelming evidence of 911, like Cindy Sheehan or Amy Goodman, must believe that acknowleging the sad truth would diminish their public credibility. That's even a sadder truth than the fact that 3000 of our fellow citizens were murdered on 911 and we still have no investigation. It's downright revolting to ignore the facts of 911.

yeah, I'm over it. Clintons

yeah, I'm over it. Clintons FBI tried to blow those buildings up in 93. That's not the point. The point is, this lady has leverage that we don't right now. She goes after her problem, and we get our symptom of the problem looked at. 911 families are the spark we have to fan. It's win win, and we should get with them hard core.

as pressure is put on people

as pressure is put on people they will in turn change their talking points.. without that pressure they will not..

if we all decide that every former president, congress person, and senator is beyond being pressured into addressing the situation then that is a defeatest stance.

it is kind of like those that say that we shouldn't write letters to any congress person or senator because they are all in on it.. to some degree that is completely true, but it doesn't mean we shouldn't try anyways.

as public opinion continues to go towards questioning the bush administration (and others) people will begin to bail ship, or distance themselves from the official line, or even perhaps try to embrace those that believe the bush administration was to blame or involved. as the tide turns so too will our elected officials change in hopes of not going down with the ship.

an example of this is senator Lahey, who on democracy now today said that the bush administration basically let 9/11 happen. i hope to get a clip of that and post it.. in fact he listed 9/11 as one of the top things which noone has had any courage in questioning.. its not much, but it is a start, and it will continue.

dz i think your posts are

dz i think your posts are very interesting and I deeply respect what you have to say; i need to register on the forums. to reply, this last year has resulted in my total disclosement with regard to politics. I feel if the masses can't wake up, quite simply, we are screwed. I am done voting for the better of two evils... in the end, their goal is the same. this midterm, I will for the first time, vote my true opinion.

i just watched super troopers with the mrs

"There's a shadow on the faces of the men who send the guns to the wars that are fought in places where their business interest runs."


Ms. O'Conner lost a daughter and an unborn granddaughter on 9/11. That's a pain that I, as a father, hope to never have the misfortune of enduring. Who are we to question this woman's faith in a system some would consider beyond repair?

Senator Leahy never forgot this moment:

Admittedly, there is a good

Admittedly, there is a good chance that Clinton is merely playing his part in the drama of distraction.

HOWEVER, if there is even a 1% chance that he would expose 9/11Truth to restore his legacy, this letter must be honored as possibly the most potent argument ever made in favor of 9/11Truth.

What do we have to lose? How ironic it would be if he honored his humble roots and spoke for the people on the most important issue ever. All of those people who completely and unquestioningly swallowed the media-driven demonizing of him wouldn't know what to say.

This is a victim talking here folks, and she just wrote the most moving statement for 9/11Truth I have ever read. Partisanship is an illusion, we owe it to the victims to pursue any possible avenue. In this case, the chances are slim, but the stakes are too high to ignore the possibility.

I don't think there is a 1%

I don't think there is a 1% chance. To think that clinton will do anything until 51% of americans believe it was an inside job is wrong. Clinton is not the answer, but if some people believe he is and it causes them to speak out, let it happen.

Beyond powerful but heartbreaking

Everyday I feel sick when observing the magnitude of the evil that is strangling the world. I cannot imagine how this womanher family and those in similar situations feel. I truly feel ill for large parts of the day over stuff like this. For Donna O'Connor, her family and others can even the truth wash away the devastation of their hearts? Somehow I doubt it.

I will pray for Donna

You know I feel for Donna and don't blame her of fault her in any way. She lost her kid. Far be it for me to judge her, I am so sorry for her loss.

I fault Clinton because he is twisting the truth or out and out lying to cover his ass and protect the fake legacy he has been trying to build since he was impeached, in so doing he is encouraging our enemy's, giving a false impression of what happened to give poor lost souls like Donna another reason to divide our country instead of trying to unite behind our armed forces and the president to finish what must be done.

We were not in Iraq on 9/11, we did not provoke these people and we will not allow these people to destroy us.

I'll pray for her.

RE: I will pra...

The 'these people' you are refering to, did not provoke us and did not try to destroy us. George Bush even says that he never said that Iraqis were responsible for 9-11. (He was lying of coarse.) But furthermore, 9-11 is a long planned inside job. A false flag event. That is what all of the evidece shows.

