Eminent Law Scholar: 9/11 Was, At the Very Least, Allowed to Happen; Anthrax was Inside Job

Infowars has the goods:

"Esteemed Professor and Law Expert Warns Of Police State

Francis A Boyle says 9/11 was allowed to happen, war on terror is facilitating the downfall of The Republic, concentration camps are in place and US citizens are the targets

Alex Jones was joined on air this week by a leading American professor, practitioner of and expert on international law to discuss his detailed knowledge of the cover up of the 2001 anthrax attacks, which he is adamant were perpetrated by criminal elements of the US government in an attempt to foment a police state by killing off opposition to hardline post 9/11 legislation.

Dr Franics A. Boyle literally helped write the law with regards to terrorism, as he was responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 that was passed unanimously by both Houses of Congress and signed into law by President Bush Snr.

Professor Boyle teaches international law at the University of Illinois, Champaign. He holds a Doctor of Law Magna Cum Laude as well as a Ph.D. in Political Science, both from Harvard University. He has also served on the Board of Directors of Amnesty International (1988-1992), and represented Bosnia- Herzegovina at the World Court.

The professor started off by explaining the motivation behind the October 2001 anthrax attacks:

"After the September 11th 2001 Terrorist attacks, the Bush administration tried to ram the USA PATRIOT Act through Congress, that would have, if already had not, set up a police state. And we know for a fact that the PATRIOT Act had already been drafted and was sitting on Ashcroft's desk as of September 10th.

Senators Daschle and Leahy were holding it up because they realised what this would lead to, indeed the first draft of the Patriot Act, they would have suspended the writ of habeas corpus. And all of a sudden out of nowhere come these anthrax attacks. And at the time I myself did not know precisely what was going on, either with respect to September 11th or the anthrax attacks, but then the New York Times revealed that the technology behind the letter to Senator Daschle. A trillion spores per gram, special electro-static treatment.

This is super-weapons grade Anthrax that even the United States government, in its openly proclaimed programs, and we had one before Nixon, had never developed before. So it was obvious to me that this was from a US Government lab, there is no where else you could have gotten that."

Dr Boyle proceeded to call a very high level official in the FBI who deals with terrorism and counter-terrorism, Spike Bowman, whom he had met at a terrorism conference at the University of Michigan Law School.

He told Bowman that the only people that would have the capability to carry out the attacks were people working on US government programs on Anthrax and with access to high level a bio-safety lab. Dr Boyle went through all the names, the contractors and the labs for Anthrax work with the FBI's Bowman.

Bowman then informed Dr Boyle that the FBI was working with Fort Detrick on the matter, to which he responded that Fort Detrick could really be the main problem.

It was documented at the time that the anthrax strain used was military grade. This was widely reported in 2002 in publications such as the New Scientist.

"Soon after I had informed Bowman of this information, the FBI authorised the destruction of the AMES cultural Anthrax database." The Professor continued.

The destruction of the anthrax culture collection at Ames, IA., from which the Ft. Detrick lab got its pathogens, was blatant destruction of evidence as it meant that there was no way of finding out which strain was sent to who to develop the larger breed of anthrax used in the attacks. The trail of genetic evidence would have led directly back to a secret but officially-sponsored US government biowarfare program that was illegal and criminal.

"Clearly for the FBI to have authorised this was obstruction of justice, a federal crime. That collection should have been preserved and protected as evidence. That's the DNA, the fingerprints right there. It later came out of course that this was AMES strain anthrax that was behind the Daschle and Leahy letter."

At that point Boyle says it became very clear to him that there was a cover up in operation by the FBI. He points out that later on on reading one of David Ray Griffin's books on the 9/11 attacks, he discovered that Agent Bowman was the same FBI agent who sabotaged the FISA warrant for access to Zacarious Moussaoui's computer, which contained information that could have facilitated the prevention of the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Later on Bowman was promoted and given a decoration, presumably because he did such a fine job on Moussaoui's computer and also on the anthrax.

