9/11 was (PARTLY) an inside job

Justice requires not only the truth, but the WHOLE TRUTH, and nothing but the truth.

Half truths can be as deadly as lies, sometimes even moreso. Because they mislead. They can lead to the wrong conclusions. Wrong conclusions often alienate would-be supporters who are turned away, not by the truths being expounded, but by the errors incorporated into the truths.

The cornerstone statement of the 9/11 truth movement is this: "9/11 was an inside job."

Supposing that statement is only half true. Supposing there really was an al-Qaeda attack on 9/11. The real truth may be this: the Washington neocons and their Israeli intelligence friends decided to let 9/11 happen, and help it to happen by adding a few elements to the scenario, such as the demolition of the towers.

My point is this: if we're going to be a truth movement, let's not use a half-truth as our cornerstone statement. Why? Because there are plenty of honest Americans who believe the evidence of a real attack by Muslim extremists on 9/11 is JUST AS VALID as any evidence of an inside job.

We can't have it both ways. We can't criticize the government and the media of lying and presenting half-truths, and then carry on the same practices ourselves. We must live by a higher standard.

I realize this is going to be a controversial blog, but hey, let's start with the facts. I am not at all disputing the evidence of controlled demolition. What I am suggesting is that the demolition of the towers was an add-on to a very REAL attack, coordinated not by the CIA, but by Muslim extremists who wanted to hurt America.

This could very well be the next hurdle the 9/11 truth movement must overcome. How will you reconcile the volumes of evidence you've properly accumulated to show there was an inside job with the volumes of evidence that shows there was an imminent attack being stages against us by Muslim extremists?

In a court of law, evidence and eye-witness accounts hold sway. Call me what you want, but I raise the very issues that would be raised in court.

So have at it....

The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth....SO HELP US, GOD!!!

OK, some facts...

Your government funded and trained el Quesodilla.

The mostly ignored prior warnings came from intelligence agencies and counter-terrorism "experts".

Osayhwereya been Lately and el Quesodilla are inextricably linked to intelligence agencies - CIA, MI6, ISI - which are inextricably linked to the counter-terrorism "experts".

el Quesodilla couldn't make NORAD stand down.

el Quesodilla couldn't pre-plant the explosives necessary to bring down WTC 7 in 6.8 seconds.

el Quesodilla couldn't make the Secret Service stand down and not whisk the pResident away to safety immediately, and without asking anyone for permission to do so.

9/11 was an inside job. PERIOD! The sooner you admit it to yourself and get of the fucking fence, the better.

Please, dear readers, give this walking organ doner some more facts.

The true threat to liberty comes not from terrorists but from our political leaders whose natural inclination is to seize upon any excuse to diminish them.
~~ Walter Williams, Nightly Business Report, September 2001


I will gladly donate my brains to you, because obviously you have none.

Please reread my post. I am not disputing any of the evidence of an inside job. Yes, that includes the tower collapses, the NORAD stand down or the events as they transpired inside the Florida elementary classroom. These all point to government complicity and involvement.

Where your argument shows weakness, (and let's face it, you highlight the weakness of your argument by resorting to comic terminology) is in negating any evidence of a REAL Islamic threat to America.

For good or ill, we have been fighting an ongoing war of retaliation with Iraq since 1990. Our political support for Israel and our continuous meddling into the affairs of the Middle East have garnered constant repetitive threats of violence from leaders like Saddam and bin Laden. They had reason to conspire against us. They hate us and wish to defeat us and conquer us. The American people know this. You do this TRUTH movement no good by suggesting that al Qaeda activities are nothing more than a division of the CIA/M16 "wag the dog" brigade. This is where you create a credibility gap with many of those who wish to connect with the valid evidence that's been accumulated.

What evidence of hijackers or hijackings?

Planted and faked evidence just makes the case even more clear that they were not real. Inside job is a half truth because it was inside/outside but not in the way you describe. Al Qaeda is mostly a fiction in that it may exist but it is not at all what it is purported to be. It is a theatrical psyop maybe using some patsy arab muslims as players but it did not carry out the attacks of 9/11, which involved controlled demolition of buildings with people in them.

Stop trying to preserve the myth--it is dead. over. finito. kaput.


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force


Half truth - half simulation

It is documented by Paul Thompson (and others) that Atta received 100,000 bucks for some job.
This job could well have been to act as hijackers for a military exercise on 9/11.
These guys had a job to do and expected to live through it...
Except someone at the controls turned the simulation into reality. Possibly just like in London...

some job could be a blow job

That isn't proof.

For that matter, the story about the 100,000 wire came from the Times of India--no other source. Just because Paul Thompson cites it doesn't make it true.

So again I ask--what proof is there of hijackings?


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force


Evidence or Proof

The air traffic controllers in Boston were the first individuals to know something had gone wrong on 9/11. They were the first witnesses. They heard hijackers on Flight 11. The voice recording of the hijackers have been publicized for anyone to hear.

There's no reason to believe the air traffic controllers are all lieing. They are mid-level professionals doing their 40 hour a week job.

In a courtroom, their evidence would trump any evidence your attorney might present suggesting that there were no hijackers on board. Unless, of course, you have PROOF there were no hijackers on Flight 11. So what is your proof?

falling in line

I know it is exciting to call each other names and to "win the point" but that is not the goal, we want to start a real revolution of truth, and I think we can all agree that neither side of this arguement knows the truth. You do not have to know the truth, all you need to do is know that the official explanation is NOT the truth and serious forces are in place to cover it up. The agents that monitor this blog, have a job, their job is to divide us. DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE their reach. You guys should work together to figure out a plan to get more people dedicated to critically thinking about the official explanation and commiited to discovering truth where ever it may lead. We need a Revolution. Where are the real Patriots.