Letter to the Editor by Professor Steven Jones

Letter to the Editor:

I stand firmly against the war in Iraq and any war of aggression.

I support scientific scrutiny of the events of 9/11/2001, a day which will live in infamy. I speak as a private citizen of the United States.

"In a democracy we can renounce war and proclaim peace. There is opportunity for dissent. Many have been speaking out and doing so emphatically. That is their privilege. That is their right, so long as they do so legally… We can give our opinions on the merits of the situation as we see it..." (Pres. Gordon B. Hinckley, LDS General Conference, 6 April 2003.)

Wholeheartedly agreeing, I am exercising that right and that privilege. "A team of American and Iraqi public health researchers has estimated that 600,000 civilians have died in violence across Iraq since the 2003 American invasion," (New York Times, 11 Oct. 2006) I renounce these killings in the Middle Eastern wars.

We must insist on complete answers to questions about what really happened on September 11th, why there were no air defenses that day, and why we have gone to war in the Middle East. These issues transcend party politics. These yearnings for understanding of 9/11 and the wars that followed take us to the core of our heritage as Americans -- I support the Constitution of the United States. I am very concerned about those elected officials who would engage in pre-emptive war rather than "common defense" to "repel invasions" (Article I), compromise our rights against torture and cruel punishments (8th Amendment), take away the right of habeas corpus (Article I), and diminish the freedom to speak out without fear of reprisals (1st Amendment).

Two structural engineering professors in Switzerland have recently spoken out as I have also done, declaring that explosives were with "utmost probability" responsible for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 on September 11th. "WTC7 was with the utmost probability brought down by explosives", said one. [Tages-Anzeiger, 9/9/2006]

After seeing the collapse of World Trade Center 7 (see wt7.net), many instinctively want to know why this 47-story skyscraper, which was never hit by a plane, collapsed completely seven hours after the WTC Towers had collapsed. How could this happen? The 9/11 Commission report fails to mention the collapse of WTC7. Federal laboratories have not officially answered yet. FEMA explains how fire might initiate a collapse, then admits, "Our best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence." Is it a crime, then, to consider an alternative hypothesis, that explosives were used?

I invite you to study this matter for yourself. Please read the peer-reviewed articles published here: www.Journalof911Studies.com . This Journal is supported by the Scholars for 9/11 Truth, which I co-chair, and considers the "official theory" of what happened on 9/11 as well as alternative explanations. One of my scientific papers on 9/11 issues is published in this Journal (as well as in a book edited by Professors David Ray Griffin and Peter Scott.) The paper therein by Joseph Firmage explores evidences that US intelligence knew in advance that the hijackers were coming and that the attacks were "allowed to happen," to justify wars in the Middle East. At least ten nations are on record as having warned the current administration that terrorist attacks were imminent, shortly before 9/11.

If another "9/11-like event" is "allowed to happen" in the near future, do you not suppose that it will be blamed this time on Iran or Syria, followed by a swift and deadly attack on the country blamed? Can you not imagine that a military draft will follow next, with college students constrained to enter the military, and handed rifles to go and kill people in the Middle East, by the tens of thousands?

Because of my concern for college-age students I have taught and loved for decades, I am motivated to speak out emphatically against what I judge – after thorough study and reflection – to be terrible wars, wars of aggression, founded on deceptions.

Steven E. Jones
Ph.D. Physicist
Co-Chair, Scholars for 9/11 Truth

Digg it!

Am I wrong to hope...

That Dr. Jones has more time to devote to the truth movement?

Obviously it'd be swell if some of his colleagues joined the fray.

But as it is, if he is formally dismissed (has that happened yet...?), it might be a boon to the movement more than a blow. Not to mention the professional martyrdom.

What are you talking about?

What are you talking about?

What are you talking about?

Dr. Jones was maligned by neocons.

They based their argument on a lie.

Why BYU backed down to this evil is the real story.

Just as well. For every end there is a beginning, and it is time for Dr. Jones to run for the Senate.

Could make a great President some day, if I say so myself.

To what publication was this

To what publication was this letter submitted?

Professor Jones has Elected

to take early retirement from BYU.

He has not been dismissed.

Say it ain't so!

GW: Tell me you're kidding and/or hypothesizing. Do you have a source for the early retirement thing? I haven't heard anything about that. Not on KSL or Deseret News. Thanks.