We most certainly were, however, in Iraq. A blokade of water treatment chemicals was responsible for the deaths of over a million Iraqi babies. Unprovoked airstrikes on Iraq were common.

You can always tell who the poor lost souls are by checking who often gets the facts wrong.

Sieg Heil!

Torture Bill States Non-Allegiance To Bush Is Terrorism
Legislation tolls the bell for the day America died, birth of the dictatorship

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison | September 29 2006

Buried amongst the untold affronts to the Bill of Rights, the Constitution and the very spirit of America, the torture bill contains a definition of "wrongfully aiding the enemy" which labels all American citizens who breach their "allegiance" to President Bush and the actions of his government as terrorists subject to possible arrest, torture and conviction in front of a military tribunal.


After five hours of searching through the 80-plus page bill, Alex Jones, who won the 2004 Project Censored award for his analysis of Patriot Act 2, uncovered numerous other provisions and definitions that make the bill appear as almost a mirror image of Hitler's 1933 Enabling Act.

In section 950j. the bill criminalizes any challenge to the legislation's legality by the Supreme Court or any United States court. Alberto Gonzales has already threatened federal judges to shut up and not question Bush's authority on the torture of detainees.

"No court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or cause of action whatsoever, including any action pending on or filed after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, relating to the prosecution, trial, or judgment of a military commission under this chapter, including challenges to the lawfulness of procedures of military commissions under this chapter."

The Bush administration is preemptively overriding any challenge to the legislation by the Supreme Court.

The definition of torture that the legislation cites is US code title 18 section 2340. This is a broad definition of torture and completely lacks the specific clarity of the Geneva Conventions. This definition allows the use of torture that is, "incidental to lawful sanctions." In alliance with the bill's blanket authority for President Bush to define the Geneva Conventions as he sees fit, this legislates the use of torture.

The media has spun the bill as if it outlaws torture - it only outlaws torture for "enemy combatants," and in fact outlaws the retaliation of any military against the United States as "murder." Those deemed "enemy combatants" are not even allowed to fight back yet the government affords itself every power including the go-ahead to torture.

Further actions that result in the classification of an individual as a terrorist include the following.

- Destruction of any property, which is deemed punishable by any means of the military tribunal's choosing.

- Any violent activity whatsoever if it takes place near a designated protected building, such as a charity building.

- A change of the definition of "pillaging" which turns all illegal occupation of property and all theft into terrorism. This makes squatters and petty thieves enemy combatants.

In light of Greg Palast's recent hounding by Homeland Security, after they accused him of potentially giving terrorists key information about U.S. "critical infrastructure" when filming Exxon’s Baton Rouge refinery (clear photos of which were publicly available on Google Maps), sub-section 27 of section 950v. should send chills down the spine of all investigative journalists and even news-gatherers.

"Any person subject to this chapter who with intent or reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign power, collects or attempts to collect information by clandestine means or while acting under false pretenses, for the purpose of conveying such information to an enemy of the United States, or one of the co-belligerents of the enemy, shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a military commission under this chapter may direct."

Subsection 4(b) (26) of section 950v. of HR 6166 - Crimes triable by military commissions - includes the following definition.

"Any person subject to this chapter who, in breach of an allegiance or duty to the United States, knowingly and intentionally aids an enemy of the United States, or one of the co-belligerents of the enemy, shall be punished as a military commission under this chapter may direct."

For an individual to hold an allegiance or duty to the United States they need to be a citizen of the United States. Why would a foreign terrorist have any allegiance to the United States to breach in the first place?

This is another telltale facet that proves the bill applies to U.S. citizens and includes them under the "enemy combatant" designation. We previously cited the comments of Yale law Professor Bruce Ackerman, who wrote in the L.A. Times, "The compromise legislation....authorizes the president to seize American citizens as enemy combatants, even if they have never left the United States. And once thrown into military prison, they cannot expect a trial by their peers or any other of the normal protections of the Bill of Rights."

The New York Times stated that the legislation introduced, "A dangerously broad definition of “illegal enemy combatant” in the bill could subject legal residents of the United States, as well as foreign citizens living in their own countries, to summary arrest and indefinite detention with no hope of appeal. The president could give the power to apply this label to anyone he wanted."

