Why Has the Greatest Crime in U.S. History Never Been Criminally Investigated?

Sometimes asking people questions gets them thinking more than rattling off a laundry list of facts at them. Its not how much you can impress other 9/11 truthers about your knowledge or your pet theories that count. Its how good you are at reaching newbies. This is a good list of basic questions from Rock Creek Free Press.

Why Has the Greatest Crime in U.S. History Never Been Criminally Investigated?

and other Unanswered Questions about September 11, 2001

For five years the 911truth movement has been quietly building support. While many ideas and theories have been put forth about what happened in that fateful day, the main thrust of the movement is to push for a new investigation of 9/11 to answer the many still unanswered questions such as:

The Warnings:

Why did the administration ignore warnings, some specific as to date and place, from at least 11 foreign intelligence
services delivered to Washington prior to 9/11? Why were several prominent Americans, including top military brass, warned not to fly on 9/11?

Missing Air Defense:

Why was established procedure not followed to intercept any of the hijacked planes on 9/11? Why did the defense missiles on top of the Pentagon not fire at the attacking plane as it flew toward the Pentagon? (Had they been disabled?) If the defense failures were due to incompetence, why was no one reprimanded or fired? Was air defense lacking because of the military exercises underway on the morning of 9/11?

Pilots of the Hijacked Planes:

How could an inexperienced pilot have successfully flown a heavy commercial airliner on his first try? Why were some of the alleged terrorists trained at U.S. military bases and CIA flight schools?

The Alleged Hijackers:

Why is it that at least six of the hijackers who were supposed to have died on 9/11 are alive and well, giving interviews and living in the Middle East? If no Arab names were on the passenger manifests released by the airlines following 9/11, how could names and photographs of the alleged hijackers have been broadcast around the world within hours of the attacks? Why were no airline tickets or recipts ever presented as evidence?

The Money:

If “follow the money” is the time-honored criminal investigative technique for uncovering criminal collusion, why did the 9/11 Commission elect to drop the pursuit
of mainstream-documented leads such as the $100,000 wire transfer from the head of Pakistan’s intelligence service to alleged lead hijacker Mohammad Atta several days before the attacks. Why was the extreem level of options trading activity in American and United Airlines stock in the days before 9/11, a clear indication of foreknowledge of the attacks, never persued?

The Plane Crashes:

How could one of the hijacker’s passports emerge from the wreckage of the Twin Towers and be found intact on the streets of New York? Why was debris from the Pennsylvania plane scattered over an area of several miles, and not confined to the 10 by 30 ft foot hole where the official story says the plane crashed? Why were no large plane parts found at the crash site? Why are the 9/11 plane crashes the only ones in modern U.S. history not to have been investigated by the National Transportation Safety Board? Why were none of the thousands of serial numbered parts ever presented as proof of the identy of the aircraft?

Collapse of the Twin Towers:

What caused the massive explosions in the basements of the Towers before the planes even hit (which registered as small earthquakes at Colombia University) and the hundreds of explosions reported by witnesses before and during the buildings collapses? How is it possible for the Towers to completely collapse in the same amount of time it would take for a brick to fall through air from the same height? How were the concrete fl oors, walls, computers, furinture and other materials atomized into dust? How could brief jet fuel fi res have caused the buildings’ collapse when no steel building has ever collapsed due to fi re in the entire history of architecture?

World Trade Center 7 Collapse:

Why did this 47-story steel offi ce building, which was
not hit by any plane, collapse completely in 6.7 seconds at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11? What did its owner Larry Silverstein mean when he said the decision had been made to “pull” the building? Was WTC 7 wired with explosives prior to 9/11? If so, were explosives also planted in the Twin Towers prior to the attacks?

