The Global Dominance Group: 9/11 Pre-Warnings & Election Irregularities in Context

From Project

The Global Dominance Group: 9/11 Pre-Warnings & Election Irregularities in Context
(pdf 404kb)

"...A significant portion of the Global Dominance Group had every opportunity to know in advance that the 9/11 attacks were imminent. Many countries warned the US of imminent terrorist attacks: Afghanistan, Argentina, Britain, Cayman Islands, Egypt, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Morocco, and Russia..."

By Peter Phillips, Bridget Thornton and Celeste Vogler

The leadership class in the US is now dominated by a neo-conservative group of people with the shared goal of asserting US military power worldwide. This global dominance group, in cooperation with major military contractors, has become a powerful force in world military unilateralism and US political processes. This research study is an attempt to identify the general parameters of those who are the key actors supporting a global dominance agenda and how collectively this group has benefited from the events of September 11, 2001 and irregularities in the 2004 presidential election. This study examines how interlocking public private partnerships, including the corporate media, public relations firms, military contractors, policy elites, and government officials, jointly support a US military global domination agenda. We ask the traditional sociological questions regarding who wins, who decides, and who facilitates action inside the most powerful military-industrial complex in the world.

A long thread of sociological research documents the existence of a dominant ruling class in the United States, which sets policy and determines national political priorities. The American ruling class is complex and inter-competitive, maintaining itself through interacting families of high social standing who have similar life styles, corporate affiliations and memberships in elite social clubs and private schools.

The American ruling class has long been determined to be mostly selfperpetuating maintaining its influence through policy-making institutions such as the National Manufacturing Association, National Chamber of Commerce, Business Council, Business Roundtable, Conference Board, American Enterprise Institute, Council on Foreign Relations and other business-centered policy groups.3 These associations have long dominated policy decisions within the US government.

C. Wright Mills, in his 1956 book on the power elite, documents how World War II solidified a trinity of power in the US that comprised corporate, military and government elites in a centralized power structure motivated by class interests and working in unison through "higher circles" of contact and agreement. Mills described how the power elite were those “who decide whatever is decided” of major consequence.These higher circle decision-makers tended to be more concerned with nterorganizational relationships and the functioning of the economy as a whole rather than advancing their particular corporate interests respectively.

The higher circle policy elites (HCPE) are a segment of the American upper class and are the principal decision-makers in society. While having a sense of "we-ness", they tend to have continuing disagreements on specific policies and necessary actions in various socio-political circumstances.6 These disagreements can block aggressive reactionary responses to social movements and civil unrest as in the case of the Labor Movement in the 1930s and the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s. During these two periods the more liberal elements of HCPE tended to dominate the decision making process and supported passing the National Labor Relations and Social Security Acts in 1935, as well as the Civil Rights and Economic Opportunities Acts in 1964. These pieces of national legislation were seen as concessions to the ongoing social movements and civil unrest and were implemented without instituting more repressive policies.

However, during periods of external threats represented by US enemies in World War I and World War II, HCPE were more consolidated. It is in these periods that more conservative/reactionary elements of the HCPE where able to push their agendas more forcefully. During and after World War I the US instituted repressive responses to social movements through the Palmer Raids and the passage of the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918. After World War II the McCarthy era attacks on liberals and radicals as well as the passage in 1947 of the National Security Act and the anti-labor Taft-Hartley Act were allowed and encouraged by HCPE.

The Cold War led to a continuing arms races and a further consolidation of military and corporate interests. President Eisenhower warned of this increasing concentration of power in his 1961 speech to the nation.




GDG? Who's been at it for centuries?

A video and some quotes:

The final layer of the onion that is 9/11:

Their [the Jesuit Order's] restoration [in 1814 by Pope Pius VII] is indeed a step toward darkness, cruelty, despotism, [and] death. I do not like the appearance of the Jesuits. If ever there was a body of men who merited eternal damnation on earth and in hell, it is this Society of [Ignatius de] Loyola."

John Adams (1735-1826; 2nd President of the United States)

"It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country - the United States of America - are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty. They have instigated MOST of the wars of Europe."

Marquis de LaFayette (1757-1834; French statesman and general. He served in the American Continental Army under the command of General George Washington during the American Revolutionary War.)

"The war [i.e., the American Civil War of 1861-1865] would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits."

Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865; 16th President of the United States)

"The public is practically unaware of the overwhelming responsibility carried by the Vatican and its Jesuits in the starting of the two world wars - a situation which may be explained in part by the gigantic finances at the disposition of the Vatican and its Jesuits, giving them power in so many spheres, especially since the last conflict."

Edmond Paris (Author of the book The Secret History of the Jesuits)

"The Jesuits are a secret society - a sort of Masonic order - with superadded features of revolting odiousness, and a thousand times more dangerous." - Samuel Morse (1791-1872; American inventor of the telegraph; author of the book Foreign Conspiracy Against the Liberties of the United States)

"[The Jesuits] are the deadly enemies of civil and religious liberty."

