JAN. 3RD: Embarass the New Congress Into Action

John Doraemi writes:

Burn a copy of the 9-11 Commission Report in front of Congress on January 3rd, 2007

Seize the moment with a new tea party for the new millenium.

The 9-11 Truth Movement should converge on the new business as usual 110th Congress, and bring as much media and independent video as possible.  As Nancy Pelosi plays footsie with George W. Bush, the movement will burn a giant stack of 9-11 Ommission Commission reports outside the building.

This is the time.  This is the opportunity.  If you can get to the US Capitol on January 3rd with a copy of the 9-11 Commission Report (printed off the internet, or purchased), then make a huge bonfire.  Challenge the congress to see the movement.  Challenge them to acknowledge the crowds.  Challenge them to respond.

Please pass this to everone in the 9-11 Truth Movement.  Time is of the essence.  January 3rd, 2007 is when the new Congress seizes power.

As far as I know, burning the flag is First Amendment protected speech. Therefore burning this state sponsored collection of lies should also fall under First Amendment protected speech, as well as petitioning the government for a redress of grievances.

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State

Book-Burning Very Bad Politically <eom>



I think the irony would be poetic...FINALLY, the real "Farenheit 9/11".


Love it! Poetic indeed -- and I think it's a great idea. Fuck political correctness.

Walk the Line of Truth

I like the idea of burning the book but feel it could too easily be turned against us as a fascist act, which ultimately it is. I think truer form of protest would be to line a path of books along the sidewalk leading up to the Capitol and have all the protesters walk the line of Truth. We walk all over the books because these lies are beneath us, we rise above. This act would be better thn the radical act of burning books and much more acceptible to the sheeple who might open their eyes with the protest. I have two copies to donate to the cause and will gladly Walk the line of Truth.

at least ...

make sure there are big bags of mail waiting for them on Jan. 3! Check out the postcards at http://911sharethetruth.com/911postcards.htm Does this look like a hollow steel shaft?


Fascism with Fascism.
Clearly that is about all these nutbags understand anyway.

Personally im all for it, and the next "burning" should be FAUX news.
I dont think peaceful demonstrations are going to accomplish much anymore because we have so much going against us, the MSM especially needs to be TAKEN back.

Fight fascism with fascism?

Fight fascism with fascism? And I suppose you think "our fascism" will stop at book burning? I mean, WE wouldn't have summary executions for anyone allegedly involved in 9/11, because WE'RE the good guys.

Slippery slope.

no, we give them a trail,

no, we give them a trail, and then if found guilty hang them for treason...

May sound radical, but that is the punishment for Treason. 

If you burn books you could

If you burn books you could be compared to nazis,but then again maybe not.People,even journalist here seem to know little history,but connotations aside...my point is just that it's not really a difficult task to burn a book or walk on it .It doesn't show strenght in my oppinion and not too many brain cells are needed in such a brave operation.Sorry to be rude. I really think you guys are great and would just hate to see you ridiculed.
The point is: just demonstrate and show people how many we are who believe or should I say KNOW 9/11 was an inside job. Make flyers with the most important facts 0n 9/11. Would it be possible to play the video of WTC & collapsing?All you need os a projector and a huge wall,I guess.

Book burning is in a sense what just happened to the OJ book!(maybe because Faux News couldn't find a sponsor!?Nice spin O'Reilly!) It is all about not wanting people to get certain information or ideas and we are not the ones covering information up!

I am from Denmark,I live in Arizona.

Keep up the good work,

by the way, in my opinion 9/11 Truth needs to go world wide. I would like to see some films translated to Arabic,Russian, and so on put out on Google abd You Tube and what not. Check Google Video, the arabs are online and just had an Egyptian tv series as number one. Hey,maybe those hijackers who the BBC and The Gardian reported as being alive would show up then. I'm not even kidding! We should go look for those guys, get an interview, that would be a power move....

I'm going to burn a copy of the Zelikow Commission report

in solidarity with the Boston Tea Party on December 16th.

another idea, would be build

another idea, would be to build a steel frame to contain the books, and dress it up to look like the twin towers. and when they are both buring uncontrollablely, point out the fact that the steel frame is in no danger of collapsing at free fall speed.

Great Idea!

