Registering on this blog was easy. Voting was even more fun. Keep it up.

"The Truth is an Offense, but not a Sin" ~ Bob Marley

It is refreshing if true, that this fellow is seeking international opinion. Why would votes from USA citizens matter to someone running for office in Britain? The registration box doesn't even mandate that a person say which country he or she comes from.

Let's hope for the day when office-holders here care about the usual Brits' opinions, or those of people from anywhere beyond home territory. Or even in home territory, for that matter...

I've been trying all day to register. I have not received the e-mail activation.

Coincidently, the vote for 9/11 viewing is currently 159; Only 3 votes behind #1. I'm just sayin...

Registered and voted!

"Release the evidence of the London Bombings" - this has now 94 votes. Here's what I posted in its comments section.

Here is my email to British journalist Mark Honigsbaum concerning the London bombings:

Dear Mr Honigsbaum,

as a Finnish reader of your article "Seeing isn't believing", I'd like to point out that you omitted the following important points from it. I have discussed the points -- enumerated below to facilitate reading -- with the editors of our national daily newspaper.

1) Charles Shoebridge, a noted terror expert has told the BBC that Mohammed Siddique Khan, the alleged ringleader of the 7/7 London bombings, was working for British intelligence agency MI5 as an informant at the time of the attacks. Shoebridge told the BBC Newshour program that from the evidence little else can be assumed other than that Khan was working for British intelligence. See, for example,

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2006/270606londonbomber.htm

2) Last year, the "July 29 edition of FOX News Channel's Day Side programme revealed that the suspected mastermind of the 7/7 London Bombings, Haroon Rashid Aswat, is a British Intelligence Asset".

http://www.infowars.net/Pages/Aug05/100805Aswat.html
http://www.williambowles.info/spysrus/aswat.html

3) The Managing Director of Visor Consultants, Peter Power, told in a BBC Radio Five interview on July 7, 2005 that

"[A]t half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now."

http://www.envirosagainstwar.org/know/read.php?itemid=2927

Statisticians have concluded that the probability that the exercises and the real events purely coincided that way -- independently of each other -- temporally, spatially, and methodologically, is infinitesimally small.

4) On May 6, 2004, a BBC Panorama program depicted a fictional terrorist attack involving four simultaneous suicide bombs: three trains on the London Underground were blown up between 8-9 am, and one more happened on a large street-vehicle an hour or so later, in central London. Surely, a suprisingly exact match between the fictional scenario and the real events a year later?

http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-timeline.html

5) Prime Minster Blair refuses to conduct a "full public inquiry" into the 7/7 events. Why? Shouldn't the worst terrorist attack in British history be investigated fully and transparently?

6) The alleged bus bomber went to have a meal at MacDonald's just before he boarded the bus, as reported by the Independent. I guess that's what Islamic fundamentalists are like.

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article307981.ece

I wish you good luck with your search for what really happened. I think people deserve to know it. One more hint: check Operation Gladio, for example. I'm afraid that history could once again teach us something.

http://www.isn.ethz.ch/php/collections/coll_gladio.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gladio

Best regards [...]

WOOOOOO!!!!! It ended 172 votes for 911 Press for Truth and 169 votes to the Cannabis blog, WE KICKED ASS!!! GREAT JOB EVERYONE!!!

The set of questions that we came top in has been mention in the Times, here's the mainstream coverage on the question about Cannabis legalisation;

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2548824,00.html
People: Hugo Rifkind

Dave on drugs at last?

Is David Cameron finally about to come clean on drugs? On the Tory leader’s much-mocked Webcameron website there is a facility for readers to ask questions and to vote on questions posed by other readers. Cameron has pledged that, each week, the top five will be answered. This week readers want his views on cannabis.

In the past Cameron has been cunning on drugs issues. During the leadership contest he refused to be drawn into a debate about cocaine use, thus tacitly allowing snorting metropolitan types to muse that he might once have been quite fun at dinner parties.

The cannabis question has been posed by supporters of a group convicted of supplying the drug to multiple sclerosis sufferers. Anything short of outright condemnation could send the already-jumpy Tory lunatic fringe scurrying UKIP- wards. What will Dave say?