Democrats Perpetuate 911 Commission Betrayal

Thanks again, Parrotfish for sending this in.

Democrats Perpetuate 911 Commission Betrayal

Pelosi and the Democrats Perpetuate Commission’s Betrayal & Cover-up of 9/11

By Kyle F. Hence - 9/11 CitizensWatch
Jan. 8, 2007

Today, Speaker of the House Pelosi and several of her Democratic colleagues announced legislation (HR1) that would enact many more of the 9/11 Commission’s recommendations. It’s hard to argue with their oft repeated mantra that these recommendations will make us safer and no doubt some, perhaps most, will do so.

In her introductory remarks, Speaker Pelosi harkened back to the creation of the 9/11 Commission saying, “we promised to fight terrorism…to give comfort to the families.” Well, as is so often the case with the usual rhetoric about “making us safer” and “honoring the families” Speaker Pelosi is charging ahead with an agenda that overlooks one of the most discomforting realities, one that is all too often denied. According to Mindy Kleinberg and Lorie Van Auken, leading members of the Family Steering Committee, the Commission failed to answer 70% of their well-founded and well-researched questions. [ ] (PDF of questions)

Who can take comfort in the fact that the very same Commission the Democratic leadership champions by working to enact its recommendations also failed to answer most of the questions posed by the 9/11 families? What could be more of an insult than this affront to the very 9/11 victim family members they promised “a full accounting”? To push recommendations all the while ignoring the Commission’s failure or refusal to answer even some of the most basic questions about what happened or seek to hold a single office holder, agent, or officer accountable is reprehensible and shameful -- and a betrayal of the highest order.

Though some of the recommendations may possibly make Americans safer, we remain in grave peril because the Commission utterly failed, likely by design, to provide a full accounting of what exactly happened on 9/11, and refused to point fingers toward those responsible for violations of laws and standard operating procedures, not to mention the laws broken by top officials who appeared to have covered up what happened by destroying evidence, denying access to key documents and simply lying.

Speaker Pelosi and those who stood with her today on Capitol Hill, particularly Commissioners Hamilton and Roemer continue to disgrace America and insult the 9/11 families for their part in ignoring a record of now well-documented lies, cover-up, obfuscation and deception surrounding the horrific September 11th murders. Congress can now right the wrong of the 9/11 Commission’s betrayal by holding hearings to examine evidence of cover-up and covered-up crimes with a mind to get to the truth, the whole truth, once and for all.

- Kyle F. Hence Director, 9/11 CitizensWatch

Why do Democrats (and Republicans) think they can get away this?

Why do Democrats (and Republicans) think they can get away with ignoring reality and the glaring lies about 9/11?

They must not want to accept the fact that a growing number of people know "the game" and will no longer tolerate the lies and distortions that are being perpetuated.

9/11 DID change the world. The citizens of this planet will no longer accept the "official" lies and evil that is being spread by the politicians and the elite of the planet.

Show "Why do you think YOU can get away with it?" by Anonymous (not verified)

a roundup and grilling

of the entire FBI, CIA, NSA, NORAD, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Bush, Cheney and all their Cabinet, present and past, followed by indictments, prosecutions and executions — nothing less will do!

Good quote...

"We can't let Pelosi get up there, and champion the recommendations of this damn commission without first getting to the bottom of what really happened, and answering ALL of the questions that the family members raised." - Kyle Hence

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

Show "You will benefit from this especially, Jon." by Anonymous (not verified)

You'll Benefit From This.

""Crank" is a pejorative term for a person who

1. holds some belief which the vast majority of his contemporaries would consider false,
2. clings to this belief in the face of all counterarguments or evidence presented to him.

The term implies that

1. a "cranky" belief is so wildly at variance with some commonly accepted truth as to be ludicrous,
2. arguing with the crank is useless, because he will invariably dismiss all evidence or arguments which contradict his cranky belief.

Common synonyms for "crank" include kook and crackpot. The word quack is usually reserved for someone who promotes a medical remedy or practice which he knows to be ineffective. The crank differs from the fanatic in that the subject of the fanatic's obsession is not necessarily widely regarded as wrong, or a "fringe" belief."

You fall somewhere between crank & fanatic, me thinks.