R. W. Thompson (Ex-Secretary, American Navy)

"The Jesuits are a MILITARY organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery. And the aim of this organization is power - power in its most despotic exercise - absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man [i.e., the Black Pope, the Superior General of the Jesuits]. Jesuitism is the most absolute of despotisms [sic] - and at the same time the greatest and most enormous of abuses."

Napoleon I (i.e., Napoleon Bonaparte; 1769-1821; emperor of the French)

"If you trace up Masonry, through all its Orders, till you come to the grand tip-top head Mason of the World, you will discover that the dread individual and the Chief of the Society of Jesus [i.e., the Superior General of the Jesuit Order] are one and the same person." - James Parton (American historian)

"The Society of Jesus [i.e., the Jesuit Order] is the enemy of man. The whole human race should unite for its overthrow. For there is no alternative between its total extirpation, and the absolute corruption and degradation of mankind." - Robert J. Breckinridge (pastor and author)

"The Jesuits are simply the Romish army for the earthly sovereignty of the world in the future, with the Pontiff of Rome for emperor that's their ideal. It is simple lust of power, of filthy earthly gain, of domination - something like a universal serfdom with them [i.e., the Jesuits] as masters - that's all they stand for. They don't even believe in God perhaps."

Fyodor Dostoyevsky (1821-1881; famous Russian novelist)

"Highly Recommended Reading"

Why would I want to read something perfectly logical and sourced to the gills?

"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

Show "Search me...." by Anonymous (not verified)

Please stop your stupid hit

Please stop your stupid hit pieces on Jon Gold. It's getting old and annoying.

BBC Editors blog about 9/11 again

Please take the time to post a polite comment to the BBC editors about 911 Truth.

what the hell?

A number of you looked forward to the other programmes in the series, which continues in the New Year, especially the programme about 9/11. To answer questions about what we are covering in the 9/11 programme, we are covering all the key issues(war games? doubt it...), including World Trade Centre 7, which was not hit by an aeroplane but which collapsed. And yes we did contact Professor Steven Jones, but he did not want to be interviewed for the programme and instead we interviewed the co-chair of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, Professor Jim Fetzer.

what the hell is wrong with Steven Jones? i thought he was devoting more time to 9/11 truth now? do we really want Fetzer over Jones? i think not. come on Jones, step up to the plate when your needed.

Likely reason...

The BBC's program would have been in production several months ago. Most likely at the relevant time Jones was still struggling to keep his post at BYU. So this could be the reason he declined, because he thought doing so would further jeopardize it.

thats a good point actually,

thats a good point actually, i didnt think of that. still, isnt it funny how Fetzer is the one they get? damn this sucks. and to think i used to defend him(i still like his book on Wellstone though).

Show ""still, isnt it funny how" by Anonymous (not verified)

way to miss the point.

way to miss the point.

Show "The point is that the point" by Anonymous (not verified)
Show "More "cutesy" (and" by Anonymous (not verified)

Why not David Ray Griffin? Or Kevin Ryan? Or Willie Rodriguez?

If it's just Uncle Fetzer they interview then we can safely say this is a BBC/Fetzer coverup production.

Whatever--no one is looking to the MSM anymore to find out about 9/11...


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero - Harvard Task Force


"If it's just Uncle Fetzer

"If it's just Uncle Fetzer they interview then we can safely say this is a BBC/Fetzer coverup production."

Safely? On what basis? Fetzer's been one of the most vocal personalities and has made some of the most appearances on television regarding 9/11 Truth. So why is it surprising that he appears on BBC?


Hey. I know this isn't the right forum to broach the topic, but how is 9/11 truth doing at Harvard? Are students there generally open or resistant to the idea that 9/11 was an inside job? Are you changing many minds and has your organization grown?

"911 was inside job" is no

"911 was inside job" is no surprise for the kids at Harvard. The real surprise is, however, the kids at Harvard. Many of them likely see 911 as a means of quelling and directing the herd in order to maintain the order of hereditary wealth and power. The good shepard sacraficing a few sheep for the betterment of his well being. Harvard is not all bad, they do turn out some bright and compassionate people capable of looking past the tip of their noses.

Please tell me you're

Please tell me you're joking. Do you go to Harvard?

Show "Are you an angry person?" by Anonymous (not verified)

Mineta gets Presidential Medal of Freedom

"Hey Norm: thanks for keeping your mouth shut."

Norman Mineta exemplifies the high ideals of service, integrity, and courage. Despite the injustice of living in an internment camp when he was a child, he later served his country in the U.S. Army and went on to become a mayor, Congressman, and Cabinet Secretary under two Presidents. The longest-serving Secretary of Transportation, he worked to improve the security of our transportation system and restore our confidence in air travel after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The United States honors Norman Y. Mineta for a life of selfless and distinguished service to our Nation.

