Some reasons to suspect a Media Hoax on 9/11

In addition to there being a long list of reasons to suspect the towers were demolished, there are many reasons to suspect a media hoax on 9/11.

Knowing that the story of "hijackers with boxcutters" came from the President's lawyer, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that a key eyewitness interviewed on Bryant Gumbel was ANOTHER one of the president's lawyers, who also just happens to manage the Bush family fortune, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that there were embedded PSYOP operatives working at the CNN newsroom in 2000, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that plans to invade Iraq and Afghanistan had already been drawn up before 9/11, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that PUBLISHED military research advocates planting fake videos in television news in order to gain public support for a war, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that airplanes cannot fly through concrete and steel buildings as if those buildings offer no resistance at all, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that the Bush adminstration has lied about everything else in order to justify a war, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that gag orders have been placed on the FBI investigators, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that the president declares "we will never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories" you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that the only evidence of plane crashes at the Pentagon and Shanksville appears to be FAKE, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that Operation Northwoods advocated fake plane crashes you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that giant skyscrapers disintegrated, and the only file cabinet found was melted into a basketball-sized glob, yet the newspapers report finding rows of passengers strapped to their seats, and finding the cockpit intact along with someone not wearing a pilots uniform, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that the "black boxes" were never recovered from Ground Zero, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that they lied and said the air at Ground Zero was safe to breathe, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing about Mockingbird and COINTELPRO, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that terrorists would not leave cars full of "Arabic How-To-Fly Manuals" and put their last wills and testements into their checked baggage which mysteriously doesn't make it onto the plane, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that the terror-alert level goes up when the president's support goes down, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that the bin Laden family was escorted out of the USA right after 9/11, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that Osama bin Laden, who ever he is, can't both be a tall skinny religious guy on dialysis who denies orchestrating 9/11 AND SIMULTANEOUSLY be a fat guy who wears gold jewelery and takes credit for 9/11, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that the published passenger manifests for the airplanes, and the autopsy lists contain no Arab names, you should suspect a media hoax.

Knowing that some of the airplanes supposedly used in the attacks were not scheduled to fly on 9/11, you should suspect a media hoax.

And finally, knowing that the mass media ridicule every aspect of 9/11 Truth, you should suspect a media hoax.

Fred -- excerpts of military research into media hoaxes like 9/11

Show "Osama did it! GWB has done" by Anonymous (not verified)


He is the terrorist.

If there were other terrorists in this country wishing to do us harm... because of our freedoms.... we would have known it by now....

Hell man... it was four years bfore they even claimed to thwart a terrorist plot.

Our borders have been wide open this whole time.

If there was a threat to us.... we would have seen it and felt it.

This war on terror is such a joke.

oh wait.... I forgot about the "Shoe Bomber"..... absolutely laughable man


Ok, so after doing about a year’s research on 9/11, and exploring many other aspects of the United States, I asked myself, "What does this all mean and how is it connected?" For some reason in the back of my mind I was trying to make sense of everything, but it seemed that there was some information that I just couldn't connect together. Now, anyone who researches 9/11 can come to the conclusion that the Government is withholding information, evidence, and is lying right to the face of the American people. Now if you look back in history and research some of the major events in history, you will find that the United States' Government has their hands in everything. From JFK to BFK to MLK to columbine, the 93 WTC bombings, 7/7 bombings in London, and many other events that changed the course of the United States. Then ask yourself, "If the government is withholding information about these events, don't we as a people have a right to know?" Then you got to ask yourself, what else does the Government know that we, the people, do not. Well, I found one such answer in my quest for normality. I then came to the realization that we as citizens of the United States are being manipulated to believe false truths. The fact that anyone working in the private sector of business, IS NOT REQUIRED TO PAY AN INCOME TAX is just one example of how the government uses fear and manipulation to control US. Do the research, and you TOO will come to the realization that you have been made to believe that if you don't file your income taxes, the IRS will come and take you to court. Supreme court rulings state the 16th amendment gave Congress NO ADDITIONAL RIGHTS TO TAX THE PRIVATE SECTOR UNLESS IT IS DIVIDED EQUALLY AMONG THE STATES.

