U.S. Government Caught Red-Handed Releasing Staged Al-Qaeda Videos

This could be big, post your thoughts in the comments below.  If this turns out to be ironclad, we can organize a major campaign to the media and members of congress. Thanks to Boast for the scoop:

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2006/051006redhanded.htm

Immediate Congressional investigation demanded, media oversight of clear and deliberate psychological warfare against American population non-existent

Revelations that the US government had been in possession of footage released on Sunday depicting alleged Al-Qaeda hijackers and Osama Bin Laden since 2001 and evidence that the footage itself was filmed by security agencies, went unquestioned by the media - who blindly towed the official line that the tape was released by Al-Qaeda. This is smoking gun proof that the U.S. government is staging the release of alleged Al-Qaeda tapes and it demands an immediate Congressional investigation.

Segments of the video that were interspersed with footage of the "laughing hijackers," Jarrah and Atta, showing Bin Laden giving a speech to an audience in Afghanistan on January 8 2000, were culled from what terror experts describe as surveillance footage taken by a "security agency."

This explains the lack of a soundtrack in the video and the fact that the tape does not focus solely on Bin Laden but pans around and shows the attendees in the audience.

Furthermore, film of the Bin Laden speech, reported by the dominant media as new footage, was previously broadcast in the UK docudramaThe Road to Guantanamo, which was first seen on British television nearly seven months ago in March.

News reports over the weekend contained the admission that the U.S. government had been in possession of the footage since 2002, while others said it was found when the United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001, and yet it was still bizarrely reported that the tape, bearing all the hallmarks of having been filmed and edited by undercover US intelligence and having admittedly been in US possession for five years, was released over the weekend by Al-Qaeda.

Either Al-Qaeda has been given access to US intelligence surveillance tapes of its own organization or the tape was released by the US intelligence apparatus. The evidence provides no other explanation.

The fact that the same footage was used in The Road to Guantanamo is startling because the context of the clip in which it is seen portrays British and American intelligence agents showing doctored footage to detainees, whereby their likeness has been edited in with CGI to the Bin laden rally scene, using it to intimidate them into confessing to being Al-Qaeda members.

The latest video tape hoax is only the most recent of a dirty laundry list of past examples where old, re-hashed, or outright faked footage of Bin Laden and his followers was mysteriously obtained and released at the most politically expedient time. These examples are all referenced in our original investigation.

Recall that the Pentagon's stated intention to artificially magnify Musab Al-Zarqawi's role in Iraq was followed by the release of a video tape of Al-Zarqawi threatening the infidels.

The target of this leaked propaganda campaign to boost Al-Qaeda's profile was said to be the "U.S. home audience," and included planting fake stories in newspapers - one of which was later splashed on the front page of the New York Times.

The agenda dovetails with the necessity of the torture program - there are very few real terror cells in existence outside of the puppet mastery of the U.S. and British intelligence apparatus. To maintain a state of fear and obedience amongst the target "home audience," there need to be regular "two minutes of hate" intervals and the artificial creation of supposed terrorist networks and plots.

The tapes are also a desperate attempt to prop up the official version of 9/11 as its credibility crumbles globally and a firestorm of awakening to the fact that the attack was an inside job rages.

I encourage everyone to fully imbue themselves of our original investigation and make it a viral story across the Internet. Click here to get the original story and lobby for mainstream media to pay attention.

We need to demand higher standards from our media starting with a proper investigation as to who the true source of this tape was and an immediate skepticism towards all such future alleged "Al-Qaeda" video tape releases.

A press that lazily dismisses the origins of these tapes as a side-issue is playing a central role in disseminating unchecked war propaganda and violating every code of journalistic ethical conduct.

The U.S. government's role in obtaining and carefully stage-managing the dissemination of these tapes, many of them old footage re-released over and over again, is now without a doubt manifestly obvious and demands immediate Congressional investigation as part of a wider probe into the admitted fake news scandal that has characterized the Bush White House as the most duplicitous and manipulative administration in history and befits a regime that is engaging in psychological warfare against the American people.

Reprehensible

I just hope this is not the precursor to some other reprehensible false flag event before the upcoming election next month.

attack

I don't think they would be stupid enough to do it again under current circumstances. Many Americans hate this administration, and people in other countries (as well as our own) are waking up to the fact that they lost millions of dollars and thousands of lives because Bush Lied. He is creating more terror and more hatred through his policies. If we are hit with a false flag op again, the perpetrators and their families will be doomed.

it could also be argued that

it could also be argued that if anything did happen it would destroy their suggestion that the way to 'win' the 'war on terror' is by fighting it head on..

with that said however, 'desperate times call for desperate measures', and i am personally of the opinion that those in power never go down without a fight.

CGI !!!

The fact that the same footage was used in The Road to Guantanamo is startling because the context of the clip in which it is seen portrays British and American intelligence agents showing doctored footage to detainees, whereby their likeness has been edited in with CGI to the Bin laden rally scene, using it to intimidate them into confessing to being Al-Qaeda members.

so i guess this was just another CGI job by adding Jarrah and Atta.

if we can get this to break, we might actually have a chance sooner than later. i'll be posting this story far and wide. i wonder if Keith Olbermann would touch this???

oh, so would that make some...

terrorist-huggers?

sorry i couldn't resist.