Calling the bill "our generation’s version of the Alien and Sedition Acts," the Times goes on to highlight the rubber stamping of torture.

"Coerced evidence would be permissible if a judge considered it reliable — already a contradiction in terms — and relevant. Coercion is defined in a way that exempts anything done before the passage of the 2005 Detainee Treatment Act, and anything else Mr. Bush chooses."

Since with this bill, in the aggregate, Bush has declared himself to be above the Constitution and the laws of the United States, the allegiance of American citizens is no longer to the flag or the freedoms for which it stands, but to Bush himself, the self-appointed dictator, and any diversion from that allegiance will mandate arrest, torture and conviction in a military tribunal under the terms of this bill.

Similar to the UK's Glorification of Terrorism law, which top lawyers have slammed as vague, open to interpretation and a potential weapon for the government to kidnap supposed subversives, the nebulous context of "wrongfully aiding the enemy," could easily be defined to include publicly absolving an accused terrorist of involvement in a terrorist attack.

That renders the entire 9/11 truth movement an aid to terrorist suspects and subject to military tribunal and torture. In addition, Bush's recently cited National Strategy for Combating Terrorism, which is available on the White House website, labels conspiracy theorists as terrorist recruiters.

This should leave us with no doubt as to which parties are the target of the government's torture and intimidation campaign.

Could protesting a war approved by the government and their bootlickers in Congress and the Senate be considered breaching an allegiance to the United States? Could campaigning against the bombing of a target country be considered wrongfully aiding the enemy?

When the USA PATRIOT act was rushed through at the height of an anthrax scare without any members of Congress even having time to read it, we were assured that it was to fight terrorists and would not be used against the American people.

Since then a plethora of cases whereby the USA PATRIOT act was used against U.S. citizens emerged, including the internment without trial for over three years of Jose Padilla, an American citizen who was finally released after no evidence of terrorism was uncovered.

The so-called "compromise" before the bill was passed and the media acclaim of John McCain as some kind of human rights champion is one of the biggest con jobs ever inflicted upon the American people.

Shortly after the bill was finalized it was spun by Bush security advisor Stephen Hadley as "good news and a good day for the American people." McCain said that it safeguarded "the integrity and letter and spirit of the Geneva Conventions."

In truth the legislation does the exact opposite, giving Bush carte blanche to "interpret the meaning and application of the Geneva Conventions."

In addition, under the bill, "No person may invoke the Geneva Conventions or any protocols thereto in any habeas corpus or other civil action or proceeding to which the United States, or a current or former officer, employee, member of the Armed Forces, or other agent of the United States is a party as a source of rights in any court of the United States or its States or territories."

The bill also allows hearsay evidence (obtained via phony confessions after torture) to be considered by the military tribunal and bars the suspect from even having knowledge of the charges against him - making a case for defense impossible. This is guaranteed to produce 100% conviction rates as you would expect in the dictatorships of Uzbekistan or Zimbabwe and other torture protagonists who are in many cases allied with the Bush administration and provide phony confessions obtained from torture that allow the U.S. government to scare its people with the threat of imaginary Al-Qaeda terror cells waiting to kill them.

Following the Supreme Court's ruling to previously strike down Bush's shadow penal system, Alberto Gonzales is already out threatening federal judges to shut up and get behind the dictator or face the consequences.

Gonzales has the sheer gall to attack judges for even considering to "overturn long-standing traditions or policies without proper support in text or precedent," which is exactly what Gonzales, Bush and the rest of the White House criminals are doing themselves by de facto abolishing the Bill of Rights!

This is a dark day for the United States, the day America died and the bastard birth of a literal dictatorship.

I asked for Clinton's help when my brother was murdered

My brother was murdered before scores of eyewitnesses by the bouncers of BB King's nightclub in an unprovoked attack. Eight employees of the popular tourist attraction crushed, strangled and beat him to death. The Memphis police handcuffed him unconscious and threw him in the street behind a running, parked police car where he succumbed to asphyxia. He was pronounced brain dead upon a strangely delayed arrival to Baptist Memorial Hospital (now demolished as of 2005). The entire city of Memphis conspired to sweep this crime under the rug. NO ONE WAS EVER ARRESTED.

