Lack of Media Coverage on 911 Questions

This was sent in to our Comments section, thought I'd post it here for everyone to see.  The Huffington Post can be found here if you'd like to send your own comments in. 

For quite some time now, about every week or so, I send Huffpo an Anonymous News Tip - there is a green box part way down the right hand side of their home page - one of three.

I was annoyed by their Fearless campaign, so send them an Anonymous News Tip.  The last one was headed "911 Questions".  The post said. "Nothing from Huffpo on this yet?  Fearless?  Really?"

Can I suggest that you encourage others to send similar Anonymous News Tips to any media organisation, but particularly Huffpo.  It enrages me that they stand on Fearless Reporting, yet they do NOTHING to address the issues, clearly out of craven fear.

FEARLESS Enough to Investigate 9/11?

{Just forwarded this to . I'm adding her to the list to whom I send similar whenever I have the time: , , , }


Post proofs that brotherhood is not so wild a dream as those who profit by postponing it pretend....
~~Norman Corwin



Where Are The Bodies?

DEAD PEOPLE DON'T TALK. And people say that 9/11 couldn’t possibly be an inside job because “someone would talk.” Not if they were rounded up in the big CIA disappearances in the DAYS after 9/11. They lost no time at all rounding up people. Anyone who could have provided information is dead now. Bank on it.


"Progressive" Pundits:

[The writer of this review focuses on the lethal CAREERISM of the Neo-cons and Neo-liberals; but the craven careerist hacks embeded in some of the most influential "progressive" media are at least as dangerous to our democracy:
David Corn of The Nation magazine, for instance, is currently RUNNING AN AD on Air America Radio frantically urging us to leave off questioning the Bush regime's account of 9/11 (even though scientific polls clearly show that only SIXTEEN PERCENT of Americans accept that account!), and to banish impeachment from our thoughts!
Some of the others who are advancing their careers by helping the Neo-cons and the Neo-libs to squelch questioning and investigation of their crimes:

Alexander Cockburn of , Ed Schultz of , The Young Turks of .

Then there is the new "democratic" site which with great fanfare advertises that its readers can vote on its articles for importance and relevance -- but anything having to do with 9/11 or anything the least bit critical of the Israeli government is instantly deleted from the site! Karl Rove could learn from these people.

And we must not forget to include in this list of treachery the grand old man of Manufacturing Consent himself: Noam Chomsky, diligently manufacturing cover-up for the most dangerous regime in US history!]

Vol. 29 No. 1 dated 4 January 2007

by Corey Robin

"....Many people believe that great crimes come from terrible ideas: Marxism, racism and Islamic fundamentalism gave us the Gulag, Auschwitz and 9/11. It was the singular achievement of [Hannah Arendt's book] EICHMANN IN JERUSALEM, however, to remind us that the worst atrocities often arise from the simplest of vices. And few vices, in Arendt's mind, were more vicious than careerism. 'The East is a career,' Disraeli wrote. And so was the Holocaust, according to Arendt. 'What for Eichmann was a job, with its daily routine, its ups and downs, was for the Jews quite literally the end of the world.' Genocide, she insisted, is work. If it is to be done, people must be hired and paid; if it is to be done well, they must be supervised and promoted.

"Eichmann was a careerist of the first order. He had 'no motives at all', Arendt insisted, 'except for an extraordinary diligence in looking out for his personal advancement'. He joined the Nazis because he saw in them an opportunity to 'start from scratch and still make a career', and 'what he fervently believed in up to the end was success.' Late in the war, as Nazi leaders brooded in Berlin over their impending fate and that of Germany, Eichmann was fretting over superiors' refusing to invite him to lunch. Years later, he had no memory of the Wannsee ['final solution'] Conference, but clearly remembered bowling with senior officials in Slovakia.

"....Most modern theorists, from Montesquieu to the American Framers to Hayek, have considered ambition and careerism to be checks against, rather than conduits of, oppression and tyranny....

