Photos of DC March from NY911Truth

Thanks to Adam of NY911Truth for sending this in. Video footage coming soon:

The other Iran:

This video should be everywhere.

The book Reading Lolita in Tehran dispelled any Iran-boogey-man misconceptions I had from being a kid during the hostage crisis, and, like this video, humanized Iranians and communicated the fact that Iran is a beautiful country.

I don't want it to be blown to radioactive smithereens.

Show "There is a statue to Albert" by brianv

somebody stealin my links eh......... ;-)

I posted this in another thread... I'm not madatcha.


///////////////////// - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

Show "TODDBEAMER.ORG" by Amanda Reconwith

The "Mark Bingham" site being registered one day after 9/11

is still interesting (what professional domain-name register knew the name Mark Bingham next day), but the rest of this stuff may be overkill by you, A-man-da, to try & hide the Bingham site mistake.

Mark Bingham's best friend registered the site...

to set up a tribute to him.

get over it.

///////////////////// - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

Hold on, DHS. Bingham's friend had a site set up for him that

quickly??? The facts were not at all clear what had happened that soon! & why such rush?

BTW, what ever happened to Bingham's mom. You know, the outgoing flight attendant who appeared on CNN Larry King for about 3 minutes one day, & the first thing she said was, "Yes, Mark called me, saying, 'Hi mom, this is Mark Bingham'" The whole think looked staged to me.

Why no further appearances of Bingham's mom on tv, like an hour on Oprah or Montel? Her son was quite a hero, after all? Why no offers to write a book? Very suspicious!

What are they hiding???

Daniel Chu, a Chi Psi fraternity brother of Mr. Bingham in the early 1990's, who registered and maintains the Web site, said his friend's sexual orientation was not the impetus for the site.

If he knew his friend was on a plane that crashed, and is dead, why is 1 day too fast to create a website?

Who cares where Mark Bingham's mom is... you want her to parade around talking about her dead son.... do you think any mother would want to do that repeatedly?

///////////////////// - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

I don't find it likely that upon learning your friend died in a

plane crash, you rush to set up a memorial website. Was he even confirmed dead at that point? It sounds very odd to me.

Among my points about Bingham's mom, she looked like a very gregarious person to me (very talkative, not shy). So why did she just disappear? Her son was allegedly one of the biggest heroes this country ever had! No book about his life? No documentary on cable tv?

if my friend died, it'd be one of the first things I would do.

especially if I'm tech-savvy enough to do it, like bingham's friend was.

///////////////////// - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

This is truly an Orwellian nightmare that must be stopped! That

2nd paragraph is totally outrageous! We cannot allow our government to have that level of power & control over our lives!!!

Science fiction is now reality. The Patriot Act and the Military Commissions Act are changing our free society into a totalitarian state. The new police state will have a major advantage in exercising its authority: RFID chips. These tiny chips are smaller than the head of a pin, and are swiftly but quietly making there way into every facet of American Life. Wallmart is now putting these chips into every item they sell. They emit an electronic signal, and information about everything the consumer purchases is registered and becomes part of the consumer's history.

If that doesn't sound scary enough, May of 2008 is the date of enforcement for the Real ID law. Everyone in the country willl be forced to get a national ID card (likely through the Motor Vehicle Agency), and must carry it with them at all times. This will be a tamper-proof ID card, having a finger print or retina scan to identify the holder. This card will have "machine readable technology", such as an RFID chip that will let the government know where you are at all times and who you're with. If you choose not to have the card, you will not be allowed to get a bank account, fly on an airplane, buy property, etc. This must be stopped. Join us in getting all the details about the National ID card, and learning about what we can do to stop this insanity before its too late.

May I add that May 2008 is by no means the distant future! Do

you really want the Bush/Cheney cabal to has this level of surveillance & authority over us all???


while profiting all the way

Half of all this RFID and security and cameras and RFID readers... and on and on..... they are making $$ off this as well

control and cash

they have it all figured out
Ignorance is NOT Bliss

Steven Jones interviewd by Kevin Barrett 4pm TODAY on GCN

For those interested...

Steven Jones will be interviewed by Kevin Barrett on GCN live (network 2) at 4pm eastern (3pm central)

Hopefully Barrett will give Jones a fair shake...


All aspects of the truth are consistent

As for the 9/11 truth

As for the 9/11 truth "contingent" in D.C., according to those photos, it was utterly pathetic. Just my opinion.
As for the I.D. cards, Americans are so completely apathetic, they'll extend their arm and accept it without question. This is what I believe the dumbing down of America through Access Hollywood was originally about. To make us so uncaring that we'd accept anything at all without debate.
What of those who refuse? What should we do? Move under a bridge? Any suggestions or are we all going to die isolated deaths?
You people aren't giving me much reason to hope for anything other than a fast and painless death. I guess that's the definition of despair.

Thanks, Will Pitt.

Will Pitt is normally one of the cooler journalists on the left and knows the official story has some stink, then he goes and blasts the spelling on the inside job sign at the rally. It is nice to see some Truthers hammer him for this.