The 9/11 Commission and Its Report:

Why, if it had nothing to hide about the attacks, did the Bush Administration resist 9/11 families’ call for an investigative commission for an unprecedented 441 days. Why was administration insider Philip Zelikow, who had
co-authored a book with Condi Rice, and whose CV states that his expertise is in the creation and maintenance of public myth, appointed to direct the Commission? Why did Bush and
Cheney refuse to testify in public, under oath, to the Commission? Why did the Commission members accept the offi cial conspiracy theory as their operating premise and say early-on that they would not investigate what happened on
9/11 and who was responsible. Why was the distruction of World Trade Center Building 7 not mentioned in the report?

False Flag Operation:

Was 9/11 a “false flag” operation, used throughout history to generate public support for political objectives
by deliberately creating a terror incident and blaming the attack on a designated enemy, thus serving as a justification for war?

was 9/11: toxic legacy on

was 9/11: toxic legacy on the discovery channel today?

http://911blogger.com/node/5888

Why were the Pentagon and Shanksville, PA

.. responders have protective clothing where no crash wreckage was found. Those bright yellow outfits complete with boots and gloves.

While in NYC they let the brave firemen go into the towers when they knew the towers were going to collapse. They told the people who were evacuating the South tower that it was safe to go back to work.

BTW - check out the PANYNJ Press release #127-98
http://www.panynj.gov/pr/127-98.html
"Plane Guided by Global Positioning System To Debut At Newark International Airport" in 1998.

Show "NJcpaTOM, I guess you're not" by Mark Roberts

I agree with you, Mark, that

I agree with you, Mark, that the wreckage and the bodies were indeed found at the Pentagon and Shanksville sites. And I'd like you to know I for one appreciate your input at this forum. I do not interpret your comments as defending the official story.

Here's a question I have: How many bodies were recovered from each of the two above mentioned sites? How reliable are the authorities who reported these body counts? And is there a good reason that not all of the bodies have been identified from these two crash scenes?

Thanks, Andrew. At the

Thanks, Andrew. At the Shanksville sight, we're talking about body parts only. Remains of all 40 victims were positively identified from the Shanksville site. Offhand, I don't recall if DNA from any of the remaining 4 hijackers was matched to profiles the FBI had established. I'd have to look that up. Several pieces of hijacker ID were found in the wreckage.

In New York, remains from about 47 victims from the planes were identified (again, this is off the top of my head. Two flight 11 IDs were made fairly recently). Overall, over 1,600 of the 2,749 people who died at the WTC have been identified, from over 20,000 body parts. Fewer than 300 intact bodies were recovered there. I would hope that the reason more remains weren't identified should be obvious: pulverization and exposure to heat and the elements. Remains of three of the WTC hijackers were matched to DNA profiles the FBI had established from samples found in motels, rental cars, etc. Several more remains were found recently while excavating for the new buildings, so there is hope of some more identifications.The New York City Medical Examiner's office handled most of the WTC remain identifications. They had 150 people working around the clock for many months on DNA analysis.

How reliable are the authorities? Well, they're the best we have in this country, which is to say some of the best in the world. For instance, at Shanksvile, Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller IDed 11 bodies from fingerprints & dental records, while forensic anthropologists Paul Sledzik and Dennis Dirkmaat handled the collection and processing of the more difficult remains. The latter two are considered to be amongst the best anywhere. Here's contact info for these three men if you want more information:

Somerset County Coroner's Office
555 Tayman Avenue, Somerset, PA 15501
(814) 445-6900
Wallace Miller, Coroner

Paul Sledzik, Curator, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology National Museum of Health and Medicine
Leader of flight 93 Disaster Mortuary (Team DMORT)
202-782-2204 sledzik@email.afip.osd.mil

Disaster Mortuary Team Main office: 1-800-USA-NDMS, ext. 205
DMORT Region 3 office (includes Pennsylvania) 410-676-4600

Dr. Dennis C. Dirkmaat
Chief Scientific Advisor to Somerset County Coroner's office in the flight 93 investigation
Director, Applied Forensic Sciences Department
Mercyhurst College
501 E. 38th St.
Erie, PA 16546
dirkmaat@mercyhurst.edu
(814) 824-2105

Thanks for the reply Mark.