No, I already know you all are

Cranky, puerile, idiots who really CAN benefit from the help offered in the link I gave you.


he thinks right

16% and falling

Typographical Error


There's a typo in the .pdf. The director of the FBI is Robert Mueller, not Muller as written.

Show "You’re not helping. Go look for Sasquatch or something." by Anonymous (not verified)

Did the 9/11 Commission...

Answer all of the questions put forward by the 9/11 Families Steering Committee?

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

Such a simple...


"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

Show "Focus, Jon, focus." by Anonymous (not verified)


"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

Is that your best shot

There is no way this movement is slowing down or stopping it's growing because of the momentum behind it. The questions that are not being answered or simply ignored by the Media and government are to big, and this is reaching a critical mass. Personally I learned about this movement around the fifth anniversary of 911, and as I began to bring the subject up in discussions I realized there are so many people here in the United States truly searching within themselves for answers to the looming question concerning 911. The official story simply falls apart and what you call debunkers really just come across as highly opinionated cynics.

Show "Your questions were adressed." by Anonymous (not verified)


Every word have to be a lie? The questions have not been answered.

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

You call leaving WTC7 out of the 911 commission report answers?

You're not even open to debate; it seems your mind is made up, so instead of being the big loser here calling people liars etc; you should move on.


Why would the end of 9/11 Truth be 2006, the year in which the most interest and support was made since the movement began? What kind of backwards logic is that?
Are you upset that you are outnumbered, now? Don't cry, just join our team!
It speaks volumes that you are on our site every single day posting on every single thread and waving your hands in the air and calling us crazies.
So ummm...if we're crazy and insane...then what's the problem? Why do we pose any threat? What sane person would listen to us?
Awww poor lil guy's just upset that 80% agree with us!
Sorry lil guy!

Show "Poor kid. Pay attention." by Anonymous (not verified)

So are you just going to

So are you just going to claim things or let us know why 2006 was the death of the Truther even though we have the highest number of followers in our history now according to mainstream polls.
So show us the evidence of our downfall. Maybe Tom Kean can help you with that evidence as well.
Good luck!

5 years and 1 pathetic conviction

of a basket case patsy who missed the bus — your bosses in their finest hour

"5 years and 1 pathetic conviction"

Don't you love how we're called 'wild eyed conspiracy theorists'?

Even funnier after looking into the farce that is the 'war on terror'. Here's your farce... illustrated, 'official conspiracy cranks'.

I'm sure Pelosi & most other Democrats know or strongly suspect

that 9/11 was an inside job. Hillary is a joke, even worse than her husband. There is no 2-party system in the U.S. any more.

The only Democrat who I still somewhat trust & respect is Ted Kennedy.

High level Dems and Repubs both complicit with 9/11

You need to undersand that there were both high level Democrats and Republicans who were complicit with the crimes of 9/11. Clinton did an excellent job protecting Bin Laden and the "Al CIA-duh" network. So did Dubya. At the highest levels of our "government", the left/right paradigm is a hoax. They are all taking orders from the same masters.

What difference does it make

What difference does it make who is in charge, Democrats or Republicans?

The entire system is corrupt. Get rid of the whole damn thing. CULTURE WAR.

The trouble is getting

The trouble is getting soccer moms (and dads) to understand this.

Show "They already understand" by Anonymous (not verified)

Does this...

Indicate that 2006 was "the year the 9/11 Truth Movement began its Death Plunge," or is that just wishful thinking on your part?

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

Show "It is a fact - and you illustrated it for us, Jon." by Anonymous (not verified)
Show ""The lies and" by Anonymous (not verified)

LMAO anon. You're the

LMAO anon. You're the goofiest troll yet. I hope to God you're being paid for this.


who else would troll around all day every day on boards with people he says he thinks are completely insane?
Of course he's being paid...he's good comedic relief, however.
Thanks, anon!

The soccer moms have to

The soccer moms have to evolve out of the "M*A*S*H" era and accept a much more horrible world that was ever portrayed in the media. They should never think that replacing leaders in the currently constituted pattern of things will change anything.

Give every soccer mom you know....

....Press For Truth....

Wait a few days, then follow up with conversation, answer questions....then leave them with 9/11 Mysteries...repeat process (with the next film of your choice)....

It's a fight for the middle third of the population now, folks....

soccer moms

Don't underestimate the intelligence of soccer moms and dads. Just keep handing out DVDs whether u choose LC 2nd ed, Press for truth or others. The overwhelming majority will understand.
Why does anyone even respond to these trolls? They don't deserve your response.

