Reminder to Vote: Ask David Cameron About 9/11



Vote to have David Cameron, U.K. Conservative Party leader, view "911 Press for Truth".

With enough votes, he will have to respond in some way. A unique opportunity to give a Blair opponent some cannon fodder. Voting requires registering on a blog, but only takes a few minutes.


Registering on this blog was easy. Voting was even more fun. Keep it up.

"The Truth is an Offense, but not a Sin" ~ Bob Marley




Corporate Web Services, Inc.
829 3rd Ave SE Suite 225
Rochester, MN 55904


Administrative Contact :
Alan De Keyrel
829 3rd Ave SE Suite 225
Rochester, MN 55904
Phone: 507-289-2229
Fax: 507-289-0349

Technical Contact :
Domain Reg CWS
3014 Allegro Park Lane SW
Rochester, MN 55902
Phone: 507-289-2229
Fax: 507-289-0349

Record expires on 11-Sep-2007
Record created on 11-Sep-2001
Database last updated on 27-Aug-2006


Spektor, Alex
610 Valley Stream Circle
Langhorne, PA 19053

Registrar Name....: REGISTER.COM, INC.
Registrar Whois...:
Registrar Homepage:


Created on..............: Tue, Sep 11, 2001
Expires on..............: Tue, Sep 11, 2007
Record last updated on..: Sat, Sep 02, 2006

Administrative Contact:
Alex Spektor
610 Valley Stream Circle
Langhorne, PA 19053
Phone: 2157417133

Technical Contact:
Domain Registrar
575 8th Avenue 11th Floor
New York, NY 10018
Phone: 1-902-7492701

DNS Servers:

And here we find Alex Spektor again on a Visual Basic Producers List

SoftLand Inc.
Att: Alex Spektor
610 Valley Stream Circle
Langhorne PA 19053

I think that just confirms

I think that just confirms he's an opportunist. On his September11Victims page it says: "on-line since 9/11/2001, 11.05 am." The VB thing means absolutely nothing.

With all your posts, do you have any knowledge of why someone wouldn't be in the SS index? Not a U.S. citizen or what?


What a cop-out.... He deserves NIL votes !!!!



There are currently 152 votes for "Watch 9/11: Press For Truth" which puts it in second place behind the 161 votes for "Views on Cannabis"

We can easily overtake it and each vote makes a big difference when there are these few of votes.

"The Truth is an Offense, but not a Sin" ~ Bob Marley

Coming closer...

my vote made it to 159. We're closing in.


#2(what is your view on the 9/11 attacks?) and #3(Press for truth) are probably splitting the vote right now unfortunately.


It is refreshing if true, that this fellow is seeking international opinion. Why would votes from USA citizens matter to someone running for office in Britain? The registration box doesn't even mandate that a person say which country he or she comes from.

Let's hope for the day when office-holders here care about the usual Brits' opinions, or those of people from anywhere beyond home territory. Or even in home territory, for that matter...