Jones leaving BYU? Do you

Jones leaving BYU? Do you have anything more about this? When did this happen?

Just Desserts: Jones was kicked out of BYU.

We all saw it coming.

Really???

Hmmm. If this is true I hope he will be okay. That is tough, you know he loved his work, his students.
He is such a nice and genuine soul. We can't lose him, he is so dedicated and important to discovering the truth.

*** Steven Jones is no longer with BYU ***

This article was posted around 35 minutes ago (10/20/2006 11:10pm CDT)
http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=582631

OT RANT: We are living in dark times...

and it's frustrating that people just don't seem to give a damn. I get a glimmer of hope with every new poll supporting 9/11 Truth, but with the stranglehold on truth (by the MSM), it goes nowhere.

I subscribe to two newspapers in my home town and they are both filled with lies and fluff and murder and death... and more lies... and more fluff.

Then when I see Dr. Steven Jones put it all on the line, his reputation , his training, his good and decent name... for what!?!? To be discarded and ignored like day old bread.

Meanwhile the hell hole that is Iraq continues to fester and bubble over like a pus filled open wound... and this bumbling idiot of a pResident continues babbling his utter nonsense... with seemingly little to NO opposition.

The democrats have been and remain virtually silent throughout all of this. We heard more from the democratic leadership when Hugo Chavez called Bush "the devil" then we've heard from them on Mark Foley and his abuse of young boys! Where do we as a nation turn for justice? What has happened to our country!?!?!

Yes I'm ranting... because I'm very, very, very PISSED!!!

Great letter though eh?

He really sticks to the main points that will get through to anyone. And at the same time make it obvious that someone in the US Gov needs to be held accountable.

That absent-air-defense-thing has always been a huge point for people just starting to investigate 9/11.

OT: Cherepanov critique of Bazant & Zhou paper

Bazant , just put out a new paper on "Progressive Collapse", in addition to a responce to a critique of their earlier paper (Bazant & Zhou) by a G.P. Cherepanov (never heard of him) which can be seen here:

http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/Progre-Rebut...

..from what I understand this critique (by Cherepanov) was distributed by email to USNCTAM Participants, but does anybody else have it??

I would like to read it....

Support Jones

Dammit people, I have been at this for awhile now and if we don't stand up for Jones we might as well forget about the whole thing.

I don't say that lightly. I am always careful not to post discouraging sentiments. Most of the time, they do more harm than good.

BUT IF WE AREN'T WILLING TO SUPPORT A PHYSICS PROFESSOR AND MAKE HIM THE FOCAL POINT OF OUR EFFORTS, WTF????

Okay

How would we make him the focal point of our efforts? ideas?

How About...

"BUT IF WE AREN'T WILLING TO SUPPORT THE FAMILY MEMBERS AND MAKE THEM THE FOCAL POINT OF OUR EFFORTS, WTF????"

No offense to the good Professor...
___________________________________

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

Jon, come on. You know as

Jon, come on. You know as well as I do that common sense trumps elaborate story lines. I think you offer a good chunk of the story, but sometimes I wonder if you aren't diverting us from the smoking gun.

I don't doubt your sincerity, but WTC 7 is the smoking gun. It works far better than any elaborate story line. WTC 7 = 2+2 =5

Which...

Group of individuals managed to force D.C. to create a so-called Independent 9/11 Commission, and why did they manage to do it? Because no one can say no to the family members when push comes to shove. At least that's my opinion. If the family members started to make a big stink, I think it would make an enormous difference. I think it's possible they're on the verge.
___________________________________

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

Jon, I use PFT as the bridge

Jon,
I use PFT as the bridge to reach people who are trapped in the MSM paradigm. I just did it again today, against all odds.

What I am saying, is WHY IS WTC 7 IGNORED?

It is our best hope and I feel it is being marginalized.

Sometimes I wonder if all of this other stuff isn't desingned to keep us from asking the real question: WHY DID WTC 7 IMPLODE?

Please know that this is from an ally, not an enemy.

If the family members do anything more

that undermines the official version of events and/or the Commission Report, we should be all over it with support. No question.

I don't get the impression that Donna Marsh O'Connor has it in her to "lead" any kind of movement, which is too bad. I'm not saying she's not capable of it -- certainly she has the brains and the guts -- but that she doesn't want to live her life like that.