Video authenticity no longer

Video authenticity no longer exists. This article even detailed how the military and TV networks could use CGI to alter world politics, via the "CNN Effect".

I totally agree that one

I totally agree that one should no longer trust any TV media footage.

But that still does not mean that *everything* on screen is a fakery. Just like not every single event is a conspiracy.

However, don't turn a blind eye on the technologies available today for military and big TV networks -- or you will regret it! (Anybody who does so, will be seen as a "media authenticy gatekeeper" in the future not too far away...)

Look, this technology was available 5 years ago (the article was written and published in Technology Review in January 2002):

                        "Lying With Pixels"

Actually, Lying with Pixels

Actually, Lying with Pixels was originally published in the July/Aug 2000 edition of Technology Review. (2nd article in the 2nd column (Features).)

But was updated after 9/11.

 

It seems they removed the last three paragraphs in the update. See here for the original.

The Road to Guantanamo on Google Video

if you want to see The Road to Guantanamo, here it is:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-599098805530677622&q=The+Road+t...

News reports over the

News reports over the weekend contained the admission that the U.S. government had been in possession of the footage since 2002, while others said it was found when the United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001, and yet it was still bizarrely reported that the tape, bearing all the hallmarks of having been filmed and edited by undercover US intelligence and having admittedly been in US possession for five years, was released over the weekend by Al-Qaeda.

Too bad we don't have a real government that would investigate something evil like this. Or an independent press that would point out the inconsistentcies of the story. We have to get rid of our secret governments within the government.

    Interesting picture!

 

 

Interesting picture! (Source: here)

I would not be surprised in the least if "video fakery" lent a hand in the creaton of al-Qaeda tapes.

 

..

Dammit...now I have to go pee...

-slaqqer

I believe he said he had to go pee.

/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

Ted Gunderson on my podcast

hey folks, I just did my show w/ Ted Gunderson
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/10/14546.php
We talked about human and drug trafficking within our gov't., Jeffery McDonald, Richard Hamlin, "The Finders", Cathy O'Brien, Mark Foley, Satanism networks through America, The synthetic terror phenomenon, specifically WTC '93 bombing, and september eleventh (9/11), as well as Waco, OKC, etc., and the covert or shadow government and what their goals and agenda is. Please check out his informative website: http://tedgunderson.com
music: "Conspiracy Theory" by Steve Earl

Thanks for nothing

I've enjoyed your 9/11 stuff, Al, but I don't understand why you would give a right-wing, theocratic American Taliban thug airtime to blame the actions of the government he proudly worked for on "the Devil." Pandering to this kind of Dark Ages, bigoted, neo-Nazi garbage just because he shares some of your views on 9/11 is a dumb thing to do.

Like Kay Griggs, this guy sounds like he needs psychotherapy.

Can someone registered to

Can someone registered to Daily Kos post this article at their site, they seem to be waking up, slowly but steadily.
Not long ago you got banned immediately for posting 911 truth.

First see this:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/10/2/19382/9841

than:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/10/3/04418/8102

than:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/10/4/161326/154

At last, Daily Kos on the job...

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/10/4/161326/154

For the third straight day!

As the comments proceed it is clear they are willing to consider all the possibilities. Hell, they are even starting to question Kos himself.

Very important development on an extremely important website.

"two minutes of hate"....for over five years

Our minds have been collectively and systematically conditioned by a "two minutes of hate" that has been going on now for over five years. In the best Orwellian modes of political thought indoctrination and various other forms of insidious deceit, we were blind to the ACTUAL TERRORISTS that attacked us on 9/11.
While I believed the Regime's story (what else, on that horrific day, was I to believe?) that Islamic fanatics were to blame, I felt that something didn't connect. How could 19 characters, like these guys, commandeer four airliners? Holding all passengers at bay, and flying them with a skill that defied trained pilots, defied logic, defied gravity, had three hit their targets.
The next surprise was while those-in-the-know who seemed to know very little, suddenly and miraculously knew everything there was to know about these strangely accomplished men of terror and of the skies.
These were just a couple of the incredible items in the 9/11 Propaganda Catalogue (on sale at a gulag near you), festering within me for the past five years, that has led me to my new position.
Good work, Alex Jones...the truth may hurt, but it's a temporary sting--lies and treachery are everlasting hell.

scraping the barrel

It shows they're scraping the barrel for disinfo. But, since corporate media is totally infiltrated, not much chance on this one. The best tact might be to hit the Left Gatekeepers hard with this. They're a major road block. Some local exchanges with progressive talk radio has demonstrated to me that hitting them with "blow back is bull" doesn't seem to work. Just makes them defensive. Somehow they must be lead to their own "discovery" - a revelation that reinforces their own brilliance. We need a psychologist to hatch an effective tactic. Ideas please. - jtg

Somehow they must be lead to

Somehow they must be lead to their own "discovery" - a revelation that reinforces their own brilliance.