Please see

The reason that I wish to add my comment is that the cold response I received from the Clinton White House should not be unknown and should not be forgotten. The outrage, the pain, in the letter of the 9/11 victim's mother......all so familiar. This was the spirit and tone of my letter to Clinton. He did nothing. After the letter I received from Clinton's letter writer saying that he could do nothing, it was up to the state of Tennessee....I knew we were on our own in this country.

I don't want to see you or anyone disappointed when you think that we have an advocate, someone to care and see the truth and go to bat for us.

In this country now, we are on our own

Comment from Rawstory piece on 100 DHS stolen computers....

Does any of this hold water or is it B.S. ?

"many consider Chertoff disloyal to the United States and a dangerous security risk.
It's obvious Chertoff is handing info to Mossad, but Bush lets him get away with it because Chertoff is linked to 911, It can now be reported massive obstruction of justice has taken place and been run directly through the offices of Michael Chertoff as U.S Attorney in New Jersey, Assistant Attorney-General of the United States, and now as the Head of the Homeland Dept. of Security.
FACT Not Fiction.
Chertoff helped orchestrate a Gag Order on two Nine Eleven Whistleblowers. Indria Singh and Sibel Edmonds, both whistleblowers had gotten to the bottom of the financing of P-Tech Software Defense Shield, the defense computer shield that failed to detect the 9-11 Attack.
P-Tech, a Boston computer software company, had inserted encrypted technology into the radar of the U.S. Air Force on Sept. 11, 2001 that disguised the mock drill that went live and turned into the real thing. It can now be reported that Chertoff has looked the other way for years at terror suspect Dr. Madgy el Amir as he laundered millions of dollars in and out of New Jersey HMO’s. This laundered money was eventually traced by U.S. Customs and DEA as narcotics funds.
It gets worse.
The Head of U.S. Customs at the time, Robert C. Bonner’s life was threatened by stooges of Chertoff aka Mossad agents. The funding for P-Tech Software can further be traced to Saudi businessman, Yassin Al Quaidi, who has direct ties to Israeli Spymaster Rafi Eytan.
It can now be reported that Tom Ridge as first head of the Dept. of Homeland Security, set forth an Operation Greenquest to get to the bottom of this only to have the U.S. Justice Department’s Assistant Attorney-General Michael Chertoff , shutdown the inquiry.
Part of the inquiry that was covered up included Dina Moshens, a colleague of Dr. Madgy el Amir, and the up to six million dollars in narcotics Al Qaeda wiretransfers that were laundered through the Mossad ridden HMO’s.
Ridge’s group Greenquest, had also tied up the Bank of Tagui to the Caymen Islands and the movement of these funds aka HMO Narcotics funds, through the Chicago Board of Options. Funds that can now be traced to American Insurance Group in New York and the massive amount of Put Options that were bought on American Airlines stock pre-Sept. 11/01.
Ridge had received testimony and information from FBI Agent Robert Wright who further explained that his investigation was being impeded by not only Chertoff, but also the Head of the local Chicago FBI Kathleen McChesney.
24 / 7 spy's | 09.29.06 - 3:37 pm | # "

Just searched "P-TECH software....

they have SO much dirt on Clinton

so he does what THEY say. period. he will not come out for 9/11 Truth--he's stuck on the sinking (stinking?) ship.

How were air defenses...

Supposed to protect her daughter from the explosives in the towers? Surely Donna's daughter is looking down from above and weeping at her mother's misplaced faith in Clinton. The man cavorts with the Bush family for God's sake. Has she not looked into the case for controlled demolition? Does she not understand it? I don't get it.

[dz: removed last sentence with accusatory tone.]

Involve Keith Olbermann

I would like to suggest that we make a concerted effort to get Keith Olbermann of Countdown on MSNBC to provide a forum for 9/11 truth. Perhaps if eough people write to him he will consider it. He certainly is anti-Bush and might welcome it. Does anyone think this is a good idea?? I sent the following email to him. His contact information is:
Keith Olbermann

I watch your show and have been pleased see you taking on the Bush administration and their destruction of our rights under the constitution. Unfortunately, no matter how lucid your comments, they will never have the desired effect since most people watching will just sit and nod in agreement.

If we hope to create change and stop this madness there is one sure way - exposing the truth about the events of 9/11. Certainly you are aware of the growing movement of those of us who have serious questions about both what happened that day and who was responsible. You are an intelligent man and I have to believe that you, too, have serious questions. What we need is someone with a large megaphone to present this issue in an unbiased, non-judgmental way. You would be a perfect person to play this role.