From my perspective, the reason 9/11 was allowed to happen was to justify the "new war on terror" and the constrictions of our civil liberties at home. THIS WAR IS ABOUT OIL and I can prove it. How is it that oil that belongs to the Iraqi people, is being confiscated by corporations like Halliburton and US contracts? Why is OIL such a big deal? Well, because it is a vital fossil fuel that is needed to provide energy.

If you have read to this point, I commend you for at least looking at things from my perspective. You might be asking yourself, what the F*&@ is this guy talking about, but I can assure you that I am going somewhere with this. Ok, what is the root of all-evil? Money and Power? Can you really sit there and tell me that our sole purpose in life is to make wars and bid on oil contracts? I'm going to go out on a limb here but, don't you feel somewhere in your very being that war and oil can not be the only reason why we were put here on earth?

So what would happen to the world as a whole, if we didn't need to worry about oil and fossil fuels and the need to fight wars based on these principles? What if there was an over-abundance of energy that was free and everyone on the planet had access to this "free energy"? Would there be a reason to go to war? Personally, I think not. If you think about it, war is just an extension of politics.

So what does all this have to do with 9/11? Well, think about it like this. Considering the fact that the "official story" doesn't add up and the extensive evidence supporting any kind of alternative "theory", it is easy to see what is really going on. This struggle to understand what really happened on 9/11 and the evidence that would suggest government involvement is what keeps most of us "truthers" actively busy trying to expose the government. This cat and mouse game of throwing evidence to the contrary is a crucial element to the "control" factor. It might sound confusing but try to follow me. While us "truthers" are busy day in and day out trying to make ground on this historic event, it detracts from every other thing going on in the world. It gives some people drive and motivation to think that they have the answers about 9/11 and any other major history-changing event. NOTE: I’m not claiming I know everything or I have all the answers. I commend the Truth Movement for their progress, but I must say that to think the Truth Movement alone can expose the government, we as truthers will be waiting a long time for that. Think about the JFK assassination, it’s been 40 years and its still being debated.

So what does all this mean? If war and oil are the gears that drive us, and the government creates conspiracies to keep the people talking about controversial subjects, its seems to me that history will repeat itself. Have you ever envisioned in your mind a world free of hate, crimes, wars, hunger, ect...? It would seem that if this were the case, life would be better.

So what if I were to tell you that "free energy" does, in fact, exist? What if I told you that this idea of free energy is the very reason why the Status Quo cannot change? You see, the people in the world who are the richest and most powerful make decisions for this country that is based on their own agendas. If you think that these Elite groups of billionaires do not know that this "free energy" exists, you are sadly mistaken. They have known this since the beginning of time and this is the reason why you never heard about it. Think about it like this, if the richest people in the world no longer had control of energy, they would lose money right? And we all know money is the root of all-evil... These Elite groups of billionaires know that if the idea of "free energy" is revealed, they would go bankrupt and the stocks in oil would drop. The dependency of foreign fuels would be obsolete and TRUE INDEPENDENCE would be achieved. EVERYONE ON EARTH WOULD BE CONSIDERED EQUAL. This would be a WORLD CHANGING EVENT.

If, by now, you think I'm just trying to create my own reality, I can assure you that what I've said is real and this "free energy" does exist. If you believe in the truth movement, believe in this truth also. Zero point energy is the future... Are you ready?

Check this link out to learn in detail about this "Free Energy" and how its implications could change the world for the better.

Remember the words of Albert Einstein, "Imagination is more important than knowledge."

let me guess you believe no

let me guess you believe no planes hit the wtc?

Let me guess, you think the

Let me guess, you think the goverment orchestrated 9/11, but they're too honest and principled to use cooperative journalists and eyewitnesses to sell their story.

i have no idea what your

ill start by saying that i DONT think the planes we saw were CGI or holograms, does that answer your convoluted question? thinking the journalists who reported on 9/11 being dishonest is obvious, but does this mean they were in on a real-time CGI insert hoax? absolutely not, people pull this "evidence" out of their arse.

so do you believe planes hit the WTC or do you think they were CGI / holograms (are you too embarrassed to admit it?)