A mini-WTC, framed, even with concrete pans (?), stuff edwith Commission reports (throw in some copies of Popular Mechanics for good measure too...), and then fire it with the some aviation jet fuel.


I love it

only bad

part of this is that you have to BUY these piles of trash in order to burn them.
Just more copies sold.

book burning?

Book Burning? Isn't that reserved to fascists?

That's not a book

that's a piece of trash


and no

nothing's "reserved" to fascists, except a good smashing

If the media doesnt cover it

If the media doesnt cover it it won't accomplish much, but I like the idea.

Show "Pay attention to the facts" by Anonymous (not verified)

This must be the obligatory baldfaced lie posting that every

thread on this site seems to have at least one of.

debunk this asshole!

these people are really starting to piss me off. when people research into 9/11, nine out of 10 join the 9/11 truth movement, the other one out of ten people who are brainwashed beyond repair, turn into people like this who love popular mechanics and screw loose change. They have a counter argument (often pretty improbable and moronic counter arguments), but they seem possible to the super brainwahsed.

I like to counter these people with the testimony of Norman Mineta. They cannot debunk Norman Mineta / NORAD response to AA 77. They do not have a leg to stand on in respect to this argument. Neither popular mechanics, or 9/11 myths, screw loose change, or anyone have even attempted to address the contradictions of Norman Mineta's testimony and Richard Clarke's book. So if you run into the ultra brainwashed who love to try to debunk us, challenge them to explain the contradictions between the 9/11 commission report and Norman Mineta's testimony. Here are the questions to debunk them. (from my mineta paper)

Skeptics still maintain that Norman Mineta is only one man. Skeptics are therefore faced with the option of 9/11 being an inside job, or that Mineta was terribly confused. People who cannot fathom their government committing such atrocities find more comfort in believing that Mineta’s testimony is grossly inaccurate when faced with the horrifying alternative. Mineta’s testimony clearly places Cheney in the PEOC before the Pentagon was struck. Both Richard Clark and David Bohrer also corroborate that Cheney was in the PEOC before 9:37.
Skeptics who still doubt this logic by making irrational arguments will be unable to adequately answer the following three questions.
1. Did Mineta witness a conversation between a “young man” and Dick Cheney where the “young man” said “the plane is 50 miles out”? (Yes/No)
This question is normally answered “yes”, even by the most extreme skeptics. To argue that no young man ever came in and said those words, you would have to be under the belief that this conversation occurred in Norman Mineta’s imagination and that no young man ever said those words to Cheney. The other alternative is that he knowingly lied in his testimony by fabricating an event that he claimed to witness, knowing it was not true, with no apparent motive.
2. Did Mineta witness this conversation before or after the Pentagon was hit? (Before/After)
If skeptics answer “before”, this puts Cheney in the PEOC before 9:37. This would directly contradict the 9/11 Commission Report. So if a skeptic answers “before” the official timeline is proven wrong, without having to prove that the plane in question was the one approaching the Pentagon.
So the only option for a skeptic is to answer “after”. This answer obviously implies that the plane that was “50 miles out” was therefore not the plane that hit the Pentagon, and that the “young man” was referring to a different plane.
There is no other possible answer to this second question. It must either be one or the other, before or after. So if a skeptic answers that they “don’t know”, you have to walk them through the only two possibilities. If they answer “before” it contradicts the 9/11 Commission’s timeline, therefore their only option is to pick “after” so as to not contradict the official story. The most effective way to force an answer to this question is to say that ‘the 9/11 commission report states that Cheney entered the PEOC after the Pentagon was struck. Are you therefore saying you “don’t know” if the 9/11 Commission Report is accurate?’ Once a skeptic answers ‘yes’ to question 1, and ‘after’ to question 2, they will be unable to answer the third question.
3. If this conversation occurred after the Pentagon was hit, why would Mineta think that the young man and Cheney were discussing the plane approaching the Pentagon?
By answering “yes” to question 1 and “after” to question 2, it implies the following series of events: The WTC towers are hit, the pentagon is hit, then after this, a young man says to Cheney “the plane is 50 miles out”. Why would Mineta think they were talking about the plane approaching the Pentagon if this conversation occurred after the Pentagon was already hit? It makes no sense at all. He clearly states that he heard the young man say that the plane was 50 miles out, “during the time that the airplane coming into the Pentagon.” A skeptic would at the very least have to admit that it would be unlikely or strange that Mineta’s recollection of these major events could be so skewed.