It's more like...

"Hey Norm... thanks for saying that your testimony before the 9/11 Commission, the one that you said on more than one occasion that specifically referred to Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, now refers to Flight 93."

"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member


...he really did that?

(Say his testimony was concerning 93?) does he make that make sense?

Man, I missed that....that's laughable isn't it? It can't possibly fit....I mean, "30 miles out" from what?


He really said that... and the debunkers have tried to pass his testimony off as referring to Flight 93 as well...

"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

"Pull it!"

"Pull it!"

If I recall correctly, Lee

If I recall correctly, Lee Hamilton very clearly asked Mineta whether his comments referred to 77 and he said yes. He has now denied this??

He told Ray McGovern...

That he was referencing Flight 93.

"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

That's not really true.

That's not really true. McGovern said he asked Minetta about his testimony but that Minetta instead talked about Flight 93. McGovern didn't know if he was "out of it" or not wanting to answer the question.


Flight 93... How can that be? The testimony he gave before the 9/11 Commission was not the only time he gave that testimony. You mean to tell me he suddenly forgot this fascinating story he gave more than once? On top of that, according to Jane Northrop, the story he told on 4/26/2006 was about "after the planes slammed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and crashed in the Pennsylvania woods, he was whisked away by Secret Service agents." Sooooo... according to Norm, he was whisked away by the Secret Service from the PEOC? To where? I think not.

"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

GDG Piece

The Project Censored GDG piece is powerful. It has several excerptable quotes. It ought to be widely disseminated.

McCain Bill Is Lethal

McCain Bill Is Lethal Injection For Internet Freedom
Exploits fear of sexual predators(same with Gonzalez) and basic misunderstanding of Internet to attack blogs critical of the warmongering agenda he fronts for

Republican Senator John McCain has introduced legislation that would fine blogs up to $300,000 for offensive statements, photos and videos posted by visitors on comment boards, effectively nixing the open exchange of ideas on the Internet, providing a lethal injection for unrestrained opinion, and acting as the latest attack tool to chill freedom of speech on the world wide web.

McCain's proposed bill is just another step in greasing the skids for Internet 2, a tightly controlled, regulated and privileged world wide web where government approval will be required just to run a blog.

In recent months, a chorus of propaganda intended to demonize the Internet and lead it down this path has spewed forth from numerous establishment organs.

- The White House's own recently de-classified strategy for "winning the war on terror" targets Internet conspiracy theories as a recruiting ground for terrorists and threatens to "diminish" their influence.

- The Pentagon recently announced its effort to infiltrate the Internet and propagandize for the war on terror.

- In a speech last month, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff identified the web as a "terror training camp," through which "disaffected people living in the United States" are developing "radical ideologies and potentially violent skills." Chertoff pledged to dispatch Homeland Security agents to local police departments in order to aid in the apprehension of domestic terrorists who use the Internet as a political tool.

- In an interview with Fox News last month, Bush senior slammed Internet bloggers for creating an "adversarial and ugly climate."

- A landmark legal case on behalf of the Recording Industry Association of America and other global trade organizations seeks to criminalize all Internet file sharing of any kind as copyright infringement, effectively shutting down the world wide web - and their argument is supported by the U.S. government.

- The European Union, led by former Stalinist and potential future British Prime Minister John Reid, has also vowed to shut down "terrorists" who use the Internet to spread propaganda.

Show "Steven Jones" by Anonymous (not verified)
Show "Yes. He's come to his senses" by Anonymous (not verified)
Show "Yes" by Anonymous (not verified)

What silly disinformation.....

Those who are new to 9/11 wouldn't ask. Those who know 9/11 know about the scholars' issues too.

The only reason you would ask that is to slur and create discord.

Get a life shill.


Yeah, I noticed that on my

Yeah, I noticed that on my first pass. My guess is this series of anonymous postage is either the same person or part of a team manufacturing a "debate".

Show "Steven Jones" by Anonymous (not verified)

Sorry, love. Go back to

Sorry, love. Go back to spook school. No one's buying it. If you got a name it would help--but not much.

Protect 9/11 Truth for the sake of humanity

Show "Protect 9/11 Truth for the sake of humanity" by Anonymous (not verified)

Neo-Cons to debunker and back to neo-cons

I just love the debunkers of 9/11 truth. They are so H&C The 9/11 commission states the WTC were hollow. And fire cause the buildings to fall. If this is true fact then I think every building or tower in the USA is trash because if fire can cause damage to any tower then it is time to come up with a new plan and blue print for better buildings. Fire is the devils best friend and only friend. Tell the truth and shame the devil.

Is totovader our stupid anon

Is totovader our stupid anon backslash troll? Is that really you on this video? LOL!