This has probably been posted before, but I haven't seen it. U.S. Army General says Flight 77 did not hit Pentagon.

You guys have to read the 9/11 American Empire book. It is the best introduction to the issues for those who will think you are crazy for doubting the official story. I did not know that Karen Kwiatkowski was in the building and now has doubts about what hit it. See Reprehensor's book review.

I highly recommend

9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out Vol. 1, especially for anyone who is already open to 9/11 Truth.

If you are recommending a book to someone who still clings to the government myth I would suggest that they start with Dr. Griffin's The New Pearl Harbor as it carefully walks the reader through the reasons the government myth cannot be true.

I had gone back and forth about what hit the Pentagon and remained undecided until I read Karen Kwiatkowski's account of her morning at the Pentagon on 9/11/01. That said, I don't think that this issue should be a point of contention within the truth movement. Instead it should motivate us to work for real investigations that will settle this question and the 1000's of others that we all have.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.


"Outside the Mall entrance, we stood for a while, listening to loud jets overhead, and wincing. Would they hit, as rumor had it, via another airplane inbound for the Pentagon? The idea that it was an airplane made sense, as we had been watching airplanes hit buildings only minutes before. Before long, we were ushered south some distance from the building to a spot between the Naval Annex and the south lawn of the Pentagon. From this elevated vantage point, a few thousand people all stared in disbelief at a smoking gash in the Pentagon, directly between the just completed and mostly unoccupied “wedge” on the right and its older, unrefurbished, sister wedge to the left. The older part of the building looked more damaged. Surreal is the word that kept coming to mind as we stared, transfixed...

...There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may have also been apparent to the secretary of defense, who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue, referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a “missile.” These aspects of the morning of September 11 combine to make me quite wary of the subsequent statements and actions taken by federal officials. This wariness might be easily eliminated with more detailed and forthcoming evidence—perhaps even a reconstruction of the aircraft that was reported to have hit the Pentagon. Unlike the painstaking reconstruction of civilian aircraft that we have witnessed in past decades, most recently in Flight 800—which exploded midair and crashed into the ocean—any physical remains of the aircraft that hit the Pentagon were quickly carted away to some unknown location, so we have no physical evidence that the aircraft really was Flight 77 or even a Boeing 757.

Like many people who watch a lot of television news and the Discovery Channel, I have seen post-passenger airline crash videos and post-accident computerized reconstructions of such events. Typically in these cases, a great deal of debris in all shapes and sizes is present, and an amazing amount of this debris is recoverable and useful in post-accident reconstruction. Yet in the case of the Pentagon attack, I saw nothing of any significance at the point of impact—no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon. Strangely, none seemed to be produced afterward in any attempted accident analysis or reconstruction. This is even stranger in light of public reports afterward estimating that the large airplane was in fact flying low and turning, suggesting that one wing would have hit the ground before the aircraft nose hit the Pentagon, leaving a terrific amount of debris. Having only minutes before observed the televised crashes against buildings in New York, all of us staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected to see was, in fact, not evident.

The same is true with regard to the kind of damage we expected. I would think that if a 100-plus-ton aircraft constructed of relatively lightweight materials and designed for lift, loaded with passenger seating, luggage, odds and ends and passengers, going several hundred miles an hour were to hit the Pentagon, it would cause a great deal of possibly superficial but visible damage to the wide swath of the side of the building and the entire area of impact. But I
did not see this kind of damage. Rather, the façade had a rather small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter. Although this façade later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 or 40 minutes, with the roof line remaining relatively straight.

The scene, in short, was not what I would have expected from a strike by a large airliner. It was, however, exactly what one would expect if a missile had struck the Pentagon. I was not thinking at the time that it was a missile. My mindset was completely oriented toward the idea that a hijacked airliner had crashed into our building. I do remember thinking at the time how fortunate it was that the impact was diametrically opposite the offices of the secretary of defense and the service secretaries."

- Karen Kwiatkowski, "Assessing the Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory", Chapter 2 of "9/11 and American Empire, Vol.1: Intellectuals Speak Out"

When it comes down to it,

When it comes down to it, we're all on our own, aren't we. Just as the enemy wants.

A few J27 DC911 pics/ lo-res video

A few J27 DC911 pics/ lo-res video

Blogs use this:

<div style="width: 480px; text-align: center;"><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" src="" height="360" width="480"></embed><a href="" target="_blank"><img src="" style="border-width: 0;" vspace="1"></a></div>

Video 1-- OBL was trained by the CIA

<embed width="430" height="389" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" src=""></embed>


VIDEO 2--official story not possible

<embed width="430" height="389" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" src=""></embed>


No, I disagree. Bin Ladin

No, I disagree. Bin Ladin was invented by the CIA not trained by..

Anything that promotes the idea that a man in a cave in Afghanistan and 19 absent minded coke snorting hijackers did 9/11 is limited hangout. LIHOP. IMO.