Left Denial on 9/11 Turns Desperately Irrational
Left Denial on 9/11 Turns Irrational
by Jack Straw
People like Noam Chomsky and Ward Churchill are turning toward the irrational as they continue to deny increasing signs that 9/11 was an inside job.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/STR505A.html
Noam Chomsky is often hailed as America's premier dissident intellectual, a fearless purveyor of truth fighting against media propaganda, murderous U.S. foreign policy, and the crimes of profit-hungry transnational corporations.
He enjoys a slavish cult-like following from millions leftist students, journalists, and activists worldwide who fawn over his dense books as if they were scripture. To them, Chomsky is the supreme deity, a priestly master whose logic cannot be questioned.
However, as one begins to examine the interviews and writings of Chomsky, a different picture emerges. His books, so vociferously lauded in leftist circles, appear to be calculated disinformation designed to distract and confuse honest activists. Since the 1960's, Chomsky has acted as the premier Left gatekeeper, using his elevated status to cover up the major crimes of the global elite.
http://www.rense.com/general67/noam.htm
Where Noam will not roam:
Chomsky manufactures consent by supporting the official stories of 9/11 and JFK
"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum."
- Noam Chomsky
"I agree that Professor Chomsky is not a CIA agent. But with respect to his pronouncements on the JFK assassination he is worse than a CIA agent. Without being an agent, with his enormous prestige as a thinker, as an independent radical, as a courageous man, he does the work of the agency. ... He is unconvinced by the evidence of a conspiracy, but his is utterly convinced that JFK was a consummate cold warrior who could not have changed and did nothing to irritate the military industrial intelligence complex."
- Vincent Salandria
http://www.oilempire.us/chomsky.html
"That's an internet theory and it's hopelessly implausible. Hopelessly implausible. So hopelessly implausible I don't see any point in talking about it."
- Noam Chomsky, at a FAIR event at New York's Town Hall, 22 January 2002, in response to a question from the audience about US government foreknowledge of 9/11. At that time, 9/11 investigators had already presented substantial documented evidence for: prior warnings, Air Force stand-down, anomalous insider trading connected to CIA, cover-up of the domestic anthrax attacks, inconsistencies in identities & timelines of "hijackers", US connections to al Qaeda in Balkans, a Pak ISI-al Qaeda funding connection, etc etc etc.
- Gangster's blog
- Login to post comments
Chomsky will promote the left/progressive causes in his books,
papers, & lectures, keeping his followers very happy. Chomsky thus accumulates his massive gatekeeping powers to be used against the crucial, world-changing events--like JFK's gov't assassination & the 9/11 inside job!
He is a CIA agent or asset!
Buckley vs. Chomsky on youtube...
Literally a staged debate between the left and the right...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dt-GUAxmxdk
Buckley is a self-admitted CIA asset.
Chomsky
The 9/11 Truth movement has attracted many outstanding leaders and researchers. With their help, we are becoming a force to be reckoned with.
Chomsky is a part of the past and is no longer at the forefront. Whether his avoidance of 9/11 Truth is due to his comfortable MIT position, his age, or worse, we can only guess. It's a shame, though, that there are people who still follow him and thus avoid 9/11 Truth.
On the other hand, the mild-mannered Prof. Jones gave up his 20-year academic position for the truth. That is REAL courage. People like Jones are the ones who matter now.
Straight from the horse's mouth.
"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum."
- Noam Chomsky
This is the game exactly.
or as Josef Goebbels put it...
What is wanted in a media system is ostensible diversity masking an actual uniformity...
Way to go, Noam, and thanks making it clear now what your role was all along.
____
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
This is why you and I have
This is why you and I have so many conflicts on this board. You really do believe what you want to believe and cherry pick your evidence.
No substantial argument demonstrating a relationship between Chomsky and the CIA has been offered, but that doesn't matter. The mere fact that he disagrees with your position is enough for you to target him as a government agent.