I'm not a phychologist (although I'm interested in the subject), but I agree 100% with this obervation. The information you find out on your own will sway you a hundred times more effectively than what someone else is "telling" you (especially "someone" you don't like or trust.) This principle holds true in anything from learning new skills and teaching to marketing and to dating women, in my experience.

When convincing Kos (and others):
1. Do NOT be confrontational. Be one of them. People have are a lot more likely to believe and trust someone they can identify with. For example, I've had success on occations by saying how I first though LC2E was bullshit and how I gradually came to change my mind by searching on my own. And it's a true story (well almost).

2. Bring them the information they are ready for. Right now they could use some dirt on Zelikow, and soon they will appreciate able danger. Timing is important. Hold back on the demolitions and for gods sake stay away from NWO and other such things.

3. Let me repeat: do NOT get confrontational, do NOT get defensive. You're not there to defend your views, just to pass on some interesting information you've discovered.

What Is LC2E?

It would be helpful if one would not rely on abbreviations so much.

Loose Change 2. edition

not an insider! ;-)

3 seconds!

3! er, minutes maybe... nvm I'm going to go make flyers

DOWN WITH FAKE AL QAEDA! 

Loose Change

second edition

Psychology of the resistant

I am not a doctor either, but I have a few observations may be useful.

We are all frightened by the events of the past six years. But the manner in which we deal with our fears is a reflection of how we view the world and our capacity to affect it:

Persons raised to obey authority figures without question do not learn how to question, nor do they assimulate the truth that authority has no validity without accountability. They believe deeply that if they obey all will be well. When frightened, they have been trained to automatically turn to authority for solutions. At no point is it part of their reality that ultimately THEY are the finally moral authority in their lives. Telling them that those in power are responsible for their fears, however well documented, merely brings on a further fear that they will be punished for challenging authority themselves.

911 Truthers tend to be a group of people who deal with their fears differently. Whether by raising, temperment or self-education, they believe, however bad it may be, if authority is not challenged it will only get worse. They also have a higher confidence in their abilities to find solutions no matter how dark the times may be, and that authority is ALWAYS accountable to those who give it to them.

So what to do? It is best to start by reiterating the obligations of those who have authority, point out they only have authority as we give it to then, under rule of law, and specify exactly how those in power have flaunted their obligations.(refusing to testify under oath, etc.) Then follow up by pointing out they cannot be allowed to do that unchallenged.

I fear this will be a long re-education process. The "gatekeepers" need to be reminded their job is to challenge authority, not those who have the right to question it.

I hope this was helpful.

What we need to do is use

What we need to do is use the collection of emails that we painfully extracted and contact the media about this.

Clik on the "CALL TO ACTION" thread and find USA and Canadian emails. Use them at your own will. Keep the email short to the point and respectful. This is a great tool!

For USA Media by County http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showpost.php?p=67073&postcount=66

For Canada Media by Provinces http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showpost.php?p=67579&postcount=135

________________________________________

Stand for SOMETHING...or you'll fall for ANYTHING!!

Huge Media Contact List - TXT File

Just copy and paste:

http://unitedslavesofamerica.org/mediacontacts.txt

/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

don't trust Al-Jazeera

Many alternative news sites have bought the idea that Al-Jazeera is the "enemy of my enemy" because it released all those Al-Qaeda tapes.
But take a look at it http://english.aljazeera.net and tell the difference to any MSM like CNN, Fox, ABC - there is none, none except those Al-Qaeda tapes, especially no 9/11 truth or any other larger Bush criticism.
Then take a look at this one http://www.aljazeerah.info - full of anti Neocon stuff, but this one is not the Al-Qaeda "outlet"....

To put it simple, the way of the tapes goes like this:
CIA blackop unit produces it -> the tape is "stonewashed" with lots of crap (noise, Arabics, sound-trouble etc. to make it seem straight from the Afghan cave) -> Al-Jazeera "obtains it" and releases parts -> Republican fools believe this "authenticates it"

Bothering question

This bothers me in Watson's text:

"US intelligence and having admittedly been in US possession for five years, was released over the weekend by Al-Qaeda.
Either Al-Qaeda has been given access to US intelligence surveillance tapes of its own organization or the tape was released by the US intelligence apparatus. The evidence provides no other explanation."

I did not find anywhere , not in MSNBC News piece either, that video was claimed given by Al-Qaida. Ok, it was released by intelligence apparatus. What does this detail prove more? The news told it was given by thtä apparatus.

The video seems evident smoking gun. The fimple fact that they don't look similar to he preivous photos is a proof.

CIA and Forest Gump

I have been in contact with the CIA and they have confirmed (unnamed source) that Forest Gump did indeed meet with President Kennedy.

Of course the video is

Of course the video is fakery. The original cover stoy goes

"The unedited video was passed to The Sunday Times through a previously tested channel. On condition of anonymity, sources from both Al-Qaeda and the United States have confirmed its authenticity."
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2382788,00.html

My point was to question if it is said here "Al Qaida had the video and sent recently to The Sunday Times.