"The main reason for the contemporary evasion of Arendt's critique of careerism, however, is that addressing it would force a confrontation with the dominant ethos of our time. In an era when capitalism is assumed to be not only efficient but also a source of freedom, the careerist seems like the agent of an easy-going tolerance and pluralism. Unlike the ideologue, whose great sin is to think too much and want too much from politics, the careerist is a genial caretaker of himself. He prefers the marketplace to the corridors of state power. He is realistic and pragmatic, not utopian or fanatic. That careerism may be as lethal as idealism, that ambition is an adjunct of barbarism, that some of the worst crimes are the result of ordinary vices rather than extraordinary ideas: these are the implications of EICHMANN IN JERUSALEM that neo-cons and neoliberals alike find too troubling to acknowledge."


Esteemed Professor and Law Expert Warns Of Police State
Francis A Boyle says 9/11 was allowed to happen, war on terror is facilitating the downfall of The Republic, concentration camps are in place and US citizens are the targets


Report rebukes FBI over Okla. City probe
By JOHN SOLOMON, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The FBI failed to fully investigate information suggesting other suspects may have helped Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols with the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, allowing questions to linger more than a decade after the deadly attack, a congressional inquiry concludes.


From the current issue of THE WASHINGTON FREE PRESS:

Does the World Trade Center Study Add Up?

by Rodger Herbst

[Numbered references appear at end of this article.]

....why did the building disintegrate into dust?

....The study does not attempt to explain why much of the mass of the building vaporized into fine dust....

....The NIST investigation also omitted or distorted many important aspects of the collapses, including movement of the WTC1 antenna before the adjacent facade, the pyroclastic dust clouds, and pools of molten metal In the WTC basements weeks after the attacks....

....The NIST study is a product of the Bush administration. An enumeration of the inconsistencies of the NIST study is consistent with a long standing and well documented pattern of Bush administration abuse of the scientific method.

The House Committee on Government Reform found "numerous instances where this Administration has manipulated the scientific process and distorted or suppressed scientific findings."

On February 18, 2004, over 60 leading scientists, including Nobel laureates, signed a statement that "The distortion of scientific knowledge for partisan political ends must cease". Since then, over 9000 additional scientists and engineers have signed on. [7]

A clear example of distortion of scientific knowledge was seen in the subsequent declaration by EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman that the "air is safe" in Manhattan a week after the attacks. In fact, according to top scientists, the air at Ground Zero was highly corrosive, and a "significant threat to health." The White House Council on Environmental Quality directed the EPA to edit the scientific findings "based on how it should be released publicly."[8]....

[Rodger Herbst has a bachelor degree in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and a master degree in Mechanical Engineering.]


The NIST 911 Report On The World Trade Center Collapse
By Mark H. Gaffney


9/11 Signs of The 9/11 Times

"I'm going to keep pushing WTC 7 until I have little kids saying:

"'Mommy, what's WTC 7 mean?'...

"If any of you have any ideas for signs, let me know.

"I'm hoping that these signs will help me recruit for the local 9/11 study and activist groups that I will be starting in the new year...."


Dam Breaks On 9/11 Truth
Lynch and Brolin re-focus attention, will more Hollywood personalities follow in their footsteps?

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, December 7, 2006

Two more major influential Hollywood stars using their fame to attract attention to 9/11 truth proves the dam is breaking and....



Michael Keefer on Alex Cockburn's anti-9/11 skeptic stance.

Into the Ring with Counterpunch on 9/11: How Alexander Cockburn, Otherwise So Bright, Blanks Out on 9/11 Evidence


William Rodriguez Featured in Devon Newspaper and Interviewed on BBC Bristol

Hero of 9/11 Won't Stop Speaking Out Against Bush

One minute he was going about his business, the next he was looking at a vision from the depths of hell. Still reeling from a blast which rocked the World Trade Center, William Rodriguez could hardly believe what he was seeing."A man came running into the office shouting 'explosion, explosion!'" Mr Rodriguez soon saw a third of his body had been badly burnt by the blast. "When I realised, I started screaming. I looked at his face and it was missing parts."

It was the start of a day that transformed Mr Rodriguez from a maintenance man to the hero of 9/11...