I think they've gone out of

I think they've gone out of their way to obscure the truth of what happened on Sept 11, including releasing lots of fake evidence, fake crash sites, and misinformation.

I'm very sure that the timing of the attack was to grab everyone's attention, including of course the TV news media, so that they could make sure the Official Script got out across all the networks.

There's now very solid evidence that two bush cronies were on TV relaying the key elements of the official story. Another eyewitness is a CNN employee... There's mounting evidence that other aspects of the "Media Presentation of Terrorist Attacks" was staged.

According to the offical textbook on Military Deception: "Ambiguity-reducing deceptions are employed to make the adversary quite certain, very
decisive, and wrong."

Clearly the "planes" idea was an abiguity reducing deception. It was a very shocking and unforgetable image to see on TV. And it worked to get us into two major wars.

Now, whether they used drones, switched planes, real boeings, missiles, airbuses, military planes, passenger planes, cargo planes, I have no idea. The point is that the "planes" were a type of deception. Even blowing up the WTC was a hoax in a sense that the goal was to create public support for foreign wars.

The videos of the planes that show up on the internet, and don't match up, are basically an ambiguity increasing distraction. I'd guess that's the same thing with releasing ridiculous "crash" footage from the Pentagon. We can spend a lot of time arguing about the videotapes and lose focus on what actually happened. A lot of energy gets sapped worrying about the technical details of the actual operation. On the other hand, we're getting pretty close to "cracking the code".

I don't know if that answered your question, but that's a summary of what I think.

I don't believe, I know

that the videos of the plane disappearing into the South Tower are fake. I don't know enough about CGI to say whether that is what it is.

This does not mean no plane hit the WTC, though it certainly suggests that. Shoe me an authenticate video showing a realistic impact, preferably with sound, and I will believe it.

Fred states the reason well:

"Knowing that airplanes cannot fly through concrete and steel buildings as if those buildings offer no resistance at all, you should suspect a media hoax."

Why is this such a big deal?

Whoops -- Show me an

Whoops -- Show me an authenticated video"

Where's the evidence that a plane hit the pentagon?

"The wise man doesn't give the right answers, he poses the right questions." - Claude Levi-Strauss

So what if he does?

I see 22 reasons here. Why do you focus on the planes issue?

Each should first be viewed independently, then as a body of circumstantial evidence.

"Hoax" is not the right word to use.

Hoax feels like you are trying to say 9/11 was all just visual trickery. That is not the case. For the most part, the media reported what happened: planes flying into the Twin Towers. Then they reported them collapsing and some reporters even talked about controlled demolition. Obviously, misinformation was provided to the news sources, and the very system of mass-media in the US is rigged to deceive the people. But it wasn't a "media hoax". 9/11 was an attack. And many lies about it were told from the very beginning from various sources. For instance, when I was watching TV on 9/11, I remember a news channel reporting that the Palestinian group Hamas had just called in to claim responsibility. Clearly, this was a "hoax". And there were plenty of hoaxs. But 9/11 was not a "media hoax". It was an attack. Except, thanks to the internet and smart people out there, we have figured out that it was planned by people in our government.

The eyewitness accounts varied so much also.

Somebody at the pentagon claimed to see the faces of the passengers in the plane. Where was he standing to be close enough to see the passengers faces? And the plane was traveling 500 mph ten feet off the ground how could he say anything other than one big blur?
An eyewitness at the WTC said that he saw the buildings fall and that it was obviously from structural failure. He surmised that without any investigation at all. Funny stuff.

I see what you're saying,

I see what you're saying, but I'd like to emphasize that the media wasn't just "caught off guard like everyone else" and then just trying to do their job as best they could. Certainly, the vast majority of people who work for news organizations are not part of any kind of conspiracy.

