I see I get a lot of hits from the SCHOLARS FRONT PAGE.

So people are very interested in finding out how the CIA-murderers did it exactly. Just like Fetzer.

It may be useful to show you this image and ask you all:

Why does no USA newspaper publish this photo and ask the government for an explanation? The answer is that newspapers and TV are in cahouts with the government AGAINST the people. Therefore the people must force things to happen, they must pry open the closed rooms, they must break open the doors to the boardrooms and they must re-establish a free press

http://www.911hoax.com/gFonebone2.asp?intPage=78&PageNum=78

WTC 2 PROJECTILES are GENUINE - HAVE a LOOK

Remember the nose of a jumbo jet is PLASTIC and the remainder of the aircraft is SHEET aluminim and the WTC tower exterior walls are constructed from heat-treated boiler plate STEEL welded together like a water tank yet the NOSE passed thru 2 exterior tower walls unscathed -????

HMMMMmmmm

All,

The situation with Scholars has taken an ominous turn, where we have been
frozen out of the Scholars web site and posting and updating has been made
impossible, which can only have been done by Fred Burks, who has possession
of the domain names, or Alex Floum, who may still control the password. It
looks like a nice example of the lack of scruples to which I drew attention
in my most recent message to the membership. I find this quite distressing.

Alex Floum continues to abuse his position as a former member of Scholars by
distributing contrived and misleading characterizations of the issues. To
hear him tell it, it is a conflict between the forces of democracy (led by
Alex Floum) and those of dictatorship (me). My frank assessment is that his
crass and underhanded tactics threaten the continuing existence of Scholars.
Here is a summary of the situation, followed by a list of forthcoming events.

1) As the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth who has acted on behalf of the
society to expose falsehoods and reveal truths about 9/11, I alone remain
as a member of the society, which former members are attempting to control.

2) The extant Scholars for 9/11 Truth is the rightful owner of the web site,
the journal, and the forum as well as their contents, where, in some cases,
such as copyrighted articles, that ownership may be shared with the authors.

3) Alex Floum, who obtained the domain names for the web site and the journal
on behalf of the society, had no right to transfer what he never owned to Fred
Burks, a friend of some ten years who served as a translator for Presidents,
who has neither legal, moral, nor intellectual rights to any of these sites.

4) The anonymous email requesting a vote on the future of the society's sites
and membership was unauthorized, illegal, null, and void. The manner in which
it was conducted (by creating fake addresses and phony administrators) offers
clear evidence that this was an ignoble action taken under cover where those
effecting these misdeeds were not even willing to identify themselves by name.

5) Theft of property is not an appropriate remedy for internal disputes over
control and content of the society's website and other properties; and thieves
have no grounds to complain about my seeking appropriate legal remedies as the
founder of the society on behalf of the society as its sole remaining officer.

6) Former members of the society have no right to determine its future. It is
as if a gang of bank employees robbed a bank as they quit or were fired from
their jobs, then complained that that the bank manager was not playing fair,
because he called the police as they tried to make their escape out the door.

7) Steve Jones has objected to open discussion of possible explanations of the
destruction of the Twin Towers other than his preferred thermite/thermate idea,
yet the adequacy of his approch can only be assessed in comparison with the
explanatory power of the available alternatives, such as mini-nukes, directed
energy or HAARP weaonry, which is the only way in which science can progress.

8) Having now siezed control of our web site, they have made it impossible to
bring current information to the members of the society. This includes the
process of updating our membership, which has taken longer to complete than
normal in the wake of recent events. That process has now been frozen.

I am taking whatever steps I can to insure that control of the web site is
returned to the society and whatever other measures must be pursued in order
to deal with this rogue group. In the meanwhile, you are entitled to know
forthcoming events of interest as well as what's going on behind the scenes.

Since I cannot have them posted on the web site, which they control, I append
the list of forthcoming events. The most interesting for many members may
be that I have invited Steve Jones to appear on my program on 2 January 2007
to discuss and debate his thermite/thermate hypothesis with Judy and Morgan:

2 January 2007
Interview: Steve Jones, Judy Wood, and Morgan Reynolds have been
invited to discuss 9/11 with Jim Fetzer on "The Dynamic Duo"
3-5 PM/CT, Genesis Communications Network, gcnlive.com

This appears to be especially imporant insofar as Steve has admitted in
a recent email, "One cannot rule out the use of thermite or superthermite
cutters for the WTC just because it has not been used before for demolition"
and that a patent for this process requires placing devices "on either side
of the steel". I have included the original email, along with a few replies
to Alex Floum, below, preceding the announcement of our forthcoming events.

