Covert Operations: Reason to suspect Demolition of the WTC Towers
Demolition of the WTC Twin Towers
From spooked at http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/
Seeing upper sections of the towers crumble apart at the same time the lower sections of the structure are crumbling apart -- you should suspect demolition.
Seeing the 1/4 mile high towers fall at incredibly rapid, near free-fall speeds -- you should suspect demolition.
Seeing the towers form massive volcanic dust clouds as they fall -- you should suspect demolition.
Seeing the towers collapse straight down, through the path of most resistance -- you should suspect demolition.
Seeing explosive squibs jutting out from the towers preceding the collapse wave -- you should suspect demolition.
Seeing the incredible devastation at Ground Zero, where almost nothing is left of two huge 1/4 mile high towers -- you should suspect demolition.
Hearing witness after witness describe explosions at the WTC -- you should suspect demolition.
Knowing that the towers had a very expensive asbestos problem -- you should suspect demolition.
Knowing that the owner of the towers had a large insurance policy covering destruction of the towers by a terrorist attack -- you should suspect demolition.
Knowing the many the anomalies and irregularities of 9/11 -- you should suspect demolition.
Seeing that government and private-sector scientists have no explanation for the rapid and global collapses of the towers, and don't even bother to model the collapses -- you should suspect demolition.
SIMPLY THAT BOTH TOWERS CAME DOWN-- you should suspect demolition!
Putting these all together, the suspicion SHOULD turn into certainty beyond any reasonable doubt.
- fred's blog
- Login to post comments
Well, I hate to be a stickler here, but
'Happens all the time"????
How about never in the history of steel reinforced concrete buildings has there been a collapse attributed to fire. Let alone 3 in one day.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it might cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know it - now"
- Patrick Henry
!!
Damn that was some weak ass argument... LMFAO!!
"i..I...I... I will tell you why those buildings fell down..... Because!
So there...... Wahhhhh!"
Good Lord Anonymous..... that was so lame!
I hope that wasn't our usual shill.
"Seeing the towers collapse
"Seeing the towers collapse straight down, through the path of most resistance -- you should suspect demolition."
Dachsie does not agree with this statement. The towers did not collapse straight down. They were blown to Kingdom Come. That is not a "collapse."
"Demolition" - Demolish simply means to wreck - to demolish something is to wreck it. The WTC buildings were wrecked and demolished for sure, and yes they were "controlled" demolitions. It is just that the twin towers were demolished in an unconventional manner and Building 7 was a conventional "controlled demolition."
Seeing explosive squibs jutting out from the towers preceding the collapse wave -- you should suspect demolition.
Dachsie says: Yes, squibs tell us part of the demolition story.
Seeing the incredible devastation at Ground Zero, where almost nothing is left of two huge 1/4 mile high towers -- you should suspect demolition.
You are not saying much here. Apparently you have some special meaning of the word "demolition" that the dictionary does not provide us. Demolition simply means wrecked and "controlled demolition" simply means the wrecking process was controlled.
Hearing witness after witness describe explosions at the WTC -- you should suspect demolition.
Again, we value these witnesses and their testimony, and of course we know the buildings were wrecked and the wrecking was controlled, but we simply do not know the total causes of all the wrecking, but we are certainly open to the idea that explosions were present and the explosions were from explosives.
Fred, you probably do not need to be telling the people on this site why they should "suspect demolition." That would not be saying much and that would be preaching to the choir.
Blessings from Dachsie in Austin.
Yeah, Fred, no new people ever visit 911Blogger.com
What were you thinking? (sarcasm)
Good blog entry, Fred.
For any newbs who may be wondering about witnesses who said they heard, saw and found explosives @ the WTC, here's a link to read some of their statements:
http://digg.com/videos_educational/WTC_witnesses_to_explosions
I agree about the word "collapse"
It is easy to say that, for lack of another word, but "collapse" implies "gravity-driven."
Annihilation, obliteration, destruction -- those are better words.
These are really reasons why the "collapse" is not a collapse. It's a great summary.
Seeing debris shot . . .
Seeing WTC debris shot vertically and laterally in utter defiance of Newton's Law of Falling Bodies, you should suspect CD.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it might cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know it - now"
- Patrick Henry
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
exactly