What I am saying, is that there WAS a concerted effort, by the perpetrators, to feed the media all sorts of fake information, and which the media dutifully reported. Many people think that real, live footage got aired. I would argue that a lot of doctored footage was deliberately mixed in to hide the tracks of the guilty. That's why I think they've put in various distractions and left things deliberately vague.

Remember, they also had a Hoax 9/11 Commission to investigate the attacks... it wasn't all TV fakery for sure, but we really shouldn't take anything for granted, and that includes (but is not limited to) the photos and videos that are all over the net.

Nice post, Fred. You got

Nice post, Fred. You got several good points across in a short space.

I think hoax is an appropriate word. It means a trick or a fraud. You correctly insert the word "knowing" throughout this short piece. The media and others did not commit a hoax if they did not know or have knowledge contrary to the words they were putting out to we the people -- but they did know.

Not only was 9-11 a hoax, it was a myth. Phillip Zelikow is the person whose area of expertise is the creation of "political myths."

I do not want to get into contention regarding the "no plane" idea. I have to assume that the videos that so convincingly show no resistance of the plane to the building wall have been carefully sustantiated and verified. If those videos have been fully investigated and found not to be "hoaxes", then the "no planers" are just fine with me. If the videos have not been or cannot have been substantiated, and yet people adhere to the "no plane" idea, then the "no plane" idea becomes itself a hoax.

I am focusing on what we have established to prove that the official story is false. There, we are all on common ground and we are all on solid ground.

I personally do not much even like the word "collapse" anymore. Collapse means a falling down, and a falling down and in upon itself. It is hard to say that the twin towers collapsed. I prefer what Morgan Reynolds says - "They were blown to Kingdom Come." 100 micron fine dust particles went up in to the air and out over the city. Instead of 500 million pounds of debris being at the base of each tower after the event, there was a glaring absence of probably 75 percent of the debris that should have been there if there had been an ordinary collapse.

Blessings from Dachsie in Austin.

Great point, Dachsie

It's a bit of a conundrum.

"I do not want to get into contention regarding the "no plane" idea. I have to assume that the videos that so convincingly show no resistance of the plane to the building wall have been carefully sustantiated and verified. If those videos have been fully investigated and found not to be "hoaxes", then the "no planers" are just fine with me. If the videos have not been or cannot have been substantiated, and yet people adhere to the "no plane" idea, then the "no plane" idea becomes itself a hoax."

The way I view it is that the planes could not have penetrated with so much energy to damage numbers of core columns as is assumed in the "collapse" scenario, and there should have been debris below the impact point. That too could be hidden, I suppose.

Yes, the word "collapse" is not accurate. "Demolished" isn't really either, because that denotes tearing down to clear the property for other development.

Annihilation, obliteration, blowing to Kingdom come.

A little clarification is in order

"Knowing that Fire Fighters and other First Responders report FINDING the black boxes, and yet we are told they were unrecoverable" . . .

"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it might cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know it - now"
- Patrick Henry

The way they handle the

The way they handle the crime scene, we'll never know how much they've tampered with the black boxes and what's happened to them.

I saw the story about the boxes getting recovered, and given to the FBI but I don't know if it's true or not.

If true, it means someone either put black boxes there to be found, or that they really crashed planes there, or...?

If it's false, they wanted to shut-up people who claimed no-planes, and start a big rift in the truth movement. (Which I think is plausible too.)

Anyway, I don't think you can trust the MSM news aired on September 11, 2001 anymore than you can trust it today.

"Knowing that the "black

"Knowing that the "black boxes" were never recovered from Ground Zero, you should suspect a media hoax."

No you disinfo f*cktard the black boxes were found, by two firemen who handed them to the FBI.

"Knowing that airplanes cannot fly through concrete and steel buildings as if those buildings offer no resistance at all, you should suspect a media hoax."