Unfortunately this kind of thinking is far too prevalent.
this guy puts it best: "I
this guy puts it best: "I agree that Professor Chomsky is not a CIA agent. But with respect to his pronouncements on the JFK assassination(and in this case 9/11. see a pattern?) he is worse than a CIA agent. Without being an agent, with his enormous prestige as a thinker, as an independent radical, as a courageous man, he does the work of the agency. ... He is unconvinced by the evidence of a conspiracy, but his is utterly convinced that JFK was a consummate cold warrior who could not have changed and did nothing to irritate the military industrial intelligence complex(which whatever you think of the man is obviously not so.Noam chooses to ignore such evidence. again a pattern)."
- Vincent Salandria
The left-gatekeep position
is completely understandable as an *initial* reaction to 9/11. Hell, I believed Arabs did it at first, but I thought: well, what are you idiots expecting? You've been boning the Middle East since before I was born. That was my very first reaction. My second was: there's going to be hell to pay for this- some little brown village is going to get bombed to f*ck. And I was hoping that that's all it would be- a Clinton-era limited bombing response. But deep down I suspected it would be much worse. When I first heard "inside job" I initially dismissed it as a conspiracy theory too, because I thought I had this politically-enlightened understanding of how the world worked.
But to hold onto this view five years after the fact, in the face of all the evidence, is utterly asinine. So the left-gatekeeper position is, I suppose, especially repugnant to me since it's essentially a delusion I once held, and I should have learned better a lot sooner than I did. And Chomsky should certain know better too.
Fighting for G.O.D. (Gold, Oil, and Drugs) is available now for pre-order on Amazon.
Manufacturing Dissent: Noam Chomsky and the LeftGateKeepers
This is a possible title for a book I may write.
I came to Chomsky in my late teens and was a great admirer of his intellect and work for over 20 years.
In the last 5 years he has clearly outed himself as a leftgatekeeper, perhaps the all-time pre-eminent leftgatekeeper in the US.
It is very sad to see this obviously brilliant man resort to the hipocrisy and deceit that he has forced upon himself to maintain his fictitious analyses of both the JFK assassination and 9/11. It is my belief that following the JFK assassination, when he was brought clear evidence regarding a conspiracy and cover-up, he made a conscious decision that he would not challenge the shadow government and just critique the policies of the official US government as harshly as possible, probably for simple self-preservation. His avoidance and/or ridicule of any subject suggesting a shadow government is now reflexive.
History will not be kind to him or any others who remain 9/11 Deniers in the face of the overwhelming evidence that continues to accumulate.
The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.
Be well.
Sad
"he made a conscious decision that he would not challenge the shadow government and just critique the policies of the official US government as harshly as possible, probably for simple self-preservation"
It would be nice to think that things are this innocent. People in his position are probably forced to take the position they do for self-survival. The leviathan that is the NWO will crush you otherwise.
Sometimes, I think Chumpski makes some of the outrageous statements that he does. As a cry for help. Like "If I don't act this way. There will be serious consequences." Can you read between the lines.
Sad to think of the twisted ways of this manufactured illusion we call our world.
I'd like to see Coleman's
I'd like to see Coleman's evidence, otherwise the accusation is crap. To suggest that Chomsky is a CIA asset based on his views alone does eveyone a disservice.
Black Propaganda
"If the left spends its time on this, that's the end of the left, in my opinion: the mainstream would be utterly delighted. It is highly likely that nothing significant will be found. And if -- which I very greatly doubt -- something is found that would quickly send everyone in Washington to the death chamber, the left is unlikely to emerge triumphant."
This Chumpski qoute should raise the hair on the back of your neck. Agent or no agent. The left's reputation and future is more important than finding out the facts. The is logic out of 1984.
Disillusioned
The red pill to the harsh reality. Which is our world stage is a production studio for the New World Order. Chumpski had to be a paid agent. No one with a half a brain can support the offical JFK line. Without having a personal interest at stake. He is a sheep herder.
I think people call him an
I think people call him an agent because he's obviously not an idiot, and he's said some very ignorant things about 9/11. It doesn't match with the persona he created for himself. Much like when Art Bell said that 9/11 truth is an impossible joke, then he goes off and talks about bigfoot, UFOs, and ghosts. That should make everyone question the character of these men. Human beings are complex creatures and there are many different sides to one person, but those are blatant contradictions of character.