Thanks for the reply Mark. Your statement that all 40 victims were positively identified from the Shanksville site is contradicted by what is reported at Jim Hoffman's site:

"The fate of Flight 93 victims is perhaps the least mysterious, although their identification took inordinately long for a jetliner that crashed into the ground. Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller said that the identification was originally expected to take six months. On October 26, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology DNA lab in Rockville, Maryland, which was tasked with identifying the victims using DNA testing, confirmed that 34 of the 44 people alleged to have been on Flight 93 had been identified."

http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/bodies.html

I am not suggesting that you should have to answer to what someone else posts, but do you have any idea why the discrepancy? And what was the total number of souls on board, including hijackers-- was it 40 or 44?

Mark, How did the FBI know

Mark,
How did the FBI know all the hotels and rented cars all 19 hijackers used within a day?
If you say they didn't get them within a day, then how would there still be DNA on the sheets? In fact, they would of been washed HOURS after the hijackers checked out the motel/hotel.
Someone surely used at least ONE of their rooms.
Surely the FBI couldn't of been there THE day of the attacks collecting evidence. Maybe the next day? Would seem more like at least a few days after the FBI was able to collect all the information on who the terrorists were and where they stayed.
You say from the rental cars maybe? How did all 19 hijackers touch the steering wheel?

And finally...if they have DNA evidence of the hijackers involvement, then why did the FBI state "We have no hard evidence linking Osama bin Laden to 9/11"?
Surely, if Osama's minions carried out the attack, he was the planner...especially since he "admitted it" on tape, correct?
Isn't DNA hard evidence?

Hijacker DNA

…Caller (Mike): What about the 7 to 9 hijackers that were reported in the British press who came forward and said, “We’re alive, what are we doing on the FBI list of so-called hijackers? We’re alive and well.” How do you explain that one?

Pop. Mech: It was one BBC report – I am saying that is false.

Caller: How did you verify that the British story was false?

PM: The remains of the hijackers who have been widely understood to have been on those planes…

Caller: What remains?

PM: There was DNA evidence collected all over the place.

Caller: The building was incinerated; the concrete was turned into powder, there were molten pools of steel in the bottom of the building that were still hot weeks after, and they were able do autopsies on bodies? Are you insane? Where are the autopsy reports you were referring to, on the hijackers, where are those reports? I haven’t heard anything about autopsy reports.

CG: I want to know, even if we presume you’re correct that they recovered the DNA of the 19 hijackers from the rubble, where did they get their original DNA with which to match it? Where did they get the original DNA of a bunch of middle-eastern Islamic madmen? Where did they get the DNA? Had they submitted DNA before they, uh…I mean, where the hell did they get it? You’re not even talking sensibly with me.

PM: Off the top of my head, I don’t know the answer to that.

We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

With all of the terror that's been caused by a history of...

outrageous disregard for the U.S. Constitution by the office of the Presidency, it's hard to NOT imagine that a REVOLUTION is on the horizon.

The filthy disregard that the Bush Administration (as well as Democrats) have had for a true 9/11 investigation is unbounded.

How much deceit, malice, and pure evil can a government propagate and NOT expect that the citizenry rightfully and peacefully will end the maniacal machinations of the rulers?

The Enemy

Big Smiles
Neocons/Zionists
Military Industrial Complex
i.e. "no bid" Halliburton, Bechtel
CIA
Intelligence Budgets
Military Budget
Law Enforcement Budgets
Prisons
Heroin Merchants
Big Oil (Rockefeller)
Big Banks and the Rothchilds
"Lucky, Pull it" Larry Silverstein
Chertoff and Homeland Security
Inside Traders
White Collar Criminals whose files were in Building 7
Controlled Demolition Inc.
Zionist contracting firms for the "new" towers

Sad Faces
EVERYONE whose pension is in dollars
truth
Constitution
Bill of Rights
911 relief workers that believed "The air was safe to breath, and the water safe to drink."
Budget deficit
"The Moral High Ground"
The civilian military
True Torah Jews
660,000 innocent civilians in the Middle East
The environment
3,000 New Yorkers not linked to Odigo Instant message warnings

Probably because

there is a perception in America that the 9/11 omission report was the criminal investigation. People need to know about the unanswered questions left out of the supposed investigations (NIST, FEMA, Kean-Zelikow)

The criminal investigations

The criminal investigations were largely done prior to the establishment of the 9/11 Commission, primarily by the FBI. A large part of the Commission report is a summary of those investigations. Read the footnotes.