So it was to be that the patriot act was rammed through, because the opposition from Leahy and Daschle, whom they had tried to kill, disappeared. Congress and even the House itself officially shut down for the first time in the history of the Republic. The Senate refused to shut down. Dr Boyle commented that he believes this to be one of the biggest political crimes in the history of America.

The professor agreed that actions such as this and legislation such as the Patriot act and the new Military Commissions act are the precursors to a military dictatorship.

"And remember that the first draft of the Patriot act that sat on Ashcroft's desk before 9/11, and also remember that Ashcroft was flying around in a private jet because he was told that there was going to be a terrorist attack with airplanes, so all this had been planned.

They were going to move to suspend the writ of habeas corpus, which is all that really separates us from a police state. And that is what they have done now with respect to enemy combatants."

With regards to 9/11 itself the professor asserted that it is clear Bush, Rice, Tennet, Ashcroft and other Bush Administration officials all knew a terrorist attack was coming and that the attacks were at the very least allowed to go ahead.

"They let it happen because they wanted a war and they wanted a police state, all the elements for a war against Afghanistan were there in place, even the military force in the gulf were there on the scene, there were massive military forces in the gulf, in the Atlantic, in the Mediterranean, in the Arabian Ocean before September 11th poised for an attack, whether it was going to be Afghanistan or Iraq would be decided by Bush and the rest of them."

The professor pointed out that it is now being argued by lawmakers that the 14th amendment does not mean what it has been taken to mean and that under the Military Commissions Act any US citizen can be stripped of their citizenship and thus be labeled an enemy combatant.

"So in other words they are taken the position that in some point in time if they want to, they can unilaterally round up United States native born citizens, as they did for Japanese Americans in World War Two, and stick us into concentration camps. That is correct. They haven't actually yet done it but my guess is that the papers have been drawn up... and we know that the FEMA camps are out there.

So it's clear that the Bush people, I guess they are waiting for some other terrorist attack, another anthrax attack, who knows what, and then they will proceed to invoke these emergency orders."

Dr Boyle believes that the domestic police state is a seen as a must by the neoconservatives who are pushing for dominance in the middle east in order to quell dissent from an American public who, the informed majority of, clearly will not stand for such aggression in their names.

The professor then went on to talk about the sickness of the neoconservative sympathizers who are pushing for the practice of torture to be made legal. Legislators such as John Yu and Professor Goldsmith of Harvard Law School. Dr Boyle believes that there is a move afoot to infiltrate both the legal profession and legal education with opinion and legislature that subverts long established US law. His warning is stark:

"The Nazis did the exact same thing too. They had their lawyers infiltrating law schools. Carl Schmidt was the worst and he was the mentor to Leo Strauss, the founder of the neoconservatives. So the same phenomena that started out in Nazi Germany is happening here and I exaggerate not... we could all be tortured, we could all be treated this way."

Dr Boyle stressed that in order to seek justice over the anthrax attacks it is vital to keep the pressure on Senator Leahy who will apparently be becoming the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Leahy will have subpoena power and investigative power, and if anyone would have motivation to try to get to the bottom of the attacks, it would be him.

Dr Boyle ended by urging readers and listeners to become informed and spread this information. He also admitted that in the Summer of 2004 he was interrogated by an agent with the CIA/FBI joint terrorism task force. The agent tried to recruit Dr Boyle as an informant to provide the FBI with information on his Arab and Muslim clients. When he refused the FBI placed him on all of the government's terrorism watch lists and he now finds it very difficult to travel in and out of the US."

Digg it! Digg it! Digg it! Digg it! Digg it! Digg it! Digg it!

Video of the towers on 9-7-01

Not sure what to make of this, if anything. This music video it says was shot on 9-7-01.


The towers are framed in the back ground, as the day turns to night, you can see lights on in certain areas of the towers. You can see pretty clearly what lights are on if you stop it at the 3:50 mark. Look at the North Tower on the right and it kind of looks like the only lights that are on are prettty much dead on where Flight 11 hit. The South Tower has some clusters of floors on too, it would be curious to see if some of the main squibs that are on video correspond to any of those floor areas.