Please know that I made repeated past proposals to this rogue faction to
resolve these matters informally, including giving them the journal and
the forum, where they need only create their own web site to bring into
existence a society of their own. I offered them the opportunity to show
that posting by committee--one of their primary desiderata--works better
than having a single site manager. They never responded to my invitation.

Moreover, I have offered Steve Jones many platforms to present and defend
his research on thermite/thermate, including earlier appearances on radio
talk shows, encouraging him to speak at The National Press Club, inviting
him to chair a panel at the forthcoming Scholars' conference in Madison,
and appointing him a member of my team for The National 9/11 Debate. He
has now declined all of these invitations. The proper way to prevail in
scientific research with logic and evidence, not political power plays.

Everyone needs to appreciate that Scholars is a relatively young society
and that growing pains are normal and to be expected. That I have been
the manager of the web site should not be news to anyone, any more than
that Steve has managed the journal. With our new steering committee of
Kevin Barrett, Richard Curtis, Rick Siegel, and Judy Wood, I am in the
process of effecting a transition from an informal structure to a more
formal structure, where the society has by-laws and a board of directors.

I have created an entity, Scholars for 9/11 Truth, Inc., as a framework
for formalizing this new society. But the by-laws, the board members,
and all the rest are the very issues we are attempting to work out, and
we intend to submit them to the members of Scholars for their comment and
review. The board of directors, for example, will supervise the editors
of our journal, the moderators of our forum, and the managers of our web
site. They can approve or remove any as they choose, including me, if I
were to be retained in the position of managing the society's web site.

I have no problem with the creation of another society. If you disagree
with the policies and practices of a society, the honorable thing to do
is to resign and, if you are so inclined, create a new one of your own.
What is going on here, however, is completely different and not at all
honorable. It is reminiscent of children playing football, where one of
them takes the football and claims it for his own, then passes it off to
another when players are closing in, where the new possessor sticks it
with a knife so the game becomes impossible. That's what is going on.

I would close by observing that, on 13 December 2006, the attorney for the
society I have retained, Jerry S. Leaphart, sent Alex Floum a proposal for
binding arbitration: "I am authorized to indicate that Dr. Fetzer would be
willing to enter into a mediation agreement concerning the domain names. I
suggest mediation under WIPO as per the rules set forth . . ." Alex Floum
did not respond to this proposal, but I reiterate it here. I am willing to
abide by the decision of binding arbitration through the professional WIPO
society to resolve the issues between us and let us get on with our work.

If any of you would like to express your opinions about their conduct,
the members of this rogue group include Alex Floum ;
Carl Weis , Steve Jones ; and
Fred Burks . These are the persons who are in
in charge now because they control all access to the journal, the forum,
and the web site. If you approve of what they are doing, tell them; if
not, let them know. The fate of Scholars for 9/11 Truth is at stake.

James H. Fetzer
Founder
Scholars for 9/11 Truth

Some emails of possible interest:
___________________________________

Sent 12/28/06

Kevin,

If you don't realize directed energy weapons exist, have been tested,
and are in use and you don't want to read our paper (which shows
examples of them in use), perhaps you'd like to visit the US
military's web site on Directed Energy Weapons:

http://www.de.afrl.af.mil/
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/
awcgate/cst/csat11.pdf directed
energy quotes (dated February 2000)

The above information is all in the public domain. So, perhaps you
can imagine what is not in the public domain.

Don't you find it a bit concerning that Steven Jones, whose area of
expertise this is in, claims to know nothing about the development of
directed energy weapons over the past 30 years? Even if he were that
ignorant about his field of expertise, isn't it a bit concerning that
he uses divisive and derogatory statements to describe our research,
such as "space beams knocking down the towers"? It's very difficult
not to conclude that his motive for taking over the ST911 website is
to keep the truth about 9/11 hidden. After all, he has admitted that
he knows of no way thermite could have brought the towers down.

I thought you might be interested in the response to Alex Floum's
email given by Andrew Johnson, a physicist and full member (FM) of
Scholars. What does it mean when yet another physicist objects to
Steven Jones' actions?

Judy
___________________________________

Sent 12/28/06 to Alex Floum

Alex,

Personal disputes aside, I would feel happier if Jim, Judy and Rick
et al lead forward with ST911 while Steve et al maintain "Journal of
911 Studies".

From a science perspective, I can no longer accept Steve Jones'
critique of Fetzer and Wood and his generally evasive attitude
(whilst generally remaining civil and polite) and have been somewhat
surprised by his apparent inability to answer basic questions and
respond to certain basic points of evidence. There is also some
apparent previous record of this type of activity from Prof Jones in
relation to his research pertaining to the LENR (Low Energy Nuclear
Reactions).

