Is the Media REALLY Involved in the 9/11 Attacks?

Is the Media REALLY Involved in the 9/11 Attacks?



It is the duty of the press and TV networks to report the news to the public. It is their job, their responsibility.


What does it tell us when certain stories are withheld? What does it tell us when CNN/FOX/et al report on nothing but Michael Jackson, Scott Peterson, Terri Schiavo, and runaway brides, for hours on end? Surely there are more important issues to discuss. What are they hiding?


The mainstream media are part of the 9/11 cover-up and therefore complicit in the attacks. If they weren’t, they would have reported on this May 2006 Zogby poll revealing that about half of America wants a new investigation, including the investigation of government officials for possible involvement.

CNN/FOX/ABC/NBC/CBS/etc should have flashed headlines on the screen: “Breaking News Alert: Half the Country Wants a New Investigation into 9/11!”

Likewise, the New York Times/Washington Post/LA Times/etc should have had front page headlines: “Half of America Wants New 9/11 Investigation”

Does it come as a surprise that the only news sources to report this poll were the internet’s leading alternative news sites Raw Story (left-wing) and World Net Daily (right-wing)?

Nothing from CNN. Nothing from the New York Times. Why?


The Zogby poll also shows that most Americans believe the media to be doing a “fair or poor” job in reporting victims’ families and unanswered questions.

Do the media not support victims’ family members? Obviously they do not, for if they did, they would have covered these two press releases showing victims’ relatives demand for a new investigation.

CNN / the New York Times /et al did not cover those press releases. Why?


Where was the media this past 9/11 5th anniversary weekend? Where was their coverage of these major events in downtown Manhattan?

Why no mention of the thousands of people wearing black t-shirts reading “Investigate 9/11” at Ground Zero this past 9/11/06 morning?

No coverage of these nationwide and worldwide events either.


Why didn’t CNN/FOX/etc report on these quotes from a Washington Post article?

“The U.S. military is conducting a propaganda campaign to magnify the role of the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, according to internal military documents and officers familiar with the program.”

“The documents explicitly list the "U.S. Home Audience" as one of the targets of a broader propaganda campaign.”


Did you know that FOX News is influenced by Saudi Princes? Anyone getting their news from FOX obviously only learns what Saudi Princes wish them to learn.


The above clearly demonstrates the mainstream media's complicity in the 9/11 attacks. But did you know they were actually involved in the attacks themselves?


What the media broadcast on the morning of 9/11 (and thereafter) was nothing more than a cartoon.


In the image above we see what the government/media says is flight 175 crashing into the South Tower. However, there is no break in the building between the left engine and fuselage. This, along with dozens of other anomalies, clearly demonstrate the TV networks were directly involved in the attacks and lying to us from day one.

Show "Important note to all 9/11" by CB_Brooklyn

i see how your entire blog

i see how your entire blog entry is focused on media culpability, and how the MSM has screwed us all over in not talking about anything going on that matters..

but, i dont see where you put 'Zionist-controlled media' into any sort of context. it seems as though you could've written the whole thing focused on media failure in general, but instead the primary focus of your title is specifically directed towards the 'zionist-controlled media'..

you reference 2 media sources that did cover that which the MSM won't even touch, but you don't put into context how they are not 'zionist-controlled'..

is the assumption that anyone in the MSM is 'zionist-controlled', but indy-media are not, or is it that only non-zionist controlled media cover useful stories? what about alternative media who don't cover useful stories? are they zionist, just zionist controlled, or do they break the assumption?

in any event, sounds like threading a needle to use the term 'zionist-controlled media', especially when you dont have anything in the article that puts the statement into any sort of context, and that really isn't even discussed in the blog entry.

Show "It's well known the msm is" by CB_Brooklyn

if your audience is average

if your audience is average joe citizen that we want to get asking questions about 9/11 then i would say they wouldn't believe it is 'well known the msm is zionist controlled'..

which is why i said you should've had something which put that phrase into context, because from the average citizen's perspective that would turn away 95% of them.

so, i guess it depends on who your desired audience is..

yeah, you're probably right

yeah, you're probably right with that! I removed the reference

Show "There is only one" by fatty was had! (not verified)


This is by far the last path you would ever want to take in the 911 truth movement. Even though I understand your thoughts, it is the hardest and most impossible to prove. If you are going to talk about 9/11 truth subjects, I would highly recommend that you address the clearest issues first.. For me, those issues are this.. In my order (My opinion after research)

WTC 7 How did that fall
Where is the plane at the Pentagon
Why are the Put options not explained before 9/11
Where is the wreckage in PA
Why is Molten Steel being extracted from WTC1 & 2 weeks after they came down?
Explain how jet fuel melts steel?
How many steel buildings have ever come down due to fire?
Why were simulations going on replicating 9/11 on 9/11.

These are a few of my questions..... I have done the research, read thousands of pages of text, and to me, these are the questions that I need answered, and as anybody tries to feed me a line of BS, I have all of the ammo to back up my points.

If you go down this path with are doomed.

Would rate it.....BUT

Id like to see more evidence of complicity with the media,and would rate that a 10,BUT I WON'T RATE SPECULATION.

Operation MockingBird should ring a bell.

Of course there is media complicity, after all the media is owned by the multinational corporations that control our government.

Read and research Operation Mockingbird and learn how the media is used as an evil propaganda machine to cover up and comit treason. In that context, the media if knowingly provided false information to deceive and cover up a crime, then they are complicit of murder after the fact and it should be treated as treason, because of the crime commited.