What a f*cking joke our government is. The opposition party was

elected by the people, taking over the House & Senate to end the war--but Bush isn't ending anything--he's sending 20,000 more kids into the meat grinder! But impeachment is off-the-table. Yeah, right.

elected by the people, taking over the House & Senate to end the

Boy do you have that right. It is time people begin to realize we live under a dictatorship. Your vote is just window dressing. The so-called government is going to do exactly what it wants to do. We have no say in it. Unless there is a military coupe or an all out revolution, get use to it.

the "families" rethoric

They never cease to cite the 3000 dead as the only relevant thing that happened on 9/11. Never mind one of the largest skyscrapers ever built by mankind collapsed in 10 seconds, never mind the resulting economic crisis, unemployment in many high tech industries, and a new era of deficit "pork" govt. spending.

Maybe soon another terrorist attack will kill 10000 Americans. Just 10000 people, without much other damage. That should be good enough reason to launch World War III, with about 50 million Americans and 1 billion worldwide killed in the process - for the "families"...

Democrats Beef Police State With 9/11 Commission Bill

Political "opposition" also helping Bush gain traction for Iran military strike:

Correct link:

On Dealing With Denial

\\\"If we really want to know the truth about history we need to allow freedom of speech.\\\"

So I was told by David Duke in an interview three weeks ago via a scratchy transatlantic connection from Tehran. Duke was then in Iran as a participant in Mahmoud Admadinejad\\\'s conference concerning the Holocaust.

David Duke does not speak for me. I have followed his career and find his repeated condemnation of Israel and her supporters to be abhorrent. Nevertheless, I knew that my acceptance of an invitation to interview the former Ku Klux Klan Imperial Wizard would itself cause a stir. It did. But I was willing to speak to him because I was then on the verge of traveling to the most deadly of all Nazi extermination camps and I wanted to hear what a self-described revisionist had to say.

The fringes represented by Duke argue that laws in Europe which prohibit Holocaust denial inhibit an analysis that could otherwise reveal the Holocaust to be historical exaggeration which exists to justify the legitimacy of Israel. No Holocaust or exaggerated description? Then there\\\'s no justification for the creation of the state of Israel in the minds of these few.

I\\\'ve now just returned from a visit to Auschwitz, and I find that I agree with David Duke that Europeans should be free to debate the Holocaust, but not for reasons with which he would concur. Having seen the haunting, ghastly evidence which I have just examined, my view is that it\\\'s far easier to defeat the deniers with fact and logic rather than risk fostering skepticism which comes from making those views illegal to espouse. It is through the clash of truth vs. falsity that the merits of veracity about the Holocaust are most readily seen.


It was there that I pondered the critical question: If the Holocaust, fully in evidence by that which then existed in front of me, is not subject to reasonable debate, should all argument to the contrary be unlawful? Close to twenty nations say yes, and ban Holocaust denial. Austria is one such nation, and only recently released imprisoned historian David Irving.

Our tour guide is one of many who believe those laws to be justified. She thinks them necessary as a safeguard for properly educating future generations about what occurred.

I agree with her that our goal must be to ensure the understanding of future generations. But I don\\\'t see those laws as a means to that end. It occurs to me that the European ban of debate on the Holocaust would be akin to America disallowing argument on the whacky 9/11 conspiracy theories that exist on the Internet.

There are many, credible-looking websites that have become clearing houses for rumor and innuendo about the attack on the Pentagon. A missile some argue, not a passenger airplane. (Overlooking, of course, the issue of what then happened to American Airlines Flight 77 and its passengers?) The most effective way of dealing with such propaganda is to discredit it point by point, not to make unlawful its utterance, which runs the risk of fueling skepticism. With regard to 9/11, Popular Mechanics did so exquisitely in both magazine, and then book form.

continued at

Of course, the denial of the 9/11 Truth Movement has been repeatedly discredited for the last 5 years.

Duke fits the too

"The agent provocateur may be a paid, or unpaid agent enlisted by the enemies of our folk. His function is to infiltrate, disrupt, and/or destroy.

There are two kinds of provocateurs: the soft provocateur, and the hard provocateur. Both are dangerous to the kindred, so be on guard.

