911 Truth Movement: WE`LL NEVER STOP . . .

Tagging for 9/11 truth . . .

Thanks to Prisonplanet for the heads up.

Note: this is a duplicate of this blog entry, sorry for the confusion.

We need much more artwork like this using paint, markers, or

chalk! Since the msm is being controlled by the gov't, such cost-effective tactics are needed. (How else can we compeat with a billionaires like Ruppert Merdock who print nothing but NeoCon propaganda?)



and Stickers

I spent a few hours one Friday night placing stickers (The War on Terror is a Lie - 9/11 was an Inside Job) on the back of signs around Boston. Everyone can do this. It was fun. It will raise awareness. I look for places where a lot of people should see it, but also not likely to take it down. Most roadway left hand turning lanes have a sign (that faces the other way) ideally located for sticker placement.

Increase your efforts people!!


Stickers are so easy to print off. With a smaller font I can easily make 60 - 100 stickers per page. They can be placed anywhere, on shopping mall doors, pay phones, shopping carts, inside menus...any place people will look.

Show "I have a bunch of stickers for you for free" by Anonymous (not verified)

Bend Over...

And put your head between your legs. I'm sure you'll find some place appropriate.

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

Jon Gold scuttles back under his rock


those signs are great... but

those signs are great... but it's good also write a website there so that people can will know of a good place to look. i like sending people to http://www.truth911.net because that site has all the good movies, info, and links to all the other truth movement sites. and it looks pretty groovy too.

More ideas needed

I agree, we need links for people to go to, another idea is write 9/11 links and infos on dollar bills. Keep spreading!!!

Then what? How about

Then what? How about nationwide congressional and AG sit-ins for the truth?

Sorry, Dem,

I didn't see your blog. My bad.


No problem dude, ps GW do

No problem dude, ps GW do you know whatever happened to "LJ Chavez" LOL?

He's probably working on

He's probably working on that new hit show, Metal Edge!

those signs are great... but

those signs are great... but it's good also write a website there so that people can will know of a good place to look. i like sending people to http://www.truth911.net because that site has all the good movies, info, and links to all the other truth movement sites. and it looks pretty groovy too.

Chaulk it up to experience

LOL! He/she? looks exactly like my twin surrogate brother in Australia, Justin Griffin. (Not sure about the skirt, maybe it's cover.)

It's legal to use chaulk because it washes off. Why not do it Sydney style, using lots of kids to make huge mandalas, like the John Lennon memorial sidewalk, so you could see them from Central Park's most posh condos, like the Sherry Netherland. They really aren't getting enough 'local color' for their $30M views.

Again, if you want to cover more ground, you really need to consider these 3' wide rolls of visqueen. Two ways to go: Black with white letters, or Clear with Red (so it looks bloody-dripping wet). For $8. you get a 50' roll. $3. can of kills spray. You'll get 100 feet's worth of 3' letters, meaning a 2-sided sign. People won't stop to take it down if you have someone standing watch and waving at the traffic, but the narcocitizencops will attempt to get your license number.

Back on the streets of B'klyn, Riverside, there are plenty of idle minds we should be recruting. The only problem is that the Kings of tagging aren't that hip to 9/11. They're the ones who need to see (dub) 'terror slum!'

This clip real?

911 Bomb explosion

It seems real but why such a short clip? It seems a little more footage before and after would have been helpful.

inspiring picture

I watched this video and was suprised at the end when they showed a picture of what inspired them to make the video because I know where that is. That was a picture of the noise wall on the east side of I-25 in Colorado Springs near downtown. While I did not see the tag as I do not drive that far south very often. It is good to know that you can do something good with a little spray paint and some time.

Show "Is the 9/11 Truth Movement dying? You bet it is." by Anonymous (not verified)

Yeah what terrible people

Yeah what terrible people they are!
Off with their heads!
You're a joke...go troll with the neo cons.
Fetzer is my hero!!!

Show "Too bad 911Blogger.com is scared" by Anonymous (not verified)

"Is the 9/11 Truth Movement

"Is the 9/11 Truth Movement dying? You bet it is."

Unfortunately for the greater population, the 911 Truth Movement is self perpetuating because Bush/Neocons have no intention of leaving Iraq. They also intend on attacking Iran as planned. As a result, 911 will never go away as it remains the justification for "wars that will not end in our lifetime".

No, unfortunately for defenders of Bush and his mad neocons, the 911 Truth movement will never go away until the wars that were based on 911 as justification cease.

DOn't let the door hit you in the a*s on the way out, troll.

Show "Which gives your motive away. You blew it big time." by Anonymous (not verified)

But Shill, loads of people were onto 9/11 truth BEFORE

the Chimp invaded Iraq. Also, not everyone agrees that the Chimp was "behind 9/11." Ultra-moneyed elements in the U.S. and abroad were the real instigators & masterminds of 9/11. Our Chimp just went along with the flow. He ain't no FDR or JFK, that's for sure.

So you are even dumber

Dissing the 9/11 Truth Movement for claiming 9//1 was NOT an inside job.

Way to go, Champ!

Our Chimp is a puppet of Bilderbergs, Rothchilds, Rockefellers

and other NeoCons who pull his strings.

speaking of Rockefeller,

speaking of Rockefeller, guess whos gonna head the intelligence commitee for the Dems? thats right,one of the the establishments favorite democrats, Jay Rockefeller. what a cruel joke.

Of course Bush knew. He was in on it! Did he plan it? Doubt it.


I suggested Chimp wasn't the mastermind. At the very least, he's

still guilty of high treason, war crimes, crimes against humanity, etc.


9/11 seems to have had more to do with stopping a global economic collapse than it did with creating the pretext to invade Iraq. In early september of 2001, economic collapse was imminent. 9/11 averted it, or at least delayed it long enough for the big bankers to consolidate their funds so they can profit more from it. One cannot underestimate the importance of drug money to this huge ponzi scheme we call an economy! The destruction of the opium crop in afghanistan was a crippling blow to the global economy.

The shrills around here are

The shrills around here are pretty stupid. Did the pentagon hire freepers for this task?

there are extreemly clever

there are extreemly clever people trolling here, or some people say all the wrong things. what is it with people saying its dying? what are they basing their statement on? seems plain ridiculous to me. seems to me its just geting started...

from the uk it looks like dems aint going to do jack all, first thing they do is say that their going to use all the reccomendations from the 9/11 comission report in order to fight terror. *tears t-shirt of and burns it in anger*

this seems to me that there is some serious machavelleing (if that is a word, heh) going on behind closed doors, bi partisanship to the max. so what to do? probably get out there and start chalking. i used to laugh at chalking but now it seems a better idea. after all....it washes off doesnt it, if u get caught......bucket of water and a brush. no biggie. slight loss of street cred. but this is 9/11 truth dude. thats all the explaining u gotta give.

Show "9/11 Truth" by Anonymous (not verified)

I do not get the point of

I do not get the point of attempting to censor that material. It's a bit outlandish, but I did learn a thing or two about the WTC that isn't talked about very often. (the bathtub design... the sheer scale of the slurry wall system.) These were well designed buildings. Not just from the ground up, but from far beneath the ground and up. You can really see the japanese archetectural influences. It's funny how they supposedly collapsed so easily. The WTC complex was not designed like some half assed hodge podge suburban strip mall. People need to be aware of that, and that site should be commended for that much at least.

Imagine what kind of explosion could occur that far underground, at the very base of the tower where it meets the bedrock. And any evidence of it would be buried under a mountain of rubble.

The slurry wall.

I learned about the slurry wall from a PBS documentary -- I don't need to hear about it from the Keebler Elf lady. The beam weapon "hypothesis" is just the next offering from the people who brought us NPT and TV Fakery. Really.

they seem to datamine 5+

they seem to datamine 5+ years worth of dead end theories and attempt to give them legitimacy, by having their disinformation figureheads regurgitate the information.

Coordinated, tireless, and obvious. 

Debunking the beam weapon theory

This came up a few days ago and I didn't have much to say about it then but it was mentioned again today and I have had some more thoughts on this. Please read what I have to say on the matter; I took some time and thought to compose this.

The easiest way to debunk the beam weapon theory is to read her paper and realize at no point does she provide any evidence for a beam weapon being used. The paper contradicts itself numerous times as well, as does the whole theory, and the technical limitations, and the fact these events look nothing like a beam weapon hit it.

The dustification of the towers is compelling but does not rule out less 'supernatural' explanations. Her seismic arguments, arguments about the holes in the buildings, and bathtub being intact are not valid, they're totally nonsensical. For that matter the whole paper is 6 pages of nonsense with some nice photos collected that I haven't seen before.

That said, one cannot rule out a beam weapon totally either, but even with a fantastic scenario and technology I still can't see a beam weapon being used. The evidence she presents does not indicate a beam weapon. The main evidence that would peak my interest would be samples of steel that showed the effects which could not be explained with a kinetic or thermal transformation such as the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hutchison_effect, which may or may not exist anyway. (it's not any part of accepted physics). In the case that such a "non-existent" device was used it's nearly impossible to prove or understand or be scientifically valid, since no one understands it anyway so valid claims cannot be made about it.

The only demolition theory currently being perused with some seriousness is that of Steven Jones. It's too bad that after 5 years we don't have any complete theory for the demolition jobs and no one has tackled the question in a head on manor such as asking. "Given how these towers were constructed what specific scenario can cause this behavior?"

It's a tough question and would be a major undertaking. It would take a serious group of multidisciplinary scientists and engineers who were the best in their fields to answer. The key is to make the topic become serious and pertinent enough that it demands such a study. I think it was Sean Hannity uncritically amusing the idea that: (paraphrasing) "We all saw the planes hit the towers and the jet fuel weakened the steel and caused the towers to collapse, now what's so hard to understand about that?" Exactly Mr Hannity, now you attempt to give a break down of exactly how the fuck that happened.

I don't have a problem with speculation and theory but the argument needs something to stand on, needs to go somewhere and needs to advance the level of understanding of what happened on that day. Her arguments do not do that and do not help the validity of this movement. It's a waste of time. Bottom line, end of story.

I admit I'm 50/50 on the

I admit I'm 50/50 on the idea of controlled demolition of the towers. But when I look at the way WTC7 fell, it showed every single characteristics that indicated controlled demolition. There were a lot of companies in wall street that benefited from the demolition of WTC7. And after 5 years, no one has still fully explained why it fell. There were even several demolition experts claiming that WTC7 was a demolition job. It just all adds up, there's no reason not to find it suspicious.

By the way you shouldnt focus so much on the WTC collapse aspect of 9/11. There are several other unexplained anomalies surrounding the attacks that you should look into...

Read this.

explosive underneath WTC concrete floors?

Take a look at


and search within that page for "green stuff", where it's suggested that a layer of plastic explosives may have been poured onto the corrugated floor pans during initial construction (together with a suspicious "anti-vibration coating" applied to the core steel columns, which required special welding procedures because of its flammability).

Explosives, thermite, and/or demolition wiring installed during initial construction, under the pretext of having a safe way to bring them down in an emergency, could explain a lot of the collapse particulars (e.g. pulverization of the concrete to dust), and this seems less far-fetched than the "beam weapon" theory. There's the question of whether the materials would remain viable over 30 years, though.

Does anyone know of the ~1987-1990 PBS documentary mentioned there (The Construction of the Twin Towers), and where a copy might be obtained? I've looked all over . since first reading this, without success. PBS' own web site doesn't have it.

Absurd! Would you work in a building loaded w/explosives?


i swear to god i always said

i swear to god i always said that this would be the final excuse for when CD reaches critical mass. could see it a mile away. nice try Jordan, but way too predictable. would you work in that building?

No I wouldn't...

but if this was the case (not quite convinced myself), it's not like the fact would be openly advertised. Perhaps only a few Port Authority higher-ups really knew.

I'm not trying to promote this as any sort of official excuse (but can see how it might be taken that way). There's certainly more than enough evidence of govt. complicity in 9/11, even if you ignore CD completely, as Ruppert does in his book.

I'd still like to see that 1990 PBS film, which has also been mentioned elsewhere.

Show ""That said, one cannot rule out a beam weapon totally either,.."" by Anonymous (not verified)

"Too bad it didn't work. If

"Too bad it didn't work. If you had just admitted that going to Iraq was bad in its OWN right without fabricating nonsense about 9/11, you would have had broad base support. But you blew it big time with the stupidity of claiming Bush was behind 9/11."

Of course attacking Iraq and genocoing 650,000 Iraqis was bad in it's own right.

Hope you sleep good at night, troll.


Just thought you'd like to know who you're defending.
The Franklin Coverup Scandal

The Child sex ring that reached Bush/Reagan Whitehouse

Anyone ever notice that trolls are OK with pedophiles?

And you didn't even mention the annual Bohemian Grove all male

retreat. WTF is that occult cult all about?


Us westerners should know. Killing isn't right and wrong, it's political. And neither is pedophilia as long as you cover that up and keep it out of the MSM.

Show "Now that's really "genociding" the truth" by Anonymous (not verified)

Now Daddy Bush Slams Bloggers

Blames Internet for "ugly climate," echoes vitriolic rhetoric of web haters
During an appearance with his wife Barbara on Fox News last night, George Bush senior slammed Internet bloggers for creating an adversarial and ugly climate, echoing the rhetoric of fellow Neo-Cons and the White House itself in trashing the reputation of the world wide web.

Establishment kingpins and their cheerleaders have increased their level of vitriolic rhetoric against the Internet in recent months, as legislation in both the U.S. and Europe to regulate, stifle and license the Internet moves forward.