I agree. Muslim 9/11 Truthers speak out on the cause of 9/11

Auction off a stack of the Omissions Report instead

#1: One slightly used 9CR. Concludes that the hijackers' source of funds is
"of little practical significance." Am I bid one cent? Anybody one cent?

#2: Another slightly used 9CR. Concludes that since the put options had no
possible connection to al Qaeda, therefore they were "benign." Am I bid one cent?

#3: Another slightly used 9CR. Changed the timeline so that Cheney's shootdown
order was safely after UA93 was already down. Instrumental in keeping Cheney on
the ticket in the 2004 election. Worth much more than one cent to Cheney!


I would like to provide you with additional information

regarding United Flight 93.
The following link will bring you to an news article that was posted on 9/11/01 at 11:43:57 AM.
It was produced by Liz Foreman who is an award winning investigative reporter for WCPO.com.


It basically states that United Airlines had identified a Boeing 767 that made an emergency landing at an airport in Cleveland due to concerns that there was a bomb on board as Flight 93.

The story was removed from their website on 8/13/04 a few hours after it's existence was announced on national radio.

Due to the lack of aircraft wreckage in Shanksville PA and numerous other information that I cannot include here, my belief is that the plane made a safe landing in Cleveland.

Hillary Clinton is a fake Democrat who tried to ban flag burning

As far as I know, burning the flag is First Amendment protected speech.

It wouldn't be if Hillary had her way. This NeoDemocrat, during the our illegal wars with Afghanistan & Iraq, tried to pass a law making flag-burning a crime! She is really a NeoCon shill!

"Fake Democrat"?

No, she's the real thing. HC is the democrat party. They are NOT the opposition. The left/right paradigm is bullshit. Democrats are not going to help us one bit. They are a big part of the problem.

For the 17,000th time, 9/11 truth is not a partisan issue! They all have blood on their hands. It's time to take the power back!

You're correct. Too many

You're correct. Too many people think the Democrats are actually going to do something. Stuff is going to get worse in this country before it gets better. The reason why is because we have too many god damned apathetic citizens. Once things get worse in this country and start becoming more salient to these currently worthless citizens they will start pulling their own damned weight when it comes to making our voices heard. Don't get discouraged however, this is just how social movements like this work. We must keep our heads held high and continue fighting for justice!

"... In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." (Galileo Galilei, 1564 - 1642)

Flag burning is the only proper way to retire a flag

Every year at least the Boy Scouts of America and the Benevolent Protective Order of Elks collect unwanted US flags and burn them during a ceremony on Flag Day.

Burning the flag as a form of protest is considered bad manners but it is a constitutional right as a form of Freedom of Speech.
As an Eagle Scout I consider myself above that because I can think of a great deal of other things to do that would upset the government a lot more.

There can't be a law that directly contradicts what is regarded as paying respect to the old flags as they are retired.

I normally have a problem with ANY book burning...

...but with this, instead of calling it a book burning - and it certainly isn't a flag burning - perhaps we should call it a FALSE FLAG burning.


Rumsfeld signed letter authorizing detainee torture...

"Make sure this is accomplished", wrote Rummy.

Outgoing Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld authorized the mistreatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, the prison's former U.S. commander said in an interview on Saturday.

Former U.S. Army Brigadier General Janis Karpinski told Spain's El Pais newspaper she had seen a letter apparently signed by Rumsfeld which allowed civilian contractors to use techniques such as sleep deprivation during interrogation.

Planet Mancow

Fox News is advertising Mancow ripping once again into 9.11 conspiracy this Sunday. Not sure if the show will simply repeat last weeks episode or whether some new material will be aired.

beware of moles!!!

B\burning anything is asking for trouble.

Bad Idea

I must disagree with this tactic of burning the books. Sure they are garbage but this is what will occur if there is a book burning. The behavior will be construed as riotous behavior and everyone involved or even onlooking would be subject to arrest and detainment. A massive gathering in peaceful protest is the way to go. In fact if people could plop down and stay on the mall for as long as possible it would get some news attention. The one day protest in November a couple years back was great but it failed because it was not a long term protest. People have got to be willing to sit like Cindy Sheehan or Ghandi to get some MSM attention.