The soft provocateur is an expert at the three D's of destruction: Dissension, distraction, and disruption. His arsenal includes fabrications, distortions, misrepresentations, and misinformation. He spreads slander systematically and craftily; seeking to undermine the kindred leadership, and thus deny it of it's driving force. He plants seeds of doubt with the object of turning the kindreds attentions away from folkish activity, and instead diverting it and it's resources against itself. His modus operandi is: divide and conquer! "

Please do read more — — your kind of folk

Another "Best Congress Money Can Buy" ...

.. what difference does it make anyway. They are just politicians. Not what we need. We need Statesmen. The difference being a Politician looks to the next election. A Statesman looks to the next generation.

Jon Christopher

Jon Christopher Dalton............did anyone notice that Bush didn't even mention OSAMA BIN LADIN in tonights address? Bush and OJ Simpson have alot in common. Both of them are spending about as much time and effort looking for the real killer.

Q What was the first thing

Q What was the first thing that went through your head when you heard that a plane crashed into the first building?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes. Well, I was sitting in a schoolhouse in Florida. I had gone down to tell my little brother what to do, and -- just kidding, Jeb. (Laughter.) And -- it's the mother in me. (Laughter.) Anyway, I was in the midst of learning about a reading program that works. I'm a big believer in basic education, and it starts with making sure every child learns to read. And therefore, we need to focus on the science of reading, not what may feel good or sound good when it comes to teaching children to read. (Applause.) I'm just getting a plug in for my reading initiative.

Anyway, I was sitting there, and my Chief of Staff -- well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on. And you know, I thought it was pilot error and I was amazed that anybody could make such a terrible mistake. And something was wrong with the plane, or -- anyway, I'm sitting there, listening to the briefing, and Andy Card came and said, "America is under attack."

And in the meantime, this teacher was going on about the curriculum, and I was thinking about what it meant for America to be under attack. It was an amazing thought. But I made up my mind that if America was under attack, we'd get them. (Applause.) I wasn't interested in lawyers, I wasn't interested in a bunch of debate. I was interested in finding out who did it and bringing them to justice. I also knew that they would try to hide, and anybody who provided haven, help, food, would be held accountable by the United States of America. (Applause.)

Anyway, it was an interesting day.

Um, excuse me but there was NO video of the plane hitting the first building on TV that morning. That footage wasn't released until the NEXT DAY!!!! let's see POPULAR MECHANICS debunk that!!!

Bush is an idiotic hand

Bush is an idiotic hand puppet, he didn't know anything.

His Secret Service people didn't know anything, either. They got their info from the Port Authority police, not the TV. So they didn't know anything more than the PAPD knew. Which was there was an attack on the buildings, large planes not involved.

Don't read much into Bush's actions at the school that day, he didn't know anything more than the kids did then.

The citation is important

But, not fot he claim you make.

1. Bush knew about planes crashing before he went into the classroom. (So why did he enter at all? Just what were the secret service, Norad and FAA telling him at that point in time?)

2. Bush was allegedly told "America is under attack," yet did nothing to protect America, or even to learn more information about the situtation. This alone could be argued as treason.

3. The secret service did nothing to secure the president, even after a warning of a plot to "assassinate Bush" was given less than two months previously at the Genoa G8, where Bush and entourage were moved out of his hotel for safety's sake. Because of a "knonw plot by Al Qaeda" to "hijack commercial jets" and "crash them into the summit of industrialized nations."

For those reasons, this interview is an important part of the record.

For your specious claim that this proves some kind of private closed circuit surveillance operation, without any other corroborating evidence, the claim is worthless.

"well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on."

He could just have meant he saw a NEWS STORY about the plane flying into the first building. With Bush's penchant for twisting the language around ("getting harder to put food on your family"), then this is an easily explained error in speech.

Ergo, you have nothing on that front.

Crimes of the State Blog

"America IS UNDER attack"....

...implies that FURTHER attacks are known by Card (and others) to be forthcoming,.....yet Bush sits and waits.....sits and waits....why is a President immobilized if he knows he is in the middle of an attack?

Why didn't Card say, "America has been attacked", instead? means they knew more planes were aiming for targets yet to be hit....yet still, Bush...sits and waits....sits and waits....

One more question: How long do you think he would've sat there if Card had said, "The Twins have been kidnapped?"