It wouldn't be necessary for you to take a public stand - you could just act as a neutral referee. If you could devote a portion of your show for a week to have various people (Dr. David Ray Griffin, Professor Steven Jones, Dr. Kevin Barrett, Nicholas Levis, Kristen Breitweiser) present their ideas and proofs in a neutral environment you could truly be a hero for this generation. With this kind of exposure millions of people would be exposed to this valuable information so that they could make up their own mind about what is true/plausible and what they will do about it.

A further benefit would be the increased likelihood of whistleblowers would be encouraged to come forward. You could even encourage this by suggesting that your show could provide a forum for credible informers to present what they know.

Please consider taking a public stand on this most important issue. Exposing 9/11 truth is the only tool we have left if we hope to salvage our country. Please, please, help.


Well done.I will send an e mail too.

olbermann will not do it.

olbermann will not do it. We all know that deep down. Olbermann is a democrat. He will do it later, when it becomes an issue to benefit democrats. Nobody will do it now while it is an issue that simply focuses on the constitution. Liberals will get it in a way you think is half way there if they win congressional seats in this ellection. Nobody will get it in the obvious way it should be understood. We get it, and let us keep getting it as we have. We get it as 19th century liberals, as thomas jefferson, or we get it as conservative libertarians in america right now. We all get it. We are all so alike. This is what america is supposed to be and we understand that. We should continue to stand togethere because there is little difference between us, We are thinking americans.

Dear Donna

First iam sorry for your loss.Iam a father of two,and nothing would enrage me more then to have justifiable questions go unanswered.
This is why we have 9/11 Bogger.Although Clinton has a huge IQ advantage over GW he's not the saint you think he is.The more i research the more i firmly believe our two party system has sold us americans out a long time ago.They are nothing more than puppets on a string to the ruling elite.
You ,and all americans deserve the truth.
Again i want to offer you my deepest sympathy.

Clinton's are members of the Rockefeller/Bush Crime Syndicate

It always astounds me when people actually think that the leading democrats and republicans are adversaries. They are at the top of the pyramid, locked by evil, hand-in-hand.

It's like the Bears vs. Packers. We all root for our team, and stay divisive the whole time toward one another, while the NFL owners rake in 100 Billion in TV rights.

Same thing here. For instance --

Then Governor of Arkansas, Clinton, was on the Tri-lateral commission in the 80's along with Poppy Bush as VP. Unheard of for a young Governor of ANY state. Unless, of course, he has nefarious connections.

Iran Contra covert planes sent out guns and brought cocaine back in under the auspices of Poppy Bush & Oliver North in the 80's. Where did the planes land? Mena Arkansas. I always wondered if Whitewater had a landing strip?!!

Word on the street is that Rhodes Scholar from Hope Arkansas, Bill Clinton is a bastard (Winthrop) Rockefeller.

Anyone who can believe that an unconnected son of a poor mother and an unknown father can rise quickly to become not only governor of Arkansas, but will himself into the White House, has got to believe that a Saudi Arabian undergoing renal failure in a cave in Afghanistan can have his friends grab a few boxcutters and defeat a trillion dollar defense system.

It just ain't gonna happen. THEY won't let it.

democrats and republicans may seem to play that they are two different sides of the coin, when in actuality, the Rothschilds and Rockefellers own the f*ckin' coins. And thanks to federal reserve and debt slavery, they own US(A).

Poppy & Bubba are tighter than Ann Coulter's adams apple.


yep, its called 'organized

yep, its called 'organized crime' and no one does it better than the US Gov't and its covert network.

Right-Left is 'divide & conquer', oldest trick in the book.

93 bombing, OKC bombing, false flags.

I can't believe people are 'surprised' that the Bushes and Clintons are friends. That's like being surprised that Lucky Luciano and Meyer Lansky were friends.

the Rothschilds and Rockefellers own the f*ckin' coins

Boy do you have that one right. That is why Russo's movie is so important. These are the puppet masters. They own Clinton, Bush ect. The world bankers are the ones we should go after. They are the madmen behind this NWO scam. (and 9/11) Untill we regain control of the money making process we are just spinning our wheels. The Fereral Reserve must go. I am going to a town hall meeting today. I am going to push Pete Starks on this issue. I want to see him squirm and double talk himself out of this one.

