9/11 Truth in the Columbus Dispatch

9/11, Iraq cause some to question our leaders
Sunday, January 28, 2007

Sherry Clark arrived for breakfast with an armload of DVDs whose messages cast the shadow of skepticism over the official line on the 9/11 attack.

Through forkfuls of pancakes, the Delaware, Ohio, woman conjured up images of shrouded schemes and dark lurkings, government complicity and war-industry profiteering.

A lunchbox purse sported a get-the-truthout sticker. A lapel button noted that polite women seldom make history.

"I want to break the conspiracy of silence," Clark said. "9/11 is the exclamation point to everything. Sept. 11 is the excuse for all of our civil-liberty compromises and the war."

For a fleeting second, with the sun cresting on the eastern horizon, I thought I could hear the engine of Japanese pilot Mitsuo Fuchida’s B5N torpedo bomber as he banked toward Pearl Harbor’s Battleship Row.

In Dallas, the black presidential limo turned toward Dealey Plaza and the Texas School Book Depository as JFK drifted into the cross hairs of a rifle sight.

"I used to be one of those who supported the troops by putting a yellow magnet on my car and going shopping, just like the president suggested," Clark said.

"I voted for Bush both times.

"I used to have total faith in my government, but that candle has gone out. I used to have a candle of optimism, but that’s gone."

She is years removed from the beauty pageants she said she once entered to help pay her way through college.

She pleads guilty to singing Lee Greenwood’s God Bless the U.S.A. to soften up contest judges.

Her transformation into a 9/11 skeptic was swift and stunning.

"I never understood how special interests could be at odds with the American people," she said, fetching from her purse a DVD titled Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers.

She slid it across the table along with a copy of 911 Mysteries.

"It’s absolute betrayal," she said. "Basically, you have to admit that you were wronged, and that means that you have to identify with the crowd that is being called conspiracy nuts.

"Of course, there are some conspiracy nuts within our midst, but most just don’t fit that type. We’re supposed to be speaking on behalf of the widows."

She suggested I visit www.Columbus911Truth.org, the Web site of a group sponsoring a series of Columbus appearances this week by Kevin Barrett, founder of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance and one of those who believe the government was complicit in 9/11.

"I think it is agreed-upon that the government had a hand in it, but we don’t know to what extent," Clark said, suggesting that the fall of the World Trade Center towers was "controlled demolition."

She pressed a flier on me and suggested that I might want to read The New Pearl Harbor.

"Undertaking this 9/11 thing," she said, "is like throwing yourself on a grenade, but it makes everything so clear."

She has lost friends, now that she is no longer a lockstep Republican. A few of them tell her, "I know a doctor you really ought to talk to." She has been asked if her transformation could have been incited by menopause.

"Right now," she said, "our greatest challenge is to just make it OK to talk about this.

"I think it’s your right to disagree with your country on moral grounds."

Mike Harden is a Dispatch Metro columnist. He can be reached at 614-461-5215 or by e-mail.


Complete Article Here.

Truth can't be stopped

Columbus OH is a very conservative city so this is proof that the truth of 9/11 cannot be stopped!! We will not rest until all are held accountable.

Dear Sherry

You do your country proud !

Is Pat Buchanan a Shill for

Is Pat Buchanan a Shill for the Neocon Iran Attack?

After watching the video below, it is difficult not to believe Pat Buchanan is working for the neocons, or at least shilling for them.

Of course, he wants us to believe he is adamantly opposed to an attack against Iran, and yet he argues from the neocon standpoint—the mullahs and Ahmadinejad are the problem—and essentially embraces, in circuitous fashion, their endgame, making plentiful reference to Iran’s nukes, a fanciful fiction at best.

Buchanan knows full well Iran, under the NPT, has a right to enrich uranium, and yet he comes off in this video sounding like a neocon, telling us Iran “has to step back and suspend uranium enrichment,” thus enhancing the neocon line that an Iran enriching uranium for domestic energy is an Iran than will nuke Israel.

I never trusted Pat Buchanan, a former Nixon speechwriter and White House Communications Director for the Reagan administration (recall Pat’s assertion, “I’m a contra too,” that is to say he supported killing 30,000 Nicaraguans).

In 2004, Pat voted for Bush, although he claimed to be an adversary of the neocons.

On the one hand, Buchanan refers to Capitol Hill as “Israeli-occupied territory,” while on the other he declares the United States has a “moral commitment” to recognize Israel’s right to “defend itself,” in other words continue its policies against the Palestinians and Arabs and Muslims in the neighborhood.

Come on, Pat. You can’t have it both ways.

Indeed, as Buchanan tells us, the neocons carry “with them the viruses of statism and globalism,” but then Pat worked for Reagan, a statist and globalist parading as a conservative. In other words, Pat Buchanan, who is nothing if not a consummate insider (and a member of the Masonic and monarchial Knights of Malta), cannot be trusted to oppose the neocons.

In the following video, taped on January 26, it sure sounds as if Pat Buchanan accepts an Iran attack as an inevitability, as do a lot of neolibs and neocons, who are now flooding the corporate media with the same sort of nonsense they unleashed in the lead-up to the March, 2003, invasion of Iraq. Pat appears to be playing the foil, that is to say he is enhancing by way of contrast.


My MIHOP epiphany

was in Columbus Ohio, watching In Plane Site. :-)


I hope you didn't hurt yourself.

I have heard that epiphanies can really rock your world
Ignorance is NOT Bliss

what about "in plane site" triggered this Epiphany?

If I may ask...

911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

ive heard many people say

ive heard many people say this. In Plane Site gets bashed more than Loose Change 2 around here, and yet ive found that it has opened more eyes than any other 9/11 video except for Loose Change 2. funny how that works out. obviously In Plane Site has some questionable info in it but that doesnt mean it hasnt opened many eyes. it most certaintly has. so fuck the micromanagers who get pissed whenever Pentagon questions or CD is put front and center. your arguments have no facts to back them up. the pentagon theories and CD theories have done more good for the movement than harm. that is an indisputable fact. yet some people still get all pissed when others lead with CD or the pentagon. anyone remember the Pentagon flash video and the huge impact it had before LC2E came out? think it would have had the same impact if it only focused on the ISI connection? USE ALL EVIDENCE. thats all my point is. im not talking CGI or mini nukes here, im no fool, i know what it would look like leading with that even if their was good evidence to back it up(there isnt in my opinion). the pentagon and CD theories are not on the same level as those things. the pentagon and CD theories have been proven to be effective in changing minds and opening eyes. thats why i find it so ridiculous when people around here get all bent out of shape when these things are mentioned.