Just something new I thought I'd throw out there. might be nothing, might be something.

That's a Good Theory

Definitely worth following! The alleged security shut downs may have been occurring then, I think?

It's also interesting to note that nowadays, the expolsive charges used in demolitions don't necessarily all have to be hot wired with a cord. They can also be set off remotely via wireless transmitter. It's not done like Wile E. Coyote in the Roadrunner cartoons, with a plunger-box, any more...


Is anyone contacting the

Is anyone contacting the so-called alternative media about this? Why is this being covered by so few news organizations? Concentration camps?? Shouldn't we be...doing something? "Who will light the beacons"? (LOTR reference)

Was this video meant

In July 2002 I visited

In July 2002 I visited Barcelona, Spain, as a tourist. While there, I had medical difficulties. I contacted someone who's name is known by me and my attorneys but Ill omit for now with the U.S. Consulate and had conversations with him before he and colleagues forcefully delivered me to a hospital for treatment. Hospital records confirm that I was “brought to emergency services from the US Embassy….” I was actually picked up on the street a mile down from the consulate after being told I would receive no help and sent away. The story is to long to go into. I would like to know if anyone knows how I can get in touch with Kevin Barrett. I saw his short tv thing today. O Riley dosn't know a thing. I hope what happened to me. And everyone like me who dared go to the embassy in Barcelona. Happens to him. After my last conversation with the person that was in charge of my case in 2002. I have no record of are conversation. But it came out that there are many other Americans that have been put in my same position. Im trying to find a way that at least I can go public with the facts Iv gathered. And find these other Americans. Anyway Iv hired lawyers in Spain who were able to retrieve my document from the hospital I was forced into finally. It took for ever and allot of hearing I was never there by the hospital and consulate. But now that I have proof. Iv been able to hire an attorney in Salt Lake City where I live and am expecting an official response from the State Department soon. But who knows. The concentration camps are real. You people have no idea. If americans don't wake up their all going there. If you can help please contact me at lc.bear@hotmail.com thank you

Frodo, is this the first time that

Frodo, is this the first time that you've heard about the prison/concentration camps? If so, this isn't something that has just recently happened. FEMA has been building them and upgrading old facilities for at least more than a decade.

News reports of any kind have been very rare, until this year, when Halliburton's subsidiary, Kellogg, Brown and Root, were given the contracts to build new facilities, but there were a couple of news reports about them on local stations in the late 90's and there's been information on them on the internet for years. You should do some research on them. You can find video on google video and there are quite a few pictures of them out there.


For anyone who hasn't heard of the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007" (Bill H.R. 5122 also know as the Martial Law Act) that the president signed October 17 of this year, you need to learn what it is.

It reforms the Insurrection Act and allows the President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder."

Read more about it at http://towardfreedom.com/home/content/view/911/

Everyone needs to check out this video. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=277826260716604258

You can view the same video on Youtube, but the picture quality is worse than the Google video.


The "furnaces" are really exhaust fans and the white gas cylinder is from AGA Gas Inc., a subsidiary of Linde Gas.

AGA GAS Inc. sells mostly asphyxiation gases.

The video shows a gas main and connections with regulators on them.

This country is only a few small steps from being completely transformed into a full blown police state. I'm not sure, but from what I read, England is also being transformed into a police state. It sounds like a different type of police statethat's being set up there, but from what I've read recently, different types of new high-tech surveillance equipment are being used to watch and listen to people as they walk around their cities and towns.

What good are prisons, internment camps, etc. that are empty?

You know they intend to put loads of people in them!

Alex Jones is the best in warning about the upcoming police state. I would listen to him.