Again no, the reason the plane cuts into the building is because it's travelling at 500 miles per hour and that any object travelling at speeds like that, including even tooth picks, will behave like something with infinitely more force and strength in comparison to a much slower travelling object. The planes had wings full of fuel, imagine how heavy water is and then imagine a large contained quantity of water travelling at 500mph impacting something, it's not going to splash it's going to smash with great force (as if it were a solid) when it collides with something.
Now take the plane and it's wings full of kerosene (which being a liquid like water is going to pack a heavy punch in this state) travelling at 500mph and into the Towers, which have outer columns specifically designed to absorb such an impact. The plane and it's wings specifically are going cut into the building "like butter" on impact and begin to instantly disintegrate once inside, igniting the fuel in the wings creating a massive orange fireball.
There is no need for "pods/missiles" "no-planes/tv fakery", that stuff is all nonsensical sensationalist bullshit designed, along with "space beams" and "mini nukes", to discredit 9/11 truth.

“Knowing that” there are disinfo assclowns and paid shills on the Internet I “should suspect” that you are one of them. Get off this site moron!

WTC Black boxes, More Deliberate Ambiguity

So, where are the black boxes?

Were they recovered or not?

What does the government say?

I've never seen any black boxes, but I've seen a ton of fake news stories.

Got any pictures of the hero firemen who recovred the black boxes? Why weren't they on TV?

When I hear ad hominem attacks, I know who the disinfo shills really are. Why don't you get off the site, you no-good Al-Qaida loving George Bush Supporting shill? I'm a shill, you're a shill, everyone's a shill-shill. Come on.

2 Firefighters Say They

2 Firefighters Say They Found 9/11 'Black Boxes'

"Two men who worked extensively in the wreckage of the World Trade Center claim they helped federal agents find three of the four "black boxes" from the jetliners that struck the towers on 9/11 - contradicting the official account."

The more important thing here is that you've tried to mix in a whole load of things, some credible some not, with "no planes/tv fakery". That is EXACTLY what disinfo shills do, so don't be surprised when people call you out on it.

Why don't you address my point explaining why "no planes hit the Towers" is complete horseshit disinfo and peddled only by shills and morons?

No Planes = Straw man = Classic Disinfo

Nice Straw Man. Great. So where are the black boxes? Do you have them? Does the NTSB have them?

Tell me, what kind of planes hit the towers? You show some pictures of wreckage... where are the parts with the serial numbers? People who go attack others are the disinfo shills. I don't have to prove that "no planes" hit anything. Do I say anywhere in any of my posts that "no planes" hit the towers?

It's amusing that you call me a shill, and attack a straw man I never, ever raised.

Why don't you show me your pay stubs from the FBI and the safe where you've got those black boxes? How come you can't show me you don't work for the FBI? Show me the serial numbers on those black boxes, OK? Thanks. When you do that, I'll prove who's a shill.

Read the book assclown; "At

Read the book assclown;

"At one point I was assigned to take Federal Agents around the site to search for the black boxes from the planes. We were getting ready to go out. My ATV was parked at the top of the stairs at the Brooks Brothers entrance area. We loaded up about a million dollars worth of equipment and strapped it into the ATV. When we got into the ATV to take off, the agent accidentally pushed me forward. The ATV was already in reverse, and my foot went down on the gas pedal. We went down the stairs in reverse. Fortunately, everything was okay. There were a total of four black boxes. We found three."

I'll take the word of these Firefighters over those of "no planes/tv fakery" disinfo jokers any day.

Great, it's true because you

Great, it's true because you read it in a book. OK fine. I guess that settles it! So now you think Osama stole the black boxes from the FBI, or that the FBI orchestrated 9/11 or what. What does that have to do with no planes?

According to you, the FBI steals the evidence, but they don't plant evidence? Your wit dazzles me.

Ok maybe I’m being a bit

Ok maybe I’m being a bit rude here, perhaps I should have said:

Don’t you think pushing “no planes/tv fakery” along with “space beams” and “mini nukes” is a bit stupid, considering that we’re trying to raise awareness about 9/11? And that we need to concentrate on the most credible issues, and put aside the least credible and crazy sounding until there's a real investigation where everything should be presented and considered?

re No planes thing harmful to the movement

Advocacy: If somebody believes the OGCT I'd probably tell them to watch Press for Truth or 911 Mysteries or something like that. I'd say there's a lot of evidence that the Bush administration is trying to cover something up and it looks like they used 9/11 as an excuse to get us into a war... or something like that.

