A Letter to Nancy Pelosi

In answer to Ed Hass' call for letters, I submit mine in the hope that I might inspire others
to do the same and get involved in the process.

November 8, 2006

Dear Madam Speaker, (you may as well get used to it),

First let me congratulate you on yesterday's historic victory. It gave me great joy and a
soaring sense of hope for my children's, and my country's, future. This was only
bolstered by your recent speeches. Your use of the words: open, honest, ethical, and
transparent, in reference to what kind of government we are to expect from you and our
other Representatives, is exactly on course and what I think the country and the entire
world need, in order to properly heal from the wounds of our recent past. In another
context, you used the word accountability. Madam, I take you at your word.

I am a lifelong Democrat, although for some time, I have grown to think of my party as
the lesser of two evils, no disrespect intended.

Ms. Pelosi, I would ask you, as a fellow American, to please help open the eyes of our
country to the realities of this war, the truth regarding the events of 9/11, and the money
that has been stolen from our children's future, through cronyist contracts, war
profiteering, price-fixing, gouging, and the miraculous financial events leading up to 9/11.
I implore you to launch these inveatigations at the earliest possible moment, as I'm
sure the shredders are already screaming.

I would further urge you to immediately begin the debate to rescind The Millitary
Commissions Act and The Patriot Act, and do whatever you can to end the "black"
prisons and suspended human rights for these detainees. The right of habeus corpus
predates the Magna Carta, as I'm sure you are aware.

With the number of books, movies, documentaries, letters, and photoes, regarding
these questions and anomalies; from experts at all levels of science, engineering and
government, I find it impossible to believe that you are unaware of them. Add to this the
pleas from family members of the deceased and eyewitnesses, regarding the official
accounts and the flawed 9/11 Commission Report, and I believe your investigations
have been all but done. At the least, the evidence cries out for further investigation.

My concern is that, like the media and 99% of Congress, you will turn the same blind
eye in their direction, when you could have saved our country's economy, and possibly
millions of lives, not to mention our national pride, and rightful place as a leader among

Madam, you can change the world or allow it to wallow into further genocide and
destruction, by maintaining the status quo. I beg you to allow the light of day
to help cleanse these wounds, that the healing process might begin. This election was
a mandate for change. Please make it a meaningful, lasting, and historic one.

With deepest regards and hope for our future,
John Beatty


letter! Good job! I'm glad you mentioned restoration of habeas corpus. Harry Reid would not talk about that yesterday. Watching CSPAN this morning with Walter Pincus (WaPo) and heard a couple of truthers call in. Mr. Pincus, predictably, brushed them aside and into the JFK conspiracy pile.

If you understand JFK....

....you understand 9/11...

The parallels regarding means, motive & opportunity are inescapable.

At the end of the Eisenhower Admin., the CIA (with VP Nixon) form plans to use the military to expand and restore, respectively, US business interests in Southeast Asia and Cuba. But Kennedy wins instead. Eisenhower, as he leaves office, famously warns about excessive influence/power of M-I-C. Bay of Pigs shoved down Kennedy's throat by CIA. Kennedy threatens to break up CIA. Military again tries, and fails, to force Operation Northwoods upon him to invade Cuba. Kennedy takes on Fed with competing currency. Kennedy issues Executive Order to remove all troops from Viet Nam by end of '65. Kennedy assassinated. CIA chief Allan Dulles (the Philip Zelikow of the Warren Commission), who Kennedy fired after the Bay of Pigs, is put in charge of the cover-up of his death. Gulf of Tonkin incident manufactured in Aug. '64, furious rhetoric involving the "domino theory" and "international communism" (the War on Terrorism of the day) ensues. Vietnam escalates and continues for 10 years. Dupont, Dow Chemical, Bell Hellicopter (the Halliburtans and Carlyle Groups of their day) get rich on American tax dollars. Domestically, US National Guard called on to oppress young Amercan prostestors (actually killing them at Kent State). 58,000 Americans die in SE Asia; as do millions of Vietnamese.

Does any of this rhyme?

To get the what the MIC wanted (war in Vietnam with the resulting military contracts), two things had to happen...Kennedy had to be removed and a false-flag attack (Gulf of Tonkin) had to be manufactured.