Looking at this in context, it appears that someone somewhere is,
with intent or through ignorance, adopting a "limited hangout" about
certain aspects of what happened on 9/11. I feel this is either
through a deliberate or unintentional failure to acknowledge the very
real threat to humanity posed by out-of-control black-projects
(sometimes called USAPs), which a number of highly credentialed
whistle-blowers have already spoken out about. There is therefore a
very strong incentive for the real power brokers in the game to limit
the credibility or ability given to anyone to demonstrate links
between 9/11 and Black Projects.

My view is that this is what is behind the split in the movement and
those that have been closest to uncovering the evidence for the above
are the ones that who have been treated with the least respect.
Because I have no reputation or position to protect, I am free to
speak in this manner, and also I now have what I think is a good
collection of evidence to back up the essential arguments behind this
analysis.

So this is the bottom line really - the future of humanity is at
stake. I hope I have made the correct choice and I hope I live to
find out if I have, for myself and my children.

With good wishes for the future of us all,

Andrew Johnson
Andrew
_________________________

Sent 12/28/06 to Alex Floum

Interesting perspective Alex. Why is it that those who Jim is
associating himself are those who are providing the most new ideas on
9/11 based on observable data? It is my observation that those who
receive the most resistance to their findings are most likely on the
right track. Further, I keep waiting for new answers from Professor
Jones and have found very little. I went to Chicago in June to see
what was new in his research and I got one slide (out of more than
100) hinting that he was close to having signature evidence that
there was thermite residues in the WTC debris. This after six or
seven months of intense research? We spent a half an hour (or more?)
talking about solar cookers and icebergs. What I expected were
results that asked more questions than it answered. What I got was a
very narrowing of the focus, like baiting a rabbit with a carrot.

Now I learn that Steven Jones was involved in burying the cold fusion
research of Pons and Fleishmann in the interests of Big Oil and Ivy
League hot fusion interests (which have spent billions of dollars and
gotten zero benefit). Would you care to explain to me how Steve
could be involved in an oil war cover-up on one hand and "come to
Jesus" on this issue (another oil war)? It would appear to me that
he has some ethical issues to answer to and if he is as innocent as
he says, would debate these issues publicly with Fetzer, Wood,
Reynolds, and Seigel. It is my understanding that this forum has
been made available to Dr. Jones via Fetzer's show. I would welcome
the debate to "let the chips fall where they may."

Last, I have included a member of the media on the carbon list just
to insure that if I, my family, friends, or respected associates
noted above become targets of harassment, someone will know where to
look. Might as well be on the record about such things.

Russ Gerst
_______________________________________________________________________________

Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:20:59 -0800
Subject: Re: The "Bathtub" and Space Beams
From: jeff strahl
To: Steve Jones
CC: hummux hummux, Ken Jenkins, Alex Floum, Robert Moore,
Fred Burks, Kevin Ryan

Cut through steel "armaments", or "armour"? If you meant the first, which is
the word you used, that's pretty insignificant. Show us the REPORT. And how
many of these devices would you need, esp if operating in pairs? And how
would the thermite work in seconds, when it usually takes so long to get
going, and how would all these be coordinated?
How much sulfur does it take to enable molten iron to steel be liquid at 600
deg C almost 900 deg C below iron's melting point? And why didn't the
mixture melt the aluminum cladding it was flowing over?
Search the web under "thermite demolition", the debunking site comes up
within the first page (of Google search), click and go to almost the end.

Can't rule it out just because it hasn't been used before? Isn't that
exactly what you're doing with other technologies?

I know you're just trying to keep me busy jumping through hoops, but two can
play this game.

on 12/27/06 2:59 PM, Steve Jones at hardevidence@gmail.com wrote:

> Jeff,
>
> The patent points out that the devices can be placed on either side of
> the steel, thus cutting up to about 4 inches. This with thermite
> using copper oxide (per the patent), but not sulfur -- sulfur will
> enhance the cutting effect.
>
> One cannot rule out the use of thermite or superthermite cutters for
> the WTC just because it has not been used before for demolition.
>
> I went to the debunking 911 site and found it interesting, but did not
> find any mention of this "miracle device." Since you cited this site,
> would you then provide the URL for the PAGE on which this "miracle
> device" is discussed? Then I can take a look at it.
>
> I have also found photos and a report of a thermite-cutter device used
> to cut through steel armaments. Yes, actually used. The device looks
> quite like the prototype I built and sent you photos of -- it is
> larger, however. If you're interested, I'll send these photos also.
>
> Steve
>
> On 12/26/06, jeff strahl wrote:
>> And what happens when beams are thicker than 2 inches? Any PROOF
>>this device
>> has ever been ACTUALLY USED? Why is it that when one does a web search for
>> thermite and demolition together, the only things that come up are your
>> articles and references to them? These latter include (on the first page of
>> returns) a debunking of your thesis at debunking911 (including
>>this "miracle
>> device"), which shows what a great job you're doing setting up the 9/11
>> Truth Movement for a fall.
>>
>> on 12/26/06 10:46 AM, Steve Jones at hardevidence@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you for the URL pointing to the patent, Hummux. Yes, the
>>> fluorine action with thermite-cutting is specifically mentioned in
>>> this patent. I also had trouble downloading the figures (today) but
>>> give one figure from the patent (extracted earlier) in the attached
>>> document.
>>>
>>> I'm enclosing replies I put together today, specifically for Jeff Strahl.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> On 12/26/06, hummux hummux wrote:
>>>> searchers--i've attached excerpts and a figure from patent #6,183,569,
>>>> Called "Cutting torch and associated methods", 2/6/2001 which
>>>>steve puts in
>>>> his powerpoint slides. this device is designed to produce
>>>>horizontal cuts
>>>> using thermite. i've been unable to download the figures on my computer
>>>> and
>>>> would appreciate having them if any of you can download them. go to
>>>> http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm and put in
>>>> 6183569.
>>>>
___________________________________________________________________________