I would encourage anyone to look at WTC 7, which was not hit by an airplane. In my mind, that's a HUGE smoking gun. There's really no viable alternative explanation.

For people who are into it, it's worth looking at the technology used. Now, for someone who's actually trying to do new research on 9/11, and is more or less up to speed, I think you have to be open to some of the more exotic ideas if you want to eventually get to the truth. It could be very important in finding out who did it. For example, if they did use satellites, it becomes who had access to satellites that day. If it was a mini-nuke, you can make a list of people or groups with access to that technology.

I personally think there's some pretty compelling evidence that they used some kind of exotic stuff with WTC 1 and 2, compared with WTC 7. But I certainly wouldn't say it's well-understood at this point. It doesn't deserve to be ridiculed, that's for sure. It's not normal for the demoition workers to all be coming down with cancer.... worth looking into IMHO.

Finally there's the media. Clearly they ridicule 9/11 truth as much as they can, comparing it to Bigfoot or UFO's or whatever. I think there's a lot that can be discovered by looking at the media hoax, seeing which "eyewitnesses" they actually aired, etc. By figuring out which folks in the media were part of the "program" we'll get that much closer to rock-solid proof of who-done-it. We can't just say "inside job" like it's the end of the story.

It's not "no planes", it's "who was selling the official story and what techniques were they using," that I'd like to shed more light on. If we could prove that they knowingly aired fake video, or talked about a fake crash site, or got told not to show tape that they STILL have, that would help crack the whole thing wide open.

You would think that WTC 7 by itself would be enough, but people have really been brainwashed by seeing the TV tell them it was terrorists over and over and over again.

There's a lot more to the media hoax than "no planes". And a lot of it can be conclusively proved without getting into a debate of exactly which plane got switched where or which brand of explosives they used.

Even the disappearing black boxes ought to be a huge smoking gun. You would think the media would be all over that, demanding to hear the tapes. It's sad.

For me, I don't have a very high level of certainty that the perpetrators (probably in the USG) didn't just play a trick on the firemen, just to put more doubt in our minds.

Advocacy vs Research

for the 2nd part of your question,

I'm all for a real investigation.

I just don't think we can push anything aside right now just because it sounds far out, especially if there's actual evidence to support it. I agree with you that it's not the thing to talk about on a stage or on Fox News or whatever. But you shouldn't shoot down real research that's going on just because it sounds high-tech or complicated.

If I were putting up a banner, I'd say WTC 7, not Directed Energy, for whatever that's worth.

For me personally, the passenger lists (fake), living hijackers (fake), lack of Arab names on the autopises (very fake), are all signs of a smoking-gun media hoax. And it's not hard to understand that the President had his lawyer who helped him defeat Al Gore in the Supreme Court agree to tell a story about boxcutters to generate sympathy.

The media deception guides published by the miltary even suggest using "Husband and Wife" and hyping enemy atrocities (beheadings, etc) as a theme to generate sympathy for a military cause. Sick, sick stuff.

Your behavior is typical disinfo

Why do the administrators of this site allow behavior like this?

Disinfo or not, who are you to talk to people like that?

You are wrong about the planes, but I will not explain to somewhat who exhibits such rude and irrational behavior.

I do not see what "space beams" have to do with this topic.

And, knowing who is helping the perps to cover it up...

Knowing that censoring is being done to protect the governement's story here on 911blogger, you should suspect a media hoax.

And finally, knowing that the 911blogger media ridicules anyone who is seeking to uncover FACTS about what happened on 9/11, you should suspect 911blogger is a CIA-run hoax.

What the hell are you doing

What the hell are you doing signing up at the "CIA-run hoax" for then? Is it so you can vote up the disinfo "no planes" blogs? Who's CIA again?

I'd like to keep this on topic.

The everyone is a shill thing is getting a little bit tiresome.