Remember when the Bush Administration suppressed a new official government history of the the Gulf of Tonkin, revealing the fiction of it, in 2004, because it was "too close to the events of 9/11" (their words)?

This time they only needed 9/11. (And the subsequent demonization of all Muslims.)

Ironically, Pincus is right. JFK is 9/11. (But he knows that).


Reading "Profiles in Courage" by JFK right now.... It's a great book about the political foundations of this country.... a must read.

JFK was a brilliant thinker and a great loss to evolution of this country and the world.

Yeah, JFK was when we lost the country to the Shadow Government

.....for good....the final nail in the coffin was when Bobby was likewise killed by the same interests....

Fletcher Prouty's book "JFK" has a lot of info on the "why" behind the JFK assassination (although it is somewhat repetitive).

And Olver Stone's film "JFK: The Director's cut" (which includes a great documentary), is his masterpiece.

Jack Ruby killing Oswald reminds me of the 9/11 cover-up

Why, if Ruby was outraged at Oswald for killing JFK, would Ruby then shoot Oswald 2 days after??? Wouldn't Ruby have obviously realized that killing Oswald would prevent us from learning if Oswald had acted alone or not, and allow any of Oswald's partners in the crime get away?

Great analysis. Throw in

Great analysis. Throw in oil interests, and you get 9/11.

and lest we forget....

two more stars of the show- LBJ and Bush 41

Dear altruist

Yes!.....I agree! Sad most people are blind to the truth,and others simply don't care.

Too many people have a

Too many people have a vested interest.... untill it's on their front door.... it doesn't matter.....

that's what scares them the most about the thought of terrorists hitting them where it hurts..... all the wrongs that we perpetuate around the world... in appearance.... finally came home.

and they can either change..... or require their country to change.... or they can squash the threat at all costs.

FEAR.... what an ingenius tool.... like a screwdriver to the earhole.... one way or another you are going to be labotomized.

Hear hear, great summary Altruist

we'll get to the bottom of it all someday!


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force


Pincus is Mockingbird from way back.


"Trento writes that "one of the most important journalists under the control of Operation Mockingbird was Joseph Alsop, whose articles appeared in over 300 different newspapers. Other journalists willing to promote the views of the CIA included Stewart Alsop (New York Herald Tribune), Ben Bradlee (Newsweek), James Reston (New York Times), Charles Douglas Jackson (Time), Walter Pincus (Washington Post), William C. Baggs (Miami News), Herb Gold (Miami News) and Charles Bartlett (Chattanooga Times)."

Too easy.

Well my point there was

that, regardless of how you feel about JFK conspiracy theories, mainstream journalists are always going to use that as a way to dismiss 911 truthers.

You don't have to like it. But it's the truth. They all want the truth to be cloaked in mystery, as is JFK's assassination is to this day, in the public consciousness I mean. They would love for 911 truth to turn out the same way and by god they will do all they can to make it so.

Hence, Pincus's dismissal. He pretends as if he'd never even heard of any of this stuff pertaining to 911 facts (the 911 Commission Report was just a PHENOMENAL historical document, some such drivel as that - riiiiight). These people kill me.

Yeah, I got that, I agree...

...and I wasn't addressing you specifically at all (even though I clumsily used the second person in my post. My bad.). I was speaking more to Pincus, if anyone.

Uh huh, he was using JFK as a way to dismiss us....what I was trying to say was that, if you look just a little below the surface, he's more right than he intended to be.

Good point that they want to bury 9/11 in the same way...we're in a "race against time"....our side is striving to get this information to as many people as possible, as fast as possible....so the people responsible can be held accountable while it's still fresh in the public's consciousness....


I got what you meant, there. I think you raised some excellent points. Unfortunately, the msm picture on the whole JFK thing is rarely presented quite so clearly with all dots connected and such will be the case with 911, I fear.

Those who are really pulling the strings do NOT want the dots connected and they typically get what they want.

It's hard, personally, for me to understand how people don't "get it" when you watch the buildings go down the way they did. But apparently, the media's control over the average human mind is as profound as we all fear and can cause people to "not believe their eyes" using the powerful drug: "spin."