I finally watched World Trade Center and have a few things to say about it. Firstly, when I heard Oliver Stone was making the film, I knew he wouldn't let us down. But I didn't expect him to make an outright gesture to us. I expected he would only include subtle signs and hints that point to a conspiracy, and nothing that makes any outright suggestions. It was too early in the 9/11 Truth Movement for that. So I was glad to hear that Stone picked two survivors' stories for the film. The movie is completely from the perspective of the two Port Authority cops who eventually get discovered in the rubble by US Marines. The film is all about heroism and duty and makes zero assumptions about who was behind 9/11. It's about reactions and responses and what happened to two people and their families. This is why the movie was lauded by conservatives and others who obviously had ignored all Stone's hints that controlled demolition was used at the WTC and that the official story is a lie. They saw the depiction of heroism, particularly by the Marines who helped rescue the trapped cops, as an approval of the US Military response to 9/11. But Stone wasn't approving it - he was just depicting it. Of course a US Marine or a cop in New York City on 9/11 would assume this was the work of foreign terrorists! Of course they would be angry and seek vengeance. This is what happened. And that's the point Stone was trying to convey in these scenes: 9/11 mobilized Americans for war - that was the whole purpose of it! The 9/11 Truthers who criticized the movie (probably because it wasn't an outright "conspiracy theory" movie, like JFK) missed the point. So they must have missed all the signs and hints too. Here are some of them:

----In the scenes before the collapse, you hear loud, sharp-sounding explosions as the cops walk through the lobby of the WTC. Explosions go off continuously until the collapse occurs. This is consistent with the 9/11 Truthers' assertion that controlled demolition was used. It is a graphic and realistic portrayal of a building collapsing as a result of steel-cutting explosives.

----Throughout the movie, we hear the original live news reports from 9/11. Among the lines that stand out was Tom Brokaw saying "A missle has hit the Pentagon". Also, you hear a newscaster discussing the Twin Towers "imploding". There are plenty of other reports that are right in line with the 9/11 Truthers' discussions of smoking guns first reported by the media. Stone didn't need to include these or highlight them. But he did.

----For the first time ever, the film exposed millions of Americans to the collapse of the WTC-7 building. This could easily have been conveniently left out of the film, like it was left out of most official accounts. But Stone remained true to the 9/11 Truthers and gave it considerable time in the movie. He even showed the clips of it collapsing. This is our smoking gun. Thanks, Oliver.

Of course this is not a comprehensive list. Rent the movie and you'll probably pick up more signs and hints. The bottom line is that Stone clearly supports the controlled demolition theory in the film. Like the pro-war types who commended the film, the 9/11 Truthers who criticized the film weren't looking deep enough to see this.

One side note: your average US Marine is a hero. Most of these men and women truly believe they are serving their country and protecting its citizens. They were victims of the 9/11 false flag operation just like we were. I'm sure when the real truth about 9/11 is finally accepted by our society, the normal men and women of our armed forces will be on our side (and we will surely need them too).

So go rent the film and tell me what you think. And remember to ask yourself: Do you really think Oliver Stone believes the official 9/11 story? Regardless of what he says publicly about it, do you think he buys it? Of course not. And this movie very subtly proves it. See if for yourself, this is no propaganda film and it accurately portrays that day as we suggest it happened. Just think what some other director trying to jump on the "first film about 9/11" bandwagon could have done to hurt our cause. Flight 93? How about ABC's piece of crap. Stone is on our side.