Burning books is going to lead to many arrests and a complete shutdown of the protests. Think it through. There are more effective methods.

"... In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." (Galileo Galilei, 1564 - 1642)

I'm afraid to say...

that I'm with Whitey on this one. America is bereft of coming pitfalls, widely known or not. And DC is rife with protestors who don't know how to turn the system in on itself. Obviously it's incorrect to call such a demonstration 'fascist,' yet it could easily be called an act of 'anarchy,' -yet another poorly defined concept in the dumbed-down public's mind...

And, some formal disruption of the system is clearly in order. Which is why I do think this visual-aid does belong at the Boston Gala. The only way I can see doing it without anyone getting busted, is to place the pyre at the bottom of a culvert, (clearly no threat to property, or life,) and encourage folks to meander toward the edge and hurl their books into the somewhat distant pile. In the background hangs the banner as shown- "REJECTED." (Plus those without a copy can use whatever similar sized volume they have at hand. Someone should consider printing 300 fake covers for this purpose.)

-Now you have a dozen compelling YouTube segements circling the world.

We need someone to post snapshot site studies in any event. Otherwise, you've got an event that requires too much time-of-show coordination. Of course it wouldn't hurt to have a nice wooden squarerigger either!

**Bull Horn Rentals** - Keep in mind these alone could come to be in very short supply, unless they are covertly brought in from Kansas.


Do your protest.... and when the TV cameras show up.... everyone walk over simultaniously and toss their books onto the Whitehouse lawn..... You may get ticketed for littering.

It would sure make a great picture..... and it would take them a while to pick up 1000 books.

The "put up or shut up" moment

"Sure they (the 9-11 report books) are garbage but this is what will occur if there is a book burning."

You agree the book is "garbage" but you are afraid of a police crackdown. Many, many people have no idea it is "garbage" and accept it as the final history of 9-11. You aren't going to be able to get their attention, as is, because you can't get on network TV.

" The behavior will be construed as riotous behavior and everyone involved or even onlooking would be subject to arrest and detainment."

There may be mass arrests. True. This has heppened many times before, and it will happen many times again.

" A massive gathering in peaceful protest is the way to go."

And, as usual, it will accomplish nothing. How's that anti-war thing going for ya?

"In fact if people could plop down and stay on the mall for as long as possible it would get some news attention."

Nothing to speak of.

"People have got to be willing to sit like Cindy Sheehan or Ghandi to get some MSM attention."

Those two have clout, a standing to speak of. The "9-11 nuts" have no such gravitas.

"Burning books is going to lead to many arrests and a complete shutdown of the protests."

GOOD! More news to report. More "story" to cover. More is on the line, more at stake, more of an impact.

"Think it through. There are more effective methods."

Do you own a news network?

I would think someone mentioning Gandhi would have some historical understanding of civil disobedience.


There is some misunderstanding about the term "peaceful," and conversely its opposite, "violent."

A bonfire is not violent in any way shape or form. I do not condone violent action, and I do not wish anyone (including the police) to engage in any form of violence whatsoever.

Burning a fire (except to some of the chicken shits hereabouts who are afraid of any flames) is simply a symbolic act, which will peaceably burn itself out when the fuel is expended. That's the plan anyway.

There is nothing non-peaceful about it. Anyone who has ever been to summer camp can remember watching a bonfire in a non-violent, peaceful manner.

The location of the bonfire should be chosen so that no property damage can result, and it is carried out in a safe and responsible manner. It will be a cold day (January) and can be considered necessary for both warmth and its political symbolism.

You are totally right on

and so is this idea.

Add This to your shopping

Add This to your shopping list...

Bond Fire Fuel - $0.59 - used at amazon.com

The 9/11 Commision Report

Oh Boy

This is a TERRIBLE idea if there ever was one. Who dreamt this up? What better way to destroy public opinion of the movement than to perform an action historically reserved for the Nazis, Stalin, and Mao. I urge anyone with a modicum of sense to stay away from this arts major's brain-fart, a disaster in the making.


I think this is a great idea. People who think this will be compared to the Nazis need to lighten up. We are burning it as a symbol of our disagreement with it. We are not burning it because we are the government and it is a banned book.

