Jim Meigs just looks guilty. all uppity and nervous. and dont you love how, once again, Fox News follows a 9/11 truth hit piece with a "war on terror" story? "is it safe to fly?". jesus christ, they make pravda look amatuer.

Explosive jet fuel, not just old ornery jet fuel but explosive jet fuel. Pathetic.

And the hits just keep on coming....sort of. Meigs does an even worse job than usual here.

Meigs mentions the WTC collapses, and stresses that although the jet fuel flame and subsequent conventional fires were not hot enough to melt steel, one does not need to melt steel to make it lose strength.

What Meigs fails to mention:

The 'steel melting' canard was universally embraced by all the so-called 'experts' who defended the official version of events days after 9/11. It was only after skeptical people made the observation that it is physically impossible for jet fuel or office furnishings burning in open air to melt steel, that the 'experts' switched to the 'softening' canard, while simultaneously creating the fiction that the 9/11 Truthers were the ones to perpetrate the 'steel melting' canard.

Think about it...these 'experts' originally made the claim that a jet fuel fire melted steel...given this, I'm disinclined to trust blindly in any other 'conclusions' they put forth.

Also, the simple fact is that the fire was never hot enough to even marginally weaken a few supports, but we're supposed to believe that a conventional, oxygen-starved fire weakened all (or very nearly all) supports equally, to the point where they all failed suddenly, completely, and catastrophically, producing the symmetrical, free-fall collapse we witnessed on 9/11. It doesn't add up, folks.

Meigs also fails to address the molten steel found at Ground Zero, and his silence regarding Building 7 speaks volumes.

Meigs mentions the Pentagon crash, and lambastes 9/11 Truthers for taking a single eyewitness' comment out of context.

What Meigs fails to mention:

How a 60-ton jetliner could essentially vaporize upon colliding with the Pentagon facade, leaving no marks other than the small hole, while the same jetliners punched Wile E. Coyote-esque silhouettes of themselves through steel supports. Both scenarios can't be correct, folks.

How 60-odd tons of aluminum could be vaporized in the 'intense heat of the jet fuel fire' (difficult, since again, jet fuel cannot burn hot enough to vaporize aluminum), and yet, enough DNA from the crash victims survives to conclusively ID nearly all of them. Again, you can't have it both ways.

Meigs mentions Shanksville, and makes the bizzare and totally unsupportable claim that the crash site is consistent with a jetliner striking the ground at high speed. He also claims that, according to the cell phone companies, it is child's play to make cell calls from an airliner at cruising altitude.

What Meigs fails to mention:

If cell calls from airplanes are so easy to make, someone really ought to call up AirCell and let them know their business model is in the toilet. AirCell markets products designed specifically to work around the difficulties of using cellphones on aircraft.

Also, if the plane plowed straight into the ground, wouldn't we expect to find most of the debris at the crash site, more or less? Would we expect jet engines, each of which is 10% of the total weight of the aircraft, to be found two miles away from the main crash site? Would we expect eyewitnesses to report confetti-like shards of aluminum drifting from the sky seven miles from the main impact site?

Such observations are not consistent with an airliner crashing under its own power. Such observations are, however, consistent with the parts of said airliner falling to earth, after it was destroyed at altitude.

Well, this turned out to be a bit longer than intended, but something has to be done to counter the incessant lies from the MSM-hit machine.

Unfortunately, people who do take Fox News as gospel will have their preconceived notions reinforced with this slickly produced hit propaganda piece.

The fact that whenever Meigs shows up on Fox News, either today or a couple months ago on the O'Reilly factor, there is no one on our side to debate, and raise the possibility that there might be holes in Mr. Meigs' "debunking" which in fact is not debunking at all, is proof that Meigs is a slick disinfo agent designed to discredit the movement. As a previous poster said, his silence on WTC 7 speaks volumes.

A couple months ago, O'Reilly whets the viewers' appetite before the commercial with: "Coming Up: Busting the myth that the 9/11 attacks were *orchestrated* by AMERICA!" Since this is the conclusion from the outset, there is by definition no debate. Just Meigs, who can parrot the straw man arguments and misinfo without being challenged. Same thing today.

ANOTHER TELLING SIGN THAT THIS WAS A PROPAGANDA PIECE: They were trying to debunk the demolition "myth" by saying "The CTists post prevalent wild claim is that the jet fuel didn't burn hot enough to melt steel. Well, it didn't have to melt the steel, it only had to weaken it and turn it into rubber." Well, as they're saying this, there's a banner at the bottom of the screen: "MYTH: Jet fuel Doesn't Burn Hot Enough to ***Melt*** Steel." (Asterisks mine of course :) DID ANYBODY ELSE NOTICE THIS???

Actually, after watching it again, the next banner a few seconds later does say "Fact: The fire didn't need to melt the steel, just weaken" or whatever. My bad on that one. But regardless, his words are still pseudoscience. The building was already supporting all the top floors anyway, so why should the building dissolve like a tree turning to sawdust from the top down?! He doesn't mention that it takes a tremendous amount of energy to pulverise the entire building's concrete into such fine powder.

He also doesn't mention how these were cool, oxygen-starved fires, and how even if they were raging fires with many orange and yellow flames not unlike the Waco massacre, the steel wouldn't have been brought up to his weakening point in the BRIEF PERIOD these towers were burning. No comparison to the skyscraper fires in LA, Philly, Venuezuela, and Madrid.

Oh,another thing: Last year I flew from Columbus OH to Toronto. No clouds in the sky, and we went directly over Cleveland; I could see downtown, and I could recognize which freeways were which. On the ground I would have had full reception. I turn on my cell, try to make a call to someone IN CLEVELAND, and there was no reception. And this was relatively low altitude, maybe 10,000 feet, definitely not 30,000. So even at low altitude, I find it hard to believe the story of the man who called from the airplane bathroom using his cell phone in 2001.

I could'nt finish this............Going to the bathroon to puke!

That soul-less, inhuman sack of puss, Meigs, is pulling figures out of his ass.
In this Fox clip, Meigs claims that there was 90,000 tons of steel above the impact zones...This is completely fabricated because each of the Twin Towers, in fact, was composed of approximately 200,000 tons of high strength structural steel (besides the weight of the concrete, drywall, furniture, etc. etc.)...That equals TWICE the amount of steel used in the Empire State Building PER TOWER!! The WTC in fact had well over 4 times the amount of steel in it than the Empire State Building.
This amounts to approximately over 1,800 tons of steel per floor in each tower (116 floors in each Twin Tower including basement levels)...Meigs tripled the amount of 'above collapse zone' weight in the case of the 1WTC (north) tower and he doubled it in the case of 2WTC (south) tower...This tells me that Meigs DOES know the specifics and he purposefully distorted and inflated them on that interview.
I read Meigs ridiculous comic book,( "Debunking" 9/11 myths) fairy tale at the bookstore (it was a VERY short read) and it's not even worthy of being called a book...It's more like a disinfo pamphlet for dummies in general.

Off topic, some of my friends are gay. But my gaydar went up as soon as Jim Meigs came on. Is he gay?

I bought the debunking 911 myths book by Jim Meigs. I have to tell you I would not be without it in my restroom. It is essential for everyone to have this book! When ever I run out of toilet paper, I rip a page out and use it on my botty. Ahhh, such absorbancy shit. This is the respect level I have for shithead like Jim Meigs and their books.

Is it better for him to just pull it.......I mean, skip it?