Did the Spires Turn to Dust?

The claim has been made that the steel cores of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center "turned to dust" on 9/11, and that indicates that some high-tech weapon (as opposed to explosives or something like nano-thermate) were used.

However, this video and this video show that the "spires" or remains of the core columns did not turn to dust. Instead, they collapsed into dust clouds caused, apparently, by the pulverization or crushing of tons of concrete when the buildings were destroyed. Note: to view the second clip you will need the free 3ivx codec which you can download here.

While there is, indeed, dust in front of the spires which obscures their views and the spires fall into a cloud of dust, the spires themselves do not appear to me to turn to dust. As someone else pointed out, the spire itself may even -- when it collapses -- throw off dust which it had previously accumulated when the towers collapsed around it. But that is a far cry from the spire itself "turning to dust". Use your finger to trace the movement of the spires and you will see what I mean.

But forget what I think.

After watching these clips while tracing the spires' motion with your finger, are you sure beyond any reasonable doubt that the spires "turned to dust"? If you are not, how are you going to convince a jury or war crimes tribunal of that claim?


You're expending time, and thought to the ridiculous.

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002


this is a claim being made all over the place. But you're probably right, Jon.

By the way, my blog in no way reflects the views of 911Blogger, but is strictly personal.

Oh I know...

You're taking care of Jim Kenobi.

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

Where Did the Thousands of WTC Filing Cabinets Go?

If the Metallic Material at the WTC Did Not Dustify,
Then Where Did the Thousands of Filing Cabinets Go???


Show "Focus your "energy beam" on" by Mark Roberts

Mark Roberts is Still a Box Cutter Believer

You should apply your ignorant "concentration" comment to yourself and check the link I provided. I'll explain it since I know you're not capable: It's a picture of the SAME filing cabinet! DUH!


So, here's the question again (Roberts and other dunces need not try answering!!):

Where did the thousands of filing cabinets go? 

This Slo-Mo Zoomed Video of the WTC Spire Shows it Turn to Dust

The Spire Turning to Dust is Clear in the Following Video


Also See Here:


Closeup of Steel Bar Turned to Dust ("Hutchison Effect" Video)

Scroll to the 4:27 Mark for a Closeup
of a Steel Bar Partially Turned to Dust:


YOUTUBE VIDEO: Photos showing evidence of scalar weapons on 911

Watch This Excellent Video from Coffinman

Associated Press: WTC Victims May Have Been 'Vaporized'

What Energy Source Caused This?




WTC Victims May Have Been 'Vaporized'

Associated Press Writers

NEW YORK (AP) -- Three months after the World Trade Center attack, victims' families are being forced to face the ghastly possibility that many of the dead were ``vaporized,'' as the medical examiner put it, and may never be identified.




Everybody knows this dude,

Everybody knows this dude, I've seen about a million posts showing the spire falling down, it's doesn’t "turn to dust", dust comes off it. Any high-resolution image shows this, but the disinfo clowns continue to with their low-res fuzzy crap animated gifs.

"Disinformation in the Information Age" comin soon Muddafonkstaz LOL!


there was dust everywhere including that spire.... when it collapsed the dust was shaken free... it did not dissentigrate

Survey says... NO

Survey says...


but how?

how is it that the "spire" suddenly had the bottom collapse/disappear beneath it?

That is a valid,

but DIFFERENT, question.

I'm sorry

But the entire structure just collapsed....errrrr...Imploded.... in the very same manner.... the question should be.... what kept that spire standing?

There was nothing left... it was like a tree that you had cut 3/4 of the way through..... a stiff wind could have brought it down.

Who knows?... do you really feel this point is imperative to knowing what happened?

Where is the real video

Siegle removed the real video and now there is only this to work with? That "codec" crashed my computer by the by. I saw that video of 911eyewitness before he removed it and it was amazing to see solid steel colums turn to dust fallig right into their own footprint! One WOULD think it would fall over, break, topple, but disintigrate into itself?

Its that Siegle again screwing with the real evidence.


I've got used to Windows Media Player *never* managing to download the required codec...

how do you know it was steel?

you don't.

for the one-millionth time..... the facade of the building was aluminum. that last little collapse is just part of the facade (now lacking any architectural integrity) simply collapsing under its own weight.

Sounds good to me.

