Vote to have David Cameron, U.K. Conservative Party leader, view "911 Press for Truth"

Vote to have David Cameron, U.K. Conservative Party leader, view "911 Press for Truth".

With enough votes, he will have to respond in some way. A unique opportunity to give a Blair opponent some cannon fodder. Voting requires registering on a blog, but only takes a few minutes.

How it works

Each week David will respond to the top 5 blog posts from the Open Blog as rated by you, the users. You can vote for a post by clicking on the green icon. Posts are displayed by popularity and you can view the full post by clicking on post title (displayed below).

David will only respond to posts in the open blog - not comments. So if you'd like Ask David a question or get his view on something, why not write a post...

It is worth noting that 2 of the top 5 questions are 9/11 related. Head on over and cast a vote - all it takes is a simple registration.

Current top 5:

  • Whats your view on cannabis?
  • Documentary - 9/11: Press for Truth (Please watch this Mr Cameron!)
  • What is your view on the 9/11 attacks?
  • Publicans Property Rights and Free Markets
  • Release the evidence of the London Bombings

Now get over there and have your voice heard!

cia/mossad/mi6/isi/kroll

like this dude doesn't know about 9/11...whatever. yeah, he'll stand up to the intelligence agencies and demand an independent int'l investigation after viewing. nice sentiment anyway, i guess.

Too much incompetence theory in 9/11 Press For Truth.

.

I totally agree. But it's a

I totally agree. But it's a gateway into looking at the issue. And as some have said, LIHOP will inevitably lead to MIHOP. Although I don't think the "incompetence" theory is actually LIHOP. Lemme say that with the incompetence theory (espoused by the gov't and its media) massive amounts of people should have been held accountable which never happened. Using the logic of the official theory enthusiasts, trials should have taken place...they never did. This alone should be enough to radicalize many straight into suspecting MIHOP.

Why doesn't Press For Truth admit 9/11 was an inside job???

Press For Truth should unequivocally say that 9/11 was an inside job, and then give all the proof that supports this. Subtle hints, innuendo, riddles, etc., are no good 5+ years after 9/11!!! Say it: "9/11 was an inside job!!!" "9/11 was an inside job!!!"

That may be fine for

That may be fine for everyone of us who’ve come to that conclusion already, but what about everyone who hasn’t? Press for Truth is a masterpiece, it's something with a ton of credibility and it helps people to take those first steps. Saying “it’s an inside job” makes a lot of people recoil initially.

because

many people would view that as an immature approach

Truth and Politicians

It is good to ask politicians like Mr. Cameron to look at these movies. But don't be disappointed if he doesn't respond positively. I believe the goal of the truth movement, in the first place, is to engage ordinary people to think about 9/11-- and it has been very successful in that sense.

It was a good idea anyway, and I am curious to know what he is going to say.

Voted

It *is* quick to register...

Please note that one can also vote for the demand to release evidence of the London bombings.

Using any access is worth

Using any access is worth trying, I suppose, but I'd rather have Michael Meacher- who's already suspious of the OT- take Labour from Blair than support a Tory.

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Everybody spread this out

Everybody spread this out and try and get as many people to vote as possible, lets give it one last "surge"! Voting ends today!!

Please vote for the London bombings question too

"Release the evidence of the London Bombings"

Here is my email to British journalist Mark Honigsbaum concerning the London bombings:

Dear Mr Honigsbaum,

as a Finnish reader of your article "Seeing isn't believing", I'd like to point out that you omitted the following important points from it. I have discussed the points -- enumerated below to facilitate reading -- with the editors of our national daily newspaper.

1) Charles Shoebridge, a noted terror expert has told the BBC that Mohammed Siddique Khan, the alleged ringleader of the 7/7 London bombings, was working for British intelligence agency MI5 as an informant at the time of the attacks. Shoebridge told the BBC Newshour program that from the evidence little else can be assumed other than that Khan was working for British intelligence. See, for example,

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2006/270606londonbomber.htm

2) Last year, the "July 29 edition of FOX News Channel's Day Side programme revealed that the suspected mastermind of the 7/7 London Bombings, Haroon Rashid Aswat, is a British Intelligence Asset".

http://www.infowars.net/Pages/Aug05/100805Aswat.html
http://www.williambowles.info/spysrus/aswat.html

3) The Managing Director of Visor Consultants, Peter Power, told in a BBC Radio Five interview on July 7, 2005 that

"[A]t half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now."

http://www.envirosagainstwar.org/know/read.php?itemid=2927

Statisticians have concluded that the probability that the exercises and the real events purely coincided that way -- independently of each other -- temporally, spatially, and methodologically, is infinitesimally small.

4) On May 6, 2004, a BBC Panorama program depicted a fictional terrorist attack involving four simultaneous suicide bombs: three trains on the London Underground were blown up between 8-9 am, and one more happened on a large street-vehicle an hour or so later, in central London. Surely, a suprisingly exact match between the fictional scenario and the real events a year later?

http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-timeline.html

5) Prime Minster Blair refuses to conduct a "full public inquiry" into the 7/7 events. Why? Shouldn't the worst terrorist attack in British history be investigated fully and transparently?

6) The alleged bus bomber went to have a meal at MacDonald's just before he boarded the bus, as reported by the Independent. I guess that's what Islamic fundamentalists are like.

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article307981.ece

I wish you good luck with your search for what really happened. I think people deserve to know it. One more hint: check Operation Gladio, for example. I'm afraid that history could once again teach us something.

http://www.isn.ethz.ch/php/collections/coll_gladio.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gladio

Best regards [...]

Report from yesterday's demo in Austin

"Below is a slideshow of pictures from our protest at the state capital today. It was cold and windy, and it poured at times, but the spirit of those that showed up wasn't shaken. I think we had about 20 people and all come through at various points of the day. We were out there from 12:30 to 6PM. There were a lot of people who honked and stopped to talk with us - many giving the thumbs up and telling us thank you.

Even one of the state troopers came over and told us that he agreed with everything we were saying. He also pointed out that the trooper in the other car loves Bush, and asked us to go show him our signs.

We hope you come by next week... or the next."

Pics: http://www.rockyou.com/show_my_gallery.php?instanceid=50982857

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

We won it guys, kickass!!

We won it guys, kickass!! 172 votes to 169 for the blog below.