Liars & Packers and Bears, O My

Well put, JHF. I use the football game analogy myself, only above the league itself, you have the mobsters fixing the games. The league is the corporate structure, the mob is the bankers.

The fact that Bill Clinton was an 'orphan' is perfect, since he was politically adopted by GHW Bush. The dictator of the U.S. - the kinder, gentler Josef Stalin.

I have a feeling the whole

I have a feeling the whole little dust up was done for the benefit of those still confused about who are and who aren't the good guys. Clinton continued the murderous embargo on the mostly innocent Iraqi civilians for his 8 year term. A lot of people died unnecessarily because of him. This fact can't be changed.

To Bill Owens: You are full

To Bill Owens:
You are full of crap. Go get a spot on Fox. NO ONE died in Iraq because of the policies of Bill Clinton. There was no economic embargo on Iraq during the Clinton administration. The reason we are having this email posting exchange is because of Clinton bashing that continues to blame everything from the Civil War to the latest fart from a Greyhound bus station on Bill. Why? To further mask the treason against this nation by both Bush administrations and the minions that devised and funded 9/11--Cheney et al.

Though there are reasons not

Though there are reasons not to consider Clinton exclusively in the role of saviour, Ms. O'Connor's letter expresses quite well the agony of watching the death of a child used to inflict death and suffering on the children of others as the masters of chaos remain safely shielded. Hers is a noble act to try to bring something positive from her loss, and President Clinton is to be commended for pushing the envelope of presidential protocol enough to call a spade a spade. Don't forget that this man's LEGAL sexual daliances were the cause of him getting ceaselessly hammered from all sides as many chose the abandon him while the opposition and media goon squads sniffed his sheets. Think William Holden in Stalag-17 who had every right to tell the rest of the POW's to get bent.

I hope WJC has the fortitude and love of country to go out on a limb regardless considering the forces we're up against can shade or supress any truth, promulgate any lie they'd otherwise be called on while at the same effectively smear anyone that stands up to them, even when they've got the goods on them dead to right. Seriously, the way some fold either means they're a 5th columnist, they've been compromised, or they are too fearful of the attack machine (now with fewer pesky Constitutional restrictions!) that lays in wait for the more daring or foolhardy rabbits to pop their head's out of the hole.

Life has become the combnined plots to "Invasion of the Body Snatchers", "They Live" and "The Thing". Awfully hard to know who to trust, what to believe, and how to protect yourself let alone be able to protect anyone else you care deeply about. Ms. O'Connor...and any loved ones of victims of 9/11 or subsequent aggression...know that my sense of loss and sadness for fellow Americans and innocent human beings the world over, though it could never equal the pain those directly connected must live with, is still great and compels me to do what I can to stop the lies and murder. I stand with Ms. O'Connor and am thankful for her effort in speaking truth to power.

When I tell any truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do. ~William Blake

Excellent! The best letter

The best letter on this thread. Well said, and exactly correct. WJC DOES have love of this country. Clinton can be counted on to say as much as he possibly can in setting the 9/11 record straight.
We all have to remember that he has a daughter he would die for. That daughter, like Ms. O'Connor's, is a tool in the evil Bush scheme to control the world. It would mean nothing to THEM to snuff Chelsea out, just like it has meant nothing to kill the 3,000 at WTC, the 150 on Texas death row, and the 30,000 Iraqis going about their simple lives. If Clinton gets too truthful, or threatens to, look for Chelsea to meet an untimely end. If Clinton soft-pedals, it's because he wants HIS baby, HIS wonderfully beautiful child to meet no harm. Remember, too, that Clinton was about to pardon Leonard Peltier, the Native American whose incarceration for life was set up by the FBI. And then the FBI told Clinton what would happen to his baby if he did. Check it out.

Clinton just said what we already knew

That there were plenty of "warnings".

Big deal.

He's an official tsunami spokesman now.

"There's a shadow on the faces of the men who send the guns to the wars that are fought in places where their business interest runs."

Is it just me or.....

are alot of Americans starting to realize that the country would be much better off if Bush, Cheney etc. were dead. Yes it really is that bad. I am sure many would like to see them die a horrible death televised on the major networks or is this only an acceptable end for innocents? What a shame it has come to this. What a tragedy for the USA. Should I apologize for saying this?