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

Correction: it was part of

Correction: it was part of the core, and it wasn't a "little collapse." About 400 feet of the south tower core and over 600 feet of the NT core remained standing briefly.

The aluminum "facade" was made of thin sheets that wrapped around the steel perimeter columns. Much of that aluminum can be seen as loose pieces flying away from the buildings during the collapses.


Don't be fooled by the vague reasonable-ness; passing for human is what debate sucking vampires are good at, at first.

He's going to make a night of it now his friend Ron's returned to his coffin. Anyone want to help patrol? Get ready for dust to pile up!

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Mark ≠ Troll (at least not this time)

Jenny, you're a nutcase. Go ahead and shriek troll every time Mark posts something, see if that wins the War for Truth...

If you actually read his post (and happened to understand the WTC collapses) you would know that what he just said is the most factually accurate post here. Video of the collapses clearly reveals sections of both cores remaining standing after the collapse... to suggest that it is part of the facade is absurd (sorry John).

In the case of the South Tower, the fragment reached the 62nd floor, consisted of columns from the Eastern side of the core (1001, 1003, etc) and collapsed relatively quickly. In the case of the North Tower, the core section extended up 41 floors at the highest (exactly reaching the mechanical floor where squibs were observed during the collapse). This section was reinforced by a corner fragment and remained standing longer, but collapsed downward as well. It is not clear why both fragments survived the collapses but failed immediately afterward, certainly suggesting explosives, but I'm afraid there is no direct evidence of any.

Mark, I do have a question for you: As I mentioned before, the core of WTC 2 consisted of the eastern most core columns from that building: This happenes to be the same direction that the upper floors topple in. Clearly the top building section didn't fall to the West of this fragment, as it had already moved considerably to the East even before being obscured to by dust, and yet the section of the core you would expect to be most affected by the falling floors from above actually survived the collapse (to within 16 floors of the collapse initation point). That means that floors 78 - 110 MUST have fallen away from the core entirely by the time it reached the 62nd floor, leaveing no explanation other than explosives for the collapse of the remaining structure. Am I not right?

He is not here to be your

He is not here to be your friend, you naive twit--he is here only for distruption. Get a clue, sunbeam.

His "reasonableness" is as fake as a date rapist's charm, if you need a metaphor to make it clear, bonehead.

Throw around names, they get thrown right back at you, "mate"...see how that works out for you.

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Gimmie a break

You called him a troll for correcting another forum member and his incorrect statements. Is anyone who doesn't think the same as you a troll? Or just a shill?

Why not try doing some original research sometime? All you do is post banter and toss around insults. If you can't see the benefit to a logical debate between one person that believes the WTC was demolished and one that doesn't, then you really don't deserve to be posting around here.


"All you do is post banter and toss around insults"

Not, true, chum--only with known trolls, as you would know if you've been paying any sort of attention for the--what is it, 4 weeks you've been here?


And you'll find more if you use Blogger's "search "feature AND you won't make an arse out of yourself in future.

Not my fault blog's been inundated with trolls since election day--but I am ready to give 'em a kickin' when they come.

As for the rest of your post--


Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.


Jenny Sparks the troll killer... hahaha I'm trembling. I think your use of the word 'troll' is quite similar to the neocon's use of 'terrorist'.

anyway yeah i finally registered an account a few weeks ago cause I was sick of people like you relentlessly voting down every post that didn't agree with them... it's funny you try and act like you're a old timer around here (what is it like 8 weeks you've been around?)

Keep kickin' you loon...


Saving Blogger from "Jenny", eh? You have fun with that...

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Captain, I haven't looked at

Captain, I haven't looked at it closely or thought about your points before. I'll have a longer look at the issue. If your description is correct, however, I don't understand how you excluded other possibilities to arrive at an explanation involving explosives. It seems to me that you're making a huge leap based on incomplete knowledge.

I don't "expect" the standing section of the ST core to have been most affected by the collapse. I need to know much more, and I doubt if that information is available. My understanding of the state of computer modeling is that there's no way to accurately predict such a specific outcome as "this part should have remained standing and this shouldn't," because there are far too many variables involved. But I'll think about it and will contact NIST to see if they can shed any light on the matter.


