Studies of Crucial Topics: Scientific Method and the Thermate Hypothesis

These studies deserve widespread discussion. If they are right, then there is a desperate need to broad the range of hypotheses under our consideration.

23 August 2006
Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate?
Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood

14 December 2006
The Scientific Method Applied to the Thermite Hypothesis
Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds


Disturbed about the content and quality of physicist Steven E. Jones'
9/11 work, Drs. Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood conducted a
peer-review. This review covers ten major issues which include
demolition of WTC 7, demolitions of WTC 1&2, evidence for high-energy
explosives, thermite, glowing aluminum, No Big Boeing Theory (NBB)
and other issues. In the "truth movement," it is vital that we
police our own. If we don't, the defenders of the OGCT certainlly
will. You can be sure that it will get mighty ugly when defenders of
the OGCT find major errors. This is the purpose for having research
peer reviewed.

A study of some issues raised in a paper by Wood and Reynolds

"A study of some issues raised in a paper by Wood and Reynolds" (January 11, 2007)
Dr. Frank Legge.

“This study shows that the paper by Wood and Reynolds is largely a collection of untrue, illogical, absurd and vexatious assertions and questions. While it contains some truths it appears to have been contrived to confuse rather than to illuminate. This suggests that its purpose is not to raise serious questions for debate but simply to destroy the credibility of Prof. Steven Jones. It has of course failed in this attempt.”

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

Show "Only 9/11 Truthlings Follow Steven Jones" by CB_Brooklyn


Why is it that Thermate is being attacked so strongly?
Because it is dangerous evidence. Dangerous to those who perpetrated the acts.

It is dangerous evidence because it is very strong grounds to launch a criminal proceeding. So when people attack the strongest evidence with "untrue, illogical, absurd and vexatious assertions and questions"...

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

Nice Try


Didn't they prepare anything for you to cut and paste that actually contained an argument.

Tell us the one undeniable bastion of proof that supports these wild space beam theories.

I would be more inclined to believe that they used Tesla resonnance technology to dissentigrate these buildings.

Either theory would be very difficult to explain to the average American.

If you really believe that this is the keystone to this movement then you better explain to us all how you will be able to convince everyone of this theory..... and you have not even convinced us... the most researched and skeptical of the American Government
Ignorance is NOT Bliss

Woods and Reynolds Are Unqualified

Reynolds (economist) and Woods (mechanical engineer) would, in the real world, never be chosen to review a paper on physics. They are simply unqualified for the task.

Show "Dr Judy Wood is not a "mechanical engineer"" by CB_Brooklyn


never worked for Hanna-Barbera either.

What part of...

Exposed don't you understand? Is it the "E"? How about the "X"?

"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

Why spend so much time and energy

ripping someone else's work apart?

Why does it have ot be one or the other?

Couldn't they have done both? Precut the beams in key places and then use some kind of weapon for the collapse?

If you knew how the buildings were built, it shouldn't have been hard to figure out how to take them down.

Understand THIS Jim:


It does not matter IF cross-homogenous-disruptor-interference-multiplex-zero-point-huchensen-scalar-seventh-dimension-tesla-radiant-bloomer-liquid-lens-focused-berden-meg-inductor-klingon-zappy zappers WHERE IN FACT USED on 9/11...

That you suggest such stuff, while SIMULTANEOUSLY undercutting the well intentioned work of others.... absolutely reveals YOU, Jim Fetzer, as divisive, antagonistic and of suspect intentions.

That people have given you so much patients and time to correct your path... as you only continue to aggravate and divide people... becomes a solid indictment of your character and motives.

Go to hell, you piece of shit!