Back to theory

Part of my demolition theory involves ofices rented by false front businesses.... these offices could have been "leased" by those people who were actually planting the explosives which brought down the building...... with this thought.... the explosives could have been planted for years concealed behind the drywall during "renovation"

this could have been done as a black op.... or it could have been done by others.... but this couldn't have been done without knowledge of either the government or Silverstein... or both

It certainly could have been

It certainly could have been done without the knowledge of the government. Silverstein on the other hand would have to give a stand-down order to the WTC security services. And it looks like that's exactly what happened the weekend before the attack.

precision fireballs

The 9/11 Commission Report says the security command center on the 22nd floor of the North Tower, which was the command post for both buildings, was knocked out by a "fireball" that shot down the elevator shafts when the planes hit. The report says that people were trapped on the 22nd floor. It says elsewhere that the software that would open the roof doors was knocked out by the plane impacts - I wonder if the controls were here. This precision fireball strikes me as very fishy. Is this an excuse for no action by the security people? Were security people taken out by operatives unknown? Very strange IMO. Where was John O'Neill?

Impact resistant windows

I had read a report at one time from a woman who worked in the WTC and she described them doing renovation in the building... I'm sure she mentioned them replacing the windows on the 22nd floor or the 33rd floor.... It was where the mainframes were kept.

the reason she was told for the modifications was to protect against aerial attack?

Aerial Attack?.... it was the 22nd floor.... the WTC was surrounded by 40 to 50 story buildings.... If an attack penetrated that far I'm guessing better windows wouldn't help.... but that wasn't the point.

I beleieve that there was a pinpoint attack on that area of the structure..... from the inside...

The Impact Resistant Windows?

were put in place to conceal the explosions..... from those outside the building.... to keep it contained as best they could.

I'm guessing that they did these renovations on other key floors as well.

the areass where the largest detonations were planned to happen.... to contain the explosions.... so you wouldn't see the plumes shooting from the side of the building.

This was not caused by jet fuel pouring down the elevator shafts.

I know this article is out there.... I just don't know where.

Perhaps we could get a FOIA request for all renovations done at the WTC in the year prior to 9/11

"Part of my demolition

"Part of my demolition theory involves ofices rented by false front businesses.... these offices could have been "leased" by those people who were actually planting the explosives which brought down the building...... with this thought.... the explosives could have been planted for years concealed behind the drywall during "renovation""

This is an interesting possibility I hadn't considered. Food for thought--though I doubt the explosives could have been there for years. Weeks or a couple of months, maybe. Even if the explosives don't degrade, the timers and other contol mechanisms would be at risk of corrosion or some other failure. Unless I'm corrected by an explosives expert, I think these types of things need maintenance over time.

As for your thought, a good point.

Show "Boyle sucks dick!! " by Anonymous (not verified)

Anonymous comments.

I hope everyone takes a moment to vote on the poll regarding anonymous posters:

dz's poll

Bonaduce... is that you?

Bonaduce... is that you?

know where I can get some roids?

Sean Penn calls for Impeachment, hits media


Sean Penn Accepts 'First Amendment Award' -- Hits Media, Calls for Impeachment

By E&P Staff

Published: December 19, 2006 11:00 AM ET updated 2:45 PM

NEW YORK Sean Penn, the actor and occasional foreign correspondent for the San Francisco Chronicle, hit the media and called for impeachment of the president in receiving the 2006 Christopher Reeve First Amendment Award fromThe Creative Coalition Monday night in New York City.

Presented since 1997, the First Amendment Award recognizes "individuals who are dedicated to the sanctity of the first amendment and its free speech provision." Other Creative Coalition honorees last night included Branford Marsalis, Harvey Keitel, Heather Graham and Marcia Gay Harden.

In his remarks, Penn listed more than a dozen serious issues facing the country, and commented, ”We depend largely for information on these issues from media industries, driven by the bottom line to such an extent that the public interest becomes uninteresting.”

Turning to his views of President Bush, Penn said, “Now, there's been a lot of talk lately on Capitol Hill about how impeachment should be ‘off the table.’ We're told that it's time to look ahead - not back...

“Can you imagine how far that argument would go for the defense at an arraignment on charges of grand larceny, or large-scale distribution of methamphetamines? How about the arranging of a contract killing on a pregnant mother? ‘Indictment should be off the table.’ Or ‘Let's look forward, not backward.’ Or ‘We can't afford another failed defendant.’