Barrett: Academic freedom is good policy

(Barrett is a part-time lecturer at UW- Madison.)
Wisconsin State Journal

In the former Soviet Union, the monopoly media acted as cheerleader for a brutal, repressive government. Dissident academics were silenced, fired, or institutionalized.

For two or three years after 9/11, our media served as a megaphone for Bush administration lies, and academics were intimidated into silence....

....The excuse that my position is marginal no longer holds, given that only 16 percent of the American people believe the government is telling the truth about 9/11 (New York Times poll) and 36 percent of Americans, and half of New Yorkers, believe top US officials conspired to commit mass murder and high treason on 9/11 (Scripps-Howard and Zogby polls).

It is long past time for a rational, evidence-based debate on the facts and meaning of 9/11. Any takers?


Fewer people are believing the official reports on September 11 attacks:



There is help for you!

If you are among the 16% who still believe the Neonazicons' conspiracy theory about 9/11, YOU CAN BE HELPED! Simply click on the links below to read the scientific debunking of the Bush pseudoscience fairytale about the WTC 9/11 atrocity.

[Cindy Rodriguez's column below is the most truthful and objective report on 9/11 investigation that Some Of The Above News has so far seen in the mainstream media.

Read entire column:



Literary giant says 9/11 allowed to happen, slams Bush administration coup de'tat of American freedom



U.S. Being Awakened from Media-induced Coma by AIR
AMERICA RADIO: Find your station HERE:


To be removed from or to subscribe to this free
Enewsletter list please email with
REMOVE or SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
And if you don't like our news go make some of your

Founder 2002: Johannieson & Friends
Editor: Myra M. Jackson


particularly corn ,
amy goodliar ,tom heydown
and their god chumsky have long ago sold out and become part of the mockingbird MM
protecting the latest in status quo

guess lots of intelligent people just cant see thorugh the smoke

Somehow Corn ..Novakula and Plame / Wilson are either tag teaming the Truth seekers or running some con game on the side

still waiting for the rover "frog march"
wonder how romeo joe's book sales are doing? a another story.
THANX for info


The NWO powers will create so many of these disruptive gatekeepers like chumsky that the signal-to-noise ratio on the 9/11 discourse will eventually go down to zero, and any any reasonable conversation will become impossible.

"The Truth shall set you free"


I also recommend people consider sending their own unique similar, on a regular, updated basis, to as many legislators (state and/or federal), and media as they can handle.

I am able to send to a list of around 1500 approximately once a week. One of the easiest ways to accumulate such a list is by using . Their government lists are easy to find. Their media lists are also extensive, and can be found far down the left side index.

Once one gets one's list into one's address book and one's message in draft, the mailing, while time-consuming (especially with dial-up), is automatic pilot, allowing one to keep up on Air America or whatever, while visions of firing squads dance in one's head.

Ha Ha Just kidding about "firing squads." Sort of.

My anonymous tip turned

My anonymous tip turned into a mini-rant--but I did plug "911Press for Truth" and the Charles Goyette show while I was at it, including the link where Charles wipes the floor with Davin. Hey, Huffo may not do anything, but at least the person who has to listen to that link will start to ponder.

More I think, that's probably a better way to go-- just give them a link, with little preamble. Oh well-- next time.

Huffpo's pretty good, nonetheless..

Ive been heavily commenting about 9/11 in the Huffpo message boards all year, they are quite tolerant..

Be sure to check out the TruthDig article too..

Here is a TruthDig article about 9/11 that's been running for quite some time now..

A few 9/11 truths on Channel 5 in UK

Thought i'd post this during the commercial break.

On Channel 5 right now in the UK - a television programme dedicated to the thoughts and opinions of David Icke.

So far the show has revealed interesting 9/11 facts, including the fact that when GWB was asked what he thought when he saw the first plane hit...
(you should already know what his response was), and the assumption/fact that 9/11 was an inside job.

Hopefully someone can find a link to this programme shortly, and post it online. The programming schedule for channel 5, oddly, does not list this programme.

It does, in fact list this

It does, in fact list this programme (26/12/06 @ 23:00).