All of you know about the bloody mess that Iraq is today .
Last week alone more than 1000 Iraqis were bombed to death.

I can not rule out that the terror was totally authentic these days, as Sunnis and Shiites are confronted in hate.
But there are serious hints that the civil war was originally created by the occupation troops.

You say that is an outlandish claim? Not so fast.

Let's go through this step by step.

The Motive- or Cui bono?

Listen to what Daniel Pipes has to say, one of the leading NeoCons:

***

The eruption of civil war in Iraq would have many implications for the West. It would likely:

[...]

Reduce coalition casualties in Iraq. As noted by the Philadelphia Inquirer, "Rather than killing American soldiers, the insurgents and foreign fighters are more focused on creating civil strife that could destabilize Iraq's political process and possibly lead to outright ethnic and religious war."

http://www.danielpipes.org/article/3423

***

So the occupation troops do have a motive in creating civil war. Keep in mind that the real goal was not "victory", whatever that means, instead it was occupation of the Iraq oil from the beginning.

Kurt Nimmo reflects about the bloody coolness of the position of Pipes:

http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=266

***

The Case: Do we have evidence or hints for false flag terror in Iraq to archieve civil war?

Indeed.

First, there was this incident back in Sept. 2004:

***

Iraqi police detained two British soldiers in civilian clothes in the southern city Basra for firing on a police station on Monday, police said.

"Two persons wearing Arab uniforms opened fire at a police station in Basra. A police patrol followed the attackers and captured them to discover they were two British soldiers," an Interior Ministry source told Xinhua.

The two soldiers were using a civilian car packed with explosives, the source said.

He added that the two were being interrogated in the police headquarters of Basra.

The British forces informed the Iraqi authorities that the two soldiers were performing an official duty, the source said. British military authorities said they could not confirm the incident but investigations were underway.

Other links:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4260894.stm

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/CAUGHT_RED__0923.html

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2005/200905stagedterror.htm

***

Besides all normal behaviour, the British did not negotiate through their ambassador, they simply took their tanks and destroyed the police station in Basra
to free the two soldiers, enflaming riots from the people. Suspicious, you say?

That was just the beginning.

***

Back in April 2006, Robert Fisk joins the false flag terror evidence. You may think what you will about Fisk, but he is a trustworthy war correspondent:

The Americans, my interlocutor suspected, are trying to provoke an Iraqi civil war so that Sunni Muslim insurgents spend their energies killing their Shia co-religionists rather than soldiers of the Western occupation forces. "I swear to you that we have very good information," my source says, finger stabbing the air in front of him. "One young Iraqi man told us that he was trained by the Americans as a policeman in Baghdad and he spent 70 per cent of his time learning to drive and 30 per cent in weapons training. They said to him: 'Come back in a week.' When he went back, they gave him a mobile phone and told him to drive into a crowded area near a mosque and phone them. He waited in the car but couldn't get the right mobile signal. So he got out of the car to where he received a better signal. Then his car blew up."

"There was another man, trained by the Americans for the police. He too was given a mobile and told to drive to an area where there was a crowd - maybe a protest - and to call them and tell them what was happening. Again, his new mobile was not working. So he went to a landline phone and called the Americans and told them: 'Here I am, in the place you sent me and I can tell you what's happening here.' And at that moment there was a big explosion in his car."

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12885.htm

***

Damning information, but it never made the headlines.

Let's move on the bombing of the Golden Mosque in Samarra.
CIA-Veteran Ray McGovern was one of the first doubters:

Moving on to the recent Askariya mosque bombing in Samarra, Iraq McGovern commented;

"The main question is Qui Bono? Who benefits from this kind of thing? You don't have to be very conspiratorial or even paranoid to suggest that there are a whole bunch of likely suspects out there and not only the Sunnis. You know, the British officers were arrested, dressed up in Arab garb, riding around in a car, so this stuff goes on."

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2006/260206mosquebombing.htm

Late it came out, that the government was warned and did nothing:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12144.htm

Can you smell LIHOP or even MIHOP?

What's even more interesting, the Bush admin came out several weeks ago and used this bombing as an excuse for staying there:

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/news/nation/16460924.htm

Please look also to Mike Whitney's article on this issue:

http://www.ichblog.eu/content/view/32/1/

***

The latest is the most damning information so far:

Last Sunday the British Sunday Telegraph run this story:

***

The JSG was formed in the '80s to tackle the IRA

Top secret army cell breaks terrorists
By Sean Rayment, Sunday Telegraph
Last Updated: 1:09am GMT 05/02/2007

Deep inside the heart of the "Green Zone", the heavily fortified administrative compound in Baghdad, lies one of the most carefully guarded secrets of the war in Iraq. It is a cell from a small and anonymous British Army unit that goes by the deliberately meaningless name of the Joint Support Group (JSG), and it has proved to be one of the Coalition's most effective and deadly weapons in the fight against terror.

Its members - servicemen and women of all ranks recruited from all three of the Armed Forces - are trained to turn hardened terrorists into coalition spies using methods developed on the mean streets of Ulster during the Troubles, when the Army managed to infiltrate the IRA at almost every level. Since war broke out in Iraq in 2003, they have been responsible for running dozens of Iraqi double agents.

...

More:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=IBEK4QSEC3PEBQFIQMFCFGGAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/02/04/nspooks04.xml

***

Let's listen to Steve Watson what this means in general:

A look into the history of the secretive JSG or Force Research Unit (FRU), the cover name it operated under in Northern Ireland, reveals the extent to which the British government supports and engages in acts of terrorism in order to further its agenda in occupied territories. Iraq, as it turns out, is unsurprisingly no exception.

The FRU is the same ultra secret cell of the SAS whose criminal activities in Northern Ireland were under investigation by former Scotland Yard commissioner Sir John Stevens for more than a decade, during which time it emerged that the unit was involved in the murder of civilians in Northern Ireland.

According to Detectives, 'Military intelligence was colluding with terrorists to help them kill so-called "legitimate targets" such as active republicans...many of the victims of these government backed hit squads were innocent civilians.'

http://infowars.net/articles/february2007/050207FRU.htm

***

So, can you say US and British intelligence and rogue elements in both governments provoke a civil war, a bloody mess as reason to stay there and get less victims for the own troops? The end justifies the means? Even as I do understand to reduce the costs of living of the own soldiers, to archieve that on the back of the civil people is a war crime according to international law. Bring them home now. Or even better: The soldiers with brain and heart should stand up to their rotten governments and turn them down...