“Our country has a legal system, not of men and women, but of laws. Why then are we so willing to put inconvenient provisions of the U.S. constitution and federal law ‘off the table?’”

Penn said he admired New York Times columnist Frank Rich but disagreed with his position that pursuing impeachment now would be “decadent.”

In his prepared remarks, he also lamented how the U.S. public was allegedly tricked into backing the Iraq invasion and derided those media figures who did that, describing Rush Limbaugh as “high as a kite on OxyContin,” Bill O'Reilly as “factually impaired,” and Sean Hannity as “simply a whore to the cause of his pimps - Murdoch and Ailes?” He then rapped former Rep. Mark Foley, Sen. Joe Lieberman and even singer Toby Keith.

With that, he imagined listeners thinking, "Oh, there goes Sean...he had to go and name-call. They say he can't help himself." But he asked: “Or, did I name-call? Maybe I just quickly summed up seven or eight little truths. Oh, no, you're right - I name-called. I said, ‘putz.’ I take it back. Or, do I? Did I say whore? Pimp? These are questions. But, the real and great questions of conscience and accountability would not loom so ominously -- unanswered or evaded at such tremendous cost -- without our day-to-day failure to insist on genuine accountability.

“Of course we'd prefer some easy ways to get there. But no easy ways exist. Not a new Congress. Not Barack Obama. And, not John McCain.”

More excerpts from his prepared speech, first posted at Huffingtonpost.com, follow.

The most effective forms of de facto censorship are pre-emptive. Systemically, we are encouraged to keep our heads down, out of the line of fire - to avoid the danger, god forbid, that someone in the White House, on Capitol Hill, or a media blow-hard might take a shot at us.

But, as a practical matter, most of the limits on creative expression and other forms of free speech come from self-censorship, where the mechanism of corporate clout offers carrots and brandishes sticks. We avoid a conflict before the conflict materializes. We reach for the carrots and stay out of range of sticks.

Decades ago, Fred Friendly called it a "positive veto" - corporations putting big money behind shows that they want to establish and perpetuate. Whether in journalism or drama, creative efforts that don't gain a financial "positive veto" are dismissible, then dismissed. We may not call that "censorship." But whatever we call it, the effects of a "positive veto" system are severe. They impose practical limits on efforts to bring the most important realities to public attention sooner rather than later...

We're beginning to see more revealing images of this war. But it's later now, isn't it? What we have to pay attention to are the results of these "practical limits." One, is that wars become much easier to launch than to halt….

I'm sure many people who I met in Baghdad, both in my trips prior to and during the occupation, now similarly cannot just look forward. With lives so entirely shattered by a violence of occupation - an ongoing U.S. war effort and the civil war that it has catalyzed. All on the back of a crumbled infrastructure, following eleven years of devastating U.N. sanctions...

Let's give the whistle-blowers cover, let's get the subpoenas out there, and then, one by one, put this administration under oath. And then, if the crimes of "Treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors" are proven, do as Article 2, Section 4 of the United States Constitution provides, and remove "the President, Vice President and...civil officers of the United States" from office. If the Justice Department then sees fit to bunk them up with Jeff Skilling, so be it….

Christopher Reeve promised to get out of that chair. Well, I don't know about you, but it feels like he's up now and I wouldn't be standing here if it weren't on his shoulders. Let it be for something.

Was the Presidency Better Off 8 Years Ago?

source: http://digg.com/politics/Newsweek_51_of_Americans_want_Bush_impeached#c3532482

The current support for President Bush's impeachment is much, much higher than support for Clinton's impeachment ever was. Yet, the media refuses to talk about impeaching Bush.


"In the wake of the House of Representatives' approval of two articles of impeachment, Bill Clinton's approval rating has jumped 10 points to 73 percent, the latest CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll shows.

