Resources from the film "Who Killed John O'Neill?"
The two attachments below include:
1) the transcript from the groundbreaking film "Who Killed John O'Neill?"
2) a list of the numerous references made throughout the film.
This film has an amazing transcript that would be as impressive to a reader as it is to a viewer. I understand some people would rather read their news than view documentaries. This is an effort to make the information from the film as accessible to as many people as possible.
The transcript would also lend itself well for community theater projects across the country. (contact wkjo@deadartfilms.com for permission)
Lastly the list of people & organizations from the film makes a great resource guide for anyone interested in putting together a criminal case against those involved in 9/11.
Hope you enjoy and as always pass them around freely.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Transcript - Who Killed John O'Neill.doc | 331 KB |
| References from film Who Killed John O'Neill.doc | 31 KB |
- Orangutan.'s blog
- Login to post comments
Thx for this
as it was not always easy to understand the text in the film!
I have a link that fits to this topic.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&add...
...
"as it was not always easy to understand the text in the film!"
There are subtitled versions on google video. Also a german one, btw ;)
WKJO Flow Chart
Anyone know if the flow chart on the wall in WKJO is available as an image file or as a .PDF?
I have looked for one unsuccessfully. I suppose that I could go back and watch the film again (7 times already!) and try to create one myself. I just thought that Rauber may have made one available somewhere already.
--
The true threat to liberty comes not from terrorists but from our political leaders whose natural inclination is to seize upon any excuse to diminish them.
~~ Walter Williams, Nightly Business Report, September 2001
WKJO Flow Chart.
This from Ty Rauber:
"I have thrown together a PDF and JPG of the Wall as it was presented in the film. It's not quite as pretty as I would like it, but it is accurate to the film."
You can find the files here:
PDF: http://wkjo.com/media/WKJO_Map.pdf
JPG: http://wkjo.com/media/WKJO_Map.jpg
Hope this helps dicktater. I'm sure you can crop and cut and paste to make them more easy to read and post. Peace.
huh? where are these names?
Larry Silverstein
Dov Zakheim
Sivan Kurzberg
At first glance it looks like WKJO falls squarely into the "flood them with LIHOP disinfo goose chases" category.
I think it may be a bit more complicated though.
WKJO does not shy away from controlled demolition, but on the other hand it does not mention Israel, not even once.
It seems also to support no plane at the Pentagon:
"We only know three things about 9/11.Three planes crashed, three buildings collapsed, and damage was done to the Pentagon."
I actually like that starting point--removing everyone's claims about what actually happened, these are undeniable facts (except the third plane crash, United 93, I don't think is conclusive...)
All that said, the gist of WKJO seems to be that a whole lot of stuff was going on for many years involving "al Qaeda" CIA, ISI, drugs, and a whole bunch of people who one can connect, even if tangentially, to the events of 9/11.
Question--should we believe then that 9/11 was simply the latest in the acts of this corrupt group of groups and individuals?
Enter the curious omission of Israel.
Let's bear in mind that elites are not a totally cohesive group. There are rivalries and there is tension. They all have dirt on each other, but care must be taken that by exposing a rival the whole racket not be given away.
The neocons come to power through W, with definite plans for a mini revolution in world affairs. 9/11 served their purposes quite well, and it is hard to believe that they would not have had a hand in planning it. 9/11 is quite the Straussian "noble lie", and it was audacious--much more than the OKC bombing, and the neocons are know for advocating bold moves.
Could it be that knowing all the dirty business that has been going on behind the scenes, from OKC to Mena to CIA drug running, someone decided to carry out 9/11 with the following in mind?
1) manufacture an event that the elites would not otherwise have thought prudent, though they would certainly know how to take advantage of it
2) count on the fact that anyone with an inkling of who carried it out would know that the perps would have the means and will to hold their knowledge of elite crimes against them
3) present the elites with a quandary--go along with an obvious hoax and reap the benefits along with the perps OR speak out against the hoax and see their crimes exposed
Some might ask--why suppose that the dirty folks described in WKJO DIDN'T actually engineer 9/11 themselves? Why suggest that an upstart faction within the elite circle would be responsible instead?
My answer would be that 9/11 was a desperate act--not worth the risk from the point of view of established elites who have been getting away with their crimes for decades without any problem. On the margins of the interests of the elite, Israel's interests in stacking the deck against arabs and muslims may have been considered well worth the risks, given the neocons' intimate knowledge of elite crimes which would ensure their cooperation in helping the cover-up.
Which brings us back to the strange omission of the word Israel in WKJO. What about the dancing Israelis? What about their leader Sivan Kurzberg's statement to police that they were not the problem, that the Palestinians were the problem? What about the spy ring? What about Amdocs? What about the wiretapping? What about the three names above?
____
♠
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
Damn....
...Great post, as usual...
Very interesting interpretation/theory/speculation.
I agree, I've always felt 9/11 was an incredible "act of desperation" by the High Perps, with a corresponding high-risk of exposure . While the motivations are myriad (wealth transfer, natural resource control, the feeding of the M-I-C, and, yes, protection of Israel)...lately, I've been thinking that the propping up of the dollar necessary for one last wealth concentration squeeze was paramount among their reasons.
Thank you for your perspective RT, it's always thought-provoking....
Hey RT, Why not...
...pose your questions to Ty Rauber directly?
wkjo (at) deadartfilms (dot) com
I am happy to report that Ty was very responsive to my query about the flow chart (mentioned in previous post above) and helpful far beyond any expectations.
It may be likely that you won't receive complete answers to your questions in one response. So, assuming that a dialog ensues, you could summarize your questions and his response(s) and post back here. I imagine that Ryan Thurston could be involved, as well. Think of it like an interview with the director/producer/actor of WKJO, if you will.
I'm sure that you have seen Russo's film. In Russo's interview, Michael Ruppert gives an interesting analogy of crime families and the two parties in control of US politics. Basically, as Rupert said, both parties have players in an ongoing game of craps or poker. Sometimes, somebody gets mad and somebody gets shot. However, as a whole, neither group lets anything threaten THE GAME, circling the wagons when such a threat arises.
Some might ask--why suppose that the dirty folks described in WKJO DIDN'T actually engineer 9/11 themselves? Why suggest that an upstart faction within the elite circle would be responsible instead?
My answer would be that 9/11 was a desperate act--not worth the risk from the point of view of established elites who have been getting away with their crimes for decades without any problem.
I don't think that 9/11 was a desparate act for anyone involved at the upper levels. Though, it may have been for the useful idiot pulling wire to rig explosives. At the top, I think that 9/11 was a well-planned sub-routine in a very complex long-running program. But, like any program beyond a BASIC "Hello World", it's riddled with bugs, like WTC7.
Maybe it's similar with the different factions that comprise the foot soldiers for the elites at the top of the pyramid, who are probably often manipulated themselves. And, there's no reason to believe that the elites at the top (the casino owners) wouldn't sometimes rig the game, pitting the actual players against one another to manipulate an outcome desired by the casino owners, one that knowingly will create a high probablity that one player will shoot another. Though they may be helpful to one or more players at times, the "cops" are never called in on the game because that would threaten THE GAME itself and is tantamount to committing the ultimate sin of ratting out.
I'll be very interested in your exchange with Ty Rauber, if one occurs.
--
The true threat to liberty comes not from terrorists but from our political leaders whose natural inclination is to seize upon any excuse to diminish them.
~~ Walter Williams, Nightly Business Report, September 2001