False Flag Terror of The NWO

Post proofs that brotherhood is not so wild a dream as those who profit by postponing it pretend....
~~Norman Corwin





9/11 Signs of The 9/11 Times

"I'm going to keep pushing WTC 7 until I have little kids saying:

"'Mommy, what's WTC 7 mean?'

"As many of you know I live just north of San Francisco in a heavily Democratic area, but way too many of the folks here are in such a hurry that most never stop to think about much, especially something as deep and important as the criminality of many in the US government and the future of our country. Hopefully, my signs will catch them as they're stuck in traffic and wake them out of their caffiene fueled rat race and force them to look at 9/11 head on, or at least ask some questions that may lead somewhere...

"If any of you have any ideas for signs, let me know.

"[9/11]Truthers are a solid 1/3 of the American population now, the fight now is for the hearts and minds of the middle third. We have truth and physics on our side, so as long as we don't give up we will win.... The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward....

"Today I placed signs at about 10 locations and many were multiple panels, so about 20 panels all together. For the morning commute I start well before sunrise so I have the cold dark to work in. I'm rarely exposed in one location for more than 5 minutes....

"I'm hoping that these signs will help me recruit for the local 9/11 study and activist groups that I will be starting in the new year...."


Dam Breaks On 9/11 Truth
Lynch and Brolin re-focus attention, will more Hollywood personalities follow in their footsteps?

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, December 7, 2006

Two more major influential Hollywood stars using their fame to attract attention to 9/11 truth proves the dam is breaking and....



Michael Keefer on Alex Cockburn's anti-9/11 skeptic stance.

Into the Ring with Counterpunch on 9/11: How Alexander Cockburn, Otherwise So Bright, Blanks Out on 9/11 Evidence


William Rodriguez Featured in Devon Newspaper and Interviewed on BBC Bristol

Hero of 9/11 Won't Stop Speaking Out Against Bush

One minute he was going about his business, the next he was looking at a vision from the depths of hell. Still reeling from a blast which rocked the World Trade Center, William Rodriguez could hardly believe what he was seeing."A man came running into the office shouting 'explosion, explosion!'" Mr Rodriguez soon saw a third of his body had been badly burnt by the blast. "When I realised, I started screaming. I looked at his face and it was missing parts."

It was the start of a day that transformed Mr Rodriguez from a maintenance man to the hero of 9/11...


The 9/11 Conspiracy Theories (We Must Have A New And Completely Independent Investigation Into The Events Of 9/11)
by Matt Kjeldsen

The conspiracy probability was researched and handed to you by several visionaries, who inspired several others, who inspired theologians, who inspired scholars, who inspired activists, who inspired celebrities, who inspired thousands more, who inspired thousands more. Each patriot who has taken up the mantle of 911 truth does so at his/her own peril. Each citizen who has seen the truth must spread the truth and will be in turn derided, insulted and abused by the mainstream press, by fellow citizens and by any and all members of the establishment. The citizen/patriot has everything to lose and yet, when faced with the reality of the lie, there is but one course and that is truth. Who are you going to believe?

The following links will lead you to many little truths:


Barrett: Academic freedom is good policy

(Barrett is a part-time lecturer at UW- Madison.)
Wisconsin State Journal

In the former Soviet Union, the monopoly media acted as cheerleader for a brutal, repressive government. Dissident academics were silenced, fired, or institutionalized.

For two or three years after 9/11, our media served as a megaphone for Bush administration lies, and academics were intimidated into silence....

....The excuse that my position is marginal no longer holds, given that only 16 percent of the American people believe the government is telling the truth about 9/11 (New York Times poll) and 36 percent of Americans, and half of New Yorkers, believe top US officials conspired to commit mass murder and high treason on 9/11 (Scripps-Howard and Zogby polls).

It is long past time for a rational, evidence-based debate on the facts and meaning of 9/11. Any takers?