That's not only an all-time high for Clinton, it also beats the highest approval rating President Ronald Reagan ever had.... At the same time, the number of Americans with an unfavorable view of the Republican Party has jumped 10 points; less than a third of the country now has a favorable view of the GOP. Unfavorable 57%"

Clinton's 73% approval rating during impeachment is double that of Bush's current approval rating - 35%.

source: http://edition.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/20/impeachment.poll/

Poll: Clinton's approval rating up in wake of impeachment

December 20, 1998
Web posted at: 10:48 p.m. EST (0348 GMT)

(AllPolitics, December 20) -- In the wake of the House of Representatives' approval of two articles of impeachment, Bill Clinton's approval rating has jumped 10 points to 73 percent, the latest CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll shows.

That's not only an all-time high for Clinton, it also beats the highest approval rating President Ronald Reagan ever had.

At the same time, the number of Americans with an unfavorable view of the Republican Party has jumped 10 points; less than a third of the country now has a favorable view of the GOP.

Despite concerns that public calls for Clinton's resignation would rise after his impeachment, the number of Americans who want Clinton to resign has remained statistically unchanged. Only 30 percent want Clinton to resign; only 29 percent want the Senate to convict Clinton and remove him from office.

The poll, released Sunday, also shows that 35 percent approve of the House's decision to impeach the president.

Interviews with 852 adult Americans were conducted December 19-20, after the House of Representatives voted to impeach Clinton.


Do you approve of the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as president?

             Now    Dec. 15-16

Approve 73% 63%
Disapprove 25 33


What is your opinion of the Republican Party?

              Now   Dec. 15-16

Favorable 31% 43%
Unfavorable 57 47


What is your opinion of both the Republican and Democratic parties?

             Favorable  Unfavorable

Republican 31% 57%
Democratic 57 30


Should your senators vote to remove Clinton from office?

Yes      29%                         
No 68


Should Clinton resign now?

        Now    Dec. 15-16

Yes 30% 33%
No 69 63


Do you approve of the decision to impeach Clinton?

Approve     35%                     
Disapprove 63


Has the GOP in Congress abused its powers?

Yes         54%                   
No 41


Who do you want to have more influence over the nation?

               Clinton   GOP

Now 60% 31%
October 53 39
September 44 43


As of now, can Clinton be an effective president during his remaining two years in office?

              Yes    No

Now 72% 26%
September 58 39


Clinton's effectiveness has been harmed...

A great deal         24%            
A moderate amount 35
Not much 27
Not at all 12


What should the Senate do?

Proceed with trial      31%        
Censure/no trial 36
No trial or censure 32


Do you think the Senate will remove Clinton from office?

           Now     Dec. 12-13

Yes 41% 37%
No 49 58


Does Speaker-elect Bob Livingston's resignation make you more likely to support Clinton's resignation?

Yes        14%                      
No 84


Is Vice President Al Gore qualified to be president?

Yes       63%
No 27


Do you approve of the military attacks on Iraq?

Approve      78%                    
Disapprove 18


Do you believe Clinton ordered the attacks on Iraq to divert attention from impeachment?

Yes 25%
No 66

All questions have a sampling error of plus or minus four points.

this is pontentially huge......

McVeigh Video Destroys OKC Bombing Official Story
Shows McVeigh was in military receiving instruction in "explosives and demolition" over a year after official story says he was discharged, whistleblower harassed for years while unknowingly in possession of bombshell tape

A video that shows Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh at a U.S. military base that specializes in explosives and demolition training over a year after he supposedly left the army puts the official story of the April 19 1995 federal building bombing under serious doubt and mandates a re-opening of an investigation into the terror attack that killed 168 people.

The video was released by Bill Bean, a film producer who has suffered intense surveillance and harassment since taking the footage, and is the subject of a February 2007 Hustler Magazine feature story.
Given permission to board the tank, Bean walked over and pointed the camera inside, at which point one of the soldiers turned around and, appearing somewhat shocked to see the camera, uttered a brief response to Bean's question and attempted to push past him.

That individual has now been positively identified to be Timothy McVeigh, who according to the official timeline as endorsed by the FBI, was honorably discharged from the military for the last time in May 1992. And yet he is seen here on tape at a U.S. military base over a year after that date in August of 1993.


I would like to know more about Bill Bean...

The only stuff I found was UFO and Ghosts...