Off Topic. Very Important: Ron Paul's Texas Straight Talk

Ron Paul's Texas Straight Talk - A weekly Column
Escalation in the Middle East January 15, 2007
Ron Paul Concerned About Contrived Gulf of Tonkin- Type Incident
While the president’s announcement that an additional 20,000 troops would be sent to Iraq dominated the headlines last week, the real story was the president’s sharp rhetoric towards Iran and Syria. And recent moves by the administration only serve to confirm the likelihood of a wider conflict in the Middle East. The president stated last week that, “Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial integrity- and stabilizing the region in the face of the extremist challenge. This begins with addressing Iran and Syria.” He also announced the deployment of an additional aircraft carrier battle group to the Persian Gulf, and the deployment of Patriot air missile defense systems to countries in the Middle East. Meanwhile, US troops stormed the Iranian consulate in Iraq and detained several Iranian diplomats. Taken together, the message was clear: the administration intends to move the US closer to a dangerous and ill-advised conflict with Iran. As I said last week on the House floor, speculation in Washington focuses on when, not if, either Israel or the U.S. will bomb Iran-- possibly with nuclear weapons. The accusation sounds very familiar: namely, that Iran possesses weapons of mass destruction. Iran has never been found in violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and our own Central Intelligence Agency says Iran is more than ten years away from producing any kind of nuclear weapon. Yet we are told we must act immediately while we still can! This all sounds very familiar, but many of my colleagues don’t seem to have learned much from the invasion of Iraq. House Democrats strongly criticized the Iraq troop surge after the president’s announcement, but then praised the president’s confrontational words condemning Iran. Many of those opposing a troop surge are not calling for a withdrawal of our troops from the Middle East, but rather for “redeployment.” Redeployment to where? Iran? We need to return to reality when it comes to our Middle East policy. We need to reject the increasingly shrill rhetoric coming from the same voices who urged the president to invade Iraq. The truth is that Iran, like Iraq, is a third-world nation without a significant military. Nothing in history hints that she is likely to invade a neighboring country, let alone America or Israel. I am concerned, however, that a contrived Gulf of Tonkin- type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran. The best approach to Iran, and Syria for that matter, is to heed the advice of the Iraq Study Group Report, which states: "… the United States should engage directly with Iran and Syria in order to try to obtain their commitment to constructive policies toward Iraq and other regional issues. In engaging with Syria and Iran, the United States should consider incentives, as well as disincentives, in seeking constructive results." In coming weeks I plan to introduce legislation that urges the administration to heed the advice of the Iraq Study Group. Dialogue and discussion should replace inflammatory rhetoric and confrontation in our Middle East policy, if we truly seek to defeat violent extremism and terrorism. tst/tst2007/tst011507.htm We must be the change we wish to see in the world. M Gandhi


I've been trying all day to register. I have not received the e-mail activation.

Coincidently, the vote for 9/11 viewing is currently 159; Only 3 votes behind #1. I'm just sayin...

Indeed, it's getting close

Indeed, it's getting close to being #1. I voted at 157 and then after 5 mins it was at 159.

Anyway. Good job to everyone who's voted.
I am pretty much convinced his response will not be what we all want but if he does in fact watch Press For Truth there's a chance he might mention it to others who might prehaps make a more public comment on it.

I'm Even More Cynical

I wouldn't be surprised if they take the whole site down. Blaim it on hackers.

I'd forgotten, but the site

I'd forgotten, but the site reminded me: I've already voted for this. Yay me.

I don't expect he'll so much mention it to others as it will be leaked one way or the other into Parlamentary business, and good people like Meacher will be able to run with it.

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Registered and voted!

Registered and voted!

"Talkin' Bout A Revolution"

"Talkin' Bout A Revolution" by Tracy Chapman(original, anti-war version)

Talking About a Revolution-Tracy Chapman(live, 9/11 version)

I remember seeing Tracy Chapman playing this song...

driving through Beverly Hills in her new Mercedes Benz

///////////////////// - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

really? what were you doing

really? what were you doing in Beverly Hills?

reconnaissance, of course... ;-)

///////////////////// - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

DHS, you for real dude or

DHS, you for real dude or talking about her song "fast car"?

Please vote for the London bombings question too

"Release the evidence of the London Bombings" - this has now 94 votes. Here's what I posted in its comments section.

Here is my email to British journalist Mark Honigsbaum concerning the London bombings:

Dear Mr Honigsbaum,

as a Finnish reader of your article "Seeing isn't believing", I'd like to point out that you omitted the following important points from it. I have discussed the points -- enumerated below to facilitate reading -- with the editors of our national daily newspaper.

1) Charles Shoebridge, a noted terror expert has told the BBC that Mohammed Siddique Khan, the alleged ringleader of the 7/7 London bombings, was working for British intelligence agency MI5 as an informant at the time of the attacks. Shoebridge told the BBC Newshour program that from the evidence little else can be assumed other than that Khan was working for British intelligence. See, for example,

2) Last year, the "July 29 edition of FOX News Channel's Day Side programme revealed that the suspected mastermind of the 7/7 London Bombings, Haroon Rashid Aswat, is a British Intelligence Asset".

3) The Managing Director of Visor Consultants, Peter Power, told in a BBC Radio Five interview on July 7, 2005 that

"[A]t half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now."

Statisticians have concluded that the probability that the exercises and the real events purely coincided that way -- independently of each other -- temporally, spatially, and methodologically, is infinitesimally small.