"Therefore burning this state sponsored collection of lies should also fall under First Amendment protected speech, as well as petitioning the government for a redress of grievances"

It's a great idea, but wouldn't it be great if we actually formally petitioned the government as well? Does anyone know how to write a legal petition to congress and how many signatures it requires? I am from Canada and up here it is 25 signatures to petition the federal government in parliament assembled. Anyone know how it works in the U.S? Maybe we could send one petition a week. That would wake Congress up to the issue, or at least make it hard to ignore.

Several Thousand Names

I think there were around 3,500 signatures collected by NY911Truth submitted to Spitzer's State Supreme Court, in 2003, to no avail. They did have quite a scene outside the courtroom, where about a dozen advocates approached the Judge with questions about specific omissions.

Like I said, we're in a stew of trouble here kids. Western Europe appears to be our leading ally. That's why I think the visuals are so important, whether they remind us of effigies of Chairman Mao or not. That's a pretty funny twist in itself.

So you like dramatic art? I was just picturing Guernica meets the Rape of the Sabine Women, when suddenly, this huge replica of the Santa Maria came into view...

Ooops, here comes Snoop-doggy driving the the Blues Brothers mobile! :)


is not a book written by a private author. I would not recommend burning a book by oh say Popular Mechanics. This is a government issued report. The government wrote this, and burning it is a symbol to the whole world that it is full of lies. FOX News will make us look bad? Guess what they already do that constantly. Why is this Boston tea party acceptable but not this idea? Both involve destroying copies of the 9/11 commission's report. Is drowning the books ok but not burning them? Give people a little more credit than that. The public will see it is a stunt and we not that we are advocating nazism.

To Tom-Scott Gordon: I don't know the specifics of what you just said, and I would like to get the details, but my guess is the petition to Spitzer was not a legal petition. A legal petition to the congress is not the same thing. It has to be on paper, not on the internet, and it has to be written in a certain format. Again I don't know the specifics of how to format a petition to the house and senate but a legal petition to the congress must be read out loud on the house and senate floor while they are in session, and the government must issue an official response to the petition. If we were to submit one every month (or imagine every week) it would send a really powerful message IMHO, even more powerful than this book burning.


Perhaps we need input from the NYC faction, DZ, etc. The question is who do they truly believe are NYC disinfo?

All I know is that our Science & Justice Alliance/ Jimmy Walter/ Webster Tarpley, and a host of others had circulated a petetion for redress against the 'pancake theory' to the NY State Supreme Court. It was presented first at the NIST meeting(s) and immediately delivered by the same entourage to the bursar of Spitzer's court. A portion of this group were already at war with each other. Out on the Left coast, other groups were busy destroying their own progress as well. It all came to amount to no progress with the confrence in Canada. Unlike- Nico, Webfairy, Strahl, Holmgren, Grossman, et. all, I was not able to discern who was, or was not working up-stream to detract from our efforts. For instance, 'Ralph and Jim,' who colluded with Eric in a real tail-spin performance in SF. I will say that I witnessed a lone individual at the CtheE, who, (reporting in the hallways via cell phone,) issued some of the most incriminating 'CIA-like' reports about each aboved named individual to his keepers during the show. He spoke shorthand, using initials for things like NY911Truth, as '9T,' etc. 'Angie,' -short for '911-groupie.'

That said, I am miffed that only one real God-honest Jewish Atty ever came to the party, literally staking his butt on the line for us. The dude at NYEnviroLaw was a joker, top-to-bottom. An ambulance chaser, if you will, IMHO.

Are you aware that Elliot Spitzer has been

elected Governor of New York. Before the elections he was only Attorney General with political ambitions.

Maybe he would be the one to contact after January 2007 ?
He nailed 2 national banks with his investigations.
As Governor of NY he will have Veto power over the Port of Authority of NY & NJ who owned the 6 buildings in the WTC and the ground under WTC 7.

The federal court the the litigation is in is the Southern District of NY (NYC).

There is always the hope that he will do something that will help the cause - like order an investigation into the massive amount of fraudulent insurance claims.

This beggars belief

What are you people, dumb? Are you trying to give them as much ammo as possible? Fox News and all the rest of them would have a field day with the grassy knoll book burners!

"Look! I guess the 9/11 twoof movement is afraid of the facts after all!"

If you're gonna burn something in an act of public protest, how about a United Nations flag? Not BOOKS, for Christ's sake. Book burners are held in lower regard than a Michael Jackson Daycare Center. Don't spend time and money burning books; it is not a form of activism, it is not educational, it is not public outreach. It's just a publicity stunt, and one that will only attract bad publicity. Better to go out to the Federal Reserve and burn Federal Reserve notes in protest, while handing out copies of America: From Freedom to Fascism.

"Where they burn books, they will, in the end, burn human beings too." - Heinrich Heine

book burning won't work

Sounds great, but I doubt very much with all the security around the White House that this will happen for more than a second. A better idea...get a large dumpster, and one person at a time walk a book up to the dumpster, toss it in, and state loudly "FOR________________" listing one victim's name at a time. You could even have a church-type bell ring every time a book is dumped. The only problem is you will need 3,000 books.

Deviant, and blogging

Simple, just send out 20,k __ "URGENT RECALL"__postcards that appear to be from the US Gov. Prinitng office, with Eric Huffschmid's return address:

"Due to incalculable omissions, distortions and outright lies on the part of certain members of the investigative committee, The Congressional sub-Committee have issued an immediate "RECALL ORDER" on all copies of the "9/11 Commission Report." Anyone found in posession of this material after 1/1/2007 will be jailed, and fined no less than US$911., and proscecuted to the fullest extent of the law." Compliance with this order is manditory for all US citizens."

(Surely his in-law, Ruppert Murdoch will bail him out!)

So you have a problem with

So you have a problem with exercising the 1st Amendment yet suggest commiting mail fraud?  A federal felony????????????????????????????????????????

I thought mine was a splendid idea!

Surely somebody gave me -minus points- for bashing Huffschmid, because they could not possibly have been upset with my -creative- take on the *RESPONSIBILITIES* of the US Government Printing Office...

I believe we all pay taxes for the 'protection' of the common good. Certainly it's the gov's responsibility to inform us of serious threats: Things like Aids, Bird Flu, Chemtrails, Aspertaime, Karl Rove, Hillary Clinton, Skull & Bones, etc.

The facts about these --clear and present National Security dangers-- must be printed, and delivered to every mailbox in America. So, I figure, why not issue a demand for the recall of the Omissions Report? It's the ONE dire warning that would really make a difference, especially to those who's sons & daughters are getting DU shovelled down their throats, all because of a fairy-tale about a few cavemen armed with box-cutters.

AND, if a little "mail fraud" bothers you, will you settle for a straight commercial venture?

OK, how about a post-card that shows the PRECISE evolution of the strain of anthrax that was sent from "Al-CIA-New Jersey," in the wake of the "Pentagate" findings?

let me adjust your compass...

Exercising your right to free speech = GOOD

Impersonating a government agency via the US Mail = BAD 

Media war needs images

Burning a giant stack of 9-11 Commission Reports is an image that news organizations will use again and again in their coverage.

Your route doesn't give the money shot.

You have to challenge them on their own turf. This is a soundbite world. You have to get the message across in one picture and one sentence, and it has to be novel (to the audience). If 1,000 people laid down their copy of the book and they set it on fire, with as much photojournalism as possible, this could be the "Tea Party" moment, a watershed that breaks through the mainstream and causes a giant hiccup across the American psyche.

No Doubt!

The images of the towers on fire is permanently burned into my memory...

Know your enemy:

"All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes."

-- Hitler


Is John Doraemi an anti-truth mole? This is worst idea EVER

Burning books would accomplish nothing but make the 9/11 truthers appear like Nazis. God that is stupid. A much better idea would be to show up at Capitol with a thousand copies of Griffen's "Ommissions and Distoritions" book and give them to every Senator and Congressmen, and whoever else is interested. We are about spreading the truth, not burning books. Have copies of the good 9/11 books, like Tarpley's and Griffin's, even been sent out to our politicians yet? This wouldn't cost that much. At least some of them would probably read them. Have we sent these books to reporters yet? We have the truth on our side, so why not use this to our advantage?


John Doraemi is not a "mole", you idiot.

John Doraemi has just given you a way to get 9-11 Truth on every network in America, embarass the congress into action on its first day, and make a pretty god damned unambigous statement that the 9-11 commission report is bunk.


What sort of idiots are you?

I'm not talking about burning OTHER people's books. I'm talking about burning your own copy, your own personal property.

The founders would think you nerds unworthy of further addressing.

Alexander Cockburn's line about "no useful political energy there" may be true after all.

Fascism, Naziism, Communism.


John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State

Nerds come out on top. Book burners get laughed into history.

If you know anything about DC you'd know that you're not burning any books anywhere near the Capitol. Nor will the media be able to get any shots worthy of making the news. If they did, it would likely show the most scruffy, "leftist"-looking goons trying to burn some books. Rather then looking like, well, nerds who scrutinized every page and found mistakes and lies, they would like more like brutes who were dismissive and rejected the report just because Bush said it was right. Exactly how Bill O'Reilly thinks of the left: dismissive of reality. The Commission Report itself is evidence of the conspiracy. Don't burn it. Use it. I agree that risks need to be taken and creativity and balls are required to get media coverage, but your idea just isn't a good idea. But I'm sure Cockburn would have a field day making fun of it.

To burn a book would mean that you

would have to buy the book.

That book does not deserve to be on the best seller list.

Why not go to the Tea Party planned for Boston before the New Congress even gets started.
December 16, 2006 is a Saturday.

If you want to damage the this government make your own Christmas Presents. The governments (federal, state & local) don't collect as many tax dollars with homemade presents as they do with the prepackaged large store items.

Think about it. Payroll taxes get paid on the wages that were paid at all levels. Corporate Taxes get paid by the wholesalers plus the retailers. Sales Taxes, etc.
There are even property taxes in the store rents, office rents and buildings, land etc.

Better to hand out 535 copies of DRG's Omissions and Distortions

and offer to exchange the official 9/11 Commission Report with any of the reality-based books by DRG or Michael Ruppert, Webster Tarpley, Barrie Zwicker, et al.

IMO, book burning would only work to the advantage of the 9/11 Truth movement if it were combined with a steel scale model of the Towers or WTC 7 to make a very specific point staged for the media or the internet video audience.

We do need to start using more street theater to get the message out in a light-hearted way. Humor can be very disarming if properly done.

The 9/11 Truth movement grows every day.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Be well.

I already mentioned

You can print the book off the internet on your own printer.

Some purchased copies should be on hand, as well as large posters with the book cover. For image.

You don't have to buy a copy to participate however.

You realize of course...

You guys are burning the evidence. :D

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

Since my Mac can't give user points...

And I've lost that address where I was secretly forwarding money to Tokyo Rose, so I'll just go back to burning books, and maybe a few damn Beatle Records as well!

How many (+/-) points do I get for burning my last copy of the White Album?


To address your real 'charge,' in terms that everyone here will soon have to come to terms with, (or perhaps faces immediately if you are in the info-hosting business,) After January 1st., Congress may damn well make it illegal to challenge this Government at all. -Goodbye "911TRUTH!"

At that point, which will you choose, Sublimination, ... or Anarchy? While a 'third' option; simply to LEAVE the USA, may also look desirable now, they have also expressed their intent "to make it illegal to leave the US without permission."

Again, which will you choose?

Given the very real "Silence of the Lambs" concerning the incontestable "VOTE FRAUD" that has enabled the current group to overtake the Government, WHO/WHAT gives this current Administration the Legal Authority to administer in the first place? The answer is clear: No One!

Just because Nancy Pelosi says you can't arrest Bush, doesn't give him the right to drive a lance through anyone who gets too close to his motorcade! Abu Grade, G'tmo, -gimmie a break. Three days on the waterboard, and I'll flat guarantee that EVERY LAST CHICKENHAWK will immediately repeal their vote of confidence for their "MIDEVAL MEASURES ACT, I, II, and III"

Ultimately, who's to say, maybe "9/11" and the irrepressible "Movement" is all about further dividing the people into splinter-groups where they (YOU) can easily be discarded like lab rats.

