Was 11/12 plane crash related to 9/11?

On November 12th 2001, AA Flight 587 crashed on takeoff in Queens NYC killing 265 people. What are the odds of another NYC plane disaster occuring only 2 months after 9/11? There is also some controversy as to whether the crash was due to a technical fault or by a bomb.

I always found this story suspicious given that the media promptly dismissed it as an accident. Could this have been a failed false-flag operation?

Always found this very suspicious, and

currently reading Tarpley's book - he says there is currently not enough information or research done on it yet to go beyond suspicion. My gut is it's gotta be related, no question.

WorldNetDaily: Flight 587 crash was no accident

Flight 587 crash was no accident

"American Airlines Flight 587, which came apart in the air over Long Island and crashed into homes in Rockaway, N.Y., was not an accident.
The tail section and two engines do not fall off by accident.
Like most Americans, I was relieved to hear the tragedy of Flight 587 was not an act of terrorism. Now, failing any contrary evidence, it seems most likely to have been an act of sabotage. My confidence in the same government players who have been feeding us bovine excrement since the downing of TWA Flight 800 has dropped below the perception of nanotechnology.
I recently had a caller to my WorldNetDaily syndicated talk show who identified himself as a United Airlines pilot with over 27-years experience. I asked him three questions:
1. Have you ever heard of a plane losing the tail section like Flight 587? He said, "No."
2. Have you ever heard of a plane losing two engines like Flight 587? He said, "No." Although he had heard of one engine dropping off as a result of traumatic weight shifting.
3. Have you ever heard (in all aviation history) of a situation in which a modern aircraft has lost the tail and two engines spontaneously? He said, "Absolutely not! And if that were possible I'd stop flying."
Statistically, the probability of any commercial airplane losing the tail section the way Flight 587 did is incomprehensible. Statistically, the probability of any commercial airplane losing two engines the way Flight 587 did is equally incomprehensible. To combine two monumentally incomprehensible statistical anomalies doesn't just double the improbability – there would be a compounded geometric explosion of zeros following the decimal point.
Flight 587 was not an accident." - WorldNetDaily (11/17/01)

http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25379

http://killtown.911review.org/oddities/2001.html#November12,2001-Flight587_crash

--------------------------------------------------------

Focus on the botched crash scene at Shanksville.