IMO, those planes were all supposed to hit targets almost simultaneously.....but things went way wrong....

"well, first of all, when we

"well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on."

He said he saw the plane fly into the building.
Cmon now...why do official theory nuts make so many excuses for these people?


"He said he saw the plane fly into the building.
Cmon now...why do official theory nuts make so many excuses for these people?"

Are you stupid enough to imply that I am an "official theory nut?"

Obviously you have never seen my previous work. Since I link to my blog with every post, the fault lies with you.

The claim cited has no corroboration. There is nothing else that confirms this.

Bush's words in this context are insufficient. The quote could easily, and probably does, mean that he saw the results of a plane hitting the WTC on a newscast, and not that he saw the actual impact.

I'm interersted in what can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, a concept you should familiarize yourself with. You don't seem to understand even the most basic principles of evidence at this point.

As I showed three other, and more substantial observations in my original post, your insinuation and treatment of this issue so far are lacking, indicating a weakness of analysis.

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog.

Good post

Good post, Kyle, and the question now is, what to do about it. I hope the widows and other families of the victims will join the IMPEACH BUSH-CHENEY movement, which should somehow be expanded to IMPEACH CONGRESS, though I'm not sure how this could be done. Those that oppose impeachment for various reasons, like Pelosi (because the Senate won't convict!) are wrong (or hypocrites) because they should really that it is the PROCESS that we need to expose the lies and get at the truth, whatever the outcome.

Bush afraid of the gallows for 9/11 treason

Report: Bush upset by Hussein hanging video

They'll get away with all we let them

"Accountability," -that's supposedly the main watchword for '07. But, of course there is not going to be any accountability, or transparency out of this unchallenged administration. And, the biggest 'dis-info' campaign of all remains to be of the reliability of 'checks & balances,' vis-a-vie the 'two-party system.'

We now know Who the enemys of freedom and democracy are.

The solution begins when everyone refuses to pay taxes. To facilitate this, every family simply needs to behave like the rich, opening off-shore accounts to function as shell operations. Pay your salary to the company, and pay all your bills from the company, only reporting as income that which you require in actual discresionary income, ie: Beer money.

The system will self-destruct anyway, as most of the middle-class are now feeling the squeeze. The Malls will run out of customers soon. And, let's not neglect to put an absolute timeline on this, since Pat Robertson has already committed himself to a position of 'Sainthood' by predicting a near-term domestic disaster, "like 9/11," in 2007.

First they ridicule you, then you look for better ways to be entertained!

Stop paying taxes, yes. But

Stop paying taxes, yes. But it has to happen in conjunction with the seizing of corporate media stations using non-violent direct action. The media is our main obstacle now. We need to physically challenge it, using models of resistance such as what happened to the WTO in '99.

powerful video

Guantánamo inmates ‘driven insane’

Prisoners held at the Guantánamo Bay detention camp in Cuba are being driven insane by a tightening of conditions and the situation of their indefinite detention without trial, according to lawyers and rights activists involved with the US camp...

Disgusting!!! And like Saddam, we'll never hear their stories for ourselves.

Fourth Generation Nukes and 911-Commission Security

Every developed country in the world is racing to be the first to develop a trigger that would allow them to build Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) that aren't covered by the Compressive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). The CTBT only covers weapons that use either Uranium or Plutonium as the primary detonator for a nuclear weapon. The 911-commission recommended that we scan all cargo coming into the United States for Uranium and Plutonium. But a country that is able to make a Deuterium-Tritium (DT) bomb that is imploded by something other than Uranium or Plutonium, would be able to defeat any device that scans for traditional nuclear weapons. That means we will again spend billions of dollars and not be one cent safer than we were before the program was implemented. In other words since the Commission's failed to identify the root cause of the collapse of the World Trade Center, their recommendations will fall short of providing any protection and all their recomendations will do is further enrich companies owned by friends and relatives of the commissioners that impliment those policies. Since the most likely planners of the attacks on the Twin Towers were never identified, which was obvious to the world's governments, a new nuclear arms race began out of fear of attack by the unknown. The point is that implementing the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission only makes everyone in the world more vulnerable to another catastrophic disaster. Since it is very doubtful that 19 Arab hijackers were responsible for the demise of the World Trade Center the question remains then who were teh perpetrators The question I like to ask every one is this. What do you hear more, foreign terrorists, or our own government?