I was pretty surprised when I found out as well - even as a strong CD believer, I had expected the falling floors from above to smash straight though the Eastern portion of the core, leaving them as the least likely to have remained standing. If the falling mass of the upper floors really had cleared the core supports entirely by the time it had reached the 62nd floor, then what possibly could have crushed the remaining floors below?

Anyway thanks for your response. I can certainly recognize the fact that you know more about 9/11 than most truthers... I just can't respect the conclusions you draw from that information.

You know what, I actually

You know what, I actually appreciate Mark's posts. I know the guy's been an asshole as Ground Zero but for a good part of what he says he knows what he's talking about, and ultimately he helps us refine are arguments.

I used to agree with you on

I used to agree with you on this point, but the time for refining arguments is over. Activism is the key now.

Mark Roberts is a troll that happens to be more articulate than other trolls, but when legitimate points are made against him, he runs and hides like all other trolls. Then, when he is confronted with this fact, he acts aloof and asks for more information. Mark probably knows more about the truth about 9/11 than most of us do.

I seem to remember something from the Bible about how there will be people that speak against God that will know more about the Bible than actual believers. The same applies in this case to Mr. Roberts.

I see what your saying, but

I see what your saying, but I still think people like that who constantly try to rebuke everything actually help us focus are message and make it more bullet proof.

ONLY if if you understand a

ONLY if if you understand a "debate" with Vampire Mark is NOT about evidence--it's about power and framing. Unfortunately most who try to debate him don't understand this---and get sucked into time wasting circular debates. This is true SQUARED with his mate, Ron.

So, if you can see something valuable in engaging him , go for it, but the troll alerts shall continue to warn the new and less informed.

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Show "No, Jenny. It's about the" by Mark Roberts

TROLL ALERT! still in effect...

Please debunk the evidence presented in "911Press for Truth"...or get back in to your coffin. Kinda bright outside for you, isn't it?

Oh, right! Transylvania IS in a different time zone.

Have you helped a first responder lately?

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Do you ever lay in bed at

Do you ever lay in bed at night and wonder if Satan is reserving a special section in the seventh circle of hell for you "Mark Roberts"? You are obviously an intelligent person and you have obviously looked at the available evidence. I know I am an intelligent, rational person, and I have looked at the evidence. I know exactly where it points and so do you. You are, therefore, obviously a liar and protecting a group of murderers that are currently ruling our country.

Re: shouting ignorance louder and louder - That sounds a lot like what you do with the NIST Report and 9/11 Commission Report. Both are completely and totally hollow because neither has any supporting evidence yet you shout it louder and louder, without refining your arguments at all. That equals truth, doesn't it?

Show "'zat you, Jimmy?" by Mark Roberts

I don't wish eternal torture

I don't wish eternal torture on you. I was just wondering what kind of burden you personally carry in shamelessly supporting the 9/11 Myth offered by our government. If it is no burden on your conscience, I pity you. You are probably just as psychotic as those that perpetrated this crime.

I assure you, many people have answered you with far more than "die". You just refuse to recognize it and remain here, apparently without remorse, to disrupt the search for truth. Happy trolling.

Show "duplicate post" by Mark Roberts
Show "here's how?" by Jim Garrison's ghost (not verified)

As GW said above, this is a

As GW said above, this is a valid and different question. And very interesting. Why does this standing structure fall straight down? Does damage at the base explain its collapse, or a demolition/incendiary slice at the bottom?

It is also important to determine conclusively whether this is the core or exterior.

Disinfo artists are spreading this engery-beam nonsense

to dissuade people from taking 9/11 truth seriously, just like the cartoon-plane crap. They used real incendiaries/explosives & real planes--why is that so hard to believe?

Let's stop this b.s. (If Fetzer wants to keep promoting this space-beam junk, then throw him out of the truth movement!)

A long time ago, in a galaxy far away...

Click Here

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

And not only that...

But do you think this administration would have hesitated using such a weapon against Afghanistan or Iraq? It would certainly limit the amount of soldiers needed. Hell, you could take over the whole world with that kind of weapon.

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002


Our "lazer."

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002



Reason "they" don't use such weapons in wars


Sorry to interrupt your dialogue but I thought you might actually be curious to know the answer to your question.

(Modern) wars are fought to consume resources and, in the case of Iraq, weaken our country's military. Sadly, they also provide a way to control (and dispose of) truly brave individuals who have a misguided sense of patriotism. The object of all modern wars is not to win but rather to fight and thereby consume resources as well as occupy the military. While such a system is morally bankrupt, it is highly profitable for those who make their money building and selling the tools of war.

It is easy to understand the confusion as such a sick and evil system is incomprehensible to any moral person. However, those who prosecute modern wars, like the perps of 9/11 and the underlings, have no morality (as most know it).

This is why "they" never use their best weapons in wars. They don't want the people to know they posess such technology and prefer to reserved such weapons for more important task, such as pulverizing extremely tall buildings.

I hope this helps.

Happy New Year to all.

So you're saying...

They build these weapons so they can bring them out only when they need to create a spectacular disaster to blame on other countries?

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

No Jon, I'm saying just what I said- read it

again. Hope this helps.

Actually it does help

It galvanizes the movement against obvious and pathetic disinformation - and soon all of this will be the subject of widespread humor and ridicule.

Soon all of this NONSENSE will be turned on its head and morphed into a learning tool by the movement. when all the dots are connected and the identities and actions of these disinformation agents are exposed - we will hit the flipping point.

its kinda like the effects like Loose Change and 9/11 Mysteries and my film have had on people. Many people have heard rumors and facts, but in a diffused way - here and there - and everywhere.

but when you distill it down for people and accumulate all these facts for them - in one place - the evidence become overwhelming.

so - soon we will have a film on Fetzer, Judy, Morgan, Nico, WingTV, Webfairy, Criminal Politics and when you see what these people have been saying - and working in concert - and attacking - and disrupting - and you see it all compiled all in one place - the TRUTH becomes obvious.

this will be happening very soon - and it will be distributed far and wide - and you can officially consider your 'cover' blown.

keen insight


Hate propaganda, anti-intellectualism, and Stalinist purges are the health of every political movement.

related to Judy Wood

I'm still trying to figure out why this apparently intelligent woman would be promoting something so unbelievable and crazy-sounding unless she believes what she's promoting... Money may be exchanging hands, I suppose... Wouldn't it be funny if she were at least partially correct...Hmm...
Not a single comprehensive story I've heard about 9/11 has been without holes. Not the official storyline, nor any alternate storyline. Enough critical evidence has been withheld that we are left with *mostly* speculation [and a few good hard facts that may be the key to finding out what really happened] - and I suppose this may have been the intended result.

So, what now?

Fascism Lite - Now with 75% less mass murder and 25% more public appeal!

Show "Of course. Just look at how" by Mark Roberts

Silly Rabbit...

The idea is to take over the world secretly and as "men of peace" i.e. spreading democracy etc etc. You start blowing cities off the map with unknown space weaponry and the jig is up, cover blown...instant and total world war and mayhem. Everybody's reachin' for a shotgun or a pitch-fork. So yes, the administration absolutely would have hesitated to use such a weapon against Afgan. or Iraq. Perpetual war is the game. Besides highly classified space weapons can't build permanent military bases or control natural resources. Space beams can't deal heroin. (They could however, control populations once world domination is achieved)... Do such weapons exist? I don't know and neither do you. But one things for sure, the idea of controlling the world from space is a very real one and is already happening in many ways. So to think that this control doesn't include weaponry would be incredibly naive.

Do the weapons exist, you ask???

take a look through here ...


Thanks ALW.

We must keep pushing though... the 9/11 perps are still hard at work, as can be seen by the constant voting down of our posts!

Albanese’s trailer still

Albanese’s trailer still makes me laugh with that starwars music set to Fetzer swinging his Lightsaber arms around, hahahahahaha....

Anyway Impeach The Dark Side;

That was brilliant! Where

That was brilliant! Where was this at?

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Rose Parade, I guess you didn't see that live

Yes, it was there next to the Norton Simon Museum for about 30 minutes, constantly in the camera shot. Pretty great, eh?

We're creating our own media, whether it's online, or passing out dvd's and leaflets, or public signs.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Be well.

of course DBLS laughs at that....

what else should a *bleep*do?


(Note: replace *bleep* with the most appropriate word) 

Does James Fetzer actually believe that steel turned to dust?

Does David Shayler actually believe that the towers were struck by "missiles wrapped inside holograms"?

Of course not.

Show "If the Steel did not turn to dust, then **where** is it???" by CB_Brooklyn





your new stappler

It could be at the bottom of the ocean for all they care

where are the pictures of the Steel BEFORE...

...it supposedly got shipped away??

Certainly there's got to be some pictures out there. If you're gonna claim there was enough steel at Ground Zero from two 110 story towers, I'd like to see it. This can be your proof that the spire did not disintegrate!

A typical controlled demolition collapses a building to about 10% of it's original height. One clear example is WTC 7. There should be pictures of two 10 story piles. (Why was the debris pile of the 47 story WTC 7 higher than that of two 110 buildings?)

Certainly there must be pictures somewhere of them loading 10 stories of steel onto trucks, and then transferring it to barges. Please show them!!


How many floors were below ground at each building?

the WTC had several floors below ground

and WTC 7 had a more compact debris field.... the WTC 1 &2 were a bit more scattered

Keep in mind that the destruction of WTC 1 & 2 were not

classic controlled demolitions.

Much more explosives were used than just what was needed to bring the buildings down. Much of the mass that would've formed the pile (concrete, drywall, furniture, etc) was completely pulverized and spread as dust all over NYC. Really all that was left was the steel framing. Add to this the destruction of the sub-basements and the pile is lower that you would expect from a conventional controlled demolition.

It should be possible to calculate the approximate mass of the steel framing and then compare that to the photographs. It would also be useful to get the trucking records to see how many loads were taken away, as well as the sales records of the tonnage to the recyclers.

I still can't believe that we didn't stop the removal of the evidence with massive protests at the time. I guess too many of us were in shock to actually realize what they were doing at the time.

While I am quite sure that directed energy weapons exist at some level, I'm equally certain that the most exotic thing used to bring the towers down was nano-thermate and maybe some other chemically based super high explosives that are not known to the public.

What is important, and what we need to focus on, is the fact that the buildings did not collapse due to impact and fire damage and that a massive cover-up remains ongoing.

Almost 3,000 people were murdered on 9/11/01. This was a heinous criminal act and we need to bring the perpetrators to justice. The sooner the better.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Are you serious? Did you

Are you serious? Did you miss them hauling out steel for months afterwards?

How is it that others need to prove even the most obvious to you, but you expect others to believe your theories of pure speculation and suggestion?

Go find your own damn pictures, only a 9/11-denier (denying airplanes and steel is intentional to fit into this future hate term which will be labeled against us all) would suggest there weren't hundreds of thousands of tons of steel that had to be excavated over many months.

Why do you think they called it 'the pile'?


Show "sorry, but that link does NOT show two 10 story piles." by CB_Brooklyn
Show "On the off chance that" by Mark Roberts

Pretty easy to demolish a strawman, isn't it?

That's the whole idea behind behind CB and associates' campaign - to make the work of people like you very easy to do. Wouldn't it be great if we all started spouting such nonsense? Why are you spending time on his bullshit while running away from legitimate questions? Do you need to be provided with links to all the convos that you've bailed on here?

Show "Unfortunately, CB's "no" by Mark Roberts
Show "Steel did turn to dust." by CB_Brooklyn
Show "Wrong, CB. You made the" by Mark Roberts
Show "Wrong Roberts, you are the one" by CB_Brooklyn

Is this not the funniest thing you've ever seen?

A "debunker" arguing against a "disinformationist."

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

I say let 'em have at each other.

As long as they're "playing safe" if you know what I mean.

I'm reminded by that line in Forrest Gump...

Me and Jenny is like peas and carrots.

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

Show "This is a serious question." by Mark Roberts

"For instance, there's a guy

"For instance, there's a guy on the JREF forum who admits to being mentally ill. "

You are a revolting excuse of a human being--WAIT! Vampire, NOT human---never mind; makes sense now.

Without context that was a meaningless statement. "Depression", whether temprary or chronic, is a mental illness. Mentaly ill means the same thing as being physically ill, a dis-ease, that , with time and adequete rest and nutrition, most people get over with on their own. Greiving falls under this catagory, as well as "Compulsive obsession"(might want to think on that, eh?)--common as the bloody cold. Most "mentally ill" aren't raving lunatics, git; MOST mental ilnesses is TEMPORARY, like most physical illness.

But no, call up the spectere of a "crazy man", raving on the street corner as an excuse to dismiss whatever this poor bastard has to say. Says more about you, really.

See what I mean, everyone? It's all power and framing with him, with a little bit of gratuitous ignorance.

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Anal-Cranial Inversion

Sorry, Mark--I didn't realize you had a "condition". Would expect a little more compassion for your fellow mentally ill, but I guess that's part of your "condition". It's okay now, Dr. LEH and Dr. casseia explained this on another thread:


I understand. I still have to call those troll alerts, but now it will be with understanding and love.

Sorry, everyone--he LOOKED like a vampire...

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Are you talking to me Mark?

Didn't I bitch slap you a few times already or have you forgotten?

You're nothing to me. As a matter of fact Mark, I have a question for you. Are you trying to make a name for yourself using the fact that you stick out like a sore thumb? There are millions of us, and only a few of you.

You want to be the new Chip Berlet Mark? Are you hoping to make some money off of the fact that you're an asshole?

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

Jonny ! Have a

Jonny ! Have a heart--remember, the man has a "condition"!

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

If he can stand...

On the streets of New York, and call members of this movement asshole, I can reciprocate.

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

basements were not full of steel

please stop spreading disinformation. the basement levels were not filled with the steel.

here's a picture of the warner store in the WTC basement after the towers were demolished. you will notice that it is not full of structural steel and is in fact structurally sound

Please state exactly where in exactly which building this photo

was taken. The date and time of the picture would also be helpful.

Unless I'm mistaken this photo is from WTC 5.

(Perhaps Mr. Roberts, our resident expert on all things WTC, could help us out here.)

Thank you.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Show "HUNT THE RUBBLE! (If it didn't turn to dust, then WHERE is it?)" by CB_Brooklyn
Show "CB, are you Alex "Ace"" by Mark Roberts
Show "Mark Roberts can't counter the FACTS so he...." by CB_Brooklyn
Show "Do you mean this Ace Baker?" by JohnGault
Show "Yes. Do you know another Ace" by Mark Roberts
Show "There is another Ace Baker?" by JohnGault

the spire

The thing collapsing into tiny pieces, aka "dust", is, i hate to break it to you, not a steel column(s) but the facing on the Tower.


Now look at it again.

Meantime, the only mystery about this is how much the pseudo-GW who posts this oh so reasonable buscistic "explanation" gets from the govt for his spin, or whether he's too dumb to file an invoice for services rendered and does it for free, in solidarity with Treason Inc.

Is this you?

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

"It is difficult to get a

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.”
– Upton Sinclair

Show "IT WAS NUKES THAT MADE THE" by RANDKILLER2006 (not verified)
Show "after reading the" by RANDKILLER2006 (not verified)

I did

I did notice the electrical disruption in some of the Audio Video equipment.

and there were other possible signs... the disease.... as well as some of the residue could be attributed to a nuclear explosion

certainly wouldn't put it past these people.... if it was nuclear... it was an advanced technology

this is the metaphorical

this is the metaphorical heart of 911truth

it was nukes----

this is a big part of the 911hoax revelation

afterwards besides just ending false flag terror-----
it will inspire banning of ALL nuke use

including "micro" nukes and DU


Show "downrating=good job----- " by RANDKILLER2006 (not verified)
Show "Scared Little Boys Must Resort To Censorship!" by CB_Brooklyn

Maybe you can show us

Maybe you can show us pictures of two ten story piles of dust ?

Are you retarded?

Are you retarded?

Are you Judy Wood?

Same vocabulary and style of argumentation...

Fetzer's "National Debate" should be a real blast.

No, im not, which is exactly

No, im not, which is exactly why I dont buy into your "steel turned to dust" from "spacebeams"
crap. But thanks for your concern.

justacitizen doesn't care about the truth.

Just as I thought.

So Im guessing that means

So Im guessing that means your not going to let me see your ten story dustpile pictures....

Is 911blogger retarded?

Do you and your 4 compatriots seriously not understand how retarded that question is?


You have just released me from my block to the laser beam from space.... I didn't want to believe it.

But now that you have presented me with the proper terminology..... I'm ready to take it to the masses

"Yes people... that's right.... I said the steel was dustified."

Show "show people the pictures." by CB_Brooklyn


NO Space Beams!

Not only that, but a hell of

Not only that, but a hell of a lot of stupid people