A new list of "Events" for Scholars for 9/11 Truth (st911.org):

29 December 2006
Interview: Eric D. Williams, author of six books and webmaster
for whatreallyisthematrix.com will be the guest of Kevin Barrett
on "The Dynamic Duo"
3-5 PM/CT, Genesis Communciations Network, gcnlive.com

30 December 2006
Interview: Theologian John Cobb will be the guest of Kevin
Barrett on "Truth Jihad Radio"
6-8 PM/CT, Republic Broadcasting Network, rbnlive.com

2 January 2007
Interview: Steve Jones, Judy Wood, and Morgan Reynolds have been
invited to discuss 9/11 with Jim Fetzer on "The Dynamic Duo"
3-5 PM/CT, Genesis Communications Network, gcnlive.com

3 January 2007
Interview: William Law will be the guest of Jim Fetzer discussing his
research on the death of JFK on "The Dynamic Duo"
3-5 PM/CT, Genesis Communications Network, gcnlive.com

4 January 2007
Interview: Jeff Strahl will be the guest of Jim Fetzer discussing
recent developments within Scholars on "The Dynamic Duo"
3-5 PM/CT, Genesis Communications Network, gcnlive.com

5 January 2007
Interview: To be announced will be the guest of Kevin Barrett on
"The Dynamic Duo"
3-5 PM/CT, Genesis Communications Network, gcnlive.com

6 January 2007
Interview: Michael Andregg, author, On the Causes of War, will be
the guest of Kevin Barrett on "Truth Jihad Radio"
6-8 PM/CT, Republic Broadcasting Network, rbnlive.com

8 January 2007
Interview: Dave Slesinger, Civil Disobedience activist, will be
the guest of Kevin Barrett on "The Dynamic Duo"
3-5 PM/CT, Genesis Communications Network, gcnlive.com

9 January 2007
Interview: Bob Bowman will be the guest of Jim Fetzer discussing
recent developments within Scholars on "The Dynamic Duo"
3-5 PM/CT, Genesis Communications Network, gcnlive.com

10 January 2007
Interview: Richard Freeman will be the guest of Jim Fetzer
discussing current economic issues on "The Dynamic Duo"
3-5 PM/CT, Genesis Communications Network, gcnlive.com

10 January 2007
Lecture: Jim Fetzer present a lecture on "9/11: What We Know Now",
as the guest of the McClendon Group at The National Press Club, where
his presentation will follow dinner and begin around 7 PM/ET

11 January 2007
Interview: Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds will be the guest of Jim
Fetzer discussing recent 9/11 research on "The Dynamic Duo"
3-5 PM/CT, Genesis Communications Network, gcnlive.com

12 January 2007
Interview: Mike Berger, 911truth.org, will be the guest of
Kevin Barrett discussing on "The Dynamic Duo"
3-5 PM/CT, Genesis Communications Network, gcnlive.com

13 January 2007
Interview: To be announced will be the guest of Kevin Barrett
on "Truth Jihad Radio"
6-8 PM/CT, Republic Broadcasting Network, rbnlive.com

15 January 2007
Interview: David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor
and much, much more, will be the guest of Kevin Barrett on
"The Dynamic Duo"
3-5 PM/CT, Genesis Communications Network, gcnlive.com

16 February 2007
Event: "Truth Days of Action" to be held in Washington, D.C.
For further information, http://www.911truth.org/calendar.php

19 February 2007
Event: "Truth Days of Action" to be held in Washington, D.C.
For further information, http://www.911truth.org/calendar.php

23-25 February 2007
Conference: "9/11 Accountability" to be held at the San
Marcos Resort, Chandler, AZ. For further information,
visit http://www.911accountability.org