so i make no allusions to what motivates you. But - i agree this is a serious topic - and since you appear to be approaching this with some level of maturity i will address you accordingly. There are some key important points to make here:

1 - You must consider the SOURCE of this research. Regardless of what you may feel in your heart of hearts - the source of much of the disputed research in question seems to originate with activists who seem to have a long track record of disrupting this movement through large-scale email smear campaigns targeting many of the most respect researchers in this movement.

Indeed - the nexus of inter-related associations between Nico Haupt and WingTV and Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood - and now Dr Fetzer himself - is extremely disturbing.

so - my question is - do you need us to yet again outline for you the vicious and slanderous accusations that have originated from this nexus of researchers? You wonder why people are hostile that you are forwarding their work?

2 - Taking this fact in concert with the fact that these same disruptors SEEM to always be forwarding the most disputed and improbable and absurdist research APPEARS to further fuel speculation that they are engaging in intentional disruption.

No planes? Energy beams? Grand Pianos that take 30 seconds to hit the ground? Mini-nukes? Fetzer's claim that "giant gillotines" are being erected in detention camps around the country? Holograms? The Zapruder film was a hoax? Cartoon planes? The promotion of the magazine Criminal Politics? etc etc etc.

To many of us - the preponderance of evidence indicates that this particular GROUP of "researchers" are not credible - and actually serving to discredit the 9/11 Truth movement. The jury seems to be IN on this.

3 - Your contention that you are simply advocating an open system of debate where "energy beams" can be discussed in a non-censored manner is disingenuous since you appear to repeatedly ignore contrary evidence and logic which dictates that this "Theory" does not even APPROACH credibility.

Simply stating that Raytheon has conducted research on directed energy beams is simply NOT ENOUGH OF A JUSTIFICATION TO CLAIM THE TOWERS WERE BROUGHT DOWN BY SUCH WEAPONS.

there simply is NO EVIDENCE that the technology exists on this scale. period. Further - there is an utter vacuum of EVIDENCE that - even if the weapons DO exist - that they were used.

4 - Its fun to speculate. If indeed you simply are of a mind that enjoys speculating - fine. enjoy. But - YOU must understand that - to those of us who are FIGHTING to bring the truth of 911 to the public - where there is a TON of CONFIRMED evidence of government complicity - speculating about hypothetical exotic weaponry is NOT productive at this time.

Surely - given your intellect and the mature nature of your post you can understand that we are attempting to reopen investigations into the murder of 3,000 people. and to those of us, like myself, who stood in the streets of NYC and WATCHED while people died in the most horrendous ways possible - we have LITTLE or NO patience for people who want to drive this movement into diversions and speculation and theorizing about science fiction.

You do not seem to grasp the solemn nature of the work we are engaged in. It appears to many of us that your insistance that we discuss "energy beams" is undignified and immature - if it is sincere.

Unfortunately, the undignified nature of your insistence that we discuss exotic and hypothetical weaponry has ALSO lead many of us to believe that you are part of an intentional cointelpro disruption campaign.

sure - given your love for speculation - you can appreciate an open and free debate on this subject as well.

personally - i am of the OPINION that you are indeed part of some silly attempt to undermine the legitimacy of the american public's RIGHT to petition its government for ACCOUNTABILITY and ANSWERS. by injecting trojan horse subjects into the debate you are attempting to derail and obfuscate the REAL questions.

That is my opinion.

So - the question is - if you are so disturbed by your treatment here - why do you persist in participating? why not start your own blog elsewhere where you can speculate to your heart's content about Keeber elves and star wars beams and little green men? If your research has any credibility at all you should be very successful.

that's why you post anonymously.

911 and the current political turmoil in the world is a product of MANY diverging interests - including the military industrial complex - money - resources - fanatical christian groups - zionism - sectarian hatred - the OIL industry - american empire and dreams of hegemony - the environment - etc etc.

sorry - but posting a single post anonymously that "zionists are pulling the strings" sounds paranoid and antisemitic to my ear.

i could be wrong - but - it does indeed sound like a simplification based on racial bias. and teh fact that you do this anonymously adds NO credibility to your argument.