Judge to FBI: You Must Disclose What Really Happened

A federal judge has told the FBI that its disclosures about evacuating Saudis after 9/11 is inadequate.

Is this the first drop in what will eventually be a dam-bursting flood of information about 9/11 itself? Given that a federal judge is challenging the feds' hollow claims for non-disclosure of vital information, let's hope so.

"U.S. District Court Judge Richard W. Roberts of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has ordered the Federal Bureau of Investigation to submit 'proper disclosures' to the Court and Judicial Watch by December 15, 2006 concerning the U.S. government's evacuation of Saudi royals and members of the bin Laden family from the United States immediately following the 9/11 terrorist attacks," the group said in a press release obtained by RAW STORY.

Judicial Watch notes that Judge Roberts criticized "the adequacy of redaction descriptions, the accuracy of the sworn statement submitted with the documents, the validity of exemption claims, and other errors in the FBI’s disclosures.

"The FBI’s 220-page annotated production and accompanying … Declaration together do not, as they must, provide sufficient detail or precision about the withheld information … the FBI’s motion for summary judgment will be denied and the FBI will be directed to file disclosures that fairly meet the requirements of [court precedent]," wrote Judge Roberts.

Judge Roberts added that one particular FBI exemption argument "strains credulity."

* * *

Wow, yet another HUGE truth story breaking today! This is very

encouraging after things had been dragging so slowly the past few weeks! I'm feeling a bit more hopeful.

Welcome Judge Roberts!

Sounds like we'll have an avid new proponent for truth by tomorrow, because you can't get a plug on "9/11 Blogger," and not hear about it from all your friends in a matter of hours...

Since you appear to be interested in upholding the rule of law, I phoned the FBI immediately after 9/11 and attempted to inform them about the --original take-over of the WTC properties-- by a group calling themselves the FBI.

They were disinterested and certainly less transparent than the Bush administration. After all, wasn't it George who said: "We never stop looking for ways to harm the American people." Sure, I know, it was just a Freudian slip, but 'cmon, he's made a complete joke of the duties we expect from the office of pResident.

This legal affidavit was submitted to the Chief of US Army Intelligence, Birmingham AL, as I was instructed to do by official order, back in June, 2006. http://www.redlineav.com/tsg.deposition.1.html

*The date of this event was 1987, not 1989, as was presented in the original version sent to the FBI Offices, here in Little Rock, in 2001-2002.

What's that all about, T.S. Gordon? That's going to take a while

to digest. I'm still struck by Nancy & Sonnenfeld in your photo section!

Nancy Sonnenfeld was murdered on Christmas Day, while her husband was en route home, having supervised the WTC Clean-up, since September 10th, 2001....
Kurt was awarded $20.M to settle the 'false-claim' suit Colorado had filed against him.

He immediately moved to Argentina, where we might assume he intends to stay very quiet about his role with FEMA, and 9/11!...

What in the world is that all about? (rhetorical question, I'll finish reading your site when I get a chance).

This is a Big deal!

Little by little our fabulous constitution is reasserting itself! First they didn't steal quite enough votes with their black boxes, and now the judges are in the act? Have hope my beloved fellow constitutionalists! We shall overcome!
We can do it! Remember, hope is the most important information we can convey! Let them be the fearmongers, we're the hopemongers!

We are ALL but grains of sand...

By now, it should be self-evident that these 'conspiracies' are the mainstay-business of our government, and they are best hidden in plain sight. Every now and again the truth leaks out.

All of this has been tremendously difficult for me. I'm not a researcher, and I normally can't speak on the phone 'live.' It took me three years to write this final text. But, ...when you Know that you Know, and there IS A MORAL IMPERATIVE, frankly, your own life suddenly becomes a non-event, relative to the pain of self-deceipt. And that's when my words finally began to flow somewhat effortlessly, after I conceded my inevitable defeat.

(I know it's been an excruciating read, and I'm certainly due for a good "roasting.")

Today, I'm glad to have learned, in hindsight, that this place we call America truly was blessed with the spirtit of 'godliness,' -somehow, despite the coutrie of bette noir, -at the top eschelon. I do hope to make miserable those who believe they can survive deep in a hole, as I witnessed at Falcon, CSOC. And I pray for each of you, because, the entire world awaits a conclusive admission, from the 9/11 perpetrators. You who are committed to seek justice truly are the life-blood for the future of this planet, but we probably won't survive long.

