How Did Human Remains End Up Miles From Flight 93's Crash Site?

What Really Happened has a round up of evidence backing the theory that Flight 93 was shot down on 9/11 (see original for links and photos).

"Finding the flight data recorder had been the focus of investigators as they widened their search area today following the discoveries of more debris, including what appeared to be human remains, miles from the point of impact at a reclaimed coal mine." [Pittsburgh Post Gazette, 09/13/01]

Have a good think about the above.

Are we supposed to believe that hijackers armed with only box cutters forced an angry mob to jump from the plane seconds before the crash? Or are we supposed to believe that people simply felt compelled to jump from the plane? If the official story is true then people jumping from the plane is the only way human remains could have been found miles from Flight 93's crash site.

A more logical explanation is that people inside the plane were sucked out because of a sudden depressurisation.
[R]elatives of Flight 93 passengers who heard the cockpit tape April 18 at a Princeton hotel said government officials laid out a timetable for the crash in a briefing and in a transcript that accompanied the recording. Relatives later reported they heard sounds of an on-board struggle beginning at 9:58 a.m., but there was a final "rushing sound" at 10:03, and the tape fell silent. [Philadelphia Daily News, 9/16/02]

The "rushing sound" indicates a depressurisation occurred.

A reason for the depressurisation:

"I know of two people - I will not mention names - that heard a missile," Stuhl said. "They both live very close, within a couple of hundred yards. . .This one fellow's served in Vietnam and he says he's heard them, and he heard one that day." The mayor adds that based on what he knows about that morning, military F-16 fighter jets were "very, very close." [, 11/15/01]

Corroborative evidence?

[See original for photos]

United said Flight 93 left Newark at 8:01 a.m. with 38 passengers, two pilots and five flight attendants. Minutes before the 10 a.m. crash, an emergency dispatcher in Pennsylvania received a cell phone call from a man who said he was a passenger locked in a bathroom aboard United Flight 93.

The man repeatedly said the call was not a hoax, said dispatch supervisor Glenn Cramer in neighboring Westmoreland County. "We are being hijacked, we are being hijacked!" Cramer quoted the man from a transcript of the call.

The man told dispatchers the plane "was going down. He heard some sort of explosion and saw white smoke coming from the plane and we lost contact with him," Cramer said. FBI agent Wells Morrison wouldn't confirm that the plane was hijacked, but said the FBI was reviewing the tape of the 911 call.

"At this point, we're not prepared to say it was an act of terrorism, though it appears to be that," Morrison said. Reporters were taken to the top of a hill overlooking the scene. The crash left a V-shaped gouge in a grassy field surrounded by thick woods, just below a hilltop strip mine. The gouge is 8- to 10-feet deep and 15- to 20-feet long, said Capt. Frank Monaco of the Pennsylvania State Police."

crash site fake

It's not so important whether it was shoot down or not. Important is that they showed a smoking hole in the ground without anything in it, no passengers, no luggage, no plane. It crashed (or landed) somewhere else, so what are they hiding about the original plane?

Exactly. Flight 93 could not have crashed in that hole

It's quite clear the shoot-down story is a major distraction from the lack of wreckage at the "crash site"


It is obviously a fake crash site. Another major piece of evidence damning the official story. We've got to get this new investigation kicking. If the Dumbercrats take control and fail to investigate, the gig is up and no one will deny it any longer: we live in a Dictatorship.

they landed...

Guys do you have the dvd "in plane site"? if you don't
go to this
you will find out that flight 93 landed at Hopkins
Airport in Cleveland, also you will see that flight 175
landed too,.
WCPO news gave the news the day of "the attacks"
read the battom left corner of the article that says
another flight landing was ..... flight 175 .

or in the lake

there's also the theory a local resident near the crash site posted recently, that larger chunks of the plane or maybe the whole thing could have sunken into the nearby lake. Debris was found floating there, but nobody ever searched for more to be found at the bottom.

they landed...

here is the link to find out what happened to flights 93
and 175.................