The White House's own recently de-classified strategy for "winning the war on terror" targets Internet conspiracy theories as a recruiting ground for terrorists and threatens to "diminish" their influence.

In addition, the Pentagon recently announced its effort to infiltrate the Internet and propagandize for the war on terror.

In a speech last month, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff identified the web as a "terror training camp," through which "disaffected people living in the United States" are developing "radical ideologies and potentially violent skills."

Chertoff pledged to dispatch Homeland Security agents to local police departments in order to aid in the apprehension of domestic terrorists who use the Internet as a political tool.

In the Fox News interview, Bush senior also reveals that his son the current President refuses to use e mail for fear that the communication would get subpoenaed and the e mails would be used to prove “that you were telling the truth and all this stuff.”


Damn straight

"In a speech last month, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff identified the web as a "terror training camp," through which "disaffected people living in the United States" are developing "radical ideologies and potentially violent skills."

They should be scared of people like me.

Show "Well, that settles it." by Anonymous (not verified)

Ghouliani announced today

Ghouliani announced today that he will explore a run for President. We need to dog that SOB everywhere he goes. Hilary too, and everyone else who runs away from the Truth. I think Ghouliani running for President could be a good thing for the 9/11 Truth Movement. He'll have no place to hide.

The Carlyle White House- William Rivers Pitt- Truthout

The Carlyle White House- William Rivers Pitt- Truthout


One more video of Chalk Guy being arrested by NYC police while

he was being interviewed by Ron Reagan, Jr. (no warning, not just a ticket or a summons for this?)

At Wellesley, arrest over chalk writing leaves a mark

General Ivashov: “International terrorism does not exist”

General Ivashov: “International terrorism does not exist” [Voltaire]


Axis for Peace
General Ivashov: “International terrorism does not exist”
by General Leonid Ivashov *
General Leonid Ivashov was the Chief of Staff of the Russian armed forces when the September 11, 2001, attacks took place. This military man, who lived the events from the inside, offers an analysis which is very different to that of his American colleagues. As he did during the Axis for Peace 2005 conference, he now explains that international terrorism does not exist and that the September 11 attacks were the result of a set-up. What we are seeing is a manipulation by the big powers; this terrorism would not exist without them. He affirms that, instead of faking a “world war on terror”, the best way to reduce that kind of attacks is through respect for international law and peaceful cooperation among countries and their citizens.

Show "Nothing like it" by Anonymous (not verified)

An awful lot of surveillance going on in New York!


javascript:pop_me_up2('http://nytimes.feedroom.com/?fr_story=8be43bbe911fe4027477fad3f56017ec4672d86c', '820_700', 'width=820,height=700,location=no,scrollbars=yes,toolbars=no,resizable=yes')

Use stencils

It is way faster and looks better too!


Here's my 2 cents.

A friend and I had a conversation in Dec 2001 and after hours of talking, we came to the conclusion that it was probable that 911 was an inside job. In the two years that followed, I did my research, but at that time, there wasn't all that much out there consisting of legit evidence to go on as 911 truth was still such a taboo subject. 2003, everyone was caught up in the (anti) war movement (including I). Whatever was true or untrue about 911 was on the back burner, we had a war to stop! I remember that within months of the beginning of the Iraq war, the protesters -totally defeated- sunk back into their respective lives. Thousands were dying ... but we did all that we could do ... While the antiwar movement funked into a depression, the prowar movement thrived. Yellow ribbons, proclomations of freedom, watercooler-talk of "brave troops" and whatnot. Saddam was "captured" during this time. Many people cheered. The better-knowing of us simply rolled our eyes and hoped for a more enlightened day. But then one day, things changed. Now, people were demanding justification for the war. The words "liar" and "bush" began to be spoken in the same context, not by pacifists, but my soldiers' mothers, by moderate people far and wide. Where were the "radical" protesters of before, now? They had moved on to discovering the truth about 911!

The point is this: What we say today may be tomorrows reality. Even if longtime 911 truth speakers fall wayside (because afterall, 911 truth or not, we still have lives to live and healthy mental states to maintain), we have already reached the point of no return. The truth is out there just as it was when 20,000,000 people took to the streets on the same day in almost every country of the world to protest the invasion of Iraq. They didn't listen then, but now almost everyone agrees... The same will be for the 911 truth movement. There will come a day not so far from now that people like stupid Cindy Sheehan is banging down the door of the White House demanding the truth about 911.

Mark my words. The tsunami is coming.

Tsunami: the water recedes

Tsunami: the water recedes before the waves arrive.

There is a faster way to tag

Get big strong paper, cut the letters, then spray on top of it on the surface you want to tag. Presto.