Your suggestion to me might well have merit, (other than the fact that I was only kidding in the first place, primarily to see if ANY of you still have such comic 'values.') But, the greater issue is ultimately one of Civil War, nothing less. So, let's suppose I gathered an army to rob a "Hummer" dealership and we head to Washington. And, Three days later, that section of LA were 'Nuked" with a False-Flag Israeli Bomb. Am I a 'hero' to the cause of justice, having both "saved the Dealership owner from further losses," (and) attempted to save America in the process? Or am I a petty thief who should be sentenced, while the AIPAC-CFR walks free for instigating "the greatest 'Nuking' of America to date!"?

The point is Laws are relative. Lies are Lies. Murder is Murder. Harming someone unnecessarily is not Godly, and therefore is wholly unpermissible.

Bush/Cheney/Rove, et' all, must be tried for Murder!

Spitzer? Don't pinch me yet, I'm bleeding.

We could have seen this coming like a bad tune on a Madonna CD.

There goes the 9/11 movement.

You may now bow your heads for a moment of silent prayer.


another idea

While I'm all for using that book for something positive burning them can not only be seen in a bad light but could also get you arrested. Walking on the books is an idea but its not big enough to get peoples attention. So I say you should build a large wall in front of the steps of congress with the books and hang a large banner which reads "Wall Of Lies" and have people sit in front of it for a few days. A big wall of books with a large group of people sitting in front of it for a few days is bound to get some attention.


Yes, protesting in America, no matter what your intentions, can get you arrested.

If you fear that possibility, then don't participate.

Doing nothing in a police state can also get you some problems. The point of the action is to challenge the police state, and attempt to roll it back.

More than half the public wants Bush impeached. It is not on the table. It must be put back on the table. This is one route to achieve that outcome.

Those blathering fools who think burning government lies is the same as "fascism" and "naziism" weren't going to do anything anyway. This is an idea for those who want to provoke a response, knowing that a debacle like this broadcast around the world could only cast more suspicion on the Bushies for their role in facilitating the mass murders of September 11th.

Spreading the Word

I have been hitting Myspace and sending messages to random people in different areas of the country and the world. It's usually the same message unless I can target a specific area where there is an upcomming event like the event being held in Boston.

there are nearly 13,000 myspacers in the 9/11 Truth group... one of the largest groups on myspace.

When I send messages to these people then they have the opportunity to come view my site which has links to all the pertinent websites and films. If you do not already have a myspace account I would reccomend it..... If you join you will have access to thousands of like minded people and a link to even more uninformed.

There are several resources at your disposal to teach you how to set-up your page and after that you will be connected to millions of people.

I am dedicating this week to the truth.... I am amping my page and extending my efforts.... Please do the same if you are so motivated..... We need this to be in full force when the new congress takes over.

John Doraemi encourages 911 Truthers to get arrested immediately

by burning books on the Capitol, with all their names being taken out by the Secret Service, DCPD, FBI and pretty much every type of law enforcement and spy intelligence in the US. Obviously, things need to be done to get attention and cause a stir, but John Doraemi's plan would equal INSTANT ARREST. i've been the Capitol building many times. It's all police, everywhere. There's no media around like there is at the White House. It's kind of a barren wasteland. I believe this idea is being encouraged nefariously. Don't go.

Use your imagination

That's what this post is calling for, obviously - there's no time or meeting point set and John hasn't indicated whether he intends to be doing this himself or not so it's up for grabs. If burning a piece of fascist propaganda in front of the Congress presents too much of a strain well then do it somewhere else! If you're of the mind to make a big scene and get arrested burning that trash, I'll be the last person in the world to stop you - just do a good job and make sure it's well documented. Personally I'm not going to be anywhere near DC in January but I WILL be burning a copy of the Zelikow Report. And no, I won't be buying one. Burning, not buying. :)

What happened to the good old

School sit-ins and love-ins of the 60s. They used to carry them out of the buildings.

Crosby, Stills & Nash even had a hit song with "Ohio". For all of you that were to young or not even born.

There was a peace demonstration at a school in Ohio.
At that Peaceful demonstration 4 innocent students were shot DEAD by the soldiers in the National Guard. Some were running away.

Are we there yet ? I think not. I hope not. I hope it doesn't have to go that far. To much unhappiness.

George W Bush is bot a stupid man he is a sick man and maybe his mental state should be challenged. Cheney also. All we would have to do is use pictures of them laying memorial wreaths where nothing happened and the war in Iraq,