4) On May 6, 2004, a BBC Panorama program depicted a fictional terrorist attack involving four simultaneous suicide bombs: three trains on the London Underground were blown up between 8-9 am, and one more happened on a large street-vehicle an hour or so later, in central London. Surely, a suprisingly exact match between the fictional scenario and the real events a year later?

5) Prime Minster Blair refuses to conduct a "full public inquiry" into the 7/7 events. Why? Shouldn't the worst terrorist attack in British history be investigated fully and transparently?

6) The alleged bus bomber went to have a meal at MacDonald's just before he boarded the bus, as reported by the Independent. I guess that's what Islamic fundamentalists are like.

I wish you good luck with your search for what really happened. I think people deserve to know it. One more hint: check Operation Gladio, for example. I'm afraid that history could once again teach us something.

Best regards [...]

well it was...

in top 5 yesterday at lunch... but didn't make it to final count :-(

....however the two 911 Q's did!! :-)..let's see how he answers them.

Number One.

Now it is number one!!! Success. Mark it up. We are a force to be reckoned with and the truth shall overcome. Good job everyone. Great way to end the day. Peace.

"The Truth is an Offense, but not a Sin" ~ Bob Marley

WOOOOOO!!!!! It ended 172

WOOOOOO!!!!! It ended 172 votes for 911 Press for Truth and 169 votes to the Cannabis blog, WE KICKED ASS!!! GREAT JOB EVERYONE!!!

Here's a screenshot I took

Here's a screenshot I took when it was at 169 (it ended on 172);

I look forward...

To hearing what he has to say.

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

Great Stuff!!!!

Great Stuff!!!!

Anyone know when David

Anyone know when David 'Chameleon' is due to comment on this ?, he'll spin it, and just give lip service to the victims families.For instance He won't mention the ISI wiring 100k to Atta, one of the most explosive peices of evidence in the whole film.

The set of questions that we

The set of questions that we came top in has been mention in the Times, here's the mainstream coverage on the question about Cannabis legalisation;,,2-2548824,00.html
People: Hugo Rifkind

Dave on drugs at last?

Is David Cameron finally about to come clean on drugs? On the Tory leader’s much-mocked Webcameron website there is a facility for readers to ask questions and to vote on questions posed by other readers. Cameron has pledged that, each week, the top five will be answered. This week readers want his views on cannabis.

In the past Cameron has been cunning on drugs issues. During the leadership contest he refused to be drawn into a debate about cocaine use, thus tacitly allowing snorting metropolitan types to muse that he might once have been quite fun at dinner parties.

The cannabis question has been posed by supporters of a group convicted of supplying the drug to multiple sclerosis sufferers. Anything short of outright condemnation could send the already-jumpy Tory lunatic fringe scurrying UKIP- wards. What will Dave say?

I thought we...

Won with the top question?

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."

— George W. Bush - State Of The Union Address - January 29th, 2002

We did, but he has'nt

We did, but he has'nt responded yet, wonder what the hold up is ?

it takes a while to research

it takes a while to research all that is presented in PFT, so give him some time;)
ah well, my hopes are not too high, but i look forward to see how he deals with the situation..
btw, there is another 'unofficial' version of his site, , the content there doesnt exactly increase my hopes either (unrelated environment stuff).

I don't expect anything from him either, but

it will once again expose his pro-elite-class party position to the public. UK citizens should IMO not vote for any of the two main UK parties (one for the rich, and one for the rest), they are arms of the same body, and that body is aligned with the elite mafia network.

I don't expect he will flat out deny the disturbing 9/11 facts and serious allegations, but he will try to steer the response into a plausible denial space, eg. with only mild mentioning of potentials and omitting important, explosive (figuratively speaking :-) facts, hoping this dirty topic blows past him and his golf party rather quickly.

He will make no acknowledgment of the long-standing UK imperial actions in the Iraq (and surrounding) region, since the fall of the Ottoman empire. Its not an easy task to do with some believability, but he has people who can try and weasel word that for him.

When all is said and done, he is just another exposable Bilderberg/NWO controlled governmental puppet, just like Angela Merkel (Chancellor of Germany) who is pushing hard to revert the rejected European Constitution status. She participated in the Bilderberg meeting from 5th to 8th of May 2005. There are some other suspicious aspects to her persona, but that would be a bit off topic here.

Here’s his response, I

Here’s his response, I don’t think this is too bad but lets tell him why a new investigation is need in the comments: