Fox wishes Foley were a Democrat
Posted by pdoherty76 on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 11:32pm
Check this "mistake" by the fox news imaginitive screen propaganda graphic boys
- pdoherty76's blog
- Login to post comments
HEADLINES
Support 911Blogger
Support Independent Journalism!
9/11 Blogger receives no foundational or corporate support. Help us cover the news and improve the site by becoming a monthly donor.
Donate via Bitcoin@
(click for our btc address)
(view transactions)
Health Alert
Mesothelioma & Asbestos Cancer
Hazardous asbestos fibers at the WTC exposed more than 110,000 people to the dangerous material; this includes 80,000 tower workers, 30,000 area residents and nearly 4,000 first responders. Asbestos exposure is directly linked to mesothelioma cancer and other asbestos-related diseases.
This ain't no
This ain't no accident.
it sure isnt, Google did the
it sure isnt, Google did the same exact thing. speaking of which:
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2006/051006googlecensors.htm
check that story out, then contact Google and tell them to stop being evil.
FOX PROPAGANDA
Wow, just wow. One time could have been an accident, three times is on purpose. My god, I'm not a fan of either Democrats or Republicans but FOX Defintely needs to be exposed for the disgusting propaganda BS it is. Everyone should see the documentary "Outfoxed". Now our national MSM here in the Netherlands is far from flawless, but some1 like O reily would have been hung long ago (forgive me my language)
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
i agree
o;reilly is a scumbag. Have u seen the video of him threatening phil donahue? Donahue totally dismantled him.
Its totally sick the way fox news is trying to justify what Foley did by using Clinton and Monica.
[dz: please don't suggest shooting or killing someone, that is not something we can allow here]
When and where did dz suggest shootings or killings???
Huh??
When and where did dz suggest "shooting or killing someone", pdoherty76 ?
Please explain.
no, i was making a
no, i was making a moderation inside of his post.. im the one who said the bold part directed towards the user who posted the comment which i in turn moderated.
Ah -- I see. Maybe you can find a way to make it more clear then
Ah -- I see.
Maybe you can find a way to make it more clear then (even overly clear), and eliminate the most obvious reasons for such misunderstandings?
I'm used to sentences starting "Somename: I have to tell you this...." that they do in fact address one Mr. Somename. Maybe underwriting/signing would be better?
[ Moderator comment:
Look, this is what it could look like, to make it less ambiguous.
(comment added by Little Pipe) ]
eheh, ill try to do that
eheh, ill try to do that from now on :)
Here's the video...