"Bill Bean" ufo


"Bill Bean" Ghosts

Not saying it's the same person, but would like to know if it is...

did you watch the video and

did you watch the video and see the picture comparison? im convinced it is indeed McVeigh and that alone makes it huge regardless of who Bill Bean is. keep in mind, not everyone is notorious enough to show up on a google search, i know i dont.

In early April 1995 a Ryder truck identical to the one used in the bombing was filmed by a pilot during an overflight of of an area near Camp Gruber-Braggs, Oklahoma. A June 17th, 1997 Washington Post article authenticates the photos as being exactly what they appear to be, photos of a Ryder truck in a clandestine base at Camp Gruber-Braggs. Why were the military in possession of a Ryder truck housed in a remote clandestine army base days before the Alfred P. Murrah bombing?
- In a 1993 letter to his sister, McVeigh claimed that he was approached by military intelligence and had joined an "elite squad of government paid assassins." McVeigh often contradicted himself and changed his story on a whim to fit in with the latest government version of events. Is the Camp Grafton footage evidence of McVeigh's enrollment in such a clandestine program?

The August 1993 footage neatly fills in an unexplained gap in McVeigh' timeline that even the FBI cannot explain. Was this gap deliberately left ignored to avoid a probe into McVeigh's activities at Camp Grafton?

its all becoming very clear now.


Huge is an understatement

Talk about cracking the door open..... If we can open the OKC can of worms and awaken people to this.... the parallels to 9/11 will hit people smack in the forehead.

This story needs to be front page!!

This story need to be Dugg

This story is monumental!!

Remember that OKC is right there with 9/11..... they would have loved to taken the "Look it was a US citizen"....and spun it into.. "lets take peoples guns"

If people can grasp the questions of OKC.... our military training him and possibly employing him to do this.... WOW!!!

i couldnt agree more man,

i couldnt agree more man, but it seems as if people are pretty much ignoring it, even in the alternative news world. did you scope the Ryder truck on the base? interesting.....

I came across that pic of the Ryder truck

a few years ago - always wondered what the deal was, if it was verified, if it was a hoax, a "coincidence" or what..

i almost never complain, in

i almost never complain, in fact probably never have complained about someone giving me negative points. but why on earth would that OKC story i posted get a negative comment? care to explain?

i didn't do it

but i would be curious as to why you would post a McVeigh story on this board which is expressly related to the anthrax attacks?

Why not post it as a blog so it can get more attention and generate its own message board??

more people are likely to

more people are likely to see it this way and its an important story that is related to 9/11. how? do i really need to explain that to you? besides, it didnt take up too much room, i dont see the big deal. i was just wondering who would give it a negative. i dont need to blog it because i dont care who comments on it, i just want people to see it.

Trolls amoung registered

Trolls amoung registered users, mate. It was gone by the time I got here, but I've noticed this on and off for at least a week-- -1 early in a thread to reasonable or Truth sympathetic posts. Once we give the annoying-mouses the ol' "heave to", it'll be easier to sort out the other trouble makers.

Did you vote?

nope, but thanks for the

nope, but thanks for the reminder, im off to vote now.

Good man.

Good man.

another credible voice

I applaud this person for expressing his professional opinion. The amount of professional government and technical people coming forward is encouraging, I hope a few more come out of the closet in the New Year.

This Blog

is without a doubt one the most important expert opinions to rock the 9/11 Truth movement since its inception. When you consider this man's credentials, and his intimate knowledge of bioweapons programs in the USA, and what he is SAYING this story should be THE big story of the 9/11 Truth movement.

I am somewhat surprised that no one on this message board is actually talking about this. Sure - videos of controlled demolition are always interesting - but if we do not take advantage of THIS story - what exactly are we waiting for?


I agree. University of Illionis is a hotbed of damning evidence against Bush

also home of Dr. Doug Rocke..... the foremost expert on Depleted Uranium.... but they expext he dies before that ever goes to trial

Agreed that it is big. What

Agreed that it is big. What further evidence of murderous thuggery does a person need?