More on Donna Marsh O'Conner...

Here is a video of Donna Marsh O'Conner speaking in front of the UN: Source:

Here is a video of Donna Marsh O'Conner speaking at the 9/11: Press Fot Truth Conference: Source:

Here is a link to the new film "9/11: Press For Truth" (This movie is a MUST SEE) Source:

"A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves" – Edward R. Murrow

That is an extremely

That is an extremely poignant letter by Mrs. Marsh O’Conner. Unfortunately, I do not expect Bill nor Hillary Clinton to do a damn thing about 9/11 (same thing goes for John Kerry). They know it was an inside job.

Instead of speaking out against our illegal, murderous, invasion of Iraq, Hillary promoted legislation to ban us from burning of the U.S. flag! As another blogger stated, Bill Clinton openly cavorts with Bush Sr., of all people. When Bill became angry with Fox News last week, I took it for what it was: staged deception!

We have a one-party system now, and it is run by PNAC NeoCons!


Clinton, if he never became a political overlord, might have successfully become a Hollywood actor. His appearance on FOX was staged. It was acting.

I have it on good authority...

That something unifying is on the way for the movement. I hope.

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

And by the way...

I DO NOT fault Mrs. O'Connor for writing a letter to Bubba.

She took a shot at contacting someone who COULD make a difference if he wanted to.

Does that mean he will? Probably not. Does that mean Bill Clinton isn't responsible for atrocities of his own? No.

It means someone took a shot, and you can't fault them for that.

Considering how the world is now, and the stakes involved, I don't fault her. Not one bit.

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

No Fault Misdirection

Anyone of responsible mind will not 'fault' someone like Ms. O'Conner for ther effort. She's a berieved Mother, expressing her grief and reaching out to someone who's true nature and involvement is unknown to her.

But as an investigative website, I think 911blogger should make an effort to weed out the chaff from the useful info. This is a dead end issue. Simply listing this as an important sidebar gives the impression that it's something the site endorses.

I didn't know...

Blogger was an "investigative website?"

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."


How many other websites would you find a letter like this?

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

Where will you find letters

Where will you find letters that repeat the Bill Clinton 9/11 misdirection? I would say all of the ones owned or directed by the CIA, at least that's where they'll be eventually. Those not controlled by our intel will recognize misdirection when it appears, or in the least, periodically cleanse themselves.

As far as this specific letter, right now I only see it here. Does that make it somehow viable, or a valuable point of the discussion? I'm not decrying it's appearance, that's what this is about - presenting issues and discussing them. I would have, perhaps, noted that this issue is somewhat peripheral to this later reality we seem to be evolving towards.

And yes, I do consider this an investigative website. Why would you not? You present evidenciary data, which is discussed and debated by the members. What part of that is not to be considered investigation? This place is still my choice for 9/11 info, and I'm trying to help retain an air of integrity by pointing out what I see as a non-issue.

Bush Knew, Planned and Wanted 9/11

Clinton had nothing to do with 9/11. He attempted to capture Bin Laden during 1998, and the CIA stymied his attempts. Here's the truth: George Bush's brother owned the company in charge of security of the WTC towers. They were closed the weekend before the 9/11 attacks--this was most likely when explosives were placed in the buildings, that caused their collapse, not the fire and not the planes hitting the tops. There was NO NO NO plane in the side of the Pentagon. I know, I was there at the time. NOTHING but some rocket dust. ALL NORAD planes were told to stand down. This should be asked of Bush, Cheney and that daughter of Satan, Condoleeza Rice. WHY? WHY? did Bush stay still reading to small children when this was taking place? Because he knew it was going to happen--his handlers designed it. Osama Bin Laden has not been touched. Where is he? Probably on the ranch at Crawford, Texas. The Bushes and the Bin Ladens have been in business together for years and Bush and Osama grew up together. The Saudis controll this country and are the Real Bubbas of the Bush family. Not Clinton. Bill Clinton did everything he possibly good to keep this country great and strong. All the SH*T has occurred under the most actively evil people ever to be in government--Cheney and Rove and that she-devil Rice. And the Anti-Christ Dubya. George Bush has murdered at least 100,000 people. Anyone that useless, hollow, arrogant, ignorant, controlled, propped-up, spoiled and scummy thrives on killing people. It makes him feel big. He and his entire family and administration should be tried and punished for treason and murder. He makes Hitler look like Pope John II. Get off Clinton's back. A poor boy, smarter than anyone in the world, gave us employment, housing, interest on our savings, and peace. Stand back---the poop is about to hit the ventilator.