Fewer people are believing the official reports on September 11 attacks:



MICAH:::....Therefore I will wail and howl, I will go stripped and naked: I will make a wailing like the dragons, and mourning as the owls.... Who hate the good, and love the evil; who pluck off their skin from off them, and their flesh from off their bones; who also eat the flesh of my people.... That they may do evil with both hands earnestly, the prince asketh, and the judge asketh for a reward; and the great man, he uttereth his mischievous desire: so they wrap it up. The best of them is as a brier: the most upright is sharper than a thorn hedge.

HABAKKUK:::....regard, and wonder marvelously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you.... Shall they not rise up suddenly that shall bite thee, and awake that shall vex thee?...Woe to him that buildeth a town with blood, and stablisheth a city by iniquity!...

HAGGAI:::....and he that earneth wages earneth wages to put it into a bag with holes.



There is help for you!

If you are among the 16% who still believe the Neonazicons' conspiracy theory about 9/11, YOU CAN BE HELPED! Simply click on the links below to read the scientific debunking of the Bush pseudoscience fairytale about the WTC 9/11 atrocity.


BREAKING: Housewives Exonerated in 9/11 Atrocity!

Subject: Re: Are You One of The 16% Who Still Believe Bush about 9/11?
9-11 DID HAPPEN !! it was not done by disgruntled housewives-- it was done by terrorists!!
would you like to fight the terrorists on the streets of NY or the beach in Miami ?
NO-- then lets fight them on their turf !
If you email me again with your garbage, I;ll report you as spam

[Cindy Rodriguez's column below is the most truthful and objective report on 9/11 investigation that Some Of The Above News has so far seen in the mainstream media.

Read entire column:



Literary giant says 9/11 allowed to happen, slams Bush administration coup de'tat of American freedom



U.S. Being Awakened from Media-induced Coma by AIR
AMERICA RADIO: Find your station HERE:


To be removed from or to subscribe to this free
Enewsletter list please email with
REMOVE or SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
And if you don't like our news go make some of your

Founder 2002: Johannieson & Friends
Editor: Myra M. Jackson

War brings out thieves and peace hangs them.

A negative rating for this?

If people are really concerned about discrediting the "movement," you might quit being so rude.

If someone comes here to learn about 9/11, what are they going to notice more? One sentence about
planes, or all the crude language in response to that?

Speaking of crude language, my philosophy about "disinfo" is this. Whoever smelt it, dealt it.

Thank you Fred for your excellent post and polite responses.

Minus 5 for

Minus 5 for thoughtcrime.

Don't be afraid to think outside the box amigos.

They may call you ugly names, and say you are hurting "the movement."

No thought control, no speed limit.

Have no fear of ridicule.

Peace & Love


If this is legit then it is huge for breaking through this paradigm of lies!

McVeigh Video Destroys OKC Bombing Official Story
Shows McVeigh was in military receiving instruction in "explosives and demolition" over a year after official story says he was discharged, whistleblower harassed for years while unknowingly in possession of bombshell tape

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet
Monday, December 18, 2006

A video that shows Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh at a U.S. military base that specializes in explosives and demolition training over a year after he supposedly left the army puts the official story of the April 19 1995 federal building bombing under serious doubt and mandates a re-opening of an investigation into the terror attack that killed 168 people.

The video was released by Bill Bean, a film producer who has suffered intense surveillance and harassment since taking the footage, and is the subject of a February 2007 Hustler Magazine feature story.


FBI and Government lies about a CONVICTED TERRORIST.... who perpetraited the second largest terrorist attack on American Soil!!

This is a huge chink in their credibility

Alex Jones!

Todays show was one of the best I have ever heard from Alex Jones! Lots of great news and info. Very well presented. BIG McVeigh Story.

If you have not heard it please go and listen to the broadcast stream!


anyone having trouble with

anyone having trouble with the video links attached to this story?

Mossad in IRAQ?!

For whomever is keeping tabs on the Mossad.... there seems to be some lies and deniability coming out of Israel with this story



Fred, this information seems to be very important, but please could you give a proper documentation. The first one is interesting "Knowing that the story of "hijackers with boxcutters" came from the President's lawyer". Where does this information come from? I've never heard of it. Could you provide a link or two? This "media hoax" line of research is very interesting, but please give references.