Inside Job

Occams Razor-911 was an inside job.

NO INVESTIGATION

Untill the public recieve direct and accountable answers to thier direct concerning questions, we will be on this page untill it is forgotten or to late to matter. Kinda like Real Estate but not location, location, location rather ; accountability, accountability, accountability.

No investigation of the people behind it

This video will answer your quesrtion:

http://www.iamthewitness.com/Bollyn-CNN-interview.html

Why no investigation? Ruling classes never investigate themselves, they cover up. The ZOMM (Zionist Owned Media Machine) is not about to expose 911, and surely Paula Zahn and her husband Mr. Cohen would not want to blame Israelis for any such dastardly deed now would they.

Show "The 9/11 investigation was" by Mark Roberts

There was no real investigation.

It is simply not true that there was any real investigation. Within 30 seconds of the second plane impact FOX news was already using the name of Osama Bin Laden. Within 24 hours the complete list of 19 patsies was released and declared to be the culprits. How is that an investigation?
Where was the DA?
What about the grand jury?
A trial? Evidence?
Nothing!

Peace.
Matt
matt@9eleven.info

There u go. An

There u go. An investigation involving 7,000+ people for 10 months and STILL no answer on why Building 7 fell!

mark roberts is right

there was the smoking gun suitcase that was found in atta's rental car with a list of the 19 hijackers and a flight training manual, because atta wanted to learn how to fly a plane on the way to his airport! LMAO

Oh and dont forget the passport and the red bandana found in the ditch in shankesville!

case closed! anyone that questions the suitcase and the bandana is a conspiracy nut!

Show "That's a straw man argument." by Mark Roberts

So...you just admitted that

So...you just admitted that the final report isn't out yet...approaching 6 six years after the biggest terror attack ever managed to knock down 3 gigantic buildings with no explosives.
If WTC7 is so plainly obvious as to why it fell, why is it taking so long for them to tell us why?

hey mark...how come you

hey mark...how come you can't debunk Norman Mineta's testimony?

Show "I suggest you do a search on" by Mark Roberts

During my youth I learned

During my youth I learned that some people are not worth arguing with because they are just to blind to see or are being paid to cause trouble.

Which one are you ?

this poll is an outrage

and a sad commentary on most americans today:

Court-Martial Looms for War Objector

SEATTLE (Feb. 5) - Anti-war activists consider 1st Lt. Ehren Watada a hero for his refusal to go to Iraq . The Army accuses him of betraying his fellow soldiers.
At a court-martial Monday at Fort Lewis, south of Seattle, the 28-year-old faces four years in prison if convicted on one count of missing movement and two counts of conduct unbecoming an officer for refusing to ship out with his unit, the 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division.

Watada has spoken out against U.S. military involvement in Iraq, calling it morally wrong and a breach of American law.

"As the order to take part in an illegal act is ultimately unlawful as well, I must as an officer of honor and integrity refuse that order," Watada said in a video statement released at a June 7 news conference.
"Though the American soldier wants to do right, the illegitimacy of the occupation itself, the policies of this administration, and the rules of engagement of desperate field commanders will ultimately force them to be party to war crime," Watada said then.

What's your position on Watada's actions?
I don't support them 61%
I support them 39%
Total Votes: 21,915
Note on Poll Results

http://news.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/court-martial-looms-for-war-obje...

Typical of AOL online polls

Of all the online polls, AOL seem to be the most rotten.

I'm sure their computer systems and poll software are provided by Diebold Inc.

Just my observations...

Best wishes