If she said "Jump!" I would definitely say "How high?" Same thing with Lorie Van Auken.

It's not just...

DMO we're dealing with...
___________________________________

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

or how about "BUT IF WE

or how about "BUT IF WE AREN'T WILLING TO SUPPORT THE FAMILY MEMBERS AND STEVEN E. JONES - BOTH UNDER THE SAME ONE 'UMBRELLA' - AND MAKE THEM THE FOCAL POINT OF OUR EFFORTS"

Its not either or, its BOTH imo !!
lets talk about that 'umbrella'.

let me add: - i think Steven

let me add:

- i think Steven E. Jones is a fantastic guy. Ok, this is not what were debating here, what i mean is, it was him who got me into all this. Reading his paper and watchin one of his lectures early this year made a big difference to me, and yes, ive seen loose change etc.. before that. And ive heard many others whom i would call 'logical thinkers' to whom it had the same impact.
- The family members are very powerful in all this too of course. Maybe more so for those who approach things more from a 'feeling' perspective, than from logic.

To put this rambling into a stereotype situation:
- i show steven e. jones's work to my programmer friend.
- i show the story of the family members and their frustration (press for 911 truth..) to my female friends.

Dont take that stereotype thing too serious, just to illustrate...in the end, both of em have to look into both things...

Oh my God, dude.

I loved PFT and greatly respect the Jersey Girls, but it was definitely Jones' work that initially made me open my eyes wide enough to see what was going on. Please don't make this a chromosomal thing. ;)

dont take it so literally

cause i didnt really mean it.
i admit, it was the worst possible example i could have given, but it was before i had my first coffee today.

Professor Steven Jones is a Class Act

He is the consumate educator, and he is also a great American.

To those who say otherwise, they are greatly mistaken; and their criticism of him is only helping to continue the perversion of the "official conspiracy theory" as promulgated by the US Government, which is pure, unadulterated tripe. But their criticism is also helping instigate the fire and indignation of a nation that is no longer going to accept quietly these lies.

The Government is servant to its master, We the People.

With all the evidence accumulated thus far regarding the facts and anomalies of 9/11, now is the time for the new 9/11 investigation, except this next one will be a true murder investigation with the goal to identify, apprehend, and bring to justice those reponsible for this heinous crime.

The place to look for these perpetrators should begin along the banks of the Potomac.

Please let your voice be heard now even more, as Steven would agree wholeheartedly in your doing so.

Only 3 More Diggs Needed...

Time to Run for The Senate Dr. Jones

"In a democracy we can renounce war and proclaim peace. There is opportunity for dissent. Many have been speaking out and doing so emphatically. That is their privilege. That is their right, so long as they do so legally… We can give our opinions on the merits of the situation as we see it..." (Pres. Gordon B. Hinckley, LDS General Conference, 6 April 2003.)

Dr. Jones I think it is time to think about running for Senator of Utah.

You would be a breath of fresh air.

Everyone that has been able to hear you speak knows that you are a good, decent, and honorable man.

You are perhaps the best person I can think of that can help "give our opinions on the merits of the situation."

Country needs you Dr. Jones.

Best Regards,
beijingyank

Great to see

Great to see Prof. Jones endorcing the study by Joseph Firmage that

1) "explores evidence that US intelligence knew in advance that the hijackers were coming"

2) "and that the attacks were "allowed to happen," to justify wars in the Middle East."

3 recognizes "At least ten nations are on record as having warned the current administration that terrorist attacks were imminent, shortly before 9/11."

Clearly Prof. Jones understands there must have been both LIHOP and MIHOP elements to the mystery of 9/11.

I wish him well. He is one of the best spokesmen for this movement. He seems to have successful dodged the temptation to conclude MIHOP only. This shows that he is willing to consider all the evidence of 9/11.

Dr. Jones Has Offer From Another University

At the 'Scholars For 9/11 Truth' website Dr. Jones shares that he has a teaching offer from a University. Any ideas as to what school? Cal Berkeley?....

Dr Jones is the very definition of a patriot.

Fetzer/Jones 2008

Fetzer/Jones 2008

Well spoken, Professor Jones

Thank you for this letter. Your words are direct, fearless and carry the ring of great moral clarity. Well done!

Thank you Dr Jones

For all you do