Our friend Nancy was, as far as I'm concerned, in EXACTLY the same position as me. And, her husband truly was a reasonably decent man, judging from the friendships that I heard he had made in Denver. I can still hear her voice from the first time we said hello, at the ASMP, in Boulder. The other bloke, he's connected to Clinton's legacy, possibly the Johnny Gosh posse as well. Classic 'FBI' sublimination profile, if you check the re-feeds.

Now, remember all those 911

Now, remember all those 911 arguments you had with your mates--back before you gave up to keep your blood pressure down--and how they dismissed discrepancies like this?

Time to show them this bit--served with a nice side of "I told you so".

I'm usually not one to gloat--lacks class--but after being called "ridiculous" and worse, sometimes you need to demand validation.

Bully for Roberts.

"Bugger this; I want a better world."

Plaintiff = "Judicial Watch, Inc."

Just a note here that the plaintiff in this case is the same "Judicial Watch, Inc.", the same group who brought us the "see, there's the plane" Pentagon video. Looks like they're sticking close to a Michael Moore-depth inquiry on this case.

Mute Point?

Of all the topics to breech... this one seems kinda weak..... and no matter what they give us on this it's still only the word of those in the FBI who were involved...

Is there really any evidence to hold them truly accountable for anything on this subject?

I agree it's weak

and I wonder why David Ray Griffin devoted an entire chapter to this issue, in addition to another chapter largely on the Saudi royal famiiy. All this can be explained away -- Richard Clarke reportedly wrote in his book that it was a diplomatic issue. It proves nothing about LIHP, and little if anything about negligence or incompetence.

Wonderful News

but I'll do my celebrating when the FBI provides missing info.

Amen to hope...

We're experiencing the greatest race for liberty of our time... Who shall be the first white house official patsy to be scapegoated and prosecuted under the Patriot Act?

"Any person... in breach of an allegiance or duty to the United States, knowingly and intentionally aids an enemy of the United States, or one of the co-belligerents of the enemy, shall be punished as a military commission under this chapter may direct." Subsection 4(b) (26) of section 950v. of HR 6166

Who thinks Bush will get away with pardoning agents found protecting terrorists?

Who thinks Pelosi will get away with pardoning Bush and Cheney? Lets pray she isn't blackmailed (or worse) into following Ford's '74 example.


Stopping Lies and Spies

Bogus smokescreen designed

Bogus smokescreen designed to divert attention from the perps back to the patsies.

Reminds me of...

"Michael Moore's new film "Fahrenheit 9/11"

has done a tremendous favor for some proponents of a war upon the Arabian Peninsula. The film achieves what endless pages of conservative think-tank studies and panel discussions, hours of PR time and books can not: spill gasoline on the anti-Saudi sparks already ignited within the United States. Moore's film lambastes the Saudis not only for their business relationships but also for leaving the US after the attacks of September 11th 2001 as did other non-Saudi officials on the same day when specific flights were permitted. The overwhelming popularity of this documentary takes the anti-Saudi message to a whole new market. It is the latest manifestation of a rationale for war that could finally execute a long-term plan to invade and occupy the Kingdom. In spite of its progressive producer and target audience, "Fahrenheit 9/11" falls lock-step in line with the stated agenda of neoconservative hawks: rid Arabia of the House of Saud thereby granting the US and allies full access to the Middle East's biggest prize."


Are they above the law, 'Doctor' Roberts?

The Dems are just as committed to taking the US soldier-boys into IRAN, as the precursors to Bilderberg were about taking the Jews into Israel in the first place. Any good gambler would fold.

Clearly the Patriot Act (and your new and improved internment camps) are purposely being built now, in direct relation to the coming 'International crisis.' And, unfortunately, while easily 50% of the people do see clearly what's happening, 80% appear totally resolved to accept defeat, in exchange for their short-range personal TV-viewing comfort.

Think about the absolute absurdity behind Bush's ramblings just today: "We've got to do something about the threat of Iran to insure peace!"

Wouldn't it be easier to flood DC with diesel fuel, and be done with the actual threat?