How can we use this to expose and ridicule Congress's lack of investigative courage? Ferchristssakes, if Congressional Democrats don't have the eggs to investigate direct, physical evidence of govt. complicity in their OWN members' attempted assassinations (which resulted in a fear-stricken capitulation on the ass-wiping Patriot Act), why in hell should anyone trust the Bush-appointed Commission whitewash?

Still believe they wouldn't kill people and sleep well at night, Ronald? Still believe there is no evidence?

The answer

is to pressure Patrick Leahy. He was the target of these attacks - and he is the new chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Here is a template letter you can use:


Is it worth the price of a postage stamp to let Leahy know that the public wants justice? I think so. And I do not agree with all the nay-sayers who automatically assume that pressuring congress is a waste of time.

Righto! Working on letter

Righto! Working on letter to Leahy.

In the meantime, I just sent a copy of the story to Wayne Madsen at WMR. He's out of town this week, but still chasing leads.

Once he checks it out and confirms it, he can put a few bugs in a few ears...

Agreed! It's a BIG story. I

Agreed! It's a BIG story. I too am surprised it's not getting more attention.

Let's see what this new Congress is made of!

Are there not more good guys will balls, than evil cowards?

I second that ...

I have great respect for Prof Boyle.

Here is another interview, recorded 31 May 2006.
If you haven't listened to this interview, do so.


Summary: Prof. Boyle explains Democrats failure to impeach Bush, the role and history of neocons, PNAC, and preventive war, the anthrax link to 9-11 and US biowarfare program

If you like to understand what fucked-up world we live in, there is also an article by leading American attorney and stalwart defender of Israel Alan Dershowitz.

Amnesty protest hijack

God bless prof. Boyle, as well as his colleague international lawyer Richard Falk.

On a different yet related note: check out http://www.amnesty.nl/10dec2006/index.php

PS: I've forwarded this

PS: I've forwarded this 9/11blogger-page to all 150 members of Dutch Parliament, with the request how many more prominent people it will take for them to finally stand up and take some action themselves, either nationally or in concert with their international colleagues.

Good to hear efforts are

Good to hear efforts are being made throughout the world. We need pressure to bear from inside and outside the United States. The 9/11 Truth movement is not American, it's international.

"The 9/11 Truth movement is

"The 9/11 Truth movement is not American, it's international."


They like to say the world changed on 911, and they're right--on 911 the bastards declared war on all people who want democracy and work for a better world.

Soon people will be demanding their Bastille Day...

Bravo Professor Boyle...

for at least taking the LIHOP view, which is a step. Professor Boyle has written extensively about the Israel Lobby and called the US congress a subsidiary of the Israel Lobby. Quite an understatement, similar to calling 911 LIHOP.

And see this!

Exposing the Criminal Zionist Network
Behind 9/11 and the "War on Terror"


Merry Christmas and Happy 2007!

death camps are debatable

this is a big debate as to the existence of the {600} camps and I dont believe it.

We all need to decide this stuff for ourselves.
I did find a few debates here:

http:// www.conspiracyarchive.com...untain_FEMA.htm

http://breakfornews.com/forum/vi...topic.php? p=784

I do invite you to post this or anything else at RI or PI which is a pretty decent debating forum.

I have no doubt that the PTB have allocated the money for the camps and I have seen the photos on a few sites.However there is a list circulating with over 600 camps that has been around for awhile and its been proven enuff to me that the list is balloney..I checked the list about the Cape Cod camp and Ft Devans ..the info is lies. My pals out west say the camps listed in AZ and NV are also lies. This is a great article but the camps are not YET ready. I thought the 600 camps were real til I began to question their existence.

IF I can find more info I will get back to ya.

FAB tells many facts
check out his expose about the neoCONthradals at U Chicago..


I dont think that this is true YET.This rumour hits the forums periodically.
I have done a lil research about it and know a few other reliable folks who say
the US death camps are not made yet. .
.remodeling the old WW II camps is real and could be a warning but its gonna take time and MANY more to hold 300 million US Citizens..

"and we know that the FEMA camps are out there."