Well said. Sometimes I

Well said. Sometimes I wonder if the truth mindset and the accompanying cynicism makes us overestimate the forces of evil. True, noone become POTUS without selling their soul in a lot of ways. However, I have a feeling that there is more debate in the upper echelons of power than many seem to believe.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that the gatekeepers weren't "in on it." They are merely taking the path of least resistance. The groundswell of support for the truth movement could very well influence some of those who are currently sitting on the fence.

Call me naive, but you have to retain some optimism, some hope that somewhere out there is a person with power that can no longer live with the blood of so many victims on their hands. Clinton may be a long shot, but it is time to start making appeals to conscience. Somewher out there, somebody has a conscience, right?

I Agree

I, too, hope that someone who is in the know, will step forward and tell us the entire truth. I am so hoping it will be a military person. They were in on the plot and the implementation--had to be. Please, if you are reading this and you have the truth in your soul, and you were an active participant at some point in the 9/11 tradegy, spill your soul. We promise to forgive, just unmask the real evildoers. Even if you carry responsibility, we will hide you. Just tell us what happened. Remember John Dean. He was a player in Watergate--as we see now, nothing compared to 9/11. But he saved our nation, our Constitutution, and our government with courage to reveal his wrongdoing in order to achieve the greater good. If the Bush regeime is not stopped soon, there will be no turning back. Come out of the closet military people and save us. That's what you took an oath to do.

you were at ther Pentagon on

you were at ther Pentagon on 9/11? care to make a blog about it? i would love to hear about your experiences from that day.

The Innocent Bill Clinton

Are you aware that it was Bill Clinton who, in the 4 years preceding 9/11, oversaw the depletion of fighter jet air cover over the continental U.S.?

Look it up. When Bill left office, we had essentially 20 total jets providing air defense. This was by deliberate intent, as a large art of the impending 9/11 op.

Bill Clinton is in the pocket of the Bush Crime Family, that began with Prescott and continues with Stooge Dubya. Bill Clinton is just middle managment. Wake up, folks.

Donna O'Connor's message to President Clinton

Finally someone has said with definite clarity what many Americans have been thinking but do not want to admit. Bush & Cheney allowed 9/11 to happen so that they could take over complete control of Washington and the middle east. Ms. O'Connor is exactly right when she states it is the darkest truth imaginable. However, Americans need to open their eyes and see what Bush and his crime family have done to this country. I am so sorry that Ms. O;Connor lost her daughter on that terrible and all the others that have lost their loved ones. They should not have had to die so that Bush could get the power that he so craved.

I admire Donna Marsh. She's

I admire Donna Marsh. She's got guts. I just would like to know when Clinton ever told the truth about 9/11 ? I'm sure that would be big news. But yeah, if I lost a daughter on 9/11, I'd try to appeal to anyone I could. Nice to see so many of you coming around to the truth as well, but we are the educated and we WANT to know. There are many out there still in the dark and you can tell by their responses that they don't want to know. They are so frightened that they'd rather laugh it off and go back to work than know. I know the evil that lurks in the hearts of men but it still took me 2 years to come around from 2003 to 2005 which were the times when I was actively listening. I kept ignoring the conspiracy theorists who post links on forums. I didn't argue with them. I just completely ignored it. What are we going to do? I don't know because yesterday, I got in a bullying match over a traffic lane. A traffic lane !!!! Seriousy, people are so out of touch with what matters. They are hypnotised by the establishment media. We got to get them to turn their TV's off for just a little bit. Geez. That's my feeling. Their reality is the television. It's stable. It's always there. Telling them that the television lied to them flips their world upside down. Some of us, including me, were practically raised by the television. We begin to just believe everything it says whether we consciously do it or shapes our beliefs and our feelings.

Does anyone know what she is

Does anyone know what she is referring to?

When did Clinton address the real crimes of